Latest news with #NickAdderley
Telegraph
11 hours ago
- Telegraph
Disgraced police chief who lied about Navy career ‘undermined' Harry Dunn case
A disgraced police chief who lied about serving in the Falklands War had a 'detrimental impact' on the Harry Dunn investigation, a report has found. Nick Adderley, a former Northamptonshire chief constable, has been reprimanded for making false statements to the media and blamed for causing an 'avoidable' breakdown in relations between the force and Mr Dunn's family. Mr Adderley, 58, was sacked last year after it was revealed he had exaggerated his naval career and rank. Suspicions were raised when the police chief was seen wearing a Falklands medal, despite having been only 15 when the conflict began. A Ministry of Defence medal expert went on to call the South Atlantic Medal, awarded to British military personnel who served in the Falklands, '110 per cent' fake. Adderley has now received further criticism in a report on the police investigation into the death of Mr Dunn, who was killed when a car driven by Anne Sacoolas, a former US State Department employee, struck the 19-year-old motorcyclist in August 2019. Sacoolas eventually pleaded guilty to causing death by careless driving via video link at the Old Bailey following three years of the Dunn family campaigning for justice, after she was able to leave the UK when diplomatic immunity was asserted on her behalf. Among other failings, Adderley was reprimanded by the Foreign Office for giving inaccurate information to the press about suspect Anne Sacoolas's immunity status after she had left the UK. The same report also found that police had prioritised Sacoolas's welfare over a 'prompt and effective investigation', a review concluded. The independent review, commissioned by Chief Constable Ivan Balhatchet, said there was a lack of coordination and adherence to professional standards guidelines amongst senior members of the force under Adderley's leadership. 'The review found that while the investigation was well handled, elements of senior leadership prioritised the suspect's welfare over a 'prompt and effective investigation', it said. 'There was a lack of coordination and adherence to APP [professional standards guidance].' It continued: 'This is evidenced during an interview when Chief Constable Adderley suggested that Anne Sacoolas could make decisions around waiving her diplomatic status, which she couldn't. 'According to the FCO [Foreign Office], diplomatic immunity belongs to the sending state. This prompted the FCO to contact Northamptonshire Police and request CC Adderley did not repeat erroneous statements.' Adderley was also criticised for 'discrepancies' during a press conference in October 2019 on the Dunn case and for failing to send what he wished to say to the senior investigating officer for fact-checking, prior to the event. The review said the breakdown in relations between the Dunn family and the force because of Mr Adderley's actions was 'avoidable'. It highlighted incidents, such as a tweet from the disgraced ex-police chief, which showed him react to the family's intentions to sue Sacoolas in the US by saying: 'How sad but how predictable.' A total of 38 recommendations were made in the report, including that the force should adopt an 'investigative mindset' at serious road crashes and review how it recovers material from the scene of a collision. The report also said concerns for the Sacoolas' welfare should not have prevented officers from arresting her. It read: 'A report has been prepared and concerning the consideration of arrest, the (Serious Collision Investigation Unit) lead is of the view that the decision not to arrest is not explained in enough detail and the overriding factor in the decision appears to be the welfare of the suspect and her suffering from shock, with little to no consideration around the full necessity test under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act.' Addressing the role Mr Adderley played in the force's failings, Mrs Charles continued: 'I remain so angry at Adderley to this day… I am glad Adderley is long gone and will never be able to police again.' The mother, who was awarded an MBE in the King's birthday honours list for services to road safety, added: 'Today's review report confirms what we have known for years - that we were failed by the very people we should have been able to trust. 'Harry was left to die on the roadside. Sacoolas was not arrested, even though the police had every power to do so. She fled the country, and they didn't tell us. These are failures no family should ever have to endure.' Assistant Chief Constable Emma James issued an apology to the family on behalf of the force, saying: 'First and foremost, on behalf of Northamptonshire Police I want to apologise to Harry's family for what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case, Harry, and his family who fought tirelessly in the years that followed to achieve justice for him. 'The picture which emerges is one of a force which has failed the family on a number of fronts, and we hope the findings, which are troubling in several respects, will provide some answers to questions which the family will have wanted to know in the years that have passed. 'I hope some good comes out of this. Much of the learning which the force has taken from this has already been put in place and we make a number of specific recommendations for best practice at a national level. 'We have taken a deep look at ourselves and hope the transparent way we have identified failings of the past will go some way to re-building the confidence of Harry's family and friends going forward as well as the wider public at large.'
ITV News
23-04-2025
- Politics
- ITV News
Northamptonshire Chief Constable welcomes sacking powers as record number of officers suspended
A leading police officer has welcomed new rules which will see officers who fail background checks automatically sacked - at a time when suspensions in his force are at an all-time high. Northamptonshire Police Chief Constable Ivan Balhatchet said there were currently more than 20 officers suspended from his force., but he felt the new measures would help rebuild trust in policing. Measures introduced by Parliament on Wednesday will make it a legal requirement for serving officers to pass vetting procedures. It will also mean police chiefs will be able to get rid of officers unfit to serve from next month. The move comes after the head of the Metropolitan Police Sir Mark Rowley accused officials of dragging their feet on giving police chiefs stronger powers to sack officers. Mr Balhatchet said he "absolutely" welcomed the rules, saying since taking over from his disgraced predecessor Nick Adderley he had made it a priority to remove those officers not fit to serve. "We do unfortunately have more suspensions for police officers than we ever have done before, but that's been done on purpose, because actually there's people who don't belong in the organisation," said Mr Balhatchet, who has expanded the force's professional standards and counter corruption unit. "The vast majority of our officers and staff are great people, but there's some who shouldn't be here. "We have been frustrated ourselves in Northamptonshire Police in trying to deal with some who we don't think should be in the organisation, so I do welcome this in terms of the changes to vetting that have been announced today, which come into effect the middle of next month." Northamptonshire Police currently has more than 20 officers suspended from duty, he said. Mr Balhatchet said the new powers could be a way of getting some officers off the books. He said the new law would give forces "some extra tools, used appropriately" to deal with officers "who cause concern to us". Mr Balchatchet could not give an exact figure as to how many of those 20-plus officers would be affected, but said he did not believe the new legislation would impact morale. "Whenever I talk about misconduct, it's always with the caveat that the vast majority of officers and staff are doing an amazing job," he said. "There is a tiny minority, though, who don't belong in the organisation. It's those people who we look to deal with and actually exit from the organisation or deal with appropriately." The new rules will come into force almost a year after Nick Adderley was sacked as Chief Constable of Northamptonshire Police for gross misconduct for lying about his military record. A report into how he was able to get away with his lies revealed the force's "very significant failings", including a failure to ask for basic corroboration or keep records of his application for the £176,500-a-year job. Adderley had claimed to serve in the Falklands War, despite it ending when he was just 15 years old, and said that he attended the prestigious Britannia Royal Naval College for four years, when it was later proven his application was rejected. He had also been wearing a Falklands War medal - implying he had served in the war - which was deemed to be "110% fake" by a Ministry of Defence medal expert. Mr Balhatchet said this was something that would never be allowed to happen again. "What I have done since then though is made sure that our most senior officers have hard copy checks of military record and educational qualifications, so that never happens again," he said. He said the new rules would help rebuild trust in both Northamptonshire Police and wider UK policing. Police officers who fail vetting to be automatically sacked under new rules Mr Balhatchet was speaking as he unveiled his new policing plan for the county. He described his strategy as "ambitious" and designed to make the county the safest place to live in the country. In addition to growing police and community support officer numbers, he said building trust was key to achieving that. "Trust and confidence is a key thing I want to achieve. Trust and confidence in policing nationally is low," adding he wanted to drive that up by "making sure our standards are the highest and how we treat victims of crime". "Confidence in Northamptonshire Police was below 40% which nobody wants to be," he said. "It has improved over the last six or seven months, which is which is really positive." Speaking of recent high-profile dismissal of officers including one who 'took indecent images of himself in uniform' on police premises and another dismissed for sending sexual messages to a vulnerable 14-year-old girl he said rootig out those officers were part of re-establishing trust. "This is a challenge and I haven't shied away from it," he said. "I've grown our professional standards department, so it's the biggest thing it ever has been; I've grown our counter-corruption department again so it's the biggest it ever has been. "Vetting standards have grown within our force, and we have made sure that we given people routes to report, whether openly or confidentially, so we can actually deal with those people who shouldn't be in the organisation." "We do have more suspensions than we ever have done before. We do have more gross misconduct hearings than we ever have done before but actually, that's about sending a message. "Dealing with those who shouldn't be in the police service and actually supporting those who every day coming to work to do the very best for the public and show the highest standards of integrity." Speaking about the new measures Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'It is simply not acceptable that officers who are clearly unfit to serve or pose a risk to their colleagues cannot be removed. That's why these new rules are essential and it is why this government has been working closely with forces to overcome these barriers to restore confidence in policing.' Sir Mark Rowley said: 'The ability to hold a vetting clearance is the most basic indication of whether someone can be trusted to hold the extensive and often intrusive powers that police officers are given. "It was never right that an officer could lose their vetting, but not lose their job." The reformed police dismissal system will come into force from 14 May. The Home Office also plans to introduce further safeguards to improve vetting national standards later this year, including stronger requirements to suspend officers under investigation for violence against women and girls. Officers convicted of certain criminal offences will also be automatically found guilty of gross misconduct.
