Latest news with #NZSIS
RNZ News
23-05-2025
- Business
- RNZ News
Budget 2025: Spy agencies funds cut as security threats grow
The Government Communications Security Bureau headquarters. File image. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Funding for the largest spy agency has taken a big cut in Budget 2025, despite an increased workload due to growing threats to national security. The $267m for the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) is well down on the previous two Budgets, and 20 per cent less than the GCSB's spending in the 2024/25 period. Its partner agency, the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service (NZSIS), also received a modest reduction, with its budget dropping to $111m from $117m. Between the two agencies, they have been allocated $375m in Budget 2025, down from $457m in 2024 and $515m in the budget for 2023. However, the newly reduced amount is far above the funding received prior to 2022. Despite the cuts, the agencies told RNZ on Friday they remain funded "at a level which enables them to deliver their important services as expected by Ministers and the public." They also noted appropriation contained both operating and capital funding "As a result there is likely to be volatility from year to year as capital projects start and finish." The reductions come at a time of intensifying security challenges with both agencies reporting the country faces a " deteriorating threat environment " from violent extremism, terrorism, foreign interference and espionage. In plain terms, both agencies report that protecting New Zealand is getting harder. According to the GCSB's latest Cyber Threat Report , online dangers are particularly severe. "As more cyber threat actors enter this environment, it is becoming increasingly difficult to disassociate or attribute state and criminal cyber activity." The government has repeatedly given the deteriorating security environment, especially in the Indo-Pacific as a core driver behind a big jump in defence spending, starting now and lasting at least for the next seven years. "New Zealand is increasingly exposed to security risks," the SIS said in its 2024 threat report. "The cyber threats we face are evolving at a remarkable pace," said the GCSB in its 2024 annual report. "The pace of geopolitical deterioration in recent years, and its impact on the rules-based architecture, has placed a greater significance on the GCSB's unique and legally mandated capabilities." In February this year, GCSB Director-General and Chief Executive Andrew Clark said in February said in a statement to the Intelligence and Security Committee that over the past year threats from "malicious cyber actors... are more persistent, more sophisticated, and more capable of causing severe impacts to New Zealanders, and can come from anywhere in the world." The agencies also work within the Five Eyes intelligence group, which has been adding functions such as a "federated" space system that conducts experiments. There was also increasing demand to help Pacific islands build secure communications, and in July 2024 the GCSB took over the Computer Emergency Response Team from MBIE. Despite this, the spy agencies were not immune to the public sector savings drive last year. Both were restructured from 2023 amid "significant workforce and technology cost pressures". Both did a "rapid savings exercise" and joint financial sustainability drive delivering $11m in savings. However, Budget 2025 has not required a repeat. Neither the GCSB nor SIS has "provided any savings in Budget 2025", they said. Among New Zealand's Five Eyes intelligence group partners, Australia, the UK and Canada have been raising spy agency spending, while the US is poised to cut intelligence jobs, and quite likely budgets. Over the Tasman, Five Eyes partner Australia increased its spy spending by $45m over the next four years in its 2025 budget. Canberra in 2021 promised $1.4b new spending on spies over the decade. Like Australia, New Zealand embarked on big increases in spy agency spending several years ago, but here the spending brakes have been pulled. In the US, the Washington Post has reported that the Trump administration "is planning significant personnel cuts at the Central Intelligence Agency and other major US spy units, downsizing the government's most sensitive national security agencies". In the UK, the government is spending more on its intelligence agencies, as it recognises an increased "overlap" with the armed forces. The Single Intelligence Account (SIA), which provides funding for the UK's, three main security and intelligence agencies was given a boost of NZ$770m for the 2023/24 and 2025/26 period, "ensuring that our world-leading intelligence agencies maintain their cutting-edge capabilities". Aside from the spy agencies, Budget 2025 sees an end to funding for two arms of counter-terrorism efforts: A strategic framework for $250,000 in 2024/25, and a research centre set up in response to the Royal Commission into the mosque attacks, where funding dried up from $1.3m in 2023, to $500,000, to nothing in 2025/26. Work to counter "foreign interference" in ground-based space infrastructure gets $3.5m over the next four years. Regulations in July are aimed to set out a new registration regime. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero, a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
23-04-2025
- Politics
- Scoop
Statement On Spy Agency Probe Into RNZ ‘Russian Edits Scandal' And IGSS Report
Conflating editorial endeavour that seeks accurate reporting and proper context in news stories with subjective support for foreign enemies is a smear, creates a chill factor within newsrooms and stifles open and informed public discourse over foreign … Statement by Mick Hall on a report released on April 17 by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, Brendan Horsley, into an RNZ 'Russian edits scandal' probe by the NZSIS April 17, 2025 I welcome a report released today by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, Brendan Horsley, which found an investigation by the NZSIS into whether I was involved in state-sponsored foreign interference while employed at Radio New Zealand was necessary, proportionate and legal. As a journalist, I am reassured by the report's findings that the spy agency followed its Sensitive Category Individuals (SCI) policy during its three-month investigation and that it informed interested parties there was nothing that indicated I was a national security threat or an agent of foreign interference. I accept that the NZSIS acted out of necessity, after my sub-editing of international news agency stories had been mis-framed by RNZ management and others in June 2023 as an exercise in Russian propaganda. These accusations, which caused widespread concern, were utterly false. Horsley's report points to this and is the second such review to do so. In July 2023, an Independent Review Panel set up to look into the circumstances of my sub-editing found 'no evidence to suggest the individual intended to insert misinformation or disinformation into the stories, let alone engage in some kind of pro-Russian propaganda campaign'. It added: 'On the contrary, it appears to have been an effort on the part of the journalist concerned to add what he considered to be more balance and accuracy into the stories via the sub-editing process.' The panel found the public broadcaster's choice of language 'unhelpful in maintaining public trust'. It found only a percentage of the 49 international news stories flagged as concerning by an RNZ internal audit of my work involved 'inappropriate' changes, while also noting that 'experienced people operating in good faith can and do disagree on where the lines are between compliance with editorial standards and a breach of those standards'. By its knee-jerk judgment that I'd acted in bad faith, and by its public pronouncements, RNZ management created a dangerous environment of hysteria and undue speculation over my motives. It helped bring a journalist to the attention of the NZSIS and its Five Eyes intelligence partners. As Horsley's report points out, it is 'at the very least, disconcerting to discover that you have come to the attention of an intelligence agency, particularly as a journalist reporting on conflicts where different views can validly be expressed'. Conflating editorial endeavour that seeks accurate reporting and proper context in news stories with subjective support for foreign enemies is a smear, creates a chill factor within newsrooms and stifles open and informed public discourse over foreign policy and international affairs. With the New Zealand government moving to introduce sweeping measures to criminalise foreign interference, RNZ management's damaging mischaracterisations should be of lasting concern. I would like to thank Mr Horsley and his team for their professionalism and courtesy.
Scoop
22-04-2025
- Politics
- Scoop
Statement On Spy Agency Probe Into RNZ 'Russian Edits Scandal' And IGSS Report
Statement by Mick Hall on a report released on April 17 by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, Brendan Horsley, into an RNZ 'Russian edits scandal' probe by the NZSIS April 17, 2025 I welcome a report released today by the Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security, Brendan Horsley, which found an investigation by the NZSIS into whether I was involved in state-sponsored foreign interference while employed at Radio New Zealand was necessary, proportionate and legal. As a journalist, I am reassured by the report's findings that the spy agency followed its Sensitive Category Individuals (SCI) policy during its three-month investigation and that it informed interested parties there was nothing that indicated I was a national security threat or an agent of foreign interference. I accept that the NZSIS acted out of necessity, after my sub-editing of international news agency stories had been mis-framed by RNZ management and others in June 2023 as an exercise in Russian propaganda. These accusations, which caused widespread concern, were utterly false. Horsley's report points to this and is the second such review to do so. In July 2023, an Independent Review Panel set up to look into the circumstances of my sub-editing found 'no evidence to suggest the individual intended to insert misinformation or disinformation into the stories, let alone engage in some kind of pro-Russian propaganda campaign'. It added: 'On the contrary, it appears to have been an effort on the part of the journalist concerned to add what he considered to be more balance and accuracy into the stories via the sub-editing process.' The panel found the public broadcaster's choice of language 'unhelpful in maintaining public trust'. It found only a percentage of the 49 international news stories flagged as concerning by an RNZ internal audit of my work involved 'inappropriate' changes, while also noting that 'experienced people operating in good faith can and do disagree on where the lines are between compliance with editorial standards and a breach of those standards'. By its knee-jerk judgment that I'd acted in bad faith, and by its public pronouncements, RNZ management created a dangerous environment of hysteria and undue speculation over my motives. It helped bring a journalist to the attention of the NZSIS and its Five Eyes intelligence partners. As Horsley's report points out, it is 'at the very least, disconcerting to discover that you have come to the attention of an intelligence agency, particularly as a journalist reporting on conflicts where different views can validly be expressed'. Conflating editorial endeavour that seeks accurate reporting and proper context in news stories with subjective support for foreign enemies is a smear, creates a chill factor within newsrooms and stifles open and informed public discourse over foreign policy and international affairs. With the New Zealand government moving to introduce sweeping measures to criminalise foreign interference, RNZ management's damaging mischaracterisations should be of lasting concern. I would like to thank Mr Horsley and his team for their professionalism and courtesy.
