Latest news with #Non-ConstituencyMemberof
Business Times
03-05-2025
- Politics
- Business Times
Singapore election 2025: SDP's Chee Soon Juan and Paul Tambyah fail to win seats
[SINGAPORE] Both Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) leaders failed in their bids to win seats even though the party had a mixed showing in this year's general election (GE) – secretary-general Chee Soon Juan had an improved vote share at the polls even as he contested in a new Single-Member Constituency (SMC), while chairman Paul Tambyah lost ground. Dr Chee went up against People's Action Party (PAP) candidate Poh Li San in newly created Sembawang West SMC, and lost. Poh garnered 11,978 votes, or 53.19 per cent of the valid votes, while Dr Chee trailed with 10,541 votes, or 46.81 per cent. A total of 22,519 valid votes were cast, while 269 votes were rejected. Before Sembawang West was carved out of Sembawang GRC in the latest review of electoral boundaries, Poh looked after the ward. In GE2020, the PAP won the Group Representation Constituency (GRC) with 67.29 per cent of the votes, against a team from the National Solidarity Party. The SDP previously contested Sembawang GRC in 2006 and 2011, when Dr Chee was not eligible to contest due to his undischarged bankruptcy. After his return to politics, the party did not contest the GRC in 2015 and 2020. In GE2020, Dr Chee contested Bukit Batok SMC, garnering 45.20 per cent of the votes and losing to PAP's Murali Pillai. The single seat has since been absorbed into the new Jurong East-Bukit Batok GRC. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up While Dr Chee failed to take the Sembawang West SMC seat, his 46.81 per cent vote share was among the highest of the losing parties' candidates, just behind those of the opposition candidates in Jalan Kayu SMC and Tampines GRC. In this election, 10 opposition candidates were victorious in their GRCs. Under the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) scheme, if fewer than 12 opposition candidates are elected at a GE, the 'best losers' from among them will be declared as NCMPs to bring the total number of opposition MPs to 12. This means that Dr Chee narrowly missed out on an NCMP seat. The SDP peaked at three parliamentary seats following the 1991 election, and has not held any seats since 1997. Before this GE, 2020 was the closest that it managed to a return to the political stage, as Dr Tambyah's and Dr Chee's vote shares crept above 45 per cent. Losing steam in Bukit Panjang Meanwhile, PAP candidate for Bukit Panjang SMC Liang Eng Hwa secured 61.41 per cent of the votes for the single-seat ward – defeating SDP's Dr Tambyah by a larger margin than in their previous face-off. Liang ended up with 19,116 votes. Dr Tambyah garnered 12,015 votes, representing 38.59 per cent of the vote share. There were a total of 31,131 valid votes, while 350 votes were rejected. Liang is a managing director at DBS, while Dr Tambyah is an infectious diseases expert at the National University Hospital. Bukit Panjang SMC's boundaries remained unchanged from the election in 2020. The straight fight for the constituency this year marked a rematch between Liang and Dr Tambyah. PAP's margin of victory widened from the last election, when Liang secured 53.73 per cent of the votes, against Dr Tambyah's 46.27 per cent. That remains the slimmest margin of victory recorded for the PAP in the SMC. Dr Tambyah's profile rose significantly then, on the back of the Covid-19 crisis. Though GE2025 is the second time they are fighting against each other in Bukit Panjang SMC, they have also faced off elsewhere. In 2015, Dr Tambyah was fielded in SDP's Holland-Bukit Timah team, while Liang contested the GRC on the PAP's side. The mixed results came as the SDP was embroiled in controversy after Marsiling-Yew Tee candidate Gigene Wong went off script to refer to teammate Ariffin Sha by a racial slur and mispronounced his name as 'elephant'. She and Dr Chee apologised in later speeches. Dr Wong did not speak at any subsequent rallies. On the campaign trail, both Dr Tambyah and Dr Chee had called for more opposition voices in Parliament, which they said would improve the PAP's governance. The SDP envisions a Singapore 'where everyone can thrive', with policies from healthcare to education. PAP had criticised their policies and said they were 'mere populist calls' to win seats in Parliament. The SDP leaders also promised to make improvements on a municipal level, with more regular engagements and wise spending. In response, their opponents questioned their understanding of the roles of Members of Parliament. For more election coverage, visit our GE2025 microsite
CNA
28-04-2025
- Politics
- CNA
GE2025: Opposition never mentions having alternative voices in parliament is 'guaranteed', says Indranee
SINGAPORE: Opposition parties often urge voters to support them in the name of bringing alternative voices into parliament - but they rarely acknowledge that such voices are already "guaranteed", said Minister in the Prime Minister's Office Indranee Rajah on Monday (Apr 28). "The opposition's narrative is: Vote for them, because we need alternative voices in parliament. They make it seem as if it is a binary choice, as if voting PAP means that there won't be opposition voices in parliament," she said. "But that's not true. What the opposition never mentions is that having alternative voices in parliament is guaranteed, and it was the PAP (People's Action Party) that made sure of that." Ms Indranee - the first of nine speakers at the PAP's lunchtime rally in Raffles Place - was referring to the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP) scheme, introduced just before the 1984 General Election to ensure a minimum number of opposition members in parliament. If fewer than 12 opposition members are voted in after an election, the 'best losers' from among the opposition candidates are declared elected as NCMPs to bring the total opposition figure in parliament to 12. An NCMP, who does not represent any constituency, is entitled to vote on all matters except supply Bills, money Bills, constitutional amendments, motions of no-confidence in the government and motions to remove the president from office. "We amended the constitution so that no matter what, there will always be at least 12 opposition members in parliament, and the opposition has not hesitated to take full advantage of this provision to their benefit," Ms Indranee said. "But they never tell you that. At the end of the day, you - all of you Singaporeans - you are the ones who get to decide who gets into parliament and who does not. You are the ones who will decide who are constituency MPs and who are non-constituency MPs. "But it is important for you to know that it is never a case that there will be no alternative voices in parliament. It is not a binary choice. But what is really even more important than opposition providing an alternative voice, is your voice." Ms Indranee acknowledged that many have voiced concerns about cost of living, saying that the PAP government would continue to provide support as long as necessary. "The cost pressures we are feeling now are mainly externally driven. We will continue to provide support to shield Singaporeans from the full impact of this," she said, citing Community Development Council (CDC) vouchers, goods and services tax (GST) vouchers, cash payouts and utilities rebates. While she did not specify the external factors driving up costs, Ms Indranee said the government has explained the need to raise the Goods and Services Tax (GST) to fund healthcare costs for an ageing population. "The opposition has sought to make an issue of GST," she said, adding that the government has "buffered" Singaporeans from the GST hike with the Assurance Package, delaying its impact for 10 years for the lower-income and five years for the middle-income. "The bulk of GST is collected from high earners, tourists and foreigners, and this revenue collected is used for Singaporeans." Ms Indranee, who leads the PAP's four-member team contesting Pasir Ris-Changi GRC, said the PAP government has also lowered pre-school fees, improved support for large families, and "heavily" subsidised education and healthcare. "We know that Singaporeans worry that this help may be just temporary, but for the PAP, our assurance is that we will provide support for as long as necessary," she said. "But we also understand your desire for assurance that you can afford things on your own, without support, and that is why our other big focus is the economy - generating jobs and finding ways to allow you to earn higher incomes." Ms Indranee said the PAP government will help students get internships and fresh graduates find jobs, while doing more for older workers, especially those who have lost their jobs. Singapore is also on track to build more than 50,000 new Build-To-Order flats in the next three years, she said, adding that the new classification system for these flats will help keep them affordable. "These are just some of the things that we want to do for Singaporeans and for Singapore. The full plans are laid out in our manifesto. And contrary to what some say, our manifesto is not short on specifics or substance," she said, shooting back at Workers' Party chief Pritam Singh's comments. "Our manifesto says all that it needs to say. It sets out the outcomes that we want to achieve. And this is enough, because Singaporeans know that if the PAP promises something, we will do it." Ms Indranee said opposition parties have been trying to sell Singaporeans a "myth" that it is okay to vote for more opposition candidates and "somehow get the same result". "That's not true. You will not. And I believe that all of you, every single one of you standing here today, know it," she said. "Many of you work in companies that are organised by teams. We have all played team sports. We have all worked on team projects, and we all know if you keep pulling out team members, you won't be able to produce the same results, no matter how hard you try." If the opposition truly believed it was just a matter of numbers and substituting those who lose with others, she said, "then it shouldn't matter which candidate they field, and where". "But you can see how carefully they have calibrated their teams and the electoral divisions in which they stand or not," she said.
