Latest news with #OperationSindoorCalm
Time of India
11-05-2025
- Sport
- Time of India
LeBron James may stay with the Los Angeles Lakers as family stability outweighs uncertainty of joining a new NBA franchise
(Image Source - Getty Images) LeBron James is 40 and coming off a disappointing playoff run, he has a big choice to make — go for a fifth championship with a different team or stay with the Lakers. While rumors about his next destination are flying, the stability of family life and his deep ties to Los Angeles could sway his decision. With his daughter Zhuri's life rooted in LA and his sons' involvement in the community, his family commitments could be a key factor in what he decides. Family ties and personal commitments may influence LeBron James' decision to stay LeBron James' ties to Los Angeles go beyond just basketball. Operation Sindoor Calm prevails in Punjab after understanding between India, Pakistan Pakistan violates ceasefire: Loud explosions, sirens haunt J&K- what we know so far Behind the scenes of ceasefire: Calls from Pakistan, Washington His daughter, Zhuri Nova James, who's 10, has grown up in the city, going to school and getting involved in local events. LeBron has shown he wants to be more present for his family, especially when it comes to supporting Zhuri in her volleyball pursuits. This focus on family indicates that moving his family for a new team might not be in line with what he values right now. On top of that, James' kids, Bronny and Bryce, have made their own friends in the LA scene. Bronny just wrapped up his first season with the Lakers, giving them a cool chance to shine together professionally. This family connection in the same team gives James even more reason to stick around with the Lakers. I Think It's Time For LeBron To MOVE ON by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Google Brain Co-Founder Andrew Ng, Recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Around Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List Undo Money matters too. James has a $52.6 million player option for the 2025–26 season. Although there are rumors he might take a pay cut to help the team, it's clear the Lakers are dedicated to surrounding him with a strong roster. The Lakers may have exited the playoffs early, but adding Luka Dončić has definitely brought some fresh vibes to the team. With the possibility of James working with Dončić and the chance to play alongside his son, it makes a solid case for him to stay. The front office seems ready to make some strategic changes to strengthen the team and help James chase another championship. Also Read: Michael Jordan flashbacks hit hard as Donovan Mitchell delivers legendary move against Indiana Pacers While the thought of winning a championship with another team is appealing, LeBron James' strong connections in Los Angeles—both personal and professional — could sway him to stay with the Lakers. As he approaches the end of his remarkable career and juggles personal responsibilities, the opportunities and stability in LA provide a strong incentive to remain. Only time will reveal his choice, but it seems like he might prefer to keep things as they are.
Time of India
11-05-2025
- Science
- Time of India
Inland Taipan vs sea snakes: Know the key differences on the basis of venom, habitat and more
In the world of poisonous snakes, two species tend to hog the limelight — the Inland Taipan and the sea snake. Although both have deadly venom that can kill a human being, they are worlds apart in terms of biology, behavior, habitat, and general threat to humans. This article presents an in-depth study of their major differences and considers a hypothetical situation: if ever they fought each other, who would emerge victorious? Difference between inland taipan and sea snakes The Inland Taipan The Inland Taipan (Oxyuranus microlepidotus), or the "fierce snake" or "small-scaled snake," inhabits dry areas of central Australia, especially clay plains of Queensland and South Australia. The most venomous land snake ever discovered by science, it is, however, very shy and seldom encountered in the wild. It prefers to stay concealed in deep crevices and cracks, evading confrontation with human beings or other animals whenever it can. What is so amazing about this snake is how deadly it is. The Inland Taipan's venom is a multifaceted mixture of neurotoxins, procoagulants, and myotoxins that paralyze the nervous system, cause quick clotting of the blood, and kill muscle. Operation Sindoor Calm prevails in Punjab after understanding between India, Pakistan Pakistan violates ceasefire: Loud explosions, sirens haunt J&K- what we know so far Behind the scenes of ceasefire: Calls from Pakistan, Washington Based on toxicology reports, one bite injects enough venom to kill 100 to 250 adult humans, the most toxic land snake by a significant amount. Sea Snakes Sea snakes are part of the Hydrophiinae subfamily and have relatives in the land-dwelling elapids such as the cobras and taipans. They inhabit tropical coastal waters in both the Indian and Pacific Oceans, particularly around Southeast Asia, Australia, and the Pacific Islands. Though more than 70 species of sea snake exist, among the most toxic are the Dubois' sea snake (Aipysurus duboisii) and the beaked sea snake (Enhydrina schistosa). Similar to the Inland Taipan, these species yield very toxic venom. Certain species have been measured to be almost as potent as, or in isolated instances more toxic than, the Inland Taipan — though the dose injected in one bite is often lower or similar. Yet sea snakes are generally harmless and unlikely to bite under any circumstances short of direct contact or provocation, and therefore human deaths by envenomation are very rare. Inland taipan vs sea snakes Venom One of the most important considerations when comparing these snakes is their yield and potency of venom. The Inland Taipan holds the record for toxicity per drop, but it delivers a fairly small volume per bite relative to some sea snakes. Sea snakes do not necessarily have venom as toxic, but they tend to inject higher doses of venom. For instance, the beaked sea snake can inject sufficient venom in one bite to kill 50+ humans, although such venom is uncommon because of their habits. Inland Taipan venom effects: Time to fatality in humans: as short as 30 to 45 minutes if left untreated Symptoms: paralysis, bleeding internally, muscle degeneration, kidney failure Sea snake venom effects: Frequently myotoxic, with extreme muscle degeneration Respiratory collapse and paralysis in extreme cases Fatalities are exceptional because of the snakes' reluctance to attack and low aggressiveness Physical adaptations Each snake's body is closely connected to its environment: Inland Taipan: Thin, agile, and swift on land Camouflage for desert landscapes Has long fangs and effective venom delivery for knocking out small mammals such as rats and mice with a single blow Sea Snake Paddle-shaped tails to swim Flat bodies to glide through water Valved nostrils that seal when underwater to avoid drowning Some species can stay underwater for as long as 2 hours These adaptations render sea snakes useless on land, where they are slow and exposed, while the Inland Taipan would be entirely out of its comfort zone in water. Behavioural differences Although both snakes have intimidating reputations, neither is especially aggressive. Inland Taipan: Extremely shy and seldom seen. Will nearly always withdraw instead of attacking. Bites to humans are very rare in the wild. Sea Snakes: Generally non-aggressive, but may become defensive if cornered, especially during mating season. Divers sometimes report sea snakes approaching out of curiosity, but actual bites are uncommon. That said, when disturbed or handled, both snakes are capable of delivering fatal bites. Habitat The Inland Taipan lives in remote, arid areas, away from large human populations. Because of its isolated environment and timid nature, the likelihood of a human being bitten is low. The majority of reported bites have been in captivity or among snake handlers. Sea snakes, on the other hand, live in coastal communities visited by fishermen and divers. In spite of their proximity to humans, envenomation cases are low because of their non-aggressive nature. Inland taipan vs sea snakes: Who would win If these two snakes were, somehow, forced into a head-to-head combat situation — which is unlikely with their totally distinct environments — then the winner would largely depend upon the environment: On land: The Inland Taipan would be in charge. It is quicker, more agile on land, and its venom more deadly. The sea snake would be slow-moving, exposed, and at its mercy in this environment. In water: The sea snake would be the most comfortable in its own league. It can effortlessly outcompete the Inland Taipan, not well suited to water. Even so, should the Taipan succeed in a bite, the venom may yet be fatal. Overall, the Inland Taipan emerges victorious with regards to overall deadliness, but the sea snake excels at water maneuverability. Inland taipan and sea snakes : Which is more deadly In order to determine the overall more hazardous snake, consider toxicity, animal behavior, and danger of encounter for humans. The Inland Taipan is currently at the top in terms of the most deadly venom on planet Earth. Sea snakes, while at risk being harmful, become most likely encountered through their use of ocean range. Concerning danger towards humanity, the sea snakes do constitute a stronger possibility due to distance, however the Inland Taipan biologically happens to be more fatal creature. Also Read | Watch | Snake guards secret hidden box in viral video, unveiling a surprising treasure buried underground
Time of India
11-05-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Kashmir not a biblical 1000-year-old conflict: Congress on Trump's mediation offer
Congress MP Manish Tewari (PTI photo) NEW DELHI: After United States President Donald Trump offered to mediate on the Kashmir issue between India and Pakistan, the Congress party strongly criticised the offer, asserting that Kashmir is not an age-old conflict and reiterating its demand for an all-party meeting and a special Parliament session. Congress MP Manish Tewari, responding to Trump's remarks, said the Kashmir conflict began only 78 years ago and not a "biblical" one as implied. Operation Sindoor Calm prevails in Punjab after understanding between India, Pakistan Pakistan violates ceasefire: Loud explosions, sirens haunt J&K- what we know so far Behind the scenes of ceasefire: Calls from Pakistan, Washington In a post on X, Tewari said, "Someone in the US establishment needs to seriously educate their President @POTUS @realDonaldTrump that Kashmir is not a biblical 1000-year-old conflict. It started on October 22, 1947 - 78 years ago when Pakistan invaded the Independent State of Jammu & Kashmir that subsequently was ceded to India in' FULL' by Maharaja Hari Singh on October 26, 1947 that includes areas illegally occupied by Pakistan till now. How difficult is it to grasp this simple fact?" Echoing similar concerns, Congress Rajya Sabha MP Jairam Ramesh once again called for an all-party meeting chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and a special Parliament session to address issues arising from the recent developments, including the terror attack in Pahalgam, India's military response through Operation Sindoor , and the ceasefire agreement . "The Indian National Congress once again demands that an all-party meeting be called under the Chairmanship of the Prime Minister and a special session of Parliament be held on the issue of Pahalgam, Operation Sindoor and the cessation of hostilities, announced first in Washington DC and subsequently by the Governments of India and Pakistan, so that all these issues can be discussed comprehensively," Jairam said. He also raised concerns over remarks by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio referring to a "neutral forum" for dialogue between India and Pakistan. "The Indian National Congress believes that the mention of a "neutral forum" for dialogue between India and Pakistan by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio raises several questions - have we abandoned the Shimla Agreement? Have we opened the door for third party mediation? The Indian National Congress would like to ask whether diplomatic channels are being reopened between India and Pakistan? What commitments have we sought from Pakistan and what have we received?" he questioned further. The comments came a day after the US President welcomed the India-Pakistan ceasefire, warning of the potential for massive destruction if hostilities had continued. In a post on Truth Social, the US President said, "I am very proud of the strong and unwaveringly powerful leadership of India and Pakistan for having the strength, wisdom, and fortitude to fully know and understand that it was time to stop the current aggression that could have led to the death and destruction of so many, and so much. Millions of good and innocent people could have died! Your legacy is greatly enhanced by your brave actions." Trump also reiterated the US's role in brokering the ceasefire and repeated his offer to mediate a resolution on Kashmir. "I am proud that the USA was able to help you arrive at this historic and heroic decision. While not even discussed, I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great Nations. Additionally, I will work with you both to see if, after a "thousand years," a solution can be arrived at concerning Kashmir. God Bless the leadership of India and Pakistan on a job well done!!!" India has consistently rejected any third-party involvement in the Kashmir issue, maintaining that Jammu and Kashmir is its internal matter and an integral part of the country. On Saturday, according to news agency ANI, Indian officials also downplayed Washington's role in the latest ceasefire development, stating that the understanding was reached through military-to-military communication between the Director Generals of Military Operations (DGMOs) of India and Pakistan.
