Latest news with #MichaelHession
New York Times
02-06-2025
- General
- New York Times
Baby Shower Gifts That Parents-to-Be Don't Yet Know They Want
Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter My twins are almost 19, and they still have their horsie lovies (in drawers by now, but still). Having a cozy little friend to hold and snuggle — especially for babies 6 months and up — provides comfort, soothing, and consistency. You have four different Pottery Barn Animal Thumbies to choose from, and each one has a squishy, bobbly head and a furry blanket body that's backed with a silky polyester satin. The ivory lamb version is a beloved confidant of editor Hannah Morrill's son — and over the years, she has bought a couple of backups when the original has gone AWOL. (Note to new parents: Lovies should be easily rebuyable to prevent heartbreak.) Crate Joy One never knows how banal bad children's books can truly be until they're stuck reading them interminably. Help build the baby's literary library with a monthly delivery of three books picked just for them by children's specialty bookstore The Reading Bug in San Carlos, California. At sign-up, indicate the child's name and age (the store has a newborn option) and a selection of topics that might be of interest to the parents, including subjects such as animals, humor, and music. Not sure? Don't worry, the booksellers at The Reading Bug have decades of experience putting award-winning, well-vetted, delightful books into even the tiniest hands. Choose a subscription of one, three, six, or 12 months. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Expecting parents will receive all sorts of practical, useful items at their baby shower. But there is always room for the adorable and fun — because who on earth doesn't like dressing up their perfect new baby? The soft leather Bird Rock Baby Rose Gold Baby Moccasins (they also come in yellow gold and a rainbow of other colors) stay on little loaf feet and are perfect for new walkers who need to feel and grip the ground as they gain their balance. Each pair of Bird Rock Baby shoes is guaranteed for life, and for each pair sold the company donates the equivalent of a day's worth of food to Feed My Starving Children. Wee Gallery The bold and high-contrast graphics in the Wee Gallery Touch and Feel board books are the best we've found for engaging a baby in those early days. What's more, they also have varied tactile elements. Each one — Ears, Scales, Tails, and Wings — gives little fingers the opportunity to connect a physical sensation with the pictures and words on the page, from fuzzy bunny ears to a spongy lizard tail to a leathery bat wing. Yes, newborns aren't quite at that point yet, but as anyone who has ever raised a child knows, they'll be reaching out to touch stuff in what seems like a matter of moments. Unfortunately, though, these books are not sold as a set. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Parents never know if they'll have a mouthy baby until their little drooly chomper is earthside. And that also means they're unlikely to register for teethers. Why not show up with the hand-painted Oli & Carol Ramona the Radish Baby Teether so they'll have it on hand for just such an occasion? Babies love this textured, 100%-natural-rubber teether because it has a bunch of different surfaces — ridged, curved, puffy, striated — for them to slurp and gnaw on. Parents love it because it's biodegradable, bacteria- and mold-resistant, and, well, kind of chic. On the off chance the discerning recipient finds radishes a touch bitter, perhaps Kendall the Kale or Pepa the Apple would be more to their liking. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter According to some medical studies and lots of good, old-fashioned folk wisdom, dates, which are rich in potassium, iron, magnesium, and selenium, can help shorten and ease labor. We can't vouch for that, personally or medically, but we can say that eating sticky, caramely, sweet dates certainly can't hurt the endeavor. Rancho Meladuco's The Due Date Bundle for Expectant Mothers comes in four- and six-week bundles. The four-week bundle includes four 2-pound boxes shipped two boxes at a time two weeks apart. Each box contains about 40 organic, unpitted Medjool dates, for a total of 160 dates — that's about five dates per day for the last month of pregnancy. And no matter where birth falls in that month, the morsels are a sweet and nourishing treat during new-baby days, too. Pearhead The easy-to-use, no-mess Pearhead Newborn Baby Handprint and Footprint Kit offers a simple way for new parents to capture prints of those itty-bitty hands and feet. (Tip from Wirecutter writer Brooklyn White: Do this before the baby enters the squirmy phase.) The kit comes with two no-mess, single-use, 3.5-by-2.5-inch ink pads. Place them face down on the included paper (or any paper the parents want to use), press the baby's hands or feet against the non-inked side, and voilà! The ink must dry for a day or two before it's completely set. No ink ever touches the baby's skin, and at $10 a pop, mess-ups aren't much of a setback. Lots of layette clothing is laughably impractical — think dry-clean-only cashmere with finicky buttons and itchy embellishments. That's what makes the Lewis Take Me Home Outfit so special. It's cute enough to be photographed endlessly (and to have those photos live on in infamy), but it's designed specifically for a smooshy, delicate new babe. The kimono styling of the top means a baby can be easily placed into it, and the footed pants have a high rise and a soft waist band, ideal for avoiding the belly button. It all washes wonderfully. January Moon The teething necklace fills three roles in one: It's something tough but chewy for babies to gnash their gums against, it's a hands-free distraction that won't get dropped and lost along the way, and it's a stylish necklace that actually looks like an intentional accessory when it's not being drooled on. The chunky silicone beads of the January Moon Saddle Signature Teething Necklace look like natural stone but are the perfect size, with lots of angles and nubs, for chewing. They're strung on Japanese polyester spindle rope, capped with 18-karat-gold-plated rubberized stopper beads, and finished with a food-safe plastic breakaway clasp. The necklace is 32 inches and comes in pastels, whites and grays, and some other designs, as well. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Few things are more annoying — or dangerous for a partnership — than snapping a baby onesie in the middle of the night while your infant cries and you are suffering from sleep deprivation. The silent magnetic closures on these snuggly, soft, Tencel modal sleepers take all the fumbling out of the equation. Magnetic Me's Footies come in dozens of patterns and colors and are available in sizes from preemie to 18 months. At upwards of $40 a pop, though, they're expensive, especially for something that is destined to get telltale yellow stains — which is why they make such a generous and thoughtful gift. A wise and knowing professional friend gifted editor Hannah Morrill two sets postpartum for her first baby. 'We treated those like gold,' she says. 'There was no night we wanted to face without a clean pair on the ready.' Paige Tate & Co. Designed by Tabitha Paige, a licensed speech therapist and skilled watercolorist, the five sturdy board books in the sweet Our Little Library boxed set are artfully appointed to help babies develop language. These are not harsh academic drills for infants. They're beautiful illustrations of everyday things in five categories — farm animals, forest animals, fruits and vegetables, toys, and transportation — with a single word on each page. It's as much a gift for the parents as it is for the babe; if you're going to be gazing at a basket of blueberries at least 5,000 times, let it be a breathtakingly composed one. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Yes, new parents will document their new baby's life on the cloud and the 'gram, in the family group chat, and in dozens of shared albums (or maybe all of the above). But the problem is, none of that is certain to be around when the bundle of joy is all grown-up and wants to cruise down memory lane. That's why we love Artifact Uprising's elegant The Story of You Baby Book. It's a lie-flat book filled with 50 thick, toothy pages of simple prompts — neither generic nor overly specific — plus photo spaces and pouches to help parents record events and occasions. Choose from seven combinations of linen colors and foil lettering. Each book comes with a coupon for 10 photo prints to get started. This article was edited by Hannah Morrill and Jennifer Hunter.
New York Times
19-05-2025
- Health
- New York Times
You Should Wash Your Face Twice a Day. These 8 Cleansers Make It a Joy.
Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter When something so affordable and in such plain-Jane packaging inspires poetry from our panelists, you know it has to be great. 'After my wife, Vanicream is the second love of my life,' said one tester with exceptionally sensitive skin. The mellow liquid-to-froth formula of Vanicream Gentle Facial Cleanser thoroughly cleans skin without tightness, dryness, or redness. This minimalist formula overachieves. Vanicream cleanser gives a deep clean but is fragrance-free and sulfate-free, and it contains a mere dozen ingredients. Among the products our panelists tested, only Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser had fewer, at 10. The Vanicream cleanser's third additive is coco glucoside, a cleansing agent made from coconut oil and sugar. The sole cleansing ingredient in Cetaphil's cleanser, by contrast, is its third to last ingredient. And testers did clock that cleaning power: 'It gets all the gunk, and it doesn't irritate or dry out my skin,' one panelist said. 'It removes any residual makeup without making my skin feel stripped of all moisture,' another said. The pearly Vanicream Gentle Facial Cleanser transforms into an impressive foam. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter For a mild cleanser, it has substantial lather. Many formulas geared toward sensitive skin felt more milky than muscly: Both Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser and Thayer's Hydrating Milky Face Cleanser take a fair amount of massaging before they bubble up — and then don't leave skin feeling especially sanitized. Vanicream cleanser, though, goes from a pearlescent liquid to pleasant froth with just a little water: 'Don't even get me started on the suds! They make me feel like I'm really doing some deep cleaning!' one panelist said. It lasts for months. We named Vanicream cleanser a pick in our drugstore beauty guide, but during testing for this guide, the $9 wonder more than held its own against prestige cleansers that cost nearly four times as much. A little goes a long way, too; the 8-ounce bottle lasts several months even when used twice daily — shaking down to pennies per use. The pump locks easily. We tested many cleansers with pumps (like Neutrogena Oil-Free Acne Wash) that only locked when the top was fully depressed, which is both messy and wasteful, like when packing to take the bottle on the go. The Vanicream cleanser pump securely closes with a clockwise quarter turn. Flaws but not dealbreakers The liquid's pearlescent luster is created by mica, which may cause sensitivity for some people. None of our panelists noticed any irritation. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Straight out of the pump, EltaMD Skin Recovery Amino Acid Foaming Cleanser is like a tiny handful of clouds. For something so froth-forward, though, it's magnificently mild — even around the eyes — and leaves skin feeling clean and nourished. For an all-foam formula, it's surprisingly gentle. Don't mistake its sudsiness for soapiness: This sulfate-free soft foam fully removes dirt and grime and leaves your face feeling deeply clean — but not at all stripped. What's more, it has a gentle feel even around the eyes. Indeed, the formula's cleansing agents are offset by moisturizing and barrier-protecting ingredients like vitamin E and amino acids taurine and glycine. Light and luscious, this puffed-up foam feels like a treat. More than one panelist used the word 'luxurious' to describe this cleanser. The foam maintains its body with and without water, one tester noted: 'It felt substantial the entire time I was washing, instead of disappearing into my skin like some of the others.' For instance, Aveeno Calm + Restore Nourishing Oat Cleanser never produced more than a few measly bubbles for one tester. A lofty puff of EltaMD Skin Recovery Amino Acid Foaming Cleanser. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter It pumps out a perfect portion. Just one press emits a dollop a bit smaller than a ping-pong ball — and it's just as airy — which is just the right amount for face-washing. That said, for about $35, the cleanser's plastic casing looks and feels a tad rinky-dink, especially when compared with the similarly priced Youth To The People Superfood Cleanser's glass bottle or Ouai Detox Face Cleanser's chic and minimalist graphic design. Flaws but not dealbreakers It contains 28 ingredients. If the formula triggers irritation or sensitivity, it might be hard to determine exactly what component is to blame. It's expensive. EltaMD Skin Recovery cleanser is nearly four times more expensive than the Vanicream cleanser. While Vanicream's formula has a nice froth, the EltaMD cleanser is the move for ASMR vibes, with its dramatic fluffiness. Although it's technically fragrance-free, it has a vague aroma with notes of medicine and coconuts. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The no-frills liquid transforms into big fluffy bubbles that tame oiliness. The chemical tang might be a turnoff. During preliminary reporting for this guide, Wirecutter staffers and dermatologists repeatedly recommended CeraVe's various cleanser options (we tested three very strong contenders, and the brand's line of washes includes about nine more). But CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser was the standout with its soft, airy formula and oil-cutting powers. The balanced formula removes grease and grime but not moisture. Old-school cleansers usually can't distinguish between good oils (lipids in the skin barrier) and bad (shine- and acne-causing sebum). This formula, though, offsets lathery oil-lifters with moisturizing ingredients like niacinamide, ceramides, and hyaluronic acid. 'I liked how the oil was thick and stayed stable on my face until I rinsed. And it felt super hydrating,' one panelist said. It bubbles up beautifully. Of all the formulas we tried, CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser had a singular texture: Just a bit of water makes the liquid gel burst into a fluffy network of bubbles (some up to a half inch in diameter). 'It feels so good in my hands and on my face,' one tester said. In fact, panelists preferred this frothiness over that of CeraVe Cream-to-Foam Facial Cleanser. Transparent out of the pump, CeraVe Foaming Facial Cleanser sudses readily with water. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter It deftly removes makeup. Though not specially marketed as a makeup remover, this cleanser efficiently lifted away foundation, concealer, sunscreen, and mascara. Panelists were split, however, on how eyes reacted to this formula: One tester said it didn't sting at all, while another experienced redness after accidentally splooshing a sudsy drop in her eye (admittedly, this could be chalked up to user error). Flaws but not dealbreakers Although the formula has no fragrance added, some testers still sensed — and disliked — a slightly chemical aroma. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Several testers deemed Kiehl's Calendula Deep Cleansing Foaming Face Wash a favorite for how thoroughly it not only cleaned but also calmed and smoothed skin. The admittedly pricey formula also won points for its refreshing fragrance and stylish packaging (although the pump can require excessive pressing to get going). This gel efficiently cleanses and softens. Although Kiehl's calendula face wash is expensive, a single pump was enough for a full and thorough wash. One tester had spent the day working outside under layers of heavy sunscreen and was pleased at how well this gently frothing formula whisked it all away: 'My face felt calm, smooth, clean, and soft,' he said. The substantial gel formula of Kiehl's Calendula Deep Cleaning Foaming Face Wash. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Rinsing is effortless. Even though the gel has a hefty body, it doesn't cling or coat the face unpleasantly. A quick splash or two is all it takes to flush away the foam. In contrast, contenders like KraveBeauty Matcha Hemp Hydrating Cleanser and Bubble Soft Launch Hydrating Cream Cleanser called for repeated dousing, especially in the hollows of our eyes, to fully remove all the product. Although the bottle is plastic, it looks luxe. With its clear brown bottle and straightforward graphic design, the packaging has old-time apothecary vibes ('Kiehl's always looks classy,' a panelist said). And while it resembles glass, it's actually plastic, which several testers appreciated for safety's sake in the shower because it did in fact become slippery in wet hands. (Testers had misgivings about similarly vibey formulas from Youth To The People and Vintner's Daughter, which come in glass bottles.) Testers liked the fragrance. With lemon peel oil and geranium oil, as well as calendula flower extract, this formula has a fresh scent that one tester described as 'lovely, clean, and natural' — although another panelist was reminded a bit of household cleaning supplies. In any case, the zesty scent here is much preferred to the chemical-forward fragrance of the soapier Kiehl's Ultra Facial Cleanser. Flaws but not dealbreakers Priming the pump takes forever. At first use, many testers had to press the spout several dozen times before even a single drop came out. Subsequent uses still required elbow grease. At just under $40 for about 8 ounces, this cleanser is expensive. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter People with dry skin may approach face-washing with the most acute side eye: Won't washing just parch their complexions more? Nope — not when the mild La Roche-Posay Toleriane Hydrating Gentle Cleanser is in play. The delicate suds cleanse without drying, though for such a straightforward formula, the price may seem high. Moisturizing ingredients nourish dry skin. This milky formula has a mere 19 ingredients, and eight of them help skin maintain its moisture. As with our CeraVe pick, the La Roche-Posay Toleriane cleanser contains glycerin, niacinamide, and a ceramide — and vitamin E and panthenol. Not too slick, drippy, or gooey: The texture is just right. Is it a gel? Is it a liquid? A lotion? A cream? Right out of the bottle, the answer is somewhere in between all of the above, and testers were into the novelty. Once panelists mixed the cleanser with water, they praised how the sheer froth moved: 'I liked the way this held onto my skin while I massaged it in,' one tester said. 'It wasn't too slippery or gummy.' The light foam flushed away easily, whether testers were in the shower or at the sink. The unique and moisturizing La Roche-Posay Toleriane Hydrating Gentle Cleanser. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The pump is a pleasure (and so is the refill pouch). You wash your face with wet hands, without eyeglasses, with the water running. No wonder most of our testers preferred pump bottles to slippery plastic tubes (like those from Tatcha, Fresh, and PanOxyl). And unlike any of our other picks (to date), La Roche-Posay's Toleriane cleanser offers refill pouches for about $15. Flaws but not dealbreakers It's more dutiful than beautiful. La Roche-Posay's Toleriane cleanser is effective, but the fragrance-free formula and weak suds are far from an 'ahh-inducing' delight, as one tester put it. If you're looking for a more spa-like experience, try Tatcha's The Rice Wash, which has a fresh fragrance and gorgeous suds. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter This rich yet gentle cream leaves skin soft and radiant thanks to a hint of exfoliating rice powder. The tangy fragrance may be too much for some. Texture is what sets Tatcha The Rice Wash apart: Straight out of the tube, it starts as a plump and seemingly smooth squiggle. When massaged with water, though, it starts to feel ever so slightly granular and then converts into a veil of froth. Testers loved the luxe cleansing, softening, and polishing effect, though the bracing scent wasn't for everyone. Rice powder gives it body and a perfect hit of grit. Unlike the hard-core apricot kernels and walnut husks of yesteryear, which can abrade skin so much that we recommended avoiding them in our guide to the best exfoliants, rice powder is the rare fine-grit ingredient that is actually a mild exfoliant. 'There's just a hint of grit to it, and my skin felt clean and glowy after this because of that light scrubby feeling,' one panelist said. The tube is pricey, but lasts a long time. At about $10 an ounce, Tatcha's rice cleanser was among the most expensive options we tested (only Vintner's Daughter Active Renewal Cleanser cost more), but you truly only need a smidge for each wash. Admittedly, it took some testers a few tries to dial in the proper amount: A half-inch dab went on too thick, felt rather gritty, and resembled mime makeup. It also called for multiple messy splashes to lather and rinse away. A much smaller dot, meanwhile, mixed with water between the palms created the perfect gentle, sudsy scrub. 'The experience of using it is quite nice, and feels expensive,' one tester said. A daub of the luxe, creamy, and ever-so-gently exfoliating Tatcha Rice Wash. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter It smells nice. While synthetic fragrance isn't listed on the ingredients panel, Tatcha's rice cleanser has a few perfuming agents, including tea leaves, and every one of our testers remarked on the bracing fragrance. 'I don't particularly like fragranced skin-care products, but this one is nice and I'm here for it,' one said. Another panelist also appreciated the noticeable light scent but did point out that 'it's more like a clinical spa than a relaxation spa.' Flaws but not dealbreakers For some testers with sensitive eyes, Tatcha felt too aggressive and abrasive. If you wear mascara and eyeliner, you'll need a dedicated makeup remover or oil cleanser pre-wash. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter With a mild hydroxy acid and a hit of aloe, this juicy gel leaves skin soft, smooth, and cool. Our testers were fans of the crisp fragrance, preferring it to formulas that cost four times as much. Neutrogena Skin Balancing Gel Cleanser was such a pleasant surprise: Inside the humdrum plastic bottle is an unexpectedly luxurious cleanser with barely there suds that glide over skin. (Granted, it did require more rinsing.) The streamlined 12-ingredient formula includes an exfoliating polyhydroxy acid and aloe, which moisturizes and softens. And it smells really nice. Skin feels great after cleansing. First and foremost, a cleanser should remove grime, makeup, and dirt — and this succulent goo is great at all that. But our panel testers especially appreciated the effects: One said it made her skin feel cool. Another happily reported, 'My face felt nice and clean afterward and — dare I say it? — a little energized and bouncy.' That same tester didn't experience any tightness and temporary dryness, which some panelists associated with cleansers from the drugstore. A pump of Neutrogena Skin Balancing Gel Cleanser. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Several ingredients smooth and soothe. This cleanser has a lean list of just 12 ingredients — and is tied with Vanicream Gentle Facial Cleanser for the fewest among our picks. Here, the standouts are gluconolactone, a gently exfoliating polyhydroxy acid, and aloe, an emollient and humectant. 'I had no oiliness or irritation,' one tester said. It slides across the skin. This tenacious gel won over several testers with its shape-shifting texture: With a little water, the clear, hearty drops turn into delicate suds that feel sheer on the face. 'This one's got slip!' one panelist said. 'It has a slidey — not slimy — texture coming out of the pump, and when it was on my face, I could still feel that nice slipperiness.' In contrast, the Fresh Soy Face Cleanser seemed runny. It's a bargain. This was the only contender we tested for normal to combination skin that cost less than $30—and our panel testers still preferred it. (They weren't privy to prices during the trial period.) Though less than $10, 'This cleanser is more luxurious than the bottle would make you think,' one tester said. Flaws but not dealbreakers For such a thin, gauzy lather, this cleanser called for assiduous rinsing. It contains fragrance. Our testers enjoyed the fresh, clean scent, but it may not be for everyone. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter This gel formula softens and refreshes with active ingredients, and the herbaceous fragrance and stylish bottle give modern vibes. With a gossamer of light bubbles, this rich gel feels like a treat while lathering, then leaves skin feeling smooth and moisturized thanks to exfoliants like polyhydroxy, glycolic, and citric acids. Ouai Detox Face Cleanser's piquant, herbaceous fragrance is so enticing, it permanently lured one of our testers off Team Fragrance-Free. Hydroxy acids help smooth skin. Like our pick from Neutrogena, Ouai's cleanser contains gluconolactone, the mildly buffing PHA. A handful of other actives juice up the clear gel; the formula includes smoothing alpha hydroxys like glycolic and citric acid, as well as vitamins C, E, and niacinamide. Granted, a cleanser interacts with your skin for only so long before you rinse it off, but our panelists appreciated the overall effectiveness. 'My face feels so clean and fresh,' one said. 'No oiliness, no dryness, and no irritation.' How Ouai Detox Face Cleanser looks right out of the pump. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The fragrance is fresh and lovely. Ouai's cleanser has a modern scent that's subtle but delectable, with herbaceous notes. That fresh essence makes the cleansing experience feel truly special, especially when compared with very good — but far less fragrant — options like Phyla pH Balancing Cleanser. Ouai's aroma also beat out the scent of Youth To The People Superfood Cleanser, which has legions of fans. It comes in chic, shatterproof packaging. It has an understatedly stylish, stout bottle with a pump that emits a perfect portion for a single wash. In tiled bathrooms and around sinks — and always with wet hands — our testers preferred handling this plastic container to Youth To The People's glass bottle and even Fresh's shiny (aka slick and droppable) tube. Flaws but not dealbreakers At first use, a few of our testers had to depress the pump repeatedly before any cleanser came out. Subsequent use was fine and efficient, though. This is among our spendier picks and costs just under $4 an ounce. I've been reporting about skin care and beauty for more than 25 years. While working for several lifestyle magazines, I've written many 'best of beauty' roundups that reflected the real-life needs and feedback of readers. I've interviewed dozens of dermatologists and dug into hundreds of academic articles about skin care, ingredients, and efficacy. I consider myself an excellent judge of products and the experiences they offer. Although I wish I had the energy to mimic my teenage kid's hour-long skin-care routine, my own regimen is streamlined and simple. I wear moisturizer both day and night, slather my lips with balm at all hours, and am a rueful and belated adopter of sunscreen (child of the '70s, teen of the '80s here). When I add a step or a product to my minimalist routine, I want it to be easy, enjoyable, and effective. I prefer to wash my face in the shower because the water pressure is much better there than at my sink, making thorough rinsing more efficient. Like all Wirecutter journalists, I review and test products with complete editorial independence. I'm never made aware of any business implications of my editorial recommendations. Read more about our editorial standards. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Entire aisles of big-box stores are dedicated to face washes. Perhaps not coincidentally, that's exactly where the research for this guide began: I browsed the aisles at Target, Sephora, CVS, Walgreens, and several small independent drugstores and clicked obsessively through online retailers. I consulted with dozens of colleagues to find out which cleansers have delivered the best results — often over the course of several years — in their varied skin-care routines. I also interviewed three dermatologists and two cosmetic chemists for their general recommendations and insights on ingredients, formulations, effectiveness, and reasonable expectations. I dove deep into online reviews, looking to find cleansers that maintained high star ratings over hundreds — and often thousands — of reviews. After I spoke with experts and cross-checked ingredient lists, it became clear that many cleansers are formulated in the same basic way. They contain cleansing ingredients like coco betaine, coco glucoside, and/or sodium cocoyl glycinate, all of which are natural and synthetic coconut derivatives that stand in as a surfactant and foaming agent for sodium laurel sulfate, which can be harsh. (The cosmetic concerns around the oil-stripping qualities of sulfates are most applicable when it comes to hair.) Cleansers also often have moisturizing ingredients like glycerin or hyaluronic acid and then extras like antioxidant botanicals, mild exfoliants, or fragrance. While we didn't specifically avoid sulfates, none of our picks contain them (one product we panel-tested, CeraVe Hydrating Cream-to-Foam Cleanser, contained a sulfate). Many cleansers also claim to balance the skin's pH — and although we tested a few such options, like Phyla pH Balancing Gel Cleanser, Tatcha The Rice Wash, and CosRX Low pH Good Morning Gel Cleanser — it didn't become a metric for inclusion or exclusion. Skin is naturally just a touch acidic, with a pH around 5, which studies have shown is an ideal environment for healthy microbiomes and barrier function. For this reason, many facial cleansers are formulated with a similar or neutral pH; bar soap, in contrast, tends to be made with have a higher (or more alkaline) pH due to strong surfactants that efficiently whisk away dirt and oils — but also take a toll on your skin barrier. Of course, other factors can affect a skin's pH, including age, gender, tap water, and other products. For that reason, we did not prioritize or eliminate any contenders based on their pH alone. Because it can be hard for people with sensitive skin to pinpoint what might be causing irritation when a product has a lot of ingredients, we did look at ingredient panels and noted formulas with succinct lists. Three of our eight picks have 18 or fewer ingredients, the longest tops out at 29. (The average among those we panel-tested was 24 ingredients, and 60 was the outlying maximum.) Starting with a list of 76 contenders, I synthesized my findings to establish a group of 35 that I would personally test (including Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser, the go-to product that I've used ever since Jesus was a boy). I washed both in the morning and at night: I had products 'face off' against each other, using one on the right side and another on the left. As such, I tested four cleansers a day, rotating through the contenders and reusing what I deemed to be the best performers. During my testing, I decided to streamline the options to exclude balms and oils that tended to be geared toward makeup removal and double-cleansing, the two-product process so popular in Korean skin care. (See below for more about that.) After about a month of my own testing, I narrowed the list to 17 final contenders and sorted them largely by the various brands' skin-typing suggestions. Generally, foamy formulas were for oily and acne-prone complexions; creamy formulas were for dry skin; mild, fragrance-free options were for sensitive skin; and gels were for normal and combination skin. The final options were tested by eight total panelists, inclusive of ages. Panelists then judged each cleanser on the following criteria: Cleansing power: We sought products that not only removed grime, dirt, and makeup, but also left our skin feeling nourished (and not tight, dry, crackly, or triggered for sensitivity). We sought products that not only removed grime, dirt, and makeup, but also left our skin feeling nourished (and not tight, dry, crackly, or triggered for sensitivity). Texture and rinse: We looked for products that felt pleasant in our hands and on our faces and thoroughly rinsed off without running up the water bill. We looked for products that felt pleasant in our hands and on our faces and thoroughly rinsed off without running up the water bill. Ease of use: We took into account what it was like to handle the bottles, tubes, and pumps with wet hands and without eyeglasses. We also watched out for products that stung our eyes. We took into account what it was like to handle the bottles, tubes, and pumps with wet hands and without eyeglasses. We also watched out for products that stung our eyes. Fragrance and packaging: Just less than half the cleansers our panelists tested had added fragrance, but even fragrance-free formulas can have an aroma. Testers clocked whether the scent interfered with fully enjoying the product. They also noted whether the handling or appearance of the packaging added anything to the experience. The multistep routines that are so popular in Korean skin care often entail double-cleansing: removing makeup, sunscreen, and general grime with a balm or oil, then rinsing away sweat and dirt with a gentle, water-based lather. If these two steps sound a lot like the makeup-remover-plus-soap moment of your youth, it's for good reason: A few dermatologists we spoke with confirmed that it's essentially the same thing, just called something different. In order to refine our points of comparison for this guide — and knowing that many people prefer a simplified, one-product process — we ultimately decided to only include true cleansers. Still, we tested balms and oils and found some truly excellent options, even if they didn't necessarily stand on their own: A balm that remarkably removed heavy eyeliner and mascara still required a frothy rinse follow-up. Or an oil that whisked away layers of a zinc-forward sunscreen stick was able to suds up a bit, but it ultimately left our skin feeling greasy. There is a lot to like about The Ordinary Squalane Cleanser, with its handy flat tube, tidy snap cap, and mild formula that didn't sting our eyes or lips. That said, it was a little too benign, and it didn't have enough oomph to fully remove eyeliner and mascara. We called out Then I Met You Living Cleansing Balm as a fantastic half of a cleansing duo in our guide to the best Korean skin care. And while we genuinely appreciate the zesty fragrance and sleek, sheer texture, this balm works best in tandem with Then I Met You Soothing Tea Cleansing Gel, and that duo costs roughly $70. At about $50, True Botanicals Ginger Turmeric Cleansing Balm costs around $10 more than the Living Cleansing Balm, but it delivers a significantly elevated experience, starting with the glass jar and tiny bamboo (not plastic) spatula used to scrape up a perfect portion. The chic ginger-scented formula immediately transforms into a silky oil that melts away makeup and schmutz, and it leaves skin feeling moist and juicy — though some might perceive that as greasy. We still full-throatedly endorse Heimish All Clean Balm, which was our two-in-one pick in our guide to Korean skin care. With shea butter and coconut extract, the smooth balm glides on in a thin layer and easily removes even long-wear eyeliner. Then, when mixed with water, it transforms into a gentle lather. The pot's clever design lets you fully unscrew the lid or simply pop it open for convenience. Best of all, the balm is a bargain: It costs about $18 — about half as much as Then I Met You balm, and a third of True Botanicals's balm. Several cleansing oils reminded us of straight-up makeup remover. In fact, the runny, drippy DHC Deep Cleansing Oil behaved and smelled a lot like old-school baby oil, which didn't warrant the $30-plus price. Bubble First Class Oil Cleanser offered a more pleasant overall experience; we liked how the soothing formula massaged into dry skin in a delicate layer to remove most makeup then turned a touch milky when mixed with water. We faulted it, though, for how much rinsing it required. Tatcha The Camellia Cleansing Oil, in comparison, was a standout oil cleanser. The dewy formula quickly and thoroughly removed heavy eye makeup and lip liner, and it left our skin feeling plumped up and smooth. It has nice body (more of a drop than a drip) and just enough aroma to register as a luxury — which is a baseline expectation for something that costs $50 for about 5 ounces. Testers with sensitive skin were genuinely impressed with the mildness of Aveeno Calm + Restore Nourishing Oat Cleanser and loved how it plumped up and soothed their skin (as with so many Aveeno products, this liquid formula contains oatmeal flour). It was just edged out by Vanicream and EltaMD because it didn't rinse off as effortlessly (one panelist had to deploy a cleansing cloth to fully remove the slickness). Bubble Skincare is a favorite among the teen and tween set, and we admit to being charmed by the colorway and graphic design of its Soft Launch Hydrating Cream Cleanser, though the little cap and pump were tricky to use with wet hands. The nice pearly liquid is fine but not fantastic, and it required some effort to rinse from the hollows of our eyes. We appreciated how Clinique Take the Day Off Cleansing Mousse transformed from cream into a lusty lather, but all those bubbles did a number on one tester's eyes (which aren't even that sensitive). CeraVe offers a broad choice of excellent cleansers for a range of skin types beyond the Foaming Facial Cleanser, our pick for oily and acne-prone skin. When we tried Hydrating Facial Cleanser or the Hydrating Cream-to-Foam Cleanser, we were invariably impressed with how the formulas always managed to effectively clean away schmutz and schvitz while still leaving skin feeling fresh and smooth, and not at all tight or filmy. In their respective categories, though, we preferred our picks. For decades, dermatologists have recommended Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser, especially for those with sensitive skin or acne. And while this subtle, sudless formula has a legion of long-time and loyal fans (including many Wirecutter staffers), it tended to trigger sensitivity and breakouts for our panel testers with sensitive skin. CosRX Low pH Good Morning Gel Cleanser is a pick in our roundup of Korean skin-care favorites, and testers loved the feel of its gently frothing gel formula. They were split, however, on the tea-tree-forward fragrance: One panelist copped to liking it despite her general aversion to scented skin care; another found it too medicinal. Our panelists were polarized by Fresh Soy Face Cleanser: One tester hated the fragrance, another loved it. One tester thought it left her skin too dry, another loved how moisturized her skin felt. There was consensus, however, about the formulation: It's rather runny and dribbles out of the tube. We appreciated that Kiehl's Ultra Facial Cleanser comes in a carry-on friendly 2.5-ounce tube and loved the way the pearlescent formula created a robust foam. But even after thorough rinsing, our skin felt a little taut. Between the brown tinge and slimy texture, KraveBeauty Matcha Hemp Hydrating Cleanser unfortunately reminded us of pond scum, which overshadowed the gel's ability to cleanse and smooth. Nothing looked nicer on our bathroom vanity than Laneige Water Bank Gentle Gel Cleanser, with its baby blue bottle and modern-looking pump. The gentle formula creates a wisp of foam that has unexpected oomph when removing heavy eye makeup. The performance was on par with Cetaphil Gentle Skin Cleanser, but ounce for ounce, Laneige's cleanser is nearly four times as expensive. Like CeraVe, La Roche-Posay has a solid lineup of impressive cleansers (including its Toleriane Hydrating Gentle Cleanser). Both Effaclar Purifying Foaming Gel Cleanser and Toleriane Purifying Foaming Cleanser were great for oil control, but they left our skin a little dry after several days (so we ended up using them only on extra-oily days). For something with oil-fighting salicylic acid, Murad Acne Control Clarifying strikes the perfect balance between leaving skin smooth and pliant, while also feeling like it's really getting into pores and doing its thing. 'It left my face feeling clean, not tight and stingy,' one panelist said. A fragrance-free update on a classic, Neutrogena Oil-Free Acne Wash with Salicylic Acid goes full-bubble foamy when wet, and it ably attacks oiliness, but — like many other options for the acne-prone — it left skin feeling a bit taut. Whereas so many gentle cleansers tend to be milky cream formulas, Neutrogena Ultra Gentle Daily Cleanser distinguished itself with a clear liquid that becomes an airy lather. For sensitive skin, though, it wasn't quite as mild and soothing as our pick from Vanicream. Olay Smoothing Daily Facial Cleanser is utterly inoffensive — a sudsless basic that was fine at refreshing skin, but only when we weren't wearing a lot of makeup. PanOxyl and pore-cleaning go hand-in-hand (in fact, the brand's Clarifying Exfoliant 2% Salicylic Acid is a top pick in our guide to chemical exfoliants). And testers did indeed like how PanOxyl Acne Foaming Wash frothed up just enough, but they found it generally too harsh and irritating (especially around the eyes). As with lots of acne treatments powered by benzoyl peroxide, it tended to bleach one tester's towels no matter how well she had rinsed. Phyla pH Balancing Gel Cleanser was a strong contender for testers with normal/combination skin, who appreciated how the light gel lathered right up and felt luxurious on the skin. The subtle fragrance earned high marks, too. Overall, though, it was just edged out by the cleansers from Neutrogena and Ouai. For dry skin, we still love Round Lab Birch Juice Moisturizing Cleanser, which was a pick in our roundup of great Korean skin-care products. Enriched with moisturizing ingredients like hyaluronic acid and birch sap, this gel leaves skin fresh and bouncy. The only strike against it is that it's hard to find in stores. Smooth, mellow Thayer's Hydrating Milky Face Cleanser held its own against other mild cream cleansers, but was edged out due to its slightly swampy smell (perhaps due to the mushroom extract). We loved everything about Vintner's Daughter Active Renewal Cleanser — except for the $125-plus price. The mixture inside the minimalist-chic glass bottle contains aloe, apples, and a form of vinegar, and it feels lusciously lively on skin. We'd be tempted to buy it as an occasional splurge, but we prefer to invest this much money in skin-care products that stay on the skin — rather than rinse down the drain. Many Wirecutter staffers are fans of Youth To The People Superfood Cleanser. Our panel testers liked how it sudsed up, removed grime and makeup, and smelled divine (fresh and green). As much as they admire the look of the glass bottle, they were less keen on using it in all-hard-surfaces bathrooms. This article was edited by Hannah Morrill and Jennifer Hunter. David Kim, MD, dermatologist, video interview, May 5, 2025 Omer Ibrahim, MD, dermatologist, email interview, February 25, 2025 Kseniya Kobets, MD, dermatologist, email interview, March 2, 2025 Julian Sass, PhD, cosmetic chemist, video interview, February 25, 2025 Ava Perkins, cosmetic chemist, email interview, March 4, 2025
New York Times
15-04-2025
- General
- New York Times
Hello Puddles! These 9 Kid Boots Are Both Fun and Functional
Laura Motley for NYT Wirecutter My family lives in Maine, where the summers are glorious but brief, and foul weather gear is a must for the rest of the year. I learned the importance of layers, warmth, and proper footwear from my youngest daughter's Waldorf-inspired preschool, where they spent three to four hours outside every day, all year long. As a Wirecutter writer, I love to nerd out on high-quality design, materials, and manufacturing. I wrote guides to the best first pedal bikes, kids helmets, kids lunch boxes, kids pajamas, and pizza ovens, among others. For this guide: I consulted Wirecutter's guides to adult rain and snow boots, polled fellow parents, and sifted through dozens of reviews and articles to find the most beloved pairs of kids boots. I weighed, measured, and inspected each boot, looking for durable seams, slip-resistant soles, and kid-friendly fastening systems. I bribed my 5- and 7-year-old daughters to try all the winter boots in the snow, and with the rain boots, dared them to stomp in the deepest puddles. (That part was easy.) Like all Wirecutter journalists, I review and test products with complete editorial independence. I'm never made aware of any business implications of my editorial recommendations. Read more about our editorial standards. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter With its lightweight seamless construction, the Bogs Essential is virtually indestructible. A choice of six bright solid colors will appeal to most kids, but if a unicorn design is non-negotiable, you'll have to look elsewhere. The seamless construction provides top-notch leak-prevention and durability. The Bogs Essential Rain Boot is made of extra sturdy seamless injected rubber, which means there's no way for water to seep in. While none of the boots we tried leaked during testing, the Bogs Essential's seamlessness makes future leaks extremely unlikely. They're roomy and comfortable. The Bogs Essential's footbeds are made of squishy polyurethane, which our testers found springy and comfy. The roomy shafts offer plenty of space to tuck pants into, as well as breathing room for bigger calves. My younger daughter's slender legs swim in them a little, but she says they're comfortable, and they stay on. The Essential Rain Tall (left) and the Essential Rain Mid (right) are the same grippy rubber boot. Other than being shorter, the only difference is that the Mid lacks handles. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter These boots use seamless construction to prevent leaks and have a chunky lug outsole that provides solid traction. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The Essential Rain Tall (left) and the Essential Rain Mid (right) are the same grippy rubber boot. Other than being shorter, the only difference is that the Mid lacks handles. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter There are two height options. While the Essential Rain Tall comes with built-in handles (which are helpful for pulling the boots on) and is 10.5 inches tall, the Essential Rain Mid has no handles, is 8 inches tall, and usually costs $5 less than the Tall. (Little kids who typically sit on the floor when they put their shoes on might miss the handles, but the Mid boot is easy to slip on from a standing position.) We found that both provided adequate protection from deep puddles. They have chunky, grippy outsoles. The nubbly tread pattern in the Essential's robust lug sole offers lots of traction. Small stones and gravel occasionally got caught in the grooves, but they were easily pried out. Flaws but not dealbreakers They only come in six solid colors. My 7-year-old is perfectly happy with the colors on offer, but my 5-year-old daughter is much more drawn to sparkly, exciting patterns. If you think a splashy design would help keep your kid properly shod, you could try the Bogs Rain Boot. This boot has slightly limited sizing. It starts at size 'little kid 10,' which typically fits 3- and 4-year-olds, so this boot won't work for most toddlers. Details Sizes: little kid 10–13, big kid 1–6 little kid 10–13, big kid 1–6 Colors/patterns: six solid colors six solid colors Material: rubber, polyurethane footbed Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Of all the high-quality kids rain boots we tested, this boot has the flashiest patterns. Who says foul weather gear can't be stylish? This classic rain boot is durable, comfortable, and comes in exceptionally kid-friendly patterns like rodeo horses, tractors, and strawberries. The designs are beguiling and unique. Lots of rain boots come in a wide variety of classic kid motifs, but the Bogs Rain Boot really turns up the charm. If you're going to spend around $50 on a pair of high-quality kids rain boots, it's nice if they're also easy on the eyes. They're durable and well-built. The Bogs Kids Rain Boot is not seamless, like the Essential, but the seam seal is especially hearty: The two pieces are unlikely to slowly peel apart, unlike with cheaper rain boots. The rubber feels thinner than the Essential's super-solid injected rubber, but reviews online speak to its durability. And this boot's cut-out handles are sturdier than thinner, loop-style handles. Our top-pick Bogs Essential Rain Tall (left) has a wider shaft than the Bogs Rain Boot (right). Kids with wider calves will likely find the roomy Essential more comfortable. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The Bogs Rain Boot uses seam seals. Though the seams are hearty and we didn't experience any leaking with this boot, the seamless construction of the company's Essential design is arguably superior. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Like other Bogs boots, the Rain Boot has a built-in spot to stick a label or write a kid's name with Sharpie. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Our top-pick Bogs Essential Rain Tall (left) has a wider shaft than the Bogs Rain Boot (right). Kids with wider calves will likely find the roomy Essential more comfortable. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter They can handle the deepest puddles. At 10.5 inches, the Bogs Kids Rain Boot and the Bogs Essential Rain Tall offer the most height of any rain boots we tested. If your kid loves to splash in deep puddles, you're going to want the extra height. The simple tread pattern offers solid traction, and the footbeds are comfy. While not as robust as the Bogs Essential Rain Boot, the Kids Rain Boot's outsole was satisfactorily grippy on wet sidewalks during our testing. And the shallower grooves trapped fewer stones. This boot has the same squishy footbed as the Essential. Flaws but not dealbreakers The shaft is on the narrow side. The Bogs Rain Boots have an exterior calf circumference of 11.5 inches, compared with the Essential Tall's 14 inches. The snug fit does a slightly better job keeping errant splashes out of the boot, but they may be too tight for kids with sturdier legs. Details Sizes: little kid 7–13, big kid 1–6 little kid 7–13, big kid 1–6 Colors/patterns: over a dozen bright and attractive patterns over a dozen bright and attractive patterns Material: rubber, polyurethane footbed Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The adult version of the Xtratuf Ankle Deck Boot is Wirecutter's favorite overall rain boot, and the kid version is equally great. Handy pull tabs, a cool look, ultra-grippy soles, and versatility make these boots stand out from the rest. They have superior slip-resistance. Xtratuf deck boots were originally designed to provide maximum traction on waterlogged boat decks, and their flat rubber soles have an intricate tread pattern that creates an impressive level of slip resistance. They performed the best in our traction tests, and Xtratuf ensures the boots meet European SRA slip-resistance standards. It's easy to take them on and off. Little kids reach for the durable cloth pull tabs on the front and rear of these boots instinctively, and in our testing they never asked for help getting these boots on or off. Xtratuf also added a thoughtful 'kick tab' to each boot, which is a little nub of rubber on the heel that helps jump-start that intuitive 'kick off your shoes' motion. They're super comfortable. A cushiony foam footbed, round toe box that can accommodate lots of foot shapes, and appealing ankle height make these boots extra comfy for most kids. Originally designed for wet boat decks, the Xtratuf Ankle Deck Boots excelled in our traction tests. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The boots have a convenient 'kick tab' at the heel that helps kids push them off with the other foot. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Cloth pull tabs at both the front and back of the shaft are another small detail that makes a big difference in a kid's ability to get a boot on independently. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Originally designed for wet boat decks, the Xtratuf Ankle Deck Boots excelled in our traction tests. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter They are versatile and have a cool look. Most rain boots feel bulky or look odd if worn on a sunny day. The Xtratuf Ankle Deck Boots make just as much sense walking to school on a clear fall day as they do waiting for the bus in the rain. Kids can choose from several solid colors and one camo-inspired pattern, and the boots look cute with a wide variety of outfits. My daughters love wide-legged pants, which get caught on taller boots but look great with Xtratufs. Flaws but not dealbreakers They may not be as durable as the adult version. Some reviews on the Xtratuf site and on Amazon complain that the kids version of the beloved adult Xtratuf ankle deck boot is less durable. There are a few reports of the seam seal coming apart and the rubber cracking. They aren't splash-proof. If your kid finds deep puddles irresistible, or likes to wade in creeks, these boots aren't the best choice for them. With that said, they aced our leak tests (in shallow water). Details Sizes: little kid 7–13, big kid 1–7 little kid 7–13, big kid 1–7 Colors/patterns: several solid colors and one camo-inspired pattern several solid colors and one camo-inspired pattern Material: rubber, foam insoles Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter These boots are the best of the under-$30 pairs we tested. They're not as durable as higher-end pairs, but they get the job done—and they're available in a dizzying array of classic kid patterns. If you're looking for a classic, affordable pair of puddle-proof rain boots, the Lone Cone Rain Boots are a great option. They may not last as long as pricier rain boots, though. They come in a few solid colors and dozens of playful patterns that hit all the notes. With a wide variety of bright, lively looks, these boots offer effortless kid appeal. This may be especially helpful with younger kids who need that extra incentive to dress properly. They're the highest quality of the inexpensive boots we tested. While these are unlikely to survive the multi-sibling life cycle, the seam seal appears heartier than seams on other inexpensive rain boots we tested, like Western Chief rain boots. The rubber loop-style handles are solidly attached, and remained strongly affixed despite aggressive tugging during testing. Of the less-expensive boots we tested, the Lone Cone Rain Boots have the sturdiest seam seal. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The loop-style handles are not as sturdy as the cut-out handles on the Bog boots we recommend, but they still do the job of helping a child pull on their boots without a parent's help. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Of the less-expensive boots we tested, the Lone Cone Rain Boots have the sturdiest seam seal. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Their outsoles offer pretty good traction. Though the chunky tread pattern on the Lone Cone outsoles didn't provide as much slip resistance as our other rain boot picks, it performed better in my traction tests than the Western Chief boots did. They have a roomy, comfortable shape. These boots are 8 inches high and have a calf circumference of 12.5 inches. These dimensions result in a classic-looking rain boot shape and feel. And while they don't come up as high as our top-pick Bogs Essential Rain Tall or runner-up Bogs Rain Boot, they offer plenty of coverage for puddle stomping and creek wading. Flaws but not dealbreakers They're less likely than our other picks to become hand-me-downs. These boots feel slightly flimsy when examined side-by-side with our other rain boot picks. And the thin rubber loop-style handles, while sturdy enough, are more likely to fail than the cutout-style handles on Bogs boots. Some reviews online refer to their lack of durability. They're geared toward younger kids. Since this boot's sizing stops at big kid 4, it's unlikely to work for most kids over age 10. But the designs are better suited for little kids, anyway, and the sizing starts at little kid 4, which many kids begin wearing around 18 months. Details Sizes: little kid 4–13, big kid 1–4 little kid 4–13, big kid 1–4 Colors/patterns: two dozen colorful patterns and a few solid colors two dozen colorful patterns and a few solid colors Material: rubber, foam insoles Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter For a reliable, streamlined workhorse of a winter boot, look no further than the warm and waterproof Bogs Neo-Classic. Its lack of bells and whistles makes it ultra-durable and likely to last through several kids and several winters. These boots are seriously warm and waterproof. A full 5 mm of neoprene insulation and seamless molded rubber construction keep little feet extra warm and dry. My 5-year-old, who is usually the first to ask to go inside, has never complained of cold feet while wearing these boots. (Bogs says they're rated to minus 35 °F, but proprietary rating systems aren't monitored by an objective regulating entity.) They're incredibly durable. Bogs uses seamless construction for these boots, which greatly minimizes the risk of cracking rubber or splitting seams. The upper and outsole are made of a continuous piece of molded rubber, unlike some other boots, where the outsoles are glued on to the uppers and can come apart with time. They're convenient and comfortable. Extra-cushiony insoles make these boots super comfy, and the slip-on design makes them notably easy to put on. It's simple to fit snow pants over them because of their sleek streamlined design, and the ridge along the heel helps kids kick them off by themselves. The Neo-Classic boots aren't as wide as our runner-up snow boot pick, the Sorel Flurry, but they're wider than our budget pick and should work for most feet. Seamless construction means the Bogs Neo-Classic offers superior durability and waterproofing. The chunky treads provide good traction for climbing up sledding hills and snowbanks. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Lined with 5 mm of neoprene, these winter boots are ready for frigid, snowy days. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Seamless construction means the Bogs Neo-Classic offers superior durability and waterproofing. The chunky treads provide good traction for climbing up sledding hills and snowbanks. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter They offer good traction. While not quite as grippy as our runner-up snow boot pick, the Bogs Neo-Classic feature shallow treads did well during our traction tests. My 5-year-old slipped on an icy sidewalk while wearing them, but she is endearingly uncoordinated, so I can't fully blame the boots. Cute patterns offer lots of kid appeal. The Neo-Classic boots are available in solid colors as well as a number of playful designs, unlike most of the other winter boots we tested, which come in only a few solid colors. While splashy styles like Topo Camo and Firework Floral aren't a must, they're a nice bonus. Flaws but not dealbreakers Snow can sneak in the top and through the handles. Unlike the snow boots we tested with bungee-cinched snow collars, including our runner-up and budget picks, snow can slip into the top of these boots. But at 10 inches high, this is the tallest of all the winter boots we tested, which helps keep snow out. (My measurements are based on size 13 boots.) And since most kids are wearing snow pants for the deepest snow play, this was rarely an issue during our testing. They're pricey. At around $90, the Bogs Neo-Classics are definitely an investment. But they're likely to last through multiple siblings or command a decent price on a secondhand market like eBay. And Bogs will provide a free shipping label so you can send gently used boots back, where they'll either be donated to an outdoor education nonprofit or recycled. Details Sizes: little kid 7–13, big kid 1–6 little kid 7–13, big kid 1–6 Colors/patterns: over a dozen patterns and solid colors over a dozen patterns and solid colors Material: rubber, neoprene, foam insoles Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The lightweight and comfortable Sorel Flurry Children's Boot is very warm and waterproof, and expertly keeps snow out with a bungee-cinched snow collar. This fastening system adds a few extra steps, but it's easy for young kids to maneuver independently. Even the fluffiest, deepest snow is no match for this boot. In my testing, the bungee-tightened snow collar did a great job keeping snow out. This feature was great on days when my 5-year-old daughter refused to wear snow pants to the bus stop but couldn't resist tromping through deep drifts. The bungee fastening system was easy for her to operate by herself, and when she did succumb to snow pants, the flexible upper easily fit under them. Seamless construction offers dependable waterproofing. Just like our top pick, the Bogs Neo-Classic, the Sorel Flurry Children's Boot is constructed seamlessly, with an injection-molded rubber shell. This makes it waterproof and extra durable. A removable 6 mm recycled felt liner keeps little feet toasty. The liner typically stays fixed in place, but when my daughter yanked it out, it was easy to fit back into the boot. If they do get wet, it's nice to be able to pull the liners out to dry quickly. And the stiff felt offers more structure than our budget snow boot pick, the Kamik North Pole, which also has a nylon upper, but a softer sewn-in faux-fur lining. Unlike our top-pick winter boot from Bogs, the Sorel Flurry Children's Boot has a bungee-cinched snow collar at the top, which is helpful for keeping snow out—and feet dry. Our school-age testers found it easy to operate independently. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Like our top-pick winter boot from Bogs, these Sorels use seamless construction at the soles. They have extra-chunky lug outsoles that aced our traction tests. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The removable liner is 6 mm thick and made of recycled felt. It makes the boot feet extra cozy on cold days. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Unlike our top-pick winter boot from Bogs, the Sorel Flurry Children's Boot has a bungee-cinched snow collar at the top, which is helpful for keeping snow out—and feet dry. Our school-age testers found it easy to operate independently. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter They're wide and comfortable. Unlike our budget pick, which runs narrow, this boot has a wide shape that makes it accommodating to many feet, and sock thicknesses. The outsole is grippy and sturdy. A thick layer of ice coated my driveway for several weeks during our testing, and while the Sorels weren't fully wipeout-proof, their chunky, multidirectional lug outsoles offered plenty of slip resistance on sketchy frozen surfaces. Flaws but not dealbreakers They're available in limited colors. By April of 2025, there was a limited selection of solid colors and two-tone styles. The palettes and patterns are subdued and might not satisfy flashy dressers. The fastening/tightening system adds extra steps. A bungee to cinch at the top and a Velcro strap to tighten around the ankle can slow kids down. My daughter typically ignored the ankle strap, but the process still took more effort than slipping on the Bogs Neo-Classic, our top pick. Details Sizes: little kid 8–13, big kid 1–7 little kid 8–13, big kid 1–7 Colors/patterns: six solid colors and two-tone styles six solid colors and two-tone styles Material: rubber, synthetic fabric, felt liner Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The Kamik North Pole is similar in style to our runner-up pick, the Sorel Flurry, with a helpful snow collar and chunky treads. The bungee fastening system is more difficult for kids to cinch independently, though, and the solid colors on offer are a little bland. They're great quality for the price. The other $50-and-under snow boots we tested were much lower quality than the Kamik North Pole boots. In many ways, these boots are comparable to our top and runner-up picks. Just like those boots, the Kamik North Pole features seamless construction, with a continuous piece of molded rubber for the outsole and upper. Kamik boots are made with synthetic rubber, which feels more pliable and less sturdy than natural rubber, but this doesn't necessarily mean that they're less durable. They have a cozy faux-fur lining. My daughter's favorite feature about this boot was its fuzzy interior. In addition to increasing coziness, it can also help achieve a snugger fit. Boots with nylon uppers, compared with the neoprene upper of our top pick, are more flexible; a furry lining adds some stability, but not as much as the Sorel Flurry's stiff felt liner. Like the more-expensive Sorel Flurry, the Kamik North Pole has a bungee-cinched collar to keep snow out. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Faux-fur lining on the inside of the boot is cozy and warm. Unlike the lining on the Sorel Flurry, it's not removable. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The Kamik boot is similar in design to our runner-up winter snow boot pick, the Sorel Flurry (left). Our kids testers found the Kamik boot harder to get on and off on their own, though, and it comes in fewer colors. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Like the more-expensive Sorel Flurry, the Kamik North Pole has a bungee-cinched collar to keep snow out. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Their rugged outsoles offer good traction. While not quite as grippy as the Sorel Flurry's multidirectional lug outsoles, the Kamik North Pole is respectably slip-resistant. They're plenty warm, and the collar keeps snow out. My daughter was wearing these on a particularly frigid day and didn't complain of frozen toes. The synthetic fleece insulation and faux fur lining did a great job keeping warmth in. And the snow collar is just as effective as the Sorel Flurry's collar at keeping unwanted snow out. Flaws but not dealbreakers They run narrow. The Kamik North Pole is significantly narrower than our top pick and runner-up recommendations. If your kid has wider feet, these may not be the best choice for them. The bungee fastening system is tricky for little hands. Unlike the Sorel Flurry's fastening system, which my 5-year-old can operate by herself, the Kamik North Pole's double bungee system (one at the snow collar, and one at the ankle) requires a surprising amount of strength to operate. My daughter could slip these boots off without adjusting the bungees, but I had to help her tighten them each time she put them on. It only comes in four solid colors. Yes, there are accented laces, but the colors are not very exciting or appealing. Details Sizes: little kid 8–13, big kid 1–6 little kid 8–13, big kid 1–6 Colors/patterns: four solid colors four solid colors Material: synthetic rubber, nylon, faux-fur liner Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter This waterproof, lightly insulated boot is a great option for those who live in milder climates and are looking for a single boot that can do it all. We don't think it's quite as warm as Bogs says it is, but it's still a solid, versatile choice for rain, mud, and light snow. The Bogs York offers the best of both worlds: It's just as waterproof as the Bogs Essential Rain Boot and, if paired with cozy socks, warm enough for some mild snow action, too. The convenient slip-on design is hard to beat. Just like both pairs of Bogs rain boots we recommend and the Bogs Neo-Classic snow boots, the Bogs York boot has cut-out handles on the sides: no laces, bungees, or Velcro. Getting young kids out the door can be a Herculean task, and a fuss-free boot can streamline the process. They're durable and well-made. These boots aren't constructed seamlessly, but like the Bogs Rain Boot, the seam between the outsole and the upper is especially tough. A respectable number of positive reviews on Amazon speak to their durability and the stitching on the neoprene upper is top notch. It's a hybrid model that works through the seasons. In Maine, it's not uncommon to see a kid wearing a pair of Bogs York boots in June, tromping through a creek looking for frogs or splashing in late spring puddles. That kid might wear the same pair of boots in January, tucked under snow pants during a snowball fight. But my own daughters did prefer the extra warmth of the Bogs Neo-Classic boots for extra cold and snowy days. In our testing, kids complained of cold feet after about 30 minutes in the York boots on below-freezing days. Temperate climates with mild winters like the mid-Atlantic or the Pacific Northwest seem especially well-suited for the York boot. We haven't tested them on sweltering summer days, but the neoprene insulation would likely feel very hot. This hybrid boot has a sole that is more similar to the Bogs Rain Boot than to the company's snow boots. Unlike our top-pick rain boot from Bogs, it doesn't offer seamless construction, though we experienced no leaking and the seam seems solid and strong. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The neoprene shaft is warm enough for many climates, as well as reliably waterproof. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The York (left) is similar to our top-pick winter boot, the Bogs Neo-Classic (right). But it's not as warm, which could definitely cut snow-play short. If you live in a cold climate you likely want a dedicated winter boot. If you're just spending a few days a year in the snow, the York is a versatile compromise. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter This hybrid boot has a sole that is more similar to the Bogs Rain Boot than to the company's snow boots. Unlike our top-pick rain boot from Bogs, it doesn't offer seamless construction, though we experienced no leaking and the seam seems solid and strong. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter They come in cool patterns. Just like the Bogs Rain Boots and the Bogs Neo-Classic Boots, the York boots are available in many kid-approved motifs. They're mid-priced. The York boots cost around $65, which makes sense, because they're basically the lovechild of the Bogs Rain Boots (around $50) and the Bogs Neo-Classic boots (around $90), which are made for winter weather. If you think these boots would work for your kid from, say, September to May, we think they're a good deal. Flaws but not dealbreakers They're not as warm as advertised. The Bogs comfort rating of -4°F seems overstated: my kids complained of cold feet after being outside for 30 minutes on a 20 degree day. Super active kids, aided by cozy socks, might find them perfectly acceptable on frigid days. But if you have ice-cold winters, these aren't the best choice for a snow boot. The outsoles offer less traction. The Bogs York's tread pattern isn't as grippy as any of our snow boot picks. It closely resembles the Bogs Rain Boots' outsole, which is fine for rainy days but less sturdy on slick ice. Details Sizes: little kid 7–13, big kid 1–6 little kid 7–13, big kid 1–6 Colors/patterns: three solid colors, eight patterns three solid colors, eight patterns Material: rubber, neoprene Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter This no-frills toddler boot is warm, waterproof, and easy to put on. Extra grippy and flexible outsoles offer stability for the littlest walkers. Stonz West Waterproof Boots are uncomplicated neoprene and rubber boots we recommend for the littlest adventurers. (After age four or five, you're better off with our other snow boot picks, which are more rugged.) Their hassle-free, slip-on design made them a parent favorite during our testing, and their uniquely flexible rubber outsole helped our toddler tester navigate icy sidewalks safely. They're easy to put on and take off. Even without handles or tabs, the Stonz West Waterproof Boots are easy to slide onto chubby toddler feet. The extra-wide opening helped our three year old tester put them on and take them off independently. They're extra warm. 6mm of neoprene insulation helps keep little feet cozy even on the chilliest days. By comparison, the Bogs Neo-Classic Kids Boot, which we found to be extremely warm during our testing, is made with 5 mm of neoprene insulation. Flexible and grippy outsoles offer lots of stability. The Stonz West boots' sturdy outsoles cover a large portion of the bottom of the boot, creeping up the sides and toe box. This boosts stability, especially for unpredictable walkers. The Stonz West Waterproof Boots have a super-grippy yet flexible outsole, which is an ideal combination for early walkers. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The neoprene insulation on the upper is 6 mm thick, making this boot extra warm and cozy. Despite the lack of tabs or handles, the roomy opening makes it easy to slip this boot on even the wiggliest, chubbiest feet. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter The Stonz West Waterproof Boots have a super-grippy yet flexible outsole, which is an ideal combination for early walkers. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter They'll work through the seasons. Warm enough for below-freezing days, and lightweight enough for spring and fall, these boots should get you from early fall to late spring. Waterproof neoprene and rubber make them rainproof, snow-proof, and muddy puddle proof. They're extra durable. While not constructed seamlessly, the Stonz West Boot feels exceptionally well made, with sturdy seams between the outsole, rubber upper, and neoprene top. The heel and toe are reinforced with textured rubber, and the neoprene stitching is high quality. Flaws but not dealbreakers They only come in two colors. If your child is pink-or-bust, they may be uninspired by the two colors Stonz offers: black and army green. Baby Bogs II boots come in several fun designs, but they're not quite as grippy, and their Velcro fastening system requires some adult help. They're pricey for a toddler boot. At around $70, these cost about $15 more than most of Sorel's and Bogs' toddler pairs. But they're more seasonally versatile, so the investment may be worth it. Details Sizes: little kid 4–13, big kid 1–2 little kid 4–13, big kid 1–2 Colors/patterns: two solid colors two solid colors Material: rubber, neoprene Laura Motley for NYT Wirecutter Above all else, kids boots must be waterproof. Even the sparkliest, comfiest, most dinosaur-y boot is rendered useless if it doesn't keep moisture out. And snow boots should be cozy and warm, as well as waterproof. I looked for: Strong, waterproof seams: Many leaks are caused by a weak seam seal, which lets water seep in between the sole and the upper. I looked for boots with strong seals, or seamless construction. Many leaks are caused by a weak seam seal, which lets water seep in between the sole and the upper. I looked for boots with strong seals, or seamless construction. Durability: Precise stitching, a sturdy outsole, and quality materials like rubber and neoprene will extend the life of a pair of boots. I avoided boots made of PVC (polyvinyl chloride), which are typically less durable. Precise stitching, a sturdy outsole, and quality materials like rubber and neoprene will extend the life of a pair of boots. I avoided boots made of PVC (polyvinyl chloride), which are typically less durable. Easy on/off systems: Handles are helpful, and kid-friendly fastening systems like bungee cords (or slip-on design) on winter boots allow for easy autonomy. Handles are helpful, and kid-friendly fastening systems like bungee cords (or slip-on design) on winter boots allow for easy autonomy. Grippy outsoles: The spacing, depth, material, and shape of treads can affect a boot's traction and stability. The spacing, depth, material, and shape of treads can affect a boot's traction and stability. Appealing and eye-catching designs: Most kids don't want boots that look like mom and dad's. Fun patterns and bright colors can help convince kids to dress properly for foul weather—and make it easier to find their pair in the pile at school. Most kids don't want boots that look like mom and dad's. Fun patterns and bright colors can help convince kids to dress properly for foul weather—and make it easier to find their pair in the pile at school. Warmth: Some companies make up their own temperature rating systems for winter boots. I simply made sure my kids could play in the snow for extended periods of time without complaining of frozen toes. Before my kids put each pair of boots to the test, I weighed and measured them. (My measurements are based on sizes little kid 13 and big kid 1.) I also inspected them for quality construction and solid seam seals, and fiddled with the fastening systems to check for ease and effectiveness. To gauge grippiness, I put the boots on my hands like gloves (to my daughters' delight), pressed firmly against a wood floor, and assessed the level of resistance. I also watched for wipeouts on wet or icy surfaces when the boots were in action. We tested rain boots first, in late 2024, and looked for pairs that were leak-proof, slip-resistant, and solidly made. I checked my kids' feet for warmth and dryness, and assessed how easy (or hard) it was for them to put them on and take them off independently. February 2025 was exceptionally snowy in Maine, so my daughters were able to test the limits of snow boot contenders. They experimented with the fastening systems, yanked snow pants over them, trudged through snow, slush, and puddles, and more often than not, wore them all day at school. Warm and colorful is a winning formula. Laura Motley for NYT Wirecutter I also recruited an older, 10-year-old tester and a younger, 3-year-old tester, both boys, to test boots in both rainy and snowy conditions. With both kinds of boots, my kids let me know which pairs were comfortable, which were the most stylish, and which kept their feet warmest and driest. The Crocs Rain Boot is streamlined, easy to clean, and lightweight. It's mostly positively reviewed on Amazon, but scattered throughout are complaints that the boots are constricting and difficult to put on and take off. My own kids said they rubbed uncomfortably against their ankles, but another one of our testers really liked them. We liked the look of the Hunter Kids First Classic Rain Boot, but we wish it had better traction and handles for easier on/off. The Hunter Big Kids Grace Waterproof Rain Boot is stylish and sturdy, but the outsole didn't offer much traction, despite its chunky appearance. My seven year old daughter loves its cute look, but at around $60 plus shipping, we don't think it's a good deal for most kids. Reima Ankle Rain Boots are a simple, stylish Chelsea-style rain boot, but their thin outsole feels flimsy, almost like a rubber sock. We preferred rain boots with chunkier soles. Western Chief Kids Rain Boot is comparable to our budget pick, the Lone Cone Rain Boot, but it feels less durable and is slightly less favorably reviewed online. The Xtratuf Tufs Ankle Deck Boot is a simple injected boot (read: one single piece) made from EVA foam, but it's not as comfortable or slip-resistant as our top-pick Xtratuf Ankle Deck Boot. Snow boots The Baffin Young Snogoose Kid's Youth Boot is an extremely rugged option, but the liner is so stiff my daughter could barely shove her foot into it. Baffin warns that they feel tight when first worn, but we couldn't break through the initial discomfort. The Baffin Ice Castle Kids Boot is a decent rain-to-snow option, but the sole isn't that grippy and many kids may not be drawn to its grown up look. The warm and waterproof Baby Bogs II boot represents a classic toddler style. We love that it's machine washable, but its sole doesn't offer as much critical traction as our pick, the Stonz West Waterproof Boot. My older daughter loves the Bogs Arcata II Dash, but it comes in just one color (black), and around $110 is a lot to pay for a kids boot. Plus, within a month of use, its bungee fastening system was stretched out and missing hardware. We preferred the simplicity, and durability, of the Bogs Neo-Classic. Amazon's popular and inexpensive Gubarun Snow Boot feels poorly made and is difficult to tighten. Its decorative bungee laces are puzzling, and some reviews online say it's not very waterproof. The Kamik Snobuster 1 is good-quality, at a pretty low price. It was surprisingly warm during our testing, but because it looks more like a rain boot (and the colors are fairly austere), it didn't rank high on our testers' lists. The Muck Big Kids' Apex Tall Winter Boot is comfortable and superwarm. Some of our testers really liked it, but the way the shaft narrows at the ankle made it nearly impossible for other testers to get on and off. It's also one of the heaviest boots we tested, and the drawstring closure is only helpful if your kid knows how to tie a shoelace. The durable Muck Kids' Rugged II Boot is well-made but only comes in a few mature colors and patterns. For $90, you're better off with the kid-friendly aesthetics of Bogs. The Sorel Snow Commander Boot is a cozy and sturdy option for toddlers and little kids, but our toddler tester did better in the streamlined slip-on style of our pick, the Stonz West Waterproof Boot. Like the grown-up version, the Sorel Yoot Pac Nylon Children's Waterproof Boot is warm, waterproof, and stylish. But we preferred the snow collar feature (and price point) of the Sorel Flurry. The Stonz Trek Snow Boot is ultra-warm and well-made, but we prefer the simplicity and versatility of the Stonz West boot. This guide was edited by Kalee Thompson and Amy Miller Kravetz.
New York Times
11-04-2025
- New York Times
This $2,000 Mirrorless Camera Is Beautiful, Simple, and Exasperating
The Sigma BF is all hard edges and offers minimal grip. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter It's a pain to hold. The BF's control scheme may be refreshingly straightforward, but it's accompanied by some baffling ergonomic decisions that suggest Sigma's engineers were a little too focused on form over function. For one thing, the BF's precisely machined aluminum edges are surprisingly sharp. They won't cut you, but they aren't comfortable over a long day of shooting. On top of that, the front side of the camera offers no grip, aside from a diamond pattern etched into the metal, and it has just a small lip for your thumb on the rear. I found that lip unexpectedly useful, but nevertheless I almost always found myself carrying the BF by the lens barrel when I wasn't actively shooting. Doing so simply felt more natural and comfortable. Even more frustrating is the fact that the screen doesn't tilt or articulate in any way. It's fixed, like that of an early digital point-and-shoot. And it doesn't get especially bright: On a cloudless New Mexico winter day, I bumped it up to the maximum brightness setting, and the battery promptly drained before my very eyes, which were still fighting horrendous glare just to make out the image on the screen. This camera calls for a pancake lens or two. Unfortunately, there is just one tiny lens available for L-mount, and it has a rather restrictive f/8 fixed aperture. Most L-mount lenses are chunky and heavy, which leads to a front-heavy feeling on a small body like the BF. Even the smallest i-series Sigma lenses, such as the 17mm f/4 and 45mm f/2.8, are all metal and thus fairly heavy for their size. That gives confidence in their build quality but doesn't lead to the best shooting experience with this camera. I encountered a few image-quality issues. Although I loved the BF's output in general, I did notice a few problems that Sigma may or may not be able to address with firmware updates. To start with, the automatic white balance and exposure both got fooled on several occasions, delivering overly warm color rendering under mixed incandescent and LED light, blowing out bright areas in some shots taken under noonday sun, or delivering unusually dim results in others. In this scene, the BF's automatic white balance skewed heavily toward warmer colors under indoor lighting. Ben Keough/NYT Wirecutter And here, it blew out my dog's face, destroying detail in her white fur. Ben Keough/NYT Wirecutter In this scene, the BF's automatic white balance skewed heavily toward warmer colors under indoor lighting. Ben Keough/NYT Wirecutter I also noticed some moiré patterns with certain i-series lenses. That result speaks to their sharpness, and it isn't particularly surprising considering Sigma's choice of a sensor lacking a low-pass antialiasing filter, but it also leads to less than desirable JPEGs in certain scenarios. Other cameras without antialiasing filters manage to avoid this issue, so hopefully Sigma can correct it. Finally, I experienced some issues with the rendering of JPEG files on macOS. Specifically, when using the Preview app to examine JPEG files, I found that highlights sometimes appeared extremely blown out, almost posterized. I didn't see this problem in DNG files or in the same JPEGs when I opened them in a third-party app like Photoshop, so this seems to be a problem related specifically to macOS system-level rendering, perhaps due to the fact that the BF outputs 10-bit JPEG files, as opposed to the more standard 8-bit variety. JPEGs from the BF rendered oddly on macOS in the Preview app. Note the posterization around my dog's eyes and feet. Ben Keough/NYT Wirecutter The camera has no viewfinder and gives you no way to add one. The screen issue wouldn't be a serious problem if the BF had a viewfinder, but it doesn't. It also lacks a hot shoe (or even a cold shoe), so you can't add an electronic or optical viewfinder accessory. And since it has no wireless connectivity, you can't use your phone as a viewfinder, either. This is a huge miss. You can forget about image stabilization. The Sigma BF doesn't include in-body image stabilization, as many other mirrorless cameras do. That wouldn't be problematic if Sigma's L-mount lenses were optically stabilized, but only its extreme telephoto zooms have that feature. As a result, this camera is harder to use in low-light situations than many of its rivals, and it has to rely on higher ISO sensitivity settings to compensate for its inability to shoot at slower shutter speeds. Panasonic and Leica (the two other major lens makers in the L-mount alliance) do offer stabilized glass, but Leica lenses are prohibitively expensive for most people, and the only stabilized, non-telephoto lenses that Panasonic produces are the Lumix S 28–200mm f/4–7.1 Macro OIS (3.7 inches and 0.9 pounds) and Lumix S 24–105mm f/4 Macro OIS (5 inches long and 1.5 pounds). Neither lens is a particularly good match for the tiny BF. The battery life is atrocious. Sigma suggests that you can expect to get about 280 shots out of the BF on a full charge. Judging from my experience, that claim seems optimistic—especially if you have to boost the screen brightness. Shortly after receiving the camera, I took it for a 20-minute walk around my neighborhood and watched with growing anxiety as the battery level dropped by 20%. You have a few ways to mitigate the battery drain: You can tap the power button to put the camera into sleep mode or long-press it to turn the camera off completely. I found that the battery still drained, slowly, in sleep mode, but turning it off between shots was a great way to eke out more life. As usual, we recommend picking up another battery or two if battery life is a concern for you. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Seriously … why is there only one strap lug? This one we don't understand at all. Dual strap lugs are a standard feature on serious cameras. Only the cheapest disposables tend to come with a single point to attach a strap, and that makes sense there since those cameras are so lightweight and, well, disposable. For a solid-aluminum camera that costs $2,000 and weighs a full pound without a lens? Yeah, nah. Having just one strap lug basically forces you to use a wrist or hand strap rather than a neck strap, which means one of your hands is always occupied while you're walking around with this camera. I happen to be a fan of wrist straps, even with a heavier camera like this, but why remove the choice?
New York Times
31-03-2025
- General
- New York Times
Our Favorite Plastic-Free Tableware for Kids
Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter This stainless steel bowl has a removable suction-cup base and a lid for saving leftovers. $25 from Avanchy May be out of stock When it comes to feeding kids, durable and easy-to-clean stainless steel accessories are hard to beat. My kids have been using the 10-ounce Avanchy Stainless Steel Suction Baby Bowl for more than six months (I bought a used version at a secondhand shop prior to starting work on this guide), and it barely has a scratch. It fits plenty of food and has both a lid and a suction base, which are handy during the toddler stage. As of press time, the bowl was out of stock, but the company is expected to re-stock at the beginning of April. It stands up to frequent and rugged use. This bowl is also easy to wash by hand, and it resisted staining and rusting during testing. This is notable, given that the competition (I tested three other stainless steel bowls) showed signs of wear and tear. You can use this bowl without the suction and lid. One of my kids loves a long, leisurely meal. The other not so much. The airtight lid makes it easy to quickly save barely touched food for later. And you can remove the suction cup base, so elementary-age kids can use the bowl without feeling like it's too babyish. It's also stackable, if you choose to buy more than one. The suction cup can be removed from the bottom of the Avanchy Stainless Steel Suction Baby Bowl once a child is no longer likely to toss it from the high chair; add the lid, and the bowl is great for storing leftovers. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Its double-wall insulation keeps its contents warm. My toddler frequently eats soups and oatmeal out of this bowl, and its walls don't get hot to the touch. Flaws but not dealbreakers Its suction isn't kid-proof. No suction is, really. Multiple Amazon buyer reviews (like this one and this one) mention that their kids figured out how to peel the bowl's suction grip from various surfaces. It's pricey. This is among the more expensive feeding accessories I tested. However, this bowl is so easy to wash and store, I've found that I only need one. Kiddobloom Children's Stainless Steel Divided Plate Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Plastic dinnerware and utensils frequently feature bold colors and recognizable animated characters; this is one of the hardest things about giving them up. Both of my kids love the Kiddobloom Children's Stainless Steel Divided Plate. It's highly rated on Amazon, and comes plain or with a frog or princess detail—basically the next best thing to that well-loved plastic Bluey plate. It fits a just-right amount of food. The plate has three compartments—one large and two small. The large section is perfect for a kid-size sandwich, a small slice of pizza, or a few chicken nuggets, while the small sections are great for fruit and veggies or dips. At 9.4 ounces, this plate weighs 2 ounces less than our top silicone pick, and it's one of the most portable options I tested. It's easy to use and care for. Wirecutter's guide to flatware explains the difference between various types of stainless steel: 18/8 stainless steel has a higher nickel content than 18/0 and is therefore more corrosion-resistant. This plate is made from 18/8 stainless steel and did not develop scratches or rust during the two-month testing period. It can also be purchased as part of a giftable set that includes a cup and bowl, which I also tested. My kids loved the handles on the 13-ounce bowl, which makes it easy to drink cereal milk and soup. And the 6-ounce cup is a nice size for toddlers. Flaws but not dealbreakers It doesn't stick to plate may not be for you if your kid consistently throws their plate from the high chair or table. Klean Kanteen 10 oz Cup Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter I tested three stainless steel cups for kids, and the Klean Kanteen 10 oz Cups performed the best. My children love using these cheery cups for everything from milk to juice, and the cups have so far resisted rust, staining, and scratches. (Stainless steel is designed to last decades.) I've also owned a similar set of 12-ounce Klean Kanteen cups for close to 10 years, and they've held up extremely well. They're dishwasher-safe and stand up to rugged use. After an exhausting meal (face it, not every family dinner is one you want to remember), it can be a relief to toss everything in the dishwasher and turn out the kitchen lights. That's one reason I love these 10-ounce cups, which stand up to frequent washing and use and come out looking spick-and-span, whether I wash them by hand or throw them in the dishwasher. They also stack well and are compatible with a spillproof (though not leakproof) straw and lid. The Klean Kanteen can go from a regular cup to a covered tumbler with the addition of the straw and lid, which cost extra. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter You can use them beyond the kitchen. I've taken these cups camping and on picnics, and I've put them to work in the pantry storing art supplies. The various colors are inviting, and they can easily be used by older kids and adults as well. Flaws but not dealbreakers They don't work well with hot beverages. Unlike the Avanchy bowl, these cups aren't insulated and readily conduct heat. The company doesn't recommend using the straw lid with warm liquids. The spillproof lid is an additional cost. Adding the straw lid costs about $7.50. Klean Kanteen also sells a single cup with a lid for the same price. Elk and Friends Babies/Toddler Stainless Steel Spoons + Forks with Silicone Handle The best stainless steel utensils for toddlers: Elk and Friends Babies/Toddler Stainless Steel Spoons + Forks with Silicone Handle. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter These colorful utensils have gentle, rounded edges and silicone handles that are easy to grasp. There are many utensils designed for kids, but it can be surprisingly tricky to find a stainless steel set that works well for babies and toddlers. Some spoons have a shovel so cavernous it seems designed exclusively for soup, for example, or the tines of a fork are far too sharp. The pint-sized Elk and Friends Babies/Toddler Stainless Steel Spoons + Forks with Silicone Handle, on the other hand, have an intuitive design and rounded edges that won't give young eaters an unexpected poke. The silicone handles are easy to grasp. When St. John works with families, she advises them to select toddler silverware with a built-up handle that's easy to grasp, which is exactly what this set offers. 'The shorter it is, the more control they're going to have.' My 2-year-old had the most success self-feeding with these forks and spoons out of all the cutlery I tested. The handles measure a manageable 4 inches, compared with 4.5 inches for the long-handled Beaba First Stage Two-Tone Silicone Spoon. A pack includes three spoons and three forks. Rounded stainless edges are gentle on tiny mouths. Importantly, the shovel of this spoon is deep enough to fit a dollop of yogurt or a scoop of soup. My son uses this spoon to eat Cheerios and milk—the shovel fits four or five milk-soaked Cheerios at a time. The tines of the fork are just sharp enough to be effective; I've watched my toddler repeatedly use the fork to spear a cooked carrot and bring it to his mouth. They sit off the table. The Elk and Friends utensils have a tiny heart on the back of the silicone handle that prevents the stainless steel end from touching the table when you set it down. This arguably helps keep mealtime more hygienic (although it won't protect the silverware when it's tossed on the floor). When the Elk and Friends Babies/Toddler Stainless Steel Spoons + Forks are set on the table, little silicone hearts keep the part of the spoon and fork that goes in the mouth from touching the surface. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter Flaws but not dealbreakers A two-piece design is more susceptible to mold. You don't need to remove the utensil's silicone sleeve from the metal handle for washing, but the two pieces do come apart. Some customer reviews mention that, as a result, their cutlery developed mold where water collected between the silicone and metal. I did not observe this. OXO Tot Cutlery Set for Big Kids Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter These utensils are slightly smaller and have smoother edges than ones intended for adults. $12 $10 from Amazon Elementary-age kids can benefit from dedicated cutlery, too, especially when the available adult options are heavy or sharp. The OXO Tot Cutlery Set for Big Kids performed best out of three sets of cutlery I tested geared toward older children. Though similar in size to adult salad forks and dessert spoons, this set weighs less, comes in kid-friendly colors, and includes a dull, serrated knife so kids can practice cutting and spreading. These have a plastic handle, but the part that kids put in their mouths is stainless steel. Colorful options are inviting to kids. I'm continually surprised by the small details that compel my 5-year-old daughter to come to the table, and this set—available in pale shades of pink, blue, and green, as well as white with navy—is one of them. She's even started helping me to set the table in the hopes of securing her favorite cutlery. Rounded edges shouldn't hurt little utensils are lightweight enough for kids who are developing hand strength, and the rounded edges of the fork and spoon are gentle enough for older toddlers to use (OXO says the set is designed for kids ages 3 and up). The adult soup spoons I own weigh 1.7 ounces, whereas this one weighs 1.1 ounces. The Beaba First Stage Two-Tone Silicone Spoon, the Elk and Friends Babies/Toddler Stainless Steel Spoon, and the OXO Tot Spoon for Big Kids all have different length handles: 4.5 inches, 4 inches, and 4.125 inches, respectively. Michael Hession/NYT Wirecutter When your kids have grown up, you can use the set for outdoor dining. The set is durable, showed no signs of rust over more than two months of use, and withstood more than 20 washings in the dishwasher. The utensils are also large enough for adults to use and resemble something you'd throw in a picnic basket. Flaws but not dealbreakers They aren't much smaller than adult-size salad forks and dessert spoons. A set costs about $12 and comes with a spoon, fork, and knife. Save your money if you think your child might be ready for adult-size silverware.
