Latest news with #MarineLifeProtectionAct
Yahoo
08-05-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
Study confirms major benefits of decades-long project along California coast: 'It was exciting to see'
In 2025, an international team of researchers published a study evaluating the effectiveness of an ambitious ocean conservation program California started at the end of the 20th century. The Golden State enacted the Marine Life Protection Act in 1999, a piece of legislation designed to protect the state's marine resources for environmental and economic reasons. The law created a constellation of 124 marine protected areas (MPAs) along the California coast — the first in the United States and the most extensive worldwide. The selection of MPA locations was strategic. They were near one another to become ecologically connected, allowing each to be part of a larger whole. Varying regulatory protections exist across MPAs, prohibiting or limiting extractive human activities to help increase the abundance, size, and diversity of sea life within them. The network took shape over 13 years based on available science and input from diverse stakeholders, including indigenous peoples, who have been responsible for caring for natural spaces and conserving biodiversity for centuries. "What everyone wants to know is: Do MPAs work?" study lead author Joshua Smith said in an interview with the University of California, Santa Barbara's magazine The Current. Counting decades to determine whether a conservation effort was successful or fruitless is a reality environmental advocates have to deal with. Luckily, the paper, published in the journal Conservation Biology, found that the reserves achieved many of the Marine Life Protection Act's objectives. After compiling disparate data from the MPA monitoring efforts focusing on four different habitats, the researchers found increased fish biomass across the board. This finding indicates that species grew in size, volume, or both. The authors noted that older marine reserves and those with more diverse habitats recorded higher fish biomass, particularly among species targeted for fishing and used for consumption. These findings highlight the role of MPAs in sustainable fishing, food security, and health. MPAs can help ensure higher catch levels and improve human nutrition over the long term. Do you think America does a good job of protecting its natural beauty? Definitely Only in some areas No way I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "It was exciting to see that all of the planning and design that went into putting this huge network into place was producing many of its intended benefits," co-author Cori Lopazanski shared after feeling encouraged by what they found. The success of California's MPA network is a victory for ocean conservation. Thoughtful modifications to it could yield pronounced improvements in species richness and diversity. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Japan Today
07-05-2025
- Science
- Japan Today
As Trump pares back ocean protections, California weighs expanding them
By ANNIKA HAMMERSCHLAG Strands of kelp glow in the dim morning light off California's Channel Islands as fish and sea lions weave through the golden fronds. It's a scene of remarkable abundance — the result of more than two decades of protection in one of the state's oldest marine reserves. But farther out in the Pacific, life in the vast Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument faces a very different future. The Trump administration has moved to reopen 500,000 square miles (about 1.3 million square kilometers) of previously protected waters there to commercial fishing, in a dramatic rollback of federal ocean protections. California, meanwhile, may be headed in the opposite direction. As it undertakes its first 10-year review of its marine protected area network, state officials, scientists, tribal leaders and environmental advocates are pushing not just to maintain protections but to expand them. 'These areas are like our underwater Yellowstone,' said Douglas McCauley, director of the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory at the University of California, Santa Barbara, speaking aboard a dive boat heading to the Channel Islands. 'It's important to protect that biological heritage, but it also creates an extremely lucrative tourism industry. People want to go see all that nature and wildlife in action.' The state's marine protected areas have become magnets for scuba divers and snorkelers drawn by their rich life. Over time, these reserves allow fish populations to rebound and spill over into nearby waters – a long-term investment with large returns for fishermen, as McCauley sees it. Launched in 2003, the network now spans 124 distinct sections along the coast. Some areas are 'no-take' zones where all fishing is prohibited, while others allow limited use. The network covers roughly 16% of state waters, with proposed expansions that would add 2%. The goal, under the 1999 Marine Life Protection Act, was to create a science-based system to rebuild ecosystems after decades of overfishing and habitat loss. The Channel Islands were among the first sites established. About 20% of the waters surrounding the eight-island chain are now fully protected. But expansion proposals have sparked debate among fishermen. Blake Hermann, a fourth-generation commercial fisherman from Ventura County, grew up fishing around the Channel Islands, where he harpoons swordfish by hand. He supports keeping much of the marine protected network intact, but he argues that some closures go too far and has petitioned the state to allow limited fishing in three no-take zones around the islands. Protected areas can help nearshore species like sea bass and lobster recover, Hermann said, but offer little benefit to wide-ranging ocean-goers like swordfish and tuna that may pass only briefly through a protected zone during migration. He questions whether it makes sense to restrict selective, low-impact fishing methods in places where these migratory species are only temporary visitors and will likely be caught when they move into unrestricted waters. 'These islands are the best thing on the planet,' Hermann said. 'We can still protect what makes sense to protect in the right areas, but you can also still give some access back too.' Others warn that reopening any part of the protected network could set a troubling precedent, especially as climate change disrupts ocean ecosystems. 'When we protect the oceans, we're really protecting ourselves,' said Sandy Aylesworth, director of the Pacific Initiative for the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'If the additional 2% is added, it will better prepare California's ocean for future stressors like climate change and new industrial uses of the ocean. So I see it as being a real benefit to all of the ocean users in California — including recreational and commercial fishermen.' Final decisions from the review are expected early next year. 'Marine protected areas are probably the most controversial thing that we work on, because you're essentially telling a group of individuals that they can't do what they've historically done in an area,' said Craig Shuman, marine region manager at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Shuman said the fishing community has become particularly vocal in response to petitions to expand the MPA network. Many aren't asking for more access, he said, just for existing opportunities not to be taken away. 'They're asking, 'If you take all the places we can fish, where do we go?'' he said. 'That's the challenge: how to find the right balance between protection and access, especially in a state like California where we already have very strong fisheries management laws.' Overall, he said, the data shows the network is working. 'It's not consistent — each MPA is a little bit different — but more often than not, we're seeing the MPAs are working to achieve the goals of the Act.' The president's executive order lifted fishing restrictions in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles around a remote Pacific island chain — areas first protected by President George W. Bush in 2009 and expanded by President Barack Obama in 2014. Supporters said doing so would boost commercial fishing interests in Hawaii and American Samoa. Conservationists fear the impacts from fishing in an area that's home to coral reefs, sea turtles, whales and thousands of other species. 'It makes it even more critical here at the state level that there is this expansion of protections to really balance out some of those rollbacks,' said Molly Morse, senior manager at the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory. Back on the boat, still within the protected waters off Anacapa Island, a shimmering school of sardines and anchovies draws a frenzy of seabirds and dolphins. Humpback whales surge from the depths, mouths agape, swallowing fish by the gallon. Along the border of the protected area, a sport fishing boat drops its lines as a container ship rumbles past in the distance. 'We've got the largest port in the United States. We've got offshore oil and gas. We've got fishing boats coming and going,' McCauley said. 'But still, in the middle of all that, we still have this wildness — a place where all the stakeholders who want value out of the ocean can find it.' © Copyright 2025 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
Nahar Net
06-05-2025
- Science
- Nahar Net
As Trump pares back ocean protections, California weighs expanding them
by Naharnet Newsdesk 7 hours Strands of kelp glow in the dim morning light off California's Channel Islands as fish and sea lions weave through the golden fronds. It's a scene of remarkable abundance — the result of more than two decades of protection in one of the state's oldest marine reserves. But farther out in the Pacific, life in the vast Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument faces a very different future. The Trump administration has moved to reopen 500,000 square miles (about 1.3 million square kilometers) of previously protected waters there to commercial fishing, in a dramatic rollback of federal ocean protections. California, meanwhile, may be headed in the opposite direction. As it undertakes its first 10-year review of its marine protected area network, state officials, scientists, tribal leaders and environmental advocates are pushing not just to maintain protections but to expand them. "These areas are like our underwater Yellowstone," said Douglas McCauley, director of the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory at the University of California, Santa Barbara, speaking aboard a dive boat heading to the Channel Islands. "It's important to protect that biological heritage, but it also creates an extremely lucrative tourism industry. People want to go see all that nature and wildlife in action." The state's marine protected areas have become magnets for scuba divers and snorkelers drawn by their rich life. Over time, these reserves allow fish populations to rebound and spill over into nearby waters – a long-term investment with large returns for fishermen, as McCauley sees it. Launched in 2003, the network now spans 124 distinct sections along the coast. Some areas are "no-take" zones where all fishing is prohibited, while others allow limited use. The network covers roughly 16% of state waters, with proposed expansions that would add 2%. The goal, under the 1999 Marine Life Protection Act, was to create a science-based system to rebuild ecosystems after decades of overfishing and habitat loss. The Channel Islands were among the first sites established. About 20% of the waters surrounding the eight-island chain are now fully protected. But expansion proposals have sparked debate among fishermen. Some anglers would like the restrictions to be relaxed Blake Hermann, a fourth-generation commercial fisherman from Ventura County, grew up fishing around the Channel Islands, where he harpoons swordfish by hand. He supports keeping much of the marine protected network intact, but he argues that some closures go too far and has petitioned the state to allow limited fishing in three no-take zones around the islands. Protected areas can help nearshore species like sea bass and lobster recover, Hermann said, but offer little benefit to wide-ranging ocean-goers like swordfish and tuna that may pass only briefly through a protected zone during migration. He questions whether it makes sense to restrict selective, low-impact fishing methods in places where these migratory species are only temporary visitors and will likely be caught when they move into unrestricted waters. "These islands are the best thing on the planet," Hermann said. "We can still protect what makes sense to protect in the right areas, but you can also still give some access back too." 'We're really protecting ourselves' Others warn that reopening any part of the protected network could set a troubling precedent, especially as climate change disrupts ocean ecosystems. "When we protect the oceans, we're really protecting ourselves," said Sandy Aylesworth, director of the Pacific Initiative for the Natural Resources Defense Council. "If the additional 2% is added, it will better prepare California's ocean for future stressors like climate change and new industrial uses of the ocean. So I see it as being a real benefit to all of the ocean users in California — including recreational and commercial fishermen." Final decisions from the review are expected early next year. "Marine protected areas are probably the most controversial thing that we work on, because you're essentially telling a group of individuals that they can't do what they've historically done in an area," said Craig Shuman, marine region manager at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Shuman said the fishing community has become particularly vocal in response to petitions to expand the MPA network. Many aren't asking for more access, he said, just for existing opportunities not to be taken away. "They're asking, 'If you take all the places we can fish, where do we go?'" he said. "That's the challenge: how to find the right balance between protection and access, especially in a state like California where we already have very strong fisheries management laws." Overall, he said, the data shows the network is working. "It's not consistent — each MPA is a little bit different — but more often than not, we're seeing the MPAs are working to achieve the goals of the Act." Trump administration moves to open up previously protected waters The president's executive order lifted fishing restrictions in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles around a remote Pacific island chain — areas first protected by President George W. Bush in 2009 and expanded by President Barack Obama in 2014. Supporters said doing so would boost commercial fishing interests in Hawaii and American Samoa. Conservationists fear the impacts from fishing in an area that's home to coral reefs, sea turtles, whales and thousands of other species. "It makes it even more critical here at the state level that there is this expansion of protections to really balance out some of those rollbacks," said Molly Morse, senior manager at the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory. Back on the boat, still within the protected waters off Anacapa Island, a shimmering school of sardines and anchovies draws a frenzy of seabirds and dolphins. Humpback whales surge from the depths, mouths agape, swallowing fish by the gallon. Along the border of the protected area, a sport fishing boat drops its lines as a container ship rumbles past in the distance. "We've got the largest port in the United States. We've got offshore oil and gas. We've got fishing boats coming and going," McCauley said. "But still, in the middle of all that, we still have this wildness — a place where all the stakeholders who want value out of the ocean can find it."
Nahar Net
06-05-2025
- General
- Nahar Net
As Trump pares back ocean protections, California weighs expanding them
by Naharnet Newsdesk 06 May 2025, 15:43 Strands of kelp glow in the dim morning light off California's Channel Islands as fish and sea lions weave through the golden fronds. It's a scene of remarkable abundance — the result of more than two decades of protection in one of the state's oldest marine reserves. But farther out in the Pacific, life in the vast Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument faces a very different future. The Trump administration has moved to reopen 500,000 square miles (about 1.3 million square kilometers) of previously protected waters there to commercial fishing, in a dramatic rollback of federal ocean protections. California, meanwhile, may be headed in the opposite direction. As it undertakes its first 10-year review of its marine protected area network, state officials, scientists, tribal leaders and environmental advocates are pushing not just to maintain protections but to expand them. "These areas are like our underwater Yellowstone," said Douglas McCauley, director of the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory at the University of California, Santa Barbara, speaking aboard a dive boat heading to the Channel Islands. "It's important to protect that biological heritage, but it also creates an extremely lucrative tourism industry. People want to go see all that nature and wildlife in action." The state's marine protected areas have become magnets for scuba divers and snorkelers drawn by their rich life. Over time, these reserves allow fish populations to rebound and spill over into nearby waters – a long-term investment with large returns for fishermen, as McCauley sees it. Launched in 2003, the network now spans 124 distinct sections along the coast. Some areas are "no-take" zones where all fishing is prohibited, while others allow limited use. The network covers roughly 16% of state waters, with proposed expansions that would add 2%. The goal, under the 1999 Marine Life Protection Act, was to create a science-based system to rebuild ecosystems after decades of overfishing and habitat loss. The Channel Islands were among the first sites established. About 20% of the waters surrounding the eight-island chain are now fully protected. But expansion proposals have sparked debate among fishermen. Some anglers would like the restrictions to be relaxed Blake Hermann, a fourth-generation commercial fisherman from Ventura County, grew up fishing around the Channel Islands, where he harpoons swordfish by hand. He supports keeping much of the marine protected network intact, but he argues that some closures go too far and has petitioned the state to allow limited fishing in three no-take zones around the islands. Protected areas can help nearshore species like sea bass and lobster recover, Hermann said, but offer little benefit to wide-ranging ocean-goers like swordfish and tuna that may pass only briefly through a protected zone during migration. He questions whether it makes sense to restrict selective, low-impact fishing methods in places where these migratory species are only temporary visitors and will likely be caught when they move into unrestricted waters. "These islands are the best thing on the planet," Hermann said. "We can still protect what makes sense to protect in the right areas, but you can also still give some access back too." 'We're really protecting ourselves' Others warn that reopening any part of the protected network could set a troubling precedent, especially as climate change disrupts ocean ecosystems. "When we protect the oceans, we're really protecting ourselves," said Sandy Aylesworth, director of the Pacific Initiative for the Natural Resources Defense Council. "If the additional 2% is added, it will better prepare California's ocean for future stressors like climate change and new industrial uses of the ocean. So I see it as being a real benefit to all of the ocean users in California — including recreational and commercial fishermen." Final decisions from the review are expected early next year. "Marine protected areas are probably the most controversial thing that we work on, because you're essentially telling a group of individuals that they can't do what they've historically done in an area," said Craig Shuman, marine region manager at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Shuman said the fishing community has become particularly vocal in response to petitions to expand the MPA network. Many aren't asking for more access, he said, just for existing opportunities not to be taken away. "They're asking, 'If you take all the places we can fish, where do we go?'" he said. "That's the challenge: how to find the right balance between protection and access, especially in a state like California where we already have very strong fisheries management laws." Overall, he said, the data shows the network is working. "It's not consistent — each MPA is a little bit different — but more often than not, we're seeing the MPAs are working to achieve the goals of the Act." Trump administration moves to open up previously protected waters The president's executive order lifted fishing restrictions in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles around a remote Pacific island chain — areas first protected by President George W. Bush in 2009 and expanded by President Barack Obama in 2014. Supporters said doing so would boost commercial fishing interests in Hawaii and American Samoa. Conservationists fear the impacts from fishing in an area that's home to coral reefs, sea turtles, whales and thousands of other species. "It makes it even more critical here at the state level that there is this expansion of protections to really balance out some of those rollbacks," said Molly Morse, senior manager at the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory. Back on the boat, still within the protected waters off Anacapa Island, a shimmering school of sardines and anchovies draws a frenzy of seabirds and dolphins. Humpback whales surge from the depths, mouths agape, swallowing fish by the gallon. Along the border of the protected area, a sport fishing boat drops its lines as a container ship rumbles past in the distance. "We've got the largest port in the United States. We've got offshore oil and gas. We've got fishing boats coming and going," McCauley said. "But still, in the middle of all that, we still have this wildness — a place where all the stakeholders who want value out of the ocean can find it."
03-05-2025
- Science
As Trump pares back ocean protections, California weighs expanding them
CHANNEL ISLANDS, Calif. -- Strands of kelp glow in the dim morning light off California's Channel Islands as fish and sea lions weave through the golden fronds. It's a scene of remarkable abundance — the result of more than two decades of protection in one of the state's oldest marine reserves. But farther out in the Pacific, life in the vast Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument faces a very different future. The Trump administration has moved to reopen 500,000 square miles (about 1.3 million square kilometers) of previously protected waters there to commercial fishing, in a dramatic rollback of federal ocean protections. California, meanwhile, may be headed in the opposite direction. As it undertakes its first 10-year review of its marine protected area network, state officials, scientists, tribal leaders and environmental advocates are pushing not just to maintain protections but to expand them. 'These areas are like our underwater Yellowstone,' said Douglas McCauley, director of the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory at the University of California, Santa Barbara, speaking aboard a dive boat heading to the Channel Islands. 'It's important to protect that biological heritage, but it also creates an extremely lucrative tourism industry. People want to go see all that nature and wildlife in action.' The state's marine protected areas have become magnets for scuba divers and snorkelers drawn by their rich life. Over time, these reserves allow fish populations to rebound and spill over into nearby waters – a long-term investment with large returns for fishermen, as McCauley sees it. Launched in 2003, the network now spans 124 distinct sections along the coast. Some areas are 'no-take' zones where all fishing is prohibited, while others allow limited use. The network covers roughly 16% of state waters, with proposed expansions that would add 2%. The goal, under the 1999 Marine Life Protection Act, was to create a science-based system to rebuild ecosystems after decades of overfishing and habitat loss. The Channel Islands were among the first sites established. About 20% of the waters surrounding the eight-island chain are now fully protected. But expansion proposals have sparked debate among fishermen. Blake Hermann, a fourth-generation commercial fisherman from Ventura County, grew up fishing around the Channel Islands, where he harpoons swordfish by hand. He supports keeping much of the marine protected network intact, but he argues that some closures go too far and has petitioned the state to allow limited fishing in three no-take zones around the islands. Protected areas can help nearshore species like sea bass and lobster recover, Hermann said, but offer little benefit to wide-ranging ocean-goers like swordfish and tuna that may pass only briefly through a protected zone during migration. He questions whether it makes sense to restrict selective, low-impact fishing methods in places where these migratory species are only temporary visitors and will likely be caught when they move into unrestricted waters. 'These islands are the best thing on the planet,' Hermann said. 'We can still protect what makes sense to protect in the right areas, but you can also still give some access back too.' Others warn that reopening any part of the protected network could set a troubling precedent, especially as climate change disrupts ocean ecosystems. 'When we protect the oceans, we're really protecting ourselves,' said Sandy Aylesworth, director of the Pacific Initiative for the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'If the additional 2% is added, it will better prepare California's ocean for future stressors like climate change and new industrial uses of the ocean. So I see it as being a real benefit to all of the ocean users in California — including recreational and commercial fishermen.' Final decisions from the review are expected early next year. 'Marine protected areas are probably the most controversial thing that we work on, because you're essentially telling a group of individuals that they can't do what they've historically done in an area,' said Craig Shuman, marine region manager at the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. Shuman said the fishing community has become particularly vocal in response to petitions to expand the MPA network. Many aren't asking for more access, he said, just for existing opportunities not to be taken away. 'They're asking, 'If you take all the places we can fish, where do we go?'' he said. 'That's the challenge: how to find the right balance between protection and access, especially in a state like California where we already have very strong fisheries management laws.' Overall, he said, the data shows the network is working. 'It's not consistent — each MPA is a little bit different — but more often than not, we're seeing the MPAs are working to achieve the goals of the Act.' The president's executive order lifted fishing restrictions in waters between 50 and 200 nautical miles around a remote Pacific island chain — areas first protected by President George W. Bush in 2009 and expanded by President Barack Obama in 2014. Supporters said doing so would boost commercial fishing interests in Hawaii and American Samoa. Conservationists fear the impacts from fishing in an area that's home to coral reefs, sea turtles, whales and thousands of other species. 'It makes it even more critical here at the state level that there is this expansion of protections to really balance out some of those rollbacks,' said Molly Morse, senior manager at the Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory. Back on the boat, still within the protected waters off Anacapa Island, a shimmering school of sardines and anchovies draws a frenzy of seabirds and dolphins. Humpback whales surge from the depths, mouths agape, swallowing fish by the gallon. Along the border of the protected area, a sport fishing boat drops its lines as a container ship rumbles past in the distance. 'We've got the largest port in the United States. We've got offshore oil and gas. We've got fishing boats coming and going,' McCauley said. 'But still, in the middle of all that, we still have this wildness — a place where all the stakeholders who want value out of the ocean can find it.'
