Latest news with #LebaneseChristian
Sydney Morning Herald
9 hours ago
- Politics
- Sydney Morning Herald
Antoinette Lattouf has won $70,000, but her case has cost the ABC so much more
At the heart of the issue was whether Lattouf was sacked at all (yes, according to the FWC and Rangiah), whether she was sacked for holding and/or expressing political views (yes, says Rangiah), and whether her race (Lebanese Christian) played a part (no, Rangiah found). The ABC did itself no favours in attempting to argue that racism could not have been a factor in its treatment of Lattouf because she had failed to prove the very existence of a Middle-Eastern or Arab race. It later withdrew that argument after a fierce public backlash. Complaints about Lattouf, who has been an outspoken critic of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, began flooding into the ABC immediately after she finished her first shift, though nothing she had said on air was deemed controversial. It soon became clear, Rangiah wrote, 'that the complaints were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists'. But Buttrose insisted on sharing them with Anderson and Oliver-Taylor nonetheless. Three days into her five-day hosting stint, management became aware of a post shared on Instagram by Lattouf they believed constituted a breach of the ABC's social media policy. Rangiah found in his 177-page judgment that following this discovery, 'the consternation of senior managers of the ABC turned into what can be described as a state of panic'. Within the hour, Rangiah said, 'a decision was made that Ms Lattouf would be taken off air. The policies she was alleged to have breached were not identified, nor was she given any opportunity to defend herself against the allegations.' Loading The judge found pressure from pro-Israeli activists and an imminent story in The Australia n stoked that sense of panic. He also found Anderson had misconstrued a 'sarcastic' social media post as expressing support for a Hamas campaign of 'ethnic cleansing' (it did not). 'While Mr Anderson was mistaken in his interpretation of the post, it does demonstrate that he attributed to Ms Lattouf hateful anti-Semitic opinions,' Rangiah wrote. The decision to terminate Lattouf's engagement at the ABC was made by Oliver-Taylor alone, though in response to concerns shared at the top of the organisation. 'I find that Mr Oliver-Taylor's reasons for his decision included his desire to mitigate further complaints about the ABC employing someone attributed with holding a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza,' said Rangiah. Holding or expressing a political opinion is not, Rangiah found, a valid reason for terminating someone's employment, even at the national broadcaster. Rangiah found 'protection for employees … against termination of employment for reasons including 'political opinion' encompasses not only the holding of a political opinion but also the expression of a political opinion'. The ramifications of all this for the ABC and other media organisations are potentially profound. Loading In his statement to staff following Wednesday's ruling, Marks stressed 'the fundamental obligations the ABC and its employees have to be independent and impartial in our work to ensure we continue to earn the trust of all Australians. Those obligations don't change as a result of this decision.' But he also acknowledged that there was confusion about the organisation's guidelines around use of social media and promised 'we will talk more about this in coming weeks'. It has arguably never been more important that Australians should be able to trust in the national broadcaster to report fairly and accurately without caving to external pressure.
The Age
9 hours ago
- Politics
- The Age
Antoinette Lattouf has won $70,000, but her case has cost the ABC so much more
At the heart of the issue was whether Lattouf was sacked at all (yes, according to the FWC and Rangiah), whether she was sacked for holding and/or expressing political views (yes, says Rangiah), and whether her race (Lebanese Christian) played a part (no, Rangiah found). The ABC did itself no favours in attempting to argue that racism could not have been a factor in its treatment of Lattouf because she had failed to prove the very existence of a Middle-Eastern or Arab race. It later withdrew that argument after a fierce public backlash. Complaints about Lattouf, who has been an outspoken critic of Israel's military campaign in Gaza, began flooding into the ABC immediately after she finished her first shift, though nothing she had said on air was deemed controversial. It soon became clear, Rangiah wrote, 'that the complaints were an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists'. But Buttrose insisted on sharing them with Anderson and Oliver-Taylor nonetheless. Three days into her five-day hosting stint, management became aware of a post shared on Instagram by Lattouf they believed constituted a breach of the ABC's social media policy. Rangiah found in his 177-page judgment that following this discovery, 'the consternation of senior managers of the ABC turned into what can be described as a state of panic'. Within the hour, Rangiah said, 'a decision was made that Ms Lattouf would be taken off air. The policies she was alleged to have breached were not identified, nor was she given any opportunity to defend herself against the allegations.' Loading The judge found pressure from pro-Israeli activists and an imminent story in The Australia n stoked that sense of panic. He also found Anderson had misconstrued a 'sarcastic' social media post as expressing support for a Hamas campaign of 'ethnic cleansing' (it did not). 'While Mr Anderson was mistaken in his interpretation of the post, it does demonstrate that he attributed to Ms Lattouf hateful anti-Semitic opinions,' Rangiah wrote. The decision to terminate Lattouf's engagement at the ABC was made by Oliver-Taylor alone, though in response to concerns shared at the top of the organisation. 'I find that Mr Oliver-Taylor's reasons for his decision included his desire to mitigate further complaints about the ABC employing someone attributed with holding a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza,' said Rangiah. Holding or expressing a political opinion is not, Rangiah found, a valid reason for terminating someone's employment, even at the national broadcaster. Rangiah found 'protection for employees … against termination of employment for reasons including 'political opinion' encompasses not only the holding of a political opinion but also the expression of a political opinion'. The ramifications of all this for the ABC and other media organisations are potentially profound. Loading In his statement to staff following Wednesday's ruling, Marks stressed 'the fundamental obligations the ABC and its employees have to be independent and impartial in our work to ensure we continue to earn the trust of all Australians. Those obligations don't change as a result of this decision.' But he also acknowledged that there was confusion about the organisation's guidelines around use of social media and promised 'we will talk more about this in coming weeks'. It has arguably never been more important that Australians should be able to trust in the national broadcaster to report fairly and accurately without caving to external pressure.
