23-04-2025
PABASA warns LPC against weaponising the institution against Mpofu
PABASA's stern warning to Labour Practice Council: Protecting the integrity of the legal profession
Image: IOL/Independent Newspapers
The Pan-African Bar Association of South Africa (PABASA) issued a stern warning to the Legal Practice Council (LPC), cautioning the regulatory body to resist attempts to weaponise disciplinary proceedings for narrow personal or political agendas.
This comes amid the LPC's recent decision to charge advocate Dali Mpofu SC, one of the country's most prominent legal figures, with bringing the legal profession into disrepute.
In a detailed letter dated April 17, addressed to LPC Chair Advocate Pule Seleka, PABASA's National Executive Committee (NEC) expressed deep concern over what it described as 'spurious charges' aimed at intimidating Mpofu SC and potentially tarnishing his reputation unjustly.
'We find this conduct disturbing. The NEC of PABASA has discussed the charges against Mpofu SC and also requested him to give us his confidence about them, which he has done," it said.
'We reiterate that the LPC is the appropriate regulatory body empowered to ensure legal practitioners comply with the Code of Conduct. Our concern is that these charges, which appear to be frivolous, are being used to intimidate and discredit a senior advocate exercising his professional duties.'
The charges levied against Mpofu include allegations of misconduct ranging from making threatening remarks during a Section 194 inquiry into the former Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane's fitness to hold office to impugning the character of constitutional figures and engaging in unprofessional conduct during high-profile interviews and court proceedings.
The charges also accuse Mpofu of breaching various provisions of the Code of Conduct, suggesting that his cross-examinations and public statements have tarnished the legal profession's reputation.
'Charging any person can potentially destroy people's lives and careers. We caution against this hatred towards people, regardless of who they are and their views. We would defend any legal practitioner against frivolous charges designed to intimidate them from doing their jobs or representing their clients.'
The association called on the LPC to exercise its discretion carefully, noting that the charges seem to misinterpret and abuse the provisions of the Code of Conduct.
It further warned that such actions risk creating a dangerous precedent where the legal profession could be targeted for political or personal motives rather than legitimate disciplinary reasons.
