Latest news with #Lerna
Yahoo
13-05-2025
- Climate
- Yahoo
Earthquake confirmed in Cumberland, Coles Counties Monday Night
UPDATE: The USGS has revised the earthquake down to a magnitude 3.3 earthquake. It also occurred about 6 miles deep, additional analysis Coles-Moultrie County 911 CECOM has not received any reports of damage or calls for assistance from the earthquake, according to an operator we spoke to. LERNA, Ill. (WCIA) – The United States Geological Survey says a magnitude 3.5 earthquake was reported 3 miles SSW of Lerna on Monday evening. The 3.5 rating comes from the Richter Scale, which rates earthquakes on their strength. Earthquakes with a rating in the 3 range typically are felt but rarely produce quake happened at around 11:43p. It was fairly shallow beneath the surface, allowing for more shaking to be felt. Several viewers have messaged WCIA asking about the quake, reporting that they felt shaking. You can learn more about the quake and provide your reports to the USGS here. Did you feel the earthquake? We want to hear from you. Email us at jdickey@ and news@ with your reports and potential video from the quake! Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
08-05-2025
- Yahoo
New Mexico Supreme Court reverses Whistleblower Protection ruling
Supreme Court of New Mexico: (from left) Justice Julie J. Vargas, Justice Michael E. Vigil, Chief Justice David K. Thomson, Justice C. Shannon Bacon, and Justice Briana H. Zamora. (Photo courtesy of the Supreme Court.) The state Supreme Court on Thursday issued a unanimous opinion it says reconciles conflicting rulings by the Court of Appeals regarding the state's Whistleblower Protection Act. Specifically, the new opinion says for a public employee to receive protection under the act, disclosures about wrong or illegal actions by a public employer must benefit the public in some way. While case law is 'sparse' regarding the Whistleblower Protection Act, the opinion says, the Appeals Court decision in the case of corrections officer Manuel Lerma conflicted with one of its earlier rulings, the state Supreme Court said, and too narrowly interpreted the law. Lerna, who had 16 years' experience with the New Mexico Corrections Department, transferred to a new facility where he guarded the prison's sally port and ensured, as 'safety protocol' that one side of the dual-gate system remained closed when the other was open. dual-gate system was to have one gate closed when opening the other gate as a 'safety protocol.' Lerna's 'strict' enforcement of this protocol led to 'disagreement' between him and other transportation division corrections officers, who wanted him to leave both gates open 'at the same time…so they could come and go as they pleased.' Lerna alleges that 'one day while he was driving home from the prison, his vehicle 'kept [being] block[ed]' when it was sandwiched between two vehicles, each driven by a DOC employee, causing him to pull his vehicle over and stop in an empty lot. Plaintiff, 'fearing for [his] life,' was beaten by a fellow corrections officer. A prison supervisory lieutenant filmed the altercation using his agency-issued cell phone.' Lerna reported both the pushback on the protocol and the violent episode, and Corrections cited and disciplined two people involved for what the department acknowledged as 'egregious conduct.' Lerna, however, contends he was reassigned after disclosing as retaliation. He subsequently filed a lawsuit citing violations of whistleblower protections, which a district court dismissed in response to Corrections Department arguments that Lerma's grievances were personal and not covered by the act. Lerma challenged the district court's summary judgement against him and the Appeals Court ruled in his favor, saying his grievances did not have to be for the benefit of the public. This, the state Supreme Court said in its opinion today, is incorrect. 'A public employee's disclosure of illegality or wrongdoing qualifies for protected whistleblower status, if otherwise eligible, so long as the disclosure confers a benefit on the public, irrespective of which benefit – public or personal – may be said to predominate,' the opinion written by Chief Justice David K. Thomson said. The court returned the case to the Appeals Court to decide if Lerma qualifies for whistleblower protection under that standard of public benefit.
