Latest news with #MV)Act
The Hindu
6 days ago
- The Hindu
Rachakonda traffic police crush modified motorcycle silencers
The Rachakonda Police have launched a campaign against illegal motorcycle silencer modifications to tackle noise pollution. The special drive has resulted in 2,325 cases being booked and 1,297 illegally modified silencers confiscated. The seized items were publicly destroyed at Uppal Bhagayath in the presence of senior traffic and law and order officials. The move is in line with the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) and the Mission LiFE Campaign, both aiming to counter the growing menace of urban pollution and promote sustainable practices. Commissioner G. Sudheer Babu said that the racket around modified silencers not only breaches traffic norms but also aggravates noise and air pollution, posing a serious risk to public health. 'These modifications are more than just a fashion statement for thrill-seeking bikers,' the officer said, adding that they are a threat to every pedestrian and commuter caught off-guard by the roar of an unregulated engine or the blast of a pressure horn. The Commissioner cited multiple studies linking long-term exposure to traffic noise with cardiovascular diseases, particularly among adults and the elderly. Excessive noise is also known to cause respiratory issues, high blood pressure, sleep disturbances, memory problems, and psychological stress. Under Section 190(2) of the Motor Vehicles (MV) Act, bikers caught using modified silencers or pressure horns that exceed 80 decibels face penalties of up to ₹10,000 and imprisonment of up to six months. Workshops and dealers have also been put on notice, with those found fitting illegal silencers may face similar legal action. Citizens are encouraged to report violators and cooperate with the campaign for cleaner air and safer roads.
Time of India
25-05-2025
- Time of India
Vehicle involvement key for relief under no-fault basis: Karnataka High Court
Karnataka high court has ruled that under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles (MV) Act, compensation is payable solely based on vehicle involvement in the accident, and not on proof of negligence. The judgment came in favour of two brothers who lost both parents in a road accident 13 years ago. "Once the vehicle is involved, the insurance firm is bound to pay compensation," Justice Lalitha Kanneganti noted, directing Tata AIG General Insurance Company to pay ₹5 lakh each to H Girish and H Yatish. The accident occurred on April 1, 2012 near NH-4, Dodderi village, Nelamangala, around 6.15pm. The victims, Gayathri and her husband Huchcha Hanumaiah, were travelling in a Scorpio when it collided with a Maruti Alto car. Both sustained fatal injuries. The two sons approached the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, seeking ₹15 lakh each in compensation, stating they had lost the family's breadwinners. Their father was a police constable and their mother contributed to household income through tailoring. However, on July 11, 2013, the tribunal rejected their claim, holding that the brothers were financially independent — one working as an assistant professor and the other as a technician with a TV channel — and that there was no evidence of rash driving by the Alto driver. It thus deemed the application as not maintainable. The high court, on appeal, observed that the tribunal had erred by applying the standard of negligence, which is relevant only under Section 166 of the Act. Justice Kanneganti clarified that Section 163A operates on a no-fault basis. Relying on the Supreme Court's ruling in the New India Assurance Co Ltd versus Urmila Halder case, the high court allowed the appeal and ordered the insurance company to disburse ₹10 lakh in total compensation to the appellants.
Time of India
24-05-2025
- Automotive
- Time of India
Vehicle involvement key for relief under no-fault basis: Karnataka High Court
Bengaluru: Karnataka high court has ruled that under Section 163A of the Motor Vehicles (MV) Act, compensation is payable solely based on vehicle involvement in the accident, and not on proof of negligence. The judgment came in favour of two brothers who lost both parents in a road accident 13 years ago. "Once the vehicle is involved, the insurance firm is bound to pay compensation," Justice Lalitha Kanneganti noted, directing Tata AIG General Insurance Company to pay Rs 5 lakh each to H Girish and H Yatish. The accident occurred on April 1, 2012 near NH-4, Dodderi village, Nelamangala, around 6.15pm. The victims, Gayathri and her husband Huchcha Hanumaiah, were travelling in a Scorpio when it collided with a Maruti Alto car. Both sustained fatal injuries. The two sons approached the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, seeking Rs 15 lakh each in compensation, stating they had lost the family's breadwinners. Their father was a police constable and their mother contributed to household income through tailoring. However, on July 11, 2013, the tribunal rejected their claim, holding that the brothers were financially independent — one working as an assistant professor and the other as a technician with a TV channel — and that there was no evidence of rash driving by the Alto driver. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Trade Bitcoin & Ethereum – No Wallet Needed! IC Markets Start Now Undo It thus deemed the application as not maintainable. The high court, on appeal, observed that the tribunal had erred by applying the standard of negligence, which is relevant only under Section 166 of the Act. Justice Kanneganti clarified that Section 163A operates on a no-fault basis. Relying on the Supreme Court's ruling in the New India Assurance Co Ltd versus Urmila Halder case, the high court allowed the appeal and ordered the insurance company to disburse Rs 10 lakh in total compensation to the appellants. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Brother's Day wishes , messages and quotes !
Pink Villa
16-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Pink Villa
Bellamkonda Sai Srinivas faces legal heat for traffic rules violation and misbehavior towards police
Popular Telugu actor Bellamkonda Sai Srinivas was booked by Hyderabad police on May 15, 2025. The actor had apparently violated a traffic rule in Jubilee Hills and was said to have behaved rudely to a police officer. As per a report by News18, the actor was on his way to the Journalists Colony in Jubilee Hills. At the crossroads, Sai is said to have taken the wrong direction in his car instead of making a U-turn. Moreover, when the traffic violation happened and a police constable asked him to stop, the actor was said to have moved ahead, disregarding the request. This led the policeman to stand in front of the car and ask him to adhere to the rules. This apparently led the actor to misbehave and be rude towards the uniformed personnel. Based on the complaint, the police have registered a case under relevant sections of the Motor Vehicle (MV) Act and Bharat Nyaya Sanhitha (BNS) for misbehaving with police and violating traffic rules. For those unaware, Bellamkonda Sai Srinivas is a Telugu actor and the son of popular producer Bellamkonda Suresh. After completing an acting course at Lee Strasberg Theatre and Film Institute, USA, and Barry John Acting Studio in Mumbai, the actor made his debut back in 2014 with the movie Alludu Seenu alongside Samantha Ruth Prabhu. With his debut being a successful venture, the actor went on to play Speedunnodu, Jaya Janaki Nayaka, Kavacham, and more. After several appearances at the Telugu cinema, the actor even made his foray into Hindi films with Chatrapathi. The movie was the Hindi adaptation of the Prabhas -starrer movie of the same name, which was originally helmed by SS Rajamouli. Coming to Bellamkonda Sai Srinivas' work front, the actor is next set to appear in the film Bhairavam. He also has ventures like Tyson Naidu, Haindava, and more in his lineup.
The Hindu
14-05-2025
- The Hindu
WhatsApp reports drive ₹75 lakh in challans for traffic violations in Cyberabad
The Cyberabad Traffic Police have recorded a steady rise in traffic violations through their 'Report Violation' WhatsApp service, with over 60% of complaints resulting in booked cases. Data from the department revealed that between January 1 and May 13 of 2025, 18,685 cases were booked, leading to the generation of challans worth ₹75 lakh. The initiative has led to a consistent increase in cases booked with the top ten violations rising from 35,777 in 2023 to 43,814 in 2024. Cumulatively, 98,276 cases have been registered since 2023. Among the top violations this year, 'stopping on the carriage way' under Section 122 of the Motor Vehicle (MV) Act topped the list with 9,667 cases. Following this, 'wrong or unauthorised parking/obstruction of carriageway' under Section 190(2) accounted for 3,800 violations and 'helmet less driving' under Section 129 with 2,627 cases. Other violations include 'wrong side driving, particularly by two and three-wheelers, under Section 119 - with 1,120 cases, 'dangerous driving' under Section 184 with 1,087 cases, 'wrong parking in carriageway' under Section 122 with 356 cases, 'cell phone driving' under Section 184 with 303 cases and 'triple riding' under Section 128 with 235 cases. Recently, the department has been sharing the helpline number 94906 17346 on X, urging citizens to send photos and videos of traffic violations via WhatsApp. While public involvement in reporting traffic violations has grown, officials note that many of the complaints submitted lack sufficient detail for further action. Raidurgam Traffic Inspector Ganesh Patel pointed out that a significant number of photos shared by complainants are missing crucial elements such as timestamps or clear location indicators. 'For the system to process a complaint effectively, the photo must clearly show where the violation occurred. In many cases, even the vehicle number is not clear, which makes it difficult for the system to issue a challan,' he said. All submitted photos are uploaded into an automated system that generates challans based on the identified type of violation. The department is now receiving a growing number of videos showing auto-rickshaw drivers watching videos, car drivers making video calls while driving and individuals blocking the free left, leading to traffic congestion, the official added.
