logo
#

Latest news with #MediaNewsGroup

Protesters flock to support woman on trial over death of her police officer boyfriend
Protesters flock to support woman on trial over death of her police officer boyfriend

Sunday World

time28-05-2025

  • Sunday World

Protesters flock to support woman on trial over death of her police officer boyfriend

'WE WANT JUSTICE' | Karen Read is charged with second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene over the death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe. Karen Read's retrial for the death of her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, has been ongoing since last month. In the early morning hours of January 29, 2022, Boston Police Department Officer John O'Keefe was found dead outside the home of Boston Police Officer Brian Albert in Canton, Massachusetts. His body was discovered by Read who had dropped O'Keefe off at the Albert residence the night before and had not heard from him since. Read is charged with second-degree murder, motor vehicle manslaughter, and leaving the scene. The prosecution argues Read intentionally struck O'Keefe with her SUV, while the defense contends he was killed in a separate incident and Read was framed. The first trial ended in a mistrial last year due to a hung jury, and the second trial, overseen by Judge Beverly Cannone, has faced challenges including a potential conflict of interest for the judge and the testimony of a disgraced police investigator. Karen Read. Photo: MediaNews Group via Getty Images News in 90 Seconds - May 28th As the trial could be entering the final days of its case, the remaining chaos unfolds in the courthouse, but outside, supporters of Karen are sitting in lawn chairs with their signs, dressed in pink, blowing bubbles, and ordering pizza while they listen to livestreams of the trial. They wave at people driving by and encouraging them to toot their horns. A group of people who were once strangers have been bonded for life after three years of supporting Karen Read. Dina Warchao, who has been livestreaming what goes on outside the courthouse on YouTube, believes that the police are framing Karen for the murder of John O'Keefe. 'I'm here to support Karen because I feel she was framed for a murder that she did not commit, and it's against corruption, and as the trial goes on, it's for change,' she told Sunday World . 'Since the first trial, I was here every single day. I'm back working now, so I'm only here once a week on Tuesdays to livestream, and sometimes I come after work. 'It's not only important for Karen to get justice, it's also important to actually get the people that killed John O'Keefe, and it also ties into Sandra Birchmore as well as her unborn child. She was murdered by another police officer here, and the cases have connections. Hundreds of Karen Read supporters. Photo: Matt Stone/MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty 'The mistrial last year was heartbreaking; it was totally heartbreaking. Whether you believe Karen is innocent or guilty, I believe she's 100% innocent, but if you put that aside, everybody should be outraged at the way the investigation went. 'It's costing millions that us, the taxpayers here, are paying. It goes to show you what a cover-up it is; they're insistent on trying her and convicting her. 'Every single person down here wants justice for Boston Police Officer John O'Keefe. We want to see the people that killed him held responsible, and we want policy changes here in police procedures. It's wrong.' For the retrial which began last month, a ban on protests within a 200-foot 'buffer zone' around the courthouse was put in place to separate protesters from the proceedings and to prevent disruptions to the trial, including the potential for jurors to be swayed by outside influences. 'We had less of a buffer zone last year, and it was more of a camaraderie; there were hundreds of people down here, all supporting Karen and seeking justice for John,' Dina added. 'It's a different kind of vibe where the judge stomped on our First Amendment rights and increased the buffer zone. Everybody down here is just trying to make change.' Another supporter, Scott McGuinness, has had his 'boots on the ground' since 2023, prior to the recent buffer zone. 'If you truly believe the corruption here and the cover-up and the framing of Karen Read, the only way to get the word out to the public is to be here. 'DA Morrissey hates it; that's why they created the buffer zone. It's all about politics. They try to say it's to give Karen Read a fair trial, yeah, but we know that's a ruse. 'The only reason they don't want us in front of the courthouse is because it makes DA Morrissey look bad, Governor Maura Healey look bad, Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell look bad. It's all a bad look for them because we don't believe our government, we don't believe in the State and in DA Morrissey prosecuting this case. Read more 'If Karen Read had dropped off John O'Keefe at a civilian's house party somewhere else in Canton, the true suspects would have been arrested within 24 hours. This was all a cover-up, favors given to Brian Albert, the connections he had to DA Morrissey's office and his State Police Detective Crew. 'If Karen Read dropped off John O'Keefe four doors down, there would have been a proper investigation, and the true suspects would have been arrested.' Read has garnered support from the online community and various members of the public who have expressed their belief in her innocence. Every day they gather in pink as it's Karen's favorite colour to show support, and people from all around the globe have been tuning into the livestreams to get daily updates of the trial. 'Karen knows a lot of the regular supporters out here by name. She walked by me one day, and I said 'Hi, Karen,' she goes, 'Hi, Scott,' and I was like, how do you know my name? We began to realize that Karen Read watches a lot of the YouTube shows. She watched live coverage of us out here, so she got to know who all the Free Karen Read people were. 'It got to the point where Karen started inviting some of the boots on the ground into the trial. I got invited into the trial. 'A lot of the people right here that go into court with Karen, a lot of them originated as boots on the ground, so that's how much she recognizes, appreciates, and supports us. 'I've been coming here since before the beginning of the first trial. I first got involved in April 2023, heavily online, in Facebook groups. Aidan Kearney (Turtle Boy) broke the story in April 2023. My first boots on the ground demonstration was July 2023. 'Aidan's previously broke a lot of state police scandals. One of the reasons Aidan ended up being honeypot trapped and jailed was the state police and their corrupt powers in the state don't like Aidan's reporting at all. 'When Aidan broke the story about this, they went after him hard. Aidan, prior to this whole Karen Read thing, has reported a lot of corruption in the state, so the powers that be don't like Aidan at all.'

How the Loss of NOAA Storm Data Will Impact the Poor
How the Loss of NOAA Storm Data Will Impact the Poor

Yahoo

time21-05-2025

  • Climate
  • Yahoo

How the Loss of NOAA Storm Data Will Impact the Poor

Mark Faber surveys the damage left behind from a large tornado that destroyed his house, garage and other structures in Bennett, Co. on May 19, 2025. Credit - Helen H. Richardson—MediaNews Group/TheSevere storms and towering tornadoes killed at least 28 people across the Midwest and South from May 17 to May 18. The last tornadoes to cause these types of mass casualties were in 2021, killing 93 people in Missouri, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Kentucky while inflicting $4.5 billion in damages. More billion-dollar disasters are laying waste to American cities each year, but soon the public will have no idea how bad these damages really are. On May 8, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced that its well-known 'billion-dollar weather and climate disasters' database 'will be retired.' As part of the Trump administration's focus on killing programs associated with 'climate,' this irreproducible source of information for taxpayers, media, and researchers will soon no longer be able to track the devastating cost of natural disasters. But low-income communities—who are at the greatest risk of these disasters—are about to feel the biggest blowback. The number of natural disasters that cost over a billion dollars has increased more than sixfold since 1980. The chart above uses available NOAA data to show a meteoric rise in catastrophic events, largely due to severe storms like the ones currently hitting the South and Midwest. From 1980 to 2000, 96 disasters caused more than $546.3 billion in damages. In the next 20 years from 2000 to 2020, these figures rose to 244 events and more than $1.95 trillion in damages—marking a 154% increase in the number of billion-dollar disasters and a 257% surge in costs. Read More: The Superstorm Era Is Upon Us Every state has now experienced a billion-dollar natural disaster, but the severity and frequency of these are rising, largely due to two significant shifts: First, the U.S. is building far more expensive properties. Even though the NOAA data is inflation adjusted, the cost of buildings, their density, and their interiors have skyrocketed. Wealth in risky coastal counties doubled from 1980 to 2020, largely driven by soaring home prices. Even low-income neighborhoods have much more expensive buildings due to costly regulatory reviews, as Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson point out in Abundance. Second, the U.S. is building in more disaster-prone areas. Homes are increasingly built in regions where the wildfire season is 105 days longer than it was in 1970, half the U.S. population now lives in towns where 100-year floods are twice as common as they were just a few decades ago, and most of the southwest—the fastest growing part of the U.S.—has been under a drought advisory for the last 20 years. The loss of the NOAA data comes at a particularly dangerous time of the year when hurricanes, floods, and wildfires are about to explode. Summer is the worst time for the nation's deadliest natural disasters. Nearly half of all billion-dollar disasters from 1980-2024 have occurred between May and August, according to the NOAA data still available. Severe storms inundate communities in May (as we've just seen), droughts sear the nation in June, and then wildfires burn the arid land in July through August. Fourteen of these monumental disasters hit the U.S. last summer that cost the U.S. $41 billion and killed 108 people. This will be the last time that we'll know these values for the foreseeable future. The indirect costs of these storms that hit in summer are even harder to calculate. According to the U.S. Farm Bureau, natural disasters in 2024 caused $20.4 billion in crop losses due to freezes, droughts, and fires, nearly half of which was uninsured. These losses aren't just bad for farmers, they raise food prices across the country. Roads may be destroyed, which causes severe disruptions to the supply chain. If one store shutters, for example, several others may follow suit. Long-term health impacts of backed-up sewage and toxic chemicals can leave communities struggling for decades. Student GPAs fall by 0.3 points for every natural disaster that hits a community and those students become 10% less likely to enroll in STEM courses due to the more challenging workload. Flood risk is 21% higher in low-income neighborhoods (median household income below $55,000) versus high-income neighborhoods. Homes in low-income areas are 29% more likely to be destroyed by wildfires due to poor structural conditions like infrequent roof repairs, as well as much further access from emergency services like fire departments that can't respond in time. It's a vicious cycle that the most at-risk communities in America—with the lowest incomes, home insurance rates, and test scores—are the ones that get slammed by storms over and over again. In 2020, A team of researchers from Princeton and UCLA analyzed all natural disasters in the U.S. over a 90-year period, combining data from NOAA, the American Red Cross, and FEMA. They looked not just at the state-level data, but at the county level to understand what was happening in specific communities. They found that after a natural disaster 'the rich move away from disaster-prone areas, while the poor are left behind…showing that these trends may worsen inequality in the U.S.' When those disasters strike again in flood zones, in the paths of hurricanes, and in the line of wildfires, the only people left are the people least prepared to manage the fallout. Not only do natural disasters hit low-income communities the hardest, but they also push people further into poverty. The Princeton and UCLA team found in the county-level data that when a super severe storm hits (defined as 100 or more deaths), poverty in the area increases by one percentage point. Rich people were able to leave, but the poor did not have the funds to restart elsewhere. 'Natural disaster exposure risk could become another cause of rising inequality between the rich and the poor. Our study suggests that areas that do not adapt to natural disaster risk will become poorer over time,' wrote the Princeton and UCLA team. Researchers from the Federal Reserve confirmed these findings. They found that 10 years after Hurricane Katrina, families whose homes had flooded had lower credit scores and lower rates of home ownership, driving massive divides in New Orleans between poverty and prosperity. Dozens of researchers have found that homes in formerly redlined areas are among the most at-risk areas for climate disasters. A 2023 report from the Federal Reserve found, 'Neighborhoods that were redlined in the 1930s-1940s by the Home Owners' Loan Corporation face disproportionately higher risks of both current and future flooding and extreme heat.' On top of that, those homes tend to have worse infrastructure to manage those events, lacking proper drainage, reinforced foundations, and structurally sound roofs. After billion-dollar disasters come, jobs wash away, savings disappear, home values plummet, school days tick by without attendance, and communities fall further and further behind. In one global study of natural disasters over a 30 year period, researchers found that annual household incomes fell by 21.5% and took almost a decade to recover. After a natural disaster, low-income families in particular take two to three times longer to financially recover compared to their wealthier counterparts. Recovery efforts are often inequitably distributed. In FEMA's own 2021 analysis of 4.8 million aid registrations submitted by disaster survivors between 2014 and 2018, they found that the poorest renters were 23% less likely than higher-income renters to get housing aid. Moreover, the poorest homeowners received about half as much to rebuild their homes compared with higher-income homeowners (disparities that researchers say cannot be explained by relative repair costs). And lastly, FEMA was about twice as likely to deny housing assistance to lower-income disaster survivors because the agency judged the damage to their home to be "insufficient." Federal aid from natural disasters can be the difference between life and death for impoverished households. 'When a hurricane damages your home, a clock starts ticking. Every day without stable shelter makes it more likely that the blow dealt by the storm will unleash a cascade of problems,' explained NPR's Ailsa Chang. 'Children miss school, adults are unable to work, older adults stop taking life-saving medication. Mold and heat exposure threaten to make everyone sick' In 2019, the head of FEMA, Peter Gaynor, shared that the agency's financial responsibility had become 'unsustainable' as costs had risen. 'The only way we can survive as a nation,' Gaynor said, 'is to set aside pre-disaster money and build state and local capacity.' Developers now build closer to shorelines, deeper into wildfire-prone forests, and nearer to floodplains. Extreme heat and cold kill far more older adults, young children, and those with chronic medical conditions than ever before. Without knowing the costs of these disasters, the U.S. government will fail to provide the proper financial compensation to these impacted families. And without this information, America's most vulnerable communities have the most to lose. Contact us at letters@

Recap: A Beautiful Black Time At Disneyland
Recap: A Beautiful Black Time At Disneyland

Black America Web

time20-05-2025

  • Entertainment
  • Black America Web

Recap: A Beautiful Black Time At Disneyland

Olga Thompson It's not an exaggeration to say that Disneyland is the happiest place on Earth. Come in a grumpy mood, particularly following an exhaustive five-hour flight from the East Coast, and it's guaranteed to be replaced with joy the minute you step foot on the Downtown Disney District in Anaheim, California. We recently took that magical journey to check out the Disneyland 70th Anniversary Celebration, which introduces new merch, events exclusive to the occasion and virtually a nonstop assortment of ways to have fun with Mickey and the gang. During our stay at Disneyland Hotel, where lawn parties are daily and Tangaroa Terrace is the go-to hotspot for a torch-lit nightcap, we were pleasantly surprised at how much our culture is rooted in the whole experience. From the Creole-themed restaurant Jazz Kitchen and Black-owned coffee shop Sip & Sonder — more on them later! — to the strip between New Orleans Square and Bayou Country that leads to the grand attraction of Tiana's Bayou Adventure, let's just say we had ourselves one good ol' Black time. RELATED: Little Known Black History Facts – Pioneering Disney Exec Robert Billingslea MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images MediaNews Group/Orange County Register via Getty Images Tiana's Bayou Adventure in particular, which is less than a year old following its grand opening back in November 2024, proved to be a focal point in Disney's overall vision of inclusivity for the future. As some are aware, the log flume ride serves as a replacement for the once-popular Splash Mountain attraction (seen above). After 34 years of being in service at Disneyland, the ride was replaced in 2023 due to its historic ties to the racially-insensitive 1946 film, Song of the South . To put it in perspective a bit further, Disney has all but ignored the film's existence by never releasing it on home video or uploading it to the Disney+ streaming service. The ride still exists in its original form in Tokyo Disneyland, but recent reports suggest that Disney has been in serious talks with the park's owner, Oriental Land Company, to make similar reconstruction. However, as one might expect in a world still struggling with race relations, OLC isn't too keen on the idea of replacing cute critter animatronics with the melanated characters featured in The Princess & The Frog . However, there has been some pushback on the new design here in the States as well from those who simply can't understand the theme of it all. Take a look below at how Forbes broke it down in a report from last year: 'The new version remains colorful and adds expressive animatronics as well as video screens which are set into the scenery. This has gone down well with some fans but as WDWMagic points out, 'the overall sentiment has skewed negatively, with many YouTube viewers expressing disappointment in the new attraction's storytelling and overall experience. One of the most frequent criticisms centers around the ride's storyline. Viewers find the plot – centering on Tiana searching for party musicians – lacking depth and coherence. Many feel the story does not capture the magic of 'The Princess and the Frog' and misses an opportunity to include more iconic elements from the film.'' While everyone is entitled to their opinion, we're here to tell you from first-hand experience that Tiana's Bayou Adventure is all that jazz and then some. Pitch-black drops that feed your adrenaline, sing-song melodies that keep you smiling even with soaked socks and an impressive job in the overall design from characters to lighting all help make it a must-ride water attraction. Olga Thompson Handout Another dose of culture we indulged in during our time in Disneyland came by way of the aforementioned Sip & Sonder, spearheaded by two lovely Black businesswomen. To speak with Amanda-Jane Thomas and Shanita Nicholas is to hear passion in motion. Each has a vivid perspective on what it means to be in their front-facing positions to directly represent for the community, with Amanda-Jane telling us, 'There's something about being seen that's important. We're oftentimes in the rooms and in the spaces, but overlooked. Having the opportunity to be at Downtown Disney and beyond that have such a visible space that's unapologetically Black is all very intentional. ' Shanita followed suit, adding, 'The word that keeps coming to mind is representation. I'm thinking about being in a place that's about joy and celebration, and also all the little Black girls coming here too! Seeing the new rides in the Bayou and a Black women-owned establishment that's integrated and part of the experience is seamless representation — it's incredibly powerful!' The ladies have been operating in California for some time now, and the recent expansion to Downtown Disney at the top of 2025 was just a testament of their hard work and determination to grow even bigger. 'We're founded in Inglewood in 2017,' confirmed Amanda-Jane, who went on break down the brand's history by adding, 'that's like our think-tank where we do a lot of our impact work. When we think of how to grow as a company, long-term contracts and sustainability are important. For us, it's determining how to do that with a mind partner while also remaining true to who we are. Being here [in Downtown Disney], it made so much sense.' It's true: little Black girls visiting Disneyland from all across the globe will feel very much at home this year. They'll see themselves at every corner of the park, be it the Paint The Night parade of lights to maybe even meeting Princess Tiana herself. For everyone else, well, your inner Disney kid will pop out at some point. Courtesy Take a look below at some highlights and bright lights from the Disneyland 70th Anniversary, and join the celebration yourselves by clicking here to plan a trip this summer: Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney Disney SEE ALSO Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE

【NBA專欄/林建煌】勇士G1扼殺了灰狼:為什麼Draymond Green是比Rudy Gobert更偉大的防守者?
【NBA專欄/林建煌】勇士G1扼殺了灰狼:為什麼Draymond Green是比Rudy Gobert更偉大的防守者?

Yahoo

time07-05-2025

  • Sport
  • Yahoo

【NBA專欄/林建煌】勇士G1扼殺了灰狼:為什麼Draymond Green是比Rudy Gobert更偉大的防守者?

我就坐在那裡看著Draymond Green和金州勇士肢解了明尼蘇達灰狼的團隊進攻。而在一周前,洛杉磯湖人和LeBron James對同一個對手毫無辦法。 Draymond Green。(資料照,Photo by) (David Berding via Getty Images) Green為何是比Rudy Gobert更好的防守者?很簡單,在季後賽之中不會有任何人會想主動去攻擊Green,但他們卻可能針對Gobert。 或許你會說,Gobert的價值體現在他的防守覆蓋面積,以及他在協防封蓋上的價值。我同意,但Green一樣能做到這些事,或許受限於較矮的身材,不一定有前者那麼優秀,但一樣能夠做得非常、非常出色。 Gobert作為一名防守者非常偉大,他是4屆年度最佳防守球員,比肩Dikembe Mutombo和Ben Wallace,他可能是聯盟中最被低估的球員。可是實事求是地說,他在例行賽的價值遠大於他在季後賽中的作用。 在隨機的例行賽中,其他球隊不太可能針對Gobert的弱點。球隊沒有時間為一場比賽制定詳盡的比賽計劃,不想打亂輪換他們主力先發五人,因為耗費大量精力制定一場特定比賽的計畫、並改變輪換以贏得一場比賽,並沒有足夠的好處。 但在季後賽中,球隊可以設計輪換和比賽計劃來擴大場上空間,這使得Rudy無法一直站在內線,從而抵消了他最大的優勢。他仍然是一名可靠的外線防守球員,但還不夠好。而且因為Gobert進攻技巧的缺乏,讓他的天敵就是小球陣容,他不能像Nikola Jokić、Alperen Şengün那樣低位單打,或是拿到進攻籃板後立刻完成二次進攻。 Rudy Gobert。(資料照,AP Photo/Abbie Parr) (ASSOCIATED PRESS) 而Green雖然對籃框的保護較差,但他的陣容靈活性和外線防守使得在系列賽中,對他進行針對基本上是不可能的。而且在進攻端他的價值太大了,他的外線投籃至少你現在必須得關注,更不要說他在擋拆後四打三的處理球對勇士來說價值極大。 必須要知道,例行賽是一場持續6個月、82場比賽的馬拉松,各支球隊得在各地飛來飛去,極度消耗選手經歷和體力;而季後賽則是在一周內與相同的對手比賽,各支球隊都會針對彼此制定專門的比賽計劃。 這不是在不貶低Gobert,他是一個強大的籃筐保護者(幾乎是NBA中最好的幾個),每晚都會通過努力防守油漆區來迫使對方改變防守計劃,而我們知道在這個位置投籃是歷史上籃球中最有效的投籃方式。 但在季後賽中,透過換防擋拆,可以將大個子球員拉出來,從而在一定程度上彌補了這一缺陷(雖然Gobert在本賽季的換防中表現出色)。 在季後賽期間,進攻計劃往往會發生變化,並更加針對性地去進攻對方防守最差的球員,所以湖人的對手會不斷打擊Austin Reaves和Luka Doncic。會有更多有針對性的球的移動、擋拆、無球掩護,甚至為了更好地達成這個目的,在進攻端就會開始以此考慮對位。而這些事情需要花很多時間來計劃和練習,在例行賽幾乎不可能。 而Green的真正天才之處在於:他能夠很快吸收這些東西,這些策略的精隨,很快了解對方掩護的意圖、傳球路線發生在哪,並且快速動作。而且他還是一名出色的一對一防守球員。他可以向Aaron Gordon和Jrue Holiday一樣擔任一個Roamer,這種球員在近年越來越重要,因為越來越多球隊認為他們需要一個機動人員,可以隨時像一個釘子釘在對方最具威脅的球員的進攻路徑上。而Gobert則是一個下限較高、但上限也較低的菁英護框者,顯然球隊必需要圍繞他制定比賽計劃,Draymond則可以隨你喜歡的使用他。 Green在G1的比賽中切換到Anthony Edwards、Julius Randle和Gobert身上,他們分別是具備投籃能力的運動型後衛、身材壯碩的大前鋒和噸位很大的中鋒,他可以將這3人全部搞定,或至少讓他們打得不舒服。 NBA歷史上有其他人能夠做到這一點嗎? Kevin Garnett。(資料照,Photo by MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images) (MediaNews Group/Boston Herald via Getty Images via Getty Images) 也許,Kevin Garnett和Dennis Rodman也能夠完美做到換防1-5號位的球員,可能還有不用在進攻端耗費太多精力的巔峰LeBron James,這兩位球員也有足夠的身形和「防守第六感」,能夠在前幾秒嗅出進攻威脅,以及和隊友溝通並布置球隊整體防守位置的能力。因此在只考慮防守實力的情況下,理論上他們可以。 但這也有點難說,因為KG和小蟲的時代,進攻行為遠不如今天那麼複雜和精確。現在籃球中,比賽充滿了無球動作、掩護等。我相信他們仍然會很出色,但今天的比賽真正考驗你的智商有多高。而Green在這方面的能力是無人能夠媲美的。 他絕對是史上最偉大的防守者之一,或許沒有之一。在護框、貼防、協防、籃板各項能力上比他更好的防守球員大有人在,但集合在一起比他更好的,沒有。 所以這一輪的賽事和灰狼對決湖人的系列賽不一樣,也和勇士對休士頓火箭的系列賽不一樣,勇士有能力對灰狼的進攻造成致命打擊,因為勇士的防守對球的壓迫更足夠,而且Green可以在在擋拆後切換任何一名防守者;灰狼也不是火箭,兩者在體型和運動能力並駕齊驅,但後者在後場的移動能力以及進攻籃板的爭搶上可以對勇士造成更大的威脅。 繼續閱讀報導 根本的差異是,勇士對火箭使用小球陣容要被懲罰,但灰狼似乎很難做出這種打擊,Naz Reid是一名靠投射得分的前鋒,Gobert的價值不在進攻,而Green則可以掐死Julius Randle。 Stephen Curry很可能要缺席兩周甚至更久的時間才能復出,具體取決於MRI結果,那意味著勇士至少要在他回來之前再拿下一場,才能把系列賽延長到第6戰。 而除非他們完全封鎖Edwards 之外所有灰狼球員的進攻,讓比賽維持在低比分的狀態之中,否則他們將做不到這一點。 如果他們能做到,我認為Green將會打出他個人生涯最佳的防守系列賽,超過2019年對火箭、2022年對塞爾提克等系列賽,這將確立他史上最偉大防守者競爭中的地位。 如果不行,勇士的賽季將就此結束。 這會是一個艱難又誘人的交易。 【Yahoo運動專欄】文章僅反映作者意見,不代表Yahoo奇摩立場。

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store