15 hours ago
The AI Talent Crisis: Why Companies Are Looking In The Wrong Places
Nicole Zheng is the Chief Business Officer at which powers companies with elite tech talent and ready-to-deploy AI solutions.
Last year, generative AI officially entered Gartner's famed 'Trough of Disillusionment'—a rite of passage for any emerging technology. While most enterprise companies are eager to embrace AI, with some saving hundreds of millions of dollars through strategic use cases, most fail to progress past the pilot phase. And one of the main barriers for many corporate leaders is talent.
"The biggest AI talent shortage has created a $134.8 billion market opportunity," said João (Joe) Moura, CEO of crewAI. "Many focus solely on technical roles, but overlook a crucial segment: Traditional approaches emphasize Deep ML engineering or Ph.D.s," which implies barriers for talent lacking those qualifications.
It's a challenge my company has heard repeatedly when consulting with enterprise leaders on their generative AI strategy, and we wanted to understand those challenges more deeply. So, we surveyed 250 senior tech leaders responsible for AI initiatives. Our research confirmed those challenges: "While 96% of tech leaders plan to increase AI investments in 2025, only 36% have successfully deployed AI to production." The gap isn't due to a lack of enthusiasm or budget—it's a talent problem. In fact, 85% of tech leaders have delayed critical AI initiatives due to talent shortages.
But I believe there's another reason for this talent crisis: Most companies are looking for AI talent in all the wrong places, using outdated hiring approaches that fundamentally clash with the pace of AI innovation.
Why Traditional Hiring Is Hindering, Not Helping
When we asked these senior AI leaders how long it takes to hire top product and engineering talent, the answers were eye-opening: 67% said "it takes 4+ months to hire top engineering talent."
This hiring timeline is completely mismatched with the whiplash pace of AI development; the technology is evolving every few weeks, bringing new opportunities to drive value for customers and employees alike. By the time most organizations have hired the talent they initially sought, that person's skills may already be outdated. It's like hiring horses while the Model T is accelerating in the fast lane.
Adopting The 'T-Shaped' Talent Model
One way organizations can succeed is by taking a different approach: a 'T-shaped' model that integrates specialized freelance talent with a smaller, core team of full-time employees. Picture the letter T: Your vertical stem is made up of core, full-time engineers who know your systems inside and out. The horizontal bar is made up of specialized contractors who bring targeted expertise where you need it.
Why does this approach work? As GenAI is still nascent, your full-time engineers carry the burden of maintaining your core platform while learning the latest agentic system design techniques and tools. It can be next to impossible to succeed with the landscape evolving daily. By contrast, independent AI/ML engineers can bring experience from dozens of deployments across different companies—often choosing independence precisely for this opportunity. You're not just hiring skills; you're hiring the experience gained from rapid innovation cycles.
Factors That Contribute To T-Shaped Model Effectiveness
1. The Shift In The Technical Talent Market: The freelance economy has evolved dramatically from its gig-economy origins. Today's freelance talent marketplace includes elite, specialized professionals who've chosen to go independent thanks to the autonomy, flexibility and financial upside that it can provide. For top AI talent, a big part of the appeal is getting to choose the specific projects and problems that interest them the most, instead of being put in a 'golden cage' and paid to literally do nothing.
2. The Innovation And Deployment Boost: Fractional talent can boost innovation capabilities and accelerate your road map. Look for freelance AI specialists who have experience with deployments at multiple companies; they should have more knowledge of the pitfalls that lurk around the corner and be able to help your company avoid them.
3. Cost Efficiency: By bringing in specialized fractional talent for the specific stages of development that you need them for, you can deploy your capital and resources more effectively.
4. A Startup Mindset: I've found that for most organizations—particularly those in non-tech industries—GenAI requires a monumental mindset shift. While IT teams excel at buying and integrating software for systems of record, capitalizing on GenAI's full capabilities often means adopting a mindset of leveraging your company's data and automating human workflows to realize new value. Choosing team members who can contribute out-of-the-box thinking as well as AI engineering expertise can help you achieve this mindset.
5. Flexibility: This model can also help solve flexibility challenges. Instead of trying to hire full-time employees for specific technical needs, focus on building fluid teams that can adapt as quickly as the technology.
The Importance Of Collaboration
A common pitfall in attempting the T-shaped model is to treat independent talent as outsiders, but this isn't outsourcing. The trick is to embed specialists into your existing teams, having them code and participate in standups right alongside your core engineers. In my experience, this approach can deliver more than project outcomes; it can also allow your core team to upskill through direct collaboration.
Conclusion
The AI talent crisis may seem daunting, but it's far from insurmountable. You don't need to compete with Netflix to hire that million-dollar AI engineer; instead, consider adopting a more flexible approach to how you build your teams.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
