Latest news with #Kindleberger
The Star
12-05-2025
- Business
- The Star
From US dollar hegemony to opportunity for euro
INTERNATIONAL monetary and financial systems may not be immutable, but neither do they change often. That is why the upheaval spurred by US President Donald Trump's trade and tariff war is so remarkable, and difficult to decipher. To figure out what is going on, it is worth revisiting Charles P. Kindleberger's theory of hegemonic stability, which essentially states that an open and stable international system depends on the presence of a dominant world power. In the nineteenth century, that power was Great Britain. As the world's financial hegemon, Britain supplied critical public goods. But World War I took its toll on Britain, which by the 1930s no longer had sufficient resources to underpin the international monetary system. And though the United States was an ascending power, it was not yet ready to fill Britain's shoes. This 'Kindleberger gap', the period between world hegemons, coincided with the Great Depression and the escalating political turmoil that culminated in World War II. Near the end of the war, in 1944, delegates from 44 countries met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, where they orchestrated a smooth transition between the old and the new hegemons. In doing so, they validated the de facto supremacy of US trading, financial and military power. At the time, the United States accounted for 35% of world gross domestic product (GDP). But though America's share of global GDP has declined, the US dollar has retained its dominance as a reserve asset, invoicing currency and anchor for fixed exchange rates. Moreover, the US Federal Reserve's policy decisions and the US economy's performance still shape the global financial cycle. Nonetheless, we seem to be approaching a new 'Kindleberger gap'. The existing hegemon appears to be self-destructing, as it refuses to supply global public goods, and there is no clear candidate to fill its shoes. The European Union (EU) is not prepared to take up the mantle, and China is not even integrated into global financial markets. Whereas the rest of the world views the US dollar's primacy as an 'exorbitant privilege', the Trump administration appears convinced that global demand for US dollar assets is a burden, as it believes it drives up the currency's value. If a currency is to serve an international role, the country issuing it generally needs to enjoy economic pre-eminence and occupy a central position in global trade. These qualities depend on innovative capabilities and growth potential, with military power and geopolitical alliances also playing a role. None of this is possible without an open economy and high-quality, stable institutions. The United States under Trump is rapidly eroding trust in the US dollar. Never has this been more apparent than in the wake of Trump's announcement, in early April, of ultra-high tariffs on goods from dozens of countries running bilateral trade surpluses. US Treasury yields rose, the US stock market fell, and the US dollar depreciated, a combination often seen in emerging economies. This economic and financial distress creates an opportunity for the eurozone, which issues the world's second-most-important international currency, to capture some of the exorbitant privilege long enjoyed by the United States. This includes cheaper capital for eurozone governments and businesses, which could support fiscal sustainability, and easier refinancing during times of crises, since demand for 'safe' euro assets would rise. It also includes increased geopolitical clout, crucial at a moment when the EU is working to achieve strategic autonomy. While internationalisation does carry risks, the eurozone is well-positioned to mitigate them. For example, the eurozone's macro-prudential policy frameworks, which are much stronger than those in the United States, can help it cope with increased capital-flow and asset-price volatility. But more must be done to enable the eurozone to raise the euro's international profile. For starters, the eurozone must deepen its single market in goods and services, and strengthen its trade relationships wherever possible. Given Europe's global climate leadership, it could consider starting to invoice climate-friendly products in euros, while building up corresponding financial instruments (such as those linked to hedging climate risk). The eurozone should also commit to completing the banking union and the savings and investment union, as spelled out in multiple recent policy reports. To deliver deep and integrated capital markets, efforts should be made to deliver a true eurozone-wide safe asset. Joint debt issuance for emergency defence spending could be a good starting point. Moreover, rather than allowing eurozone payments to remain largely dependent on US payment systems, the bloc must increase the sovereignty of its own. This would probably rely on a central bank digital currency, complemented with a robust payment system that may or may not involve euro stablecoins. Finally, the European Central Bank's function as lender of last resort must be carefully structured, so as to ensure widespread and strong confidence in the euro. These changes will not be easy to implement. But if Kindleberger taught us anything, it is that the world economy will be better off if, as America retreats from global economic and financial leadership, Europe steps quickly into the breach. — The Jakarta Post/ANN Helene Rey is a professor of economics at the London Business School. The views expressed here are the writer's own.
Economist
08-05-2025
- Business
- Economist
What happens when a hegemon falls?
The 'Kindleberger Spiral', a graph of world trade between 1929 and 1933, looks like water circling a drain, or a small animal curling up into a ball. It was produced by Charles Kindleberger, an economic historian, in 'The World in Depression', a book published in 1973, and has recently enjoyed a new lease of life as a demonstration of the self-harm that protectionism inflicts. From month to month, Kindleberger charted how the global economy turned in on itself throughout the late-1920s and 1930s, spiralling towards disaster. Another idea from his work—the 'Kindleberger gap', referring to a leadership void—is also proving helpful.
Bloomberg
07-04-2025
- Business
- Bloomberg
Can This Chart Predict Economic Depressions?
Some experts think that Kindleberger's Spiral shows that tariffs caused the Great Depression in the 1930s. But the chart is not really about trade wars, explains Bloomberg Opinion columnist Paul Davies (Source: Bloomberg)
South China Morning Post
23-02-2025
- Business
- South China Morning Post
Rediscovering an American economic prophet of doom
OK, apologies! You are probably sick of hearing about the Thucydides trap. Thanks to American political scientist Graham Allison, the media have been saturated with it. It's doubtful, though, that the author of the History of the Peloponnesian War even subscribed to it. I thought it may be interesting to present an opposing view proposed by another towering economic thinker. Advertisement Charles Kindleberger is best known as the author of the investment classic, Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A History of Financial Crises. In a new intellectual biography, Money and Empire: Charles P. Kindleberger and the Dollar System, economist Perry Mehrling aims to restore Kindleberger as an important economist on the functions of central banks, their role in the international financial system, and most interestingly, the connection between economic and political hegemony. In Kindleberger's theory, it's the decline of the hegemon, not the rise of an upstart power à la Allison, that most disrupts an international system. Academics sometimes call it the theory of hegemonic stability. Allison's trap metaphor caught on because of the worsening rivalry between China and the United States, and the 'blame China' media industry in the West. But it could also be dangerous as it tends to encourage the view – admittedly not one advocated by Allison himself – that if war is inevitable, you ought to start it as soon as you can to gain a first-strike advantage. In other words, you assume your adversary, say China, thinks that way, so even if you don't want to think like that, you do anyway. It's a 'doom loop' logic that makes hawks in Washington think Beijing will invade Taiwan tomorrow, next year or the year after. The Thucydides trap could easily become a deadly world view. By contrast, Kindleberger and others who postulate hegemonic stability argue an overarching hegemonic authority is necessary to maintain stability and offer public goods, both domestically and internationally. Advertisement His latest biography lends an elegant symmetry between Kindleberger's economic conception of the central bank as a lender of last resort and guarantor of liquidity and his political idea about the need for a dominant state as the guarantor of a stable international system. That was the idealised post-war America and the global monetary system it dominated.
