22-05-2025
Federal judge: campers can stay while civil case against Nelson County Park Board is pending
May 21—NELSON COUNTY — A federal judge granted a motion for preliminary injunction on Monday that will allow four people to continue using camping spaces they were previously ordered to vacate as long as their civil case progresses.
The plaintiffs argue the vacation notice was retaliation for expressing concerns about the park's management.
"They were treated very unfairly," said David Thompson, attorney for the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs are Loralyn Maixner, Wayne Maixner, Ron Maixner and Alane Maixner. In their civil complaint filed in February, the group alleges their lease renewal applications for Stump Lake Park campsites were wrongfully denied in November 2024 after they voiced concerns about park management in a Nelson County Park Board meeting one month earlier. Lessees are subject to a "three strikes" policy for engaging in any conduct that violates park rules, however, none of the plaintiffs received any strikes throughout the years they'd been leasing campsites, according to the order written by U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor.
The plaintiffs assert a claim for retaliation in violation of their First Amendment right to free speech, petition to the government and their Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law, according to court documents.
The civil complaint says that while leaving the Sept. 10, 2024, Park Board meeting where the plaintiffs shared their concerns, a microphone at the board's table captured the statement: "Are these our three problem makers?"
Audio recordings from the next month's board meeting revealed that the board discussed the plaintiffs, joking and laughing about the comments they had made, the judge's order said.
One board member is accused of saying the plaintiffs were always complaining, and their contracts should be terminated, according to the complaint.
"The park manager, Donna Rickford, suggested giving them a strike, but other board members discouraged that option," the judge's order said. "Discussions during the meeting concluded the reason for non-renewal was other behavior, not public comments about park management, but the other behavior was never actually stated in the public meeting. Instead, the plaintiffs were mockingly referred to as 'troublemakers.'"
No reason was given for the plaintiffs' nonrenewal, according to the order.
Thompson said it's unfortunate that his clients have had to go to such lengths for protection of their civil rights, but he expressed relief that, for now, his clients can continue enjoying their summers as they have for many years.
Loralyn Maixner and Wayne Maixner had been leasing the same campsite at the park for 27 years; Ron Maixner and Alane Maixner had been leasing a campsite for 11 years, according to the judge's May 19 order.
"(Traynor) issued injunctive relief in order to preserve the status quo," Thompson said. "The trial is not until January of 2027, so my clients get to enjoy their camping lots for that entire period, based on this decision. It's very significant, and we think it was the right call on the part of Judge Traynor."
Defendants in the case include Jayme Jo Tenneson, Nelson County state's attorney and legal adviser for the board, and all board members (to include all county commissioners): Harold Eidsness, Cody Johnson, Aaron Mork, Doug Flaagan, Michael Haugland, Cameron Swenson, Nathan Parks, Steve Forde and Dennis Fahey. The Park Board itself is also listed as a defendant.
The Herald reached out to the defendants through the defense attorneys listed in the case. Attorney Dan Gaustad responded to say he would not be providing any comment due to the pending litigation. None of the other attorneys answered.
A temporary restraining order was granted in late March that preserved the status quo until a hearing could be held in April to address a possible preliminary injunction. During that time, the defendants were prohibited from taking any action against the plaintiffs regarding the termination of their leases, including removal proceedings, the order said.
Prior to this, the plaintiffs had been expected to remove all their belongings from the premises by March 31.
To be awarded a preliminary injuction, a plaintiff has to establish that they will be irreparably harmed without immediate relief, the balance of equities favors them, there's a likelihood of success on the merits of the case and the injunction serves public interest, according to the order.
Traynor wrote that the plaintiffs have demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their retaliation claim, therefore, he does not need to address the other matters. He found that the plaintiffs met their burden, and granted them relief while the case progresses.
A settlement conference is scheduled to be held at 10 a.m. on June 2 in Grand Forks, during which Magistrate Judge Alice Senechal will act as a mediator as the parties attempt to reach a settlement.
The plaintiffs are seeking $450,000, as well as compensatory damages and imposition of punitive damages against each defendant, according to their complaint.
"If there's no settlement, a jury will determine what their damages are," Thompson said.
