Latest news with #Nunan
Yahoo
09-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Bridgton man charged with threatening to 'shoot' Trump
Apr. 8—Police arrested a Bridgton man who allegedly threatened to shoot and kill President Donald Trump while speaking to an undercover officer Saturday, according to court documents. Kevin Bell, 46, walked into a local restaurant and began speaking with Special Agent Bradford Nunan of the United States Secret Service. Though Nunan was wearing plain clothes and driving an unmarked vehicle, Bell spotted him as a law enforcement officer after asking restaurant staff whom the vehicle belonged to, the officer said in the criminal complaint. Bell allegedly told Nunan about previous encounters with law enforcement and several social media posts that he said were flagged by the Secret Service and the FBI and "got him in trouble," before making a threat against Trump, Nunan said. "I wanted to shoot (former President George W.) Bush but didn't, but now Trump is in and I don't care for him," Nunan quoted Bell as saying. He allegedly added "I'll try to shoot him" or "I'll just shoot him." Bell is charged with making a threat against the president, which is a Class D, felony-level crime, according to court documents. He faces up to five years in prison and up to $250,000 in fines. The U.S. District Court in Portland issued an arrest warrant for Bell Monday, two days after the alleged threats. Witnesses, including Nunan, described Bell's behavior leading up to the conversation as odd, according to the complaint. Bell was taken into protective custody in February after threatening to kill his psychiatrist, Nunan said. In 2023, he threatened to "overdose on Zoloft" on a flight to Kansas City, Missouri, to force an emergency landing, Nunan said. Copy the Story Link We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others. We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion. You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs. Show less
Yahoo
08-04-2025
- General
- Yahoo
Only two religious bodies offer contributions to mother and baby redress scheme
Only two of eight religious bodies linked to mother and baby homes in Ireland have offered to contribute to a survivor redress scheme, a report has found. The Sisters of Bon Secours offered 12.97 million euro (about £11 million) – a sum deemed as meaningful and accepted by the Irish Government. The Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul has proposed contributing a building to the scheme. That offer is to be considered by the Government. A third religious body – the Sisters of St John of God – declined to contribute to the scheme but offered a conditional donation of 75,000 euro (£64,000) to be used for a charitable purpose associated with mother and baby home survivors. Min. @NormaFoleyTD1 today published the report of the independent negotiator, Ms. Sheila Nunan Ms. Nunan engaged with eight religious bodies involved in the institutions over a period of some 20 months Full Press Release: — Children, Equality, Disability, Integration, Youth (@dcediy) April 8, 2025 The remaining five bodies – the Congregation of Lady of the Good Shepherd; the Congregation of the Sacred Hearts of Jesus and Mary; the Congregation of the Sisters of Mercy; the Legion of Mary; and the Church of Ireland – made no offer. The details were contained in a report compiled by Sheila Nunan, the independent negotiator appointed by the Government to engage with the organisations over financial redress. The negotiation was part of a bid to secure contributions from religious bodies towards the cost of the Government-established Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme. The scheme will cost more than 800 million euro (£680 million) and the Government had been seeking around 270 million (£231 million) in total from the religious bodies. A commission of investigation was set up in 2015 to examine homes run by the state and religious organisations where tens of thousands of unmarried Irish women were sent to have their babies. The commission found that almost 170,000 women and children passed through the institutions from 1922 until the last one closed in 1998. The investigation exposed the often harsh conditions and unforgiving regimes many women and children experienced in the institutions. Minister for Children Norma Foley expressed disappointment at the approach adopted by the majority of religious bodies to the redress scheme. 'The commission (of investigation) made significant findings in relation to the failings of the state and religious organisations who together ran mother and baby and county home institutions,' said Ms Foley. 'I know that people across Irish society, both religious and lay, have been distressed and appalled by the harsh conditions that women who became pregnant outside of marriage endured in these institutions. 'They had to face unfair, unwarranted and unbearable shame and stigma both inside the walls of the mother and baby homes and outside the walls from both state and society.' She added: 'The state has accepted its own responsibility for what happened to women and their children in mother and baby homes by firstly apologising and also setting up a payment scheme. 'A process was put in place to seek a financial contribution towards the cost of the Mother and Baby Institutions Payment Scheme from religious bodies associated with mother and baby and county home institutions. 'While acknowledging the financial contribution by the Sisters of Bon Secours, I believe that much more could have been done by the other religious bodies concerned. 'I would encourage other religious bodies to reflect further on their willingness to make a meaningful contribution to the payment scheme and note that my department is available to engage with them on this matter at any stage.'
