Latest news with #PFUTP
Time of India
3 days ago
- Business
- Time of India
Sebi Market Ban: Sebi Extends Ban on LS Industries Amid Fraud Allegations, ET LegalWorld
Sebi on Friday said LS Industries, its promoter, and four others will remain barred from the securities markets till the outcome of a probe following allegations of fraudulent activities and stock price manipulation. Profound Finance (promoter of LS Industries), Jahangir Panikkaveettil Perumbarambathu, a Dubai-based NRI public shareholder of LS Industries, Suresh Goyal, Alka Sahni, Shashi Kant Sahni HUF have also been prohibited from the markets. "...hereby confirm the directions issued vide the interim order dated February 11, 2025," Sebi's whole-time member Ashwani Bhatia said in the confirmatory order. Advt Advt The markets watchdog also said the timeline to complete the investigation in this matter is extended to November 15 and the entities are directed to cooperate with Sebi's probe in the right February this year, Sebi had passed an interim order and restrained LS Industries, Profound Finance and four others from the securities markets following allegations of fraudulent activities and stock price had also directed Perumbarambathu to impound unlawful gains of Rs 1.14 crore from the sale of shares as part of a prima facie fraudulent matter pertains to LS Industries and its key associates were involved in artificially inflating the company's share price despite negligible revenue and financial the interim order, Sebi noted that LS Industries reported negligible revenue in the last three financial years (FY22-FY24) and first three quarters of FY25, which indicated that the company was not doing any business during this poor financials, the share price of LSIL rose by over 10 times from Rs 22.50 to a high of Rs 267.50 between July 23, 2024 and September 27, 2024, with the company reaching a peak market capitalisation of about Rs 22,700 sudden price movement in the scrip without any meaningful change in fundamentals, the dubious transfer of shares to Perumbarambathu, and the suspicious trading patterns of certain entities came under the prima facie appeared that the entities were part of a manipulative scheme designed to defraud investors and allegedly violated the provisions of PFUTP ( Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices ) rules. Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis. Download ETLegalWorld App Get Realtime updates Save your favourite articles Scan to download App
Economic Times
3 days ago
- Business
- Economic Times
Sebi confirms market ban on LS Industries, promoter, 4 others
Sebi on Friday said LS Industries, its promoter, and four others will remain barred from the securities markets till the outcome of a probe following allegations of fraudulent activities and stock price manipulation. ADVERTISEMENT Profound Finance (promoter of LS Industries), Jahangir Panikkaveettil Perumbarambathu, a Dubai-based NRI public shareholder of LS Industries, Suresh Goyal, Alka Sahni, Shashi Kant Sahni HUF have also been prohibited from the markets. "...hereby confirm the directions issued vide the interim order dated February 11, 2025," Sebi's whole-time member Ashwani Bhatia said in the confirmatory order. The markets watchdog also said the timeline to complete the investigation in this matter is extended to November 15 and the entities are directed to cooperate with Sebi's probe in the right earnest. In February this year, Sebi had passed an interim order and restrained LS Industries, Profound Finance and four others from the securities markets following allegations of fraudulent activities and stock price manipulation. Sebi had also directed Perumbarambathu to impound unlawful gains of Rs 1.14 crore from the sale of shares as part of a prima facie fraudulent scheme. ADVERTISEMENT The matter pertains to LS Industries and its key associates were involved in artificially inflating the company's share price despite negligible revenue and financial instability. In the interim order, Sebi noted that LS Industries reported negligible revenue in the last three financial years (FY22-FY24) and first three quarters of FY25, which indicated that the company was not doing any business during this period. ADVERTISEMENT Despite poor financials, the share price of LSIL rose by over 10 times from Rs 22.50 to a high of Rs 267.50 between July 23, 2024 and September 27, 2024, with the company reaching a peak market capitalisation of about Rs 22,700 crore. The sudden price movement in the scrip without any meaningful change in fundamentals, the dubious transfer of shares to Perumbarambathu, and the suspicious trading patterns of certain entities came under the scanner. It prima facie appeared that the entities were part of a manipulative scheme designed to defraud investors and allegedly violated the provisions of PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) rules. PTI (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
Mint
21-05-2025
- Business
- Mint
IREDA approaches DRT Delhi to recover about ₹729 cr from Gensol Engineering, its arm
New Delhi, May 21 (PTI) State-owned Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency on Wednesday said it has approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal Delhi to recover about ₹ 729 crore from Gensol Engineering and Gensol EV Lease Pvt Ltd. Earlier, Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) had filed a bankruptcy application against beleaguered Gensol Engineering as well as its electric vehicle leasing unit Gensol EV Lease Ltd. In an exchange filing, IREDA stated that it has filed an "original application under Section 19 of The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 before Debt Recovery Tribunal Delhi on May 20, 2025 for a default amount of ₹ 510,00,52,672 and Rs. 218.95 crore against Gensol Engineering Ltd and Gensol EV Lease Pvt Ltd respectively". The agency on May 14 filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Gensol Engineering Limited for the default amount of ₹ 510 crore. It also filed a bankruptcy application on May 15 against Gensol EV Lease Ltd, a subsidiary of Gensol Engineering Ltd, for a default of ₹ 218.95 crore. Last month, in an interim order, Sebi barred Gensol Engineering and promoters -- Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi -- from the securities markets till further orders in a fund diversion and governance lapses case. On May 12, Jaggi brothers resigned from the company following market regulator Sebi's interim order, according to an exchange filing. Anmol Singh Jaggi held the post of Managing Director while Puneet Singh Jaggi was a Whole-time Director. In its order on April 15, 2025, the Sebi debarred Jaggi brothers from holding the position of a director or key managerial personnel in Gensol until further orders. The order came after the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) received a complaint in June 2024 relating to the manipulation of share price and diversion of funds from GEL and thereafter started examining the matter. In the 29-page order, Sebi had said, "The prima facie findings have shown mis-utilisation and diversion of funds of the company (GEL) in a fraudulent manner by its promoter directors, Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi, who are also the direct beneficiaries of the diverted funds". Gensol Engineering's promoters treated the listed company as a proprietary firm, diverting corporate funds to buy a high-end apartment in The Camellias, DLF Gurgaon, splurging on a luxury golf set, paying off credit cards, and transferring money to close relatives, Sebi said in its interim order. "The company has attempted to mislead Sebi, the CRAs (credit rating agencies), the lenders and the investors by submitting forged conduct letters purportedly issued by its lenders," the regulator had said. The noticees 1, 2 and 3 (GEL, Anmol and Puneet Singh Jaggi) are alleged to have violated the provisions of PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) rules, it had added. Sebi had noted that the promoters were running a listed public company as if it were a proprietary firm. GEL's funds were routed to related parties and used for unconnected expenses as if the company's funds were promoters' piggy banks. According to the regulator, the company secured a total of ₹ 977.75 crore in loans, of which ₹ 663.89 crore was meant specifically for the purchase of 6,400 electric vehicles (EVs). EVs were procured by the company and subsequently leased to BluSmart, a related party. The result of these transactions would mean that the diversions at some time need to be written off from Gensol's books, ultimately resulting in losses to the investors of the company. The internal controls at Gensol appear to be loose, and through the quick layering of transactions, funds have seamlessly flowed to multiple related entities/individuals, the regulator had said.
Mint
21-05-2025
- Business
- Mint
IREDA approaches DRT Delhi to recover ₹729 crore from Gensol Engineering
State-owned Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency on Wednesday said it has approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal Delhi to recover about ₹ 729 crore from Gensol Engineering and Gensol EV Lease Pvt Ltd. Earlier, Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) had filed a bankruptcy application against beleaguered Gensol Engineering as well as its electric vehicle leasing unit Gensol EV Lease Ltd. In an exchange filing, IREDA stated that it has filed an "original application under Section 19 of The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 before Debt Recovery Tribunal Delhi on May 20, 2025 for a default amount of ₹ 510,00,52,672 and Rs. 218.95 crore against Gensol Engineering Ltd and Gensol EV Lease Pvt Ltd respectively". The agency on May 14 filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Gensol Engineering Limited for the default amount of ₹ 510 crore. It also filed a bankruptcy application on May 15 against Gensol EV Lease Ltd, a subsidiary of Gensol Engineering Ltd, for a default of ₹ 218.95 crore. Last month, in an interim order, Sebi barred Gensol Engineering and promoters -- Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi -- from the securities markets till further orders in a fund diversion and governance lapses case. On May 12, Jaggi brothers resigned from the company following market regulator Sebi's interim order, according to an exchange filing. Anmol Singh Jaggi held the post of Managing Director while Puneet Singh Jaggi was a Whole-time Director. In its order on April 15, 2025, the Sebi debarred Jaggi brothers from holding the position of a director or key managerial personnel in Gensol until further orders. The order came after the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) received a complaint in June 2024 relating to the manipulation of share price and diversion of funds from GEL and thereafter started examining the matter. In the 29-page order, Sebi had said, "The prima facie findings have shown mis-utilisation and diversion of funds of the company (GEL) in a fraudulent manner by its promoter directors, Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi, who are also the direct beneficiaries of the diverted funds". Gensol Engineering's promoters treated the listed company as a proprietary firm, diverting corporate funds to buy a high-end apartment in The Camellias, DLF Gurgaon, splurging on a luxury golf set, paying off credit cards, and transferring money to close relatives, Sebi said in its interim order. "The company has attempted to mislead Sebi, the CRAs (credit rating agencies), the lenders and the investors by submitting forged conduct letters purportedly issued by its lenders," the regulator had said. The noticees 1, 2 and 3 (GEL, Anmol and Puneet Singh Jaggi) are alleged to have violated the provisions of PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) rules, it had added. Sebi had noted that the promoters were running a listed public company as if it were a proprietary firm. GEL's funds were routed to related parties and used for unconnected expenses as if the company's funds were promoters' piggy banks. According to the regulator, the company secured a total of ₹ 977.75 crore in loans, of which ₹ 663.89 crore was meant specifically for the purchase of 6,400 electric vehicles (EVs). EVs were procured by the company and subsequently leased to BluSmart, a related party. The result of these transactions would mean that the diversions at some time need to be written off from Gensol's books, ultimately resulting in losses to the investors of the company. The internal controls at Gensol appear to be loose, and through the quick layering of transactions, funds have seamlessly flowed to multiple related entities/individuals, the regulator had said.
Mint
21-05-2025
- Business
- Mint
IREDA approaches DRT Delhi to recover ₹729 crore from Gensol Engineering
State-owned Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency on Wednesday said it has approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal Delhi to recover about ₹ 729 crore from Gensol Engineering and Gensol EV Lease Pvt Ltd. Earlier, Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) had filed a bankruptcy application against beleaguered Gensol Engineering as well as its electric vehicle leasing unit Gensol EV Lease Ltd. In an exchange filing, IREDA stated that it has filed an "original application under Section 19 of The Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 before Debt Recovery Tribunal Delhi on May 20, 2025 for a default amount of ₹ 510,00,52,672 and Rs. 218.95 crore against Gensol Engineering Ltd and Gensol EV Lease Pvt Ltd respectively". The agency on May 14 filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Gensol Engineering Limited for the default amount of ₹ 510 crore. It also filed a bankruptcy application on May 15 against Gensol EV Lease Ltd, a subsidiary of Gensol Engineering Ltd, for a default of ₹ 218.95 crore. Last month, in an interim order, Sebi barred Gensol Engineering and promoters -- Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi -- from the securities markets till further orders in a fund diversion and governance lapses case. On May 12, Jaggi brothers resigned from the company following market regulator Sebi's interim order, according to an exchange filing. Anmol Singh Jaggi held the post of Managing Director while Puneet Singh Jaggi was a Whole-time Director. In its order on April 15, 2025, the Sebi debarred Jaggi brothers from holding the position of a director or key managerial personnel in Gensol until further orders. The order came after the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) received a complaint in June 2024 relating to the manipulation of share price and diversion of funds from GEL and thereafter started examining the matter. In the 29-page order, Sebi had said, "The prima facie findings have shown mis-utilisation and diversion of funds of the company (GEL) in a fraudulent manner by its promoter directors, Anmol Singh Jaggi and Puneet Singh Jaggi, who are also the direct beneficiaries of the diverted funds". Gensol Engineering's promoters treated the listed company as a proprietary firm, diverting corporate funds to buy a high-end apartment in The Camellias, DLF Gurgaon, splurging on a luxury golf set, paying off credit cards, and transferring money to close relatives, Sebi said in its interim order. "The company has attempted to mislead Sebi, the CRAs (credit rating agencies), the lenders and the investors by submitting forged conduct letters purportedly issued by its lenders," the regulator had said. The noticees 1, 2 and 3 (GEL, Anmol and Puneet Singh Jaggi) are alleged to have violated the provisions of PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) rules, it had added. Sebi had noted that the promoters were running a listed public company as if it were a proprietary firm. GEL's funds were routed to related parties and used for unconnected expenses as if the company's funds were promoters' piggy banks. According to the regulator, the company secured a total of ₹ 977.75 crore in loans, of which ₹ 663.89 crore was meant specifically for the purchase of 6,400 electric vehicles (EVs). EVs were procured by the company and subsequently leased to BluSmart, a related party. The result of these transactions would mean that the diversions at some time need to be written off from Gensol's books, ultimately resulting in losses to the investors of the company. The internal controls at Gensol appear to be loose, and through the quick layering of transactions, funds have seamlessly flowed to multiple related entities/individuals, the regulator had said. It had also directed the firm to appoint a forensic auditor to examine the books of accounts of Gensol and its related parties.
