Latest news with #Nightsleeper
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Daily Mirror
Dept Q star looks completely different in forgotten Call the Midwife role
Netflix's new drama Dept Q stars Leah Byrne as cadet Rose - however, some fans may recognise the Scottish actress for her role in an episode of BBC One's Call the Midwife Netflix's brand new crime drama Dept Q arrived today on the streamer, starring Downton Abbey's Matthew Goode as a detective attempting to track down the mysterious criminal who shot him in the face. After returning back to his Edinburgh police station for the first time since the attack, Carl (Goode) is tasked with setting up Department Q - a cold case unit - while he covertly tries to investigate the crime himself. In his new team, Carl is joined by Rose - a cadet who is keen to prove herself to Carl - played by Scottish actress Leah Byrne. The actress has just a few credits under her belt, including small roles in BBC drama Nightsleeper and Channel 4's Deadwater Fell. However, before taking on the role of Rose, Leah appeared in a 2019 episode of Call the Midwife as Maggie Nickle - an expectant mother. With a brunette head of hair, Leah couldn't look more different in the BBC role. Meanwhile, in Dept. Q, Leah sports a ginger perm as rookie detective Rose. Leah isn't the only unrecognisable star in Dept Q. Matthew Goode takes on a scruffy look and a beard for his role as DCI Carl Morck. Speaking about the Netflix drama ahead of its release, Matthew said of Carl: "He's so aggressive and rude. I loved his sense of humour. He's a complex character, and you get to see him warts and all." He added that he was hooked on the character from the moment he was sent the script. "Scott could have cast anybody,' Matthew said. 'When someone trusts you like that, you take it seriously. There was pressure but, as Billie Jean King said, 'Pressure is a privilege.'' Matthew opened up about one scene, where he needed to drive an old Ford Sierra with dodgy brakes. 'Every time Scott told me to drive fast, I'd be thinking, 'I hope it stops and I don't plough into anyone,'' says Matthew. 'Occasionally, I'd turn the car off and walk away, then I'd hear it start again and have to give it a kick.' The series also stars The Queen's Gambit actress Chloe Pirrie as Merritt - an ambitious lawyer whose disappearance is investigated by Carl. "Merritt's main strength is she doesn't feel the need to please people," Chloe said. "She's loyal, someone you'd want on your side, but she's also isolated herself. She uses people and doesn't think that highly of them. She's similar to Carl in that way." Dept Q is now streaming on Netflix.
The National
4 days ago
- Entertainment
- The National
Top roles on BBC Scottish dramas 'more often based in London'
BBC Scotland has been told there is a 'lot of distrust' among the Scottish production community due to the corporation choosing London-based creatives over them, The National understands. Peter Strachan, who sits on the board of trade body Directors UK, said the broadcaster still has 'a long way to go' in providing careers for film and TV talent based in Scotland. The veteran TV director's research, for which he looked at where the people who hold above-the-line roles on established and new Scottish BBC dramas are based, suggested that more people based in London hold key production positions than those in Scotland. READ MORE: Scottish director's film set during Highland Clearances takes Cannes by storm Strachan looked at eight dramas commissioned by BBC Scotland: Granite Harbour, Nightsleeper, Shetland, Vigil, Mint, Counsels, Grams, and The Young Team. The latter three are set to be funded from the soon-to-be axed River City's budget. The research showed that nearly 43% of above-the-line roles, which include positions like directors, producers, and writers, were held by London-based creatives, while less than 42% of the same positions were held by those based in Scotland. Strachan (below) has called on BBC Scotland to boost the level of Scottish writers, producers, and directors working on its shows. (Image: Supplied) He said: 'The stats aren't all bad news but reveal there's still a long way to go in terms of creating career-sustaining opportunities for senior film and TV talent based in Scotland. 'There's a lot of distrust in the Scottish production community, as one senior drama director put it, 'I've already been to a lot of rodeos'. 'It's important the BBC does even more to boost the level of Scottish writers, producers and directing talent working on its network Scottish productions. Editors, too.' A report published by Screen Scotland late last year found that only five of the BBC's top 15 'Scottish' producers (by hours commissioned) were headquartered in Scotland. Previous research by Strachan also found that the hit TV show The Traitors had 81% of its production team based in England. At the same time, he also published an open letter calling for 'urgent' changes, without which he warned Scotland's screen industry will 'continue to dwindle and die'. Strachan told The National that London-based creatives being favoured by the BBC isn't just a Scotland issue but one that affects the whole of the UK. He added: 'The best way to do this is to award commissions to genuinely Scottish production companies, which guarantees the IP stays in Scotland, helping to sustain jobs and develop new productions. 'My colleagues and I at Directors UK look forward to working collaboratively with the BBC to bring about positive change. 'This isn't just a Scottish issue, it's one that impacts all of Directors UK's 'Out of London' members and has done for many years.' BBC Scotland has been approached for comment.
Scotsman
25-04-2025
- Entertainment
- Scotsman
Readers' letters: BBC 'not turning its back on Scottish talent by axeing River City'
BBC Scotland defends its decision to decommission River City, saying it is responding to changing viewing habits Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Jackie Baillie MSP raises important points about the role which River City has played in developing screen industry talent in Scotland (Scotsman, 23 April). She is also understandably passionate about the BBC's production having been based in her constituency. At BBC Scotland, we're very mindful of our role in supporting and growing the creative industries, and equally passionate about making content which people in Scotland will love. Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie and culture spokesperson Neil Bibby hosted the cast of River City as they visited Holyrood yesterday to call on MSPs to back the campaign to save the Scottish soap opera (Picture: Lisa Ferguson) The decision to decommission River City is not based on the quality of the writing, the excellent performances of the cast or the high-quality work of the crew. It is a response to what viewers in Scotland are doing, which is moving away – in large numbers – from long-running formats to shorter-run dramas. BBC Scotland needs to make dramas that people want to watch. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad River City now attracts an average audience of 200,000 per episode, while Granite Harbour attracts around double that figure, and Shetland, Vigil and Nightsleeper all average well over 700,000 viewers per episode in Scotland alone. We need to follow our audience's behaviour, and believe that our three new dramas, which will be funded from the current River City budget, will meet these audience expectations. The new BBC Scotland dramas will all be written by Scottish writers, they will employ a wide range of Scotland-based talent, will have training opportunities attached to them and will be made by producers with bases in Scotland – just like River City has been. They will sit alongside a raft of other BBC Scotland productions, in comedy, factual and entertainment, all of which will continue to develop and showcase Scotland's talent, to audiences here at home, and to the world. Luke McCullough. Corporate Affairs Director, BBC Scotland, Edinburgh Running scared Murdo Fraser (Scotsman, 23 April) is right to be concerned about a more fragmented Unionist vote giving the SNP an advantage at the Holyrood election. Where he fails to convince is in his analysis of Reform as bedfellows of the SNP, declaring that the parties are 'in a symbiotic relationship, with a mutual interest in promoting each other'. The opposite is true. John Swinney's summit was in part to 'lock out' far-right Reform from Scottish politics while Reform see their exclusion by him as a denial of democracy. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad There are three important facts that all parties need to consider. Firstly, an increasing number of voters like myself are disillusioned with Scottish party politics and feel they can't trust any party to deliver. Secondly, Reform offer false hope to some of change and are taking votes from all parties including the SNP. Finally, the best way to defeat Reform is for parties to get their own houses in order. Labour, Tories and the Lib Dems need to prove they are credible opposition parties to the SNP. Farage says the established parties are right to be worried. That is what he wants most and clearly Mr Swinney and Mr Fraser have fallen into that trap. Scots are concerned about immigration, according to Farage, but provides no evidence of this, nor does he adequately explain how he would restore farming and fishing, so badly affected by Brexit. Farage offers style but little substance. The only change he helped deliver was the disastrous Brexit with the help of the English establishment. The traditional parties are running scared of Reform rather than working harder together for the Scottish people while Farage peddles his politics of fear to the disaffected. Holyrood needs to waken up and deliver for Scotland's people as Reform certainly won't. Neil Anderson, Edinburgh Unionist mindset Murdo Fraser's article in response to the summit on far-right extremism was enlightening. By stating that the rise of Reform in Scotland would benefit the SNP, he confirms that it is the Unionist/British elements in Scotland who will be attracted to Reform policies and that it is independence supporters who will resist their sinister attitudes. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Any article by Fraser would not be complete without his often used argument that supporters of the SNP sow division in Scottish society by their continuing campaign for independence. Given that support for and against independence sits at around 50 per cent each, it could be argued that the Unionist campaign to keep us under the control of the British state equally sows divisions in Scottish society. Brian Kelly, Edinburgh Swinney's crusade There should be little doubt, after the long and detailed discussion led by First Minister Swinney (Scotsman, 24 April), that the far right will not be welcome in Scotland. Indeed, the far and central left led by the SNP, along with other members of the great and the good, intend to boot Reform back to whence they came. I'm intrigued how the likes of Reform stack up in their position of almost to the right of Ghengis Khan and surely a perusal of their objectives will guide us in that matter. Obviously one can never judge a party by their promises, as we well know from recent events. However, we have to start somewhere so a quick look through Reform's promises suggests an extreme right bias. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Examples run thick and fast, as the following snapshot examples demonstrate: 1. Restore law and order; 2. Repair public services; 3. Cut taxes; 4. Slash energy bills; 5. Control borders. These few examples demonstrate why the SNP and Greens worry for the direction of travel of our country. No mention of protecting the environment or net zero, no mention of protecting people fleeing persecution from their home countries using fragile small boats. No mention of using debt to build more homes using greenfield land. No mention of protecting the rights of those convicted of crimes. The list of areas of concern to counter the rising tide of the far right are almost endless. Therefore we have to hope and pray that the SNP and Greens gather sufficient support for their opposition to the far right to save us from purgatory. A Lewis, Coylton, South Ayrshire Left v right I read in The Scotsman that in the meeting arranged by John Swinney, STUC general secretary Roz Foyer claimed we are seeing 'a rising amount of dialogue and extreme right-wing ideology that is affecting our communities'. I would like to know which communities and what exactly she considers to be extreme right wing, as she says this with absolutely no examples offered. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad If this is indeed the case, maybe they should have done more to prevent extreme left-wing views from infecting just about every aspect of our lives. They seem to assume everyone is in favour of these left-wing views and policies just because they are. I would suggest a starting point for them is to get the tax bands changed back in line with the rest of the UK, I don't think anyone should be paying 41 per cent of their wages on £43,000, which is not a great wage given the high cost of everythint today. A Thorpe, Dunfermline, Fife Democracy denied Once again, I am left totally perplexed by a John Swinney statement. He said he was convening a meeting to gather together all opposed to the far right and Reform UK party. Try as I might, I simply cannot see how excluding one party from a multi-view meeting 'strengthens' – to use Mr Swinney's own words – democracy. I would venture very much the opposite is the case. Alexander McKay, Edinburgh Shared values Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad When John Swinney announced at the end of February that he would hold a 'summit' to tackle the rise of the 'far right' that would 'provide leadership and stress the importance of our shared values', he added that it would also 'draw a line in the sand, to set out who we are and what we believe in'. At the 'summit', Mr Swinney warned about 'serious threats to our democratic system and our values in Scotland'. How exactly is our democratic system threatened? Could it be by a regime lasting 18 years whose Auditor General and others have accused of lacking transparency? That redacts huge and embarrassing areas of official documents? That insults MSPs instead of answering their questions? That tries to conceal its monumental incompetence? That is fundamentally unaccountable? Did anyone discover at this 'summit' what 'our shared values' are? Where can we view the mythical line in the sand that it was supposed to draw? This surely is self-righteous nationalist piffle at its most grandiose. Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh Court in the act Your editorial (23 April) is right to question Maggie Chapman's claim that her comment that 'bigotry, prejudice and hatred coming from the Supreme Court' did not refer to its judges. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It is reasonable to assume that what she means is that anyone disagreeing with her views on trans is automatically a transphobic bigot, even if they believe in sex chromosomes, which cannot be changed by a certificate, wearing a wig, or even by surgery. I hope that I am right, and that her views were not an attack on the independence of judges, a principle which is a bedrock of our constitution. I declare an interest in that in 2023 the Supreme Court dissected in detail my work as an expert witness in a food poisoning case. Lord Hodge's judgement agreed with my findings in its 34-page report, which quoted many legal precedents going back to the 1820 trial of Queen Caroline for adultery. Hugh Pennington, Aberdeen Write to The Scotsman
