Latest news with #MatthewToomer
Yahoo
06-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Gay railway station volunteer banned over gender-critical views
A gay volunteer was banned from a railway group after expressing his gender-critical views on email and social media. Matthew Toomer, 48, was thrown out of West Midlands Railway's 'Adopt a Station' scheme after he privately contacted company bosses to express concern about its 'Progress Pride' train. WMR rebranded one of its trains last summer with a 'rainbow diamond motif' that bares similarities to the Progress Pride flag, which features a yellow diamond. It was also named 'Hurst Street' after the Birmingham road at the centre of the city's Gay Village. Mr Toomer commented on a social media post about the rebranded train, asking if it would 'return to its natural state once the event is over'. In response, he was summoned to a meeting and told that his views 'do not align with [WMR's] values and mission'. He was banned from the Redditch station volunteer group. Mr Toomer said: 'As a gay man myself, I want to stress that this wasn't about objecting to visibility. My concern was the increasing tendency of public transport organisations to take visible positions on divisive issues. 'The Progress Pride flag has become associated with particular ideological stances – particularly around gender – which not everyone, including many within the LGB community, fully endorse. 'My position was simply that public services should remain neutral and welcoming to everyone.' The new train was named 'Hurst Street' ahead of Birmingham Pride last summer - West Midlands Trains The Free Speech Union (FSU), which represents the volunteer, has written to the rail operator to warn it that punishing Mr Toomer in this way 'unjustifiably restricts his freedom of expression, and that it is contrary to WMR's stated values of diversity, equality and inclusion'. Rebekah Brown, a case officer at the FSU, called on the train company to 'apologise for this vindictive decision and reinstate him'. Instead a spokesman claimed to The Telegraph that Mr Toomer's social media activity in general 'felt problematic'. The WMR spokesman said: 'Our company has a proud culture of inclusion and allyship. 'We believe the views Mr Toomer has expressed on social media on a range of subjects are at odds with these values and could be harmful or offensive to our colleagues, customers or other volunteers. 'We have therefore asked that Mr Toomer no longer volunteers on behalf of West Midlands Railway.' When asked to point out examples of allegedly 'problematic' posts by Mr Toomer, the spokesman failed to do so. 'Majority of WMR customers will agree with Mr Toomer' Ms Brown, the FSU case officer, said: 'WMR should focus on delivering a working service for their passengers, not compelling every volunteer to be a fellow traveller for corporate wokery. 'I expect the vast majority of West Midland's Railway's customers will agree with Mr Toomer, not with WMR's enforced ideological orthodoxy. 'A train company has no business acting as the arbiter of permissible opinion for volunteers, with these chilling consequences for individuals' freedom of speech in their daily lives.' Train companies' efforts to align themselves with political ideologies have caused a number of controversies. Last year Government-owned LNER prompted outrage after a senior manager trawled through a passenger's social media account to find material to justify refusing to answer her questions about the cost of a similar Pride train rebrand. Similarly, Avanti West Coast triggered a row after a racial diversity-themed 'wrapping' of one of its trains. Unlike the well-known rainbow Gay Pride flag, the Progress Pride flag is associated with the pro-transgender political movement. This campaigns for the view that men who wish to call themselves women – that is, changing their gender to become trans women – must be treated as if they had been born female. This political stance was dealt a fatal blow by the Supreme Court a few weeks ago when the country's most senior judges ruled that such trans women are not women, and are therefore not allowed to use women's facilities such as public toilets and changing rooms. Securing lawful access to such areas is a key focus of pro-transgender campaigners and lobbyists. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Telegraph
06-05-2025
- Politics
- Telegraph
Gay railway station volunteer banned over gender-critical views
A gay volunteer was banned from a railway group after expressing his gender-critical views on email and social media. Matthew Toomer, 48, was thrown out of West Midlands Railway's 'Adopt a Station' scheme after he privately contacted company bosses to express concern about its 'Progress Pride' train. WMR rebranded one of its trains last summer with a 'rainbow diamond motif' that bares similarities to the Progress Pride flag, which features a yellow diamond. It was also named 'Hurst Street' after the Birmingham road at the centre of the city's Gay Village. Mr Toomer commented on a social media post about the rebranded train, asking if it would 'return to its natural state once the event is over'. In response, he was summoned to a meeting and told that his views 'do not align with [WMR's] values and mission'. He was banned from the Redditch station volunteer group. Mr Toomer said: 'As a gay man myself, I want to stress that this wasn't about objecting to visibility. My concern was the increasing tendency of public transport organisations to take visible positions on divisive issues. 'The Progress Pride flag has become associated with particular ideological stances – particularly around gender – which not everyone, including many within the LGB community, fully endorse. 'My position was simply that public services should remain neutral and welcoming to everyone.' The Free Speech Union (FSU), which represents the volunteer, has written to the rail operator to warn it that punishing Mr Toomer in this way 'unjustifiably restricts his freedom of expression, and that it is contrary to WMR's stated values of diversity, equality and inclusion'. Rebekah Brown, a case officer at the FSU, called on the train company to 'apologise for this vindictive decision and reinstate him'. Instead a spokesman claimed to The Telegraph that Mr Toomer's social media activity in general 'felt problematic'. The WMR spokesman said: 'Our company has a proud culture of inclusion and allyship. 'We believe the views Mr Toomer has expressed on social media on a range of subjects are at odds with these values and could be harmful or offensive to our colleagues, customers or other volunteers. 'We have therefore asked that Mr Toomer no longer volunteers on behalf of West Midlands Railway.' When asked to point out examples of allegedly 'problematic' posts by Mr Toomer, the spokesman failed to do so. 'Majority of WMR customers will agree with Mr Toomer' Ms Brown, the FSU case officer, said: 'WMR should focus on delivering a working service for their passengers, not compelling every volunteer to be a fellow traveller for corporate wokery. 'I expect the vast majority of West Midland's Railway's customers will agree with Mr Toomer, not with WMR's enforced ideological orthodoxy. 'A train company has no business acting as the arbiter of permissible opinion for volunteers, with these chilling consequences for individuals' freedom of speech in their daily lives.' Train companies' efforts to align themselves with political ideologies have caused a number of controversies. Last year Government-owned LNER prompted outrage after a senior manager trawled through a passenger's social media account to find material to justify refusing to answer her questions about the cost of a similar Pride train rebrand. Similarly, Avanti West Coast triggered a row after a racial diversity-themed 'wrapping' of one of its trains. Unlike the well-known rainbow Gay Pride flag, the Progress Pride flag is associated with the pro-transgender political movement. This campaigns for the view that men who wish to call themselves women – that is, changing their gender to become trans women – must be treated as if they had been born female. This political stance was dealt a fatal blow by the Supreme Court a few weeks ago when the country's most senior judges ruled that such trans women are not women, and are therefore not allowed to use women's facilities such as public toilets and changing rooms. Securing lawful access to such areas is a key focus of pro-transgender campaigners and lobbyists.
