Latest news with #PSRaman
Mint
an hour ago
- Business
- Mint
Turkish company Celebi moves Madras HC to challenge cancellation of services contract at Chennai airport
Turkish company Celebi's subsidiary has moved the Madras High Court seeking an interim injunction on the Airports Authority of India's decision to cancel its concession agreement for the Chennai Airport, LiveLaw reported on June 9. The company is seeking Madras HC intervention over AAI's cancellation of the concession agreement, after the Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS) removed its security clearance, it added. Chennai Airport had cancelled its contract with Celebi Ground Services Chennai on May 26, the report said. Addressing the Madras HC bench of Justice Abdul Quddhose for Celebi, advocate PS Raman told the court that the company made huge investments for equipments and software, adding that the AAI was attempting to appoint a third parties, who would exploit these tools, the LiveLaw report stated. (This is a developing story, more updates coming…)
Time of India
22-05-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
DVAC assures Madras HC it won't close TASMAC FIRs while PIL for CBI probe is pending
Madras high court CHENNAI: The Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption ( DVAC ) on Thursday assured the Madras High Court that FIRs registered against TASMAC and its officials would not be closed pending the disposal of the PIL seeking the transfer of the probe to the CBI. "I will advise the Home Secretary not to file a closure report in any of the cases," Advocate-General P S Raman said. The submission was made in view of the apprehension raised by the vacation bench of Justice G S Swaminathan and Justice V Lakshminarayanan that the present PIL would become infructuous if the FIRs were closed. The court then recorded the submission of the AG and directed the DVAC to file status reports of the FIRs in three weeks. The issue pertains to a PIL moved by Advocate K Venkatachalapathy, alleging that the irregularities against the state-owned liquor corporation were valued at over Rs 1,000 crore and wanted the court to order a probe by the central agency. According to the petitioner, the Tamil Nadu govt and TASMAC were creating hindrances for investigating agencies like the Enforcement Directorate (ED) by using the state machinery. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 2025년 가장 멋진 RPG 게임을 지금 정복하세요 레이드 섀도우 레전드 Undo He wanted the court to direct the CBI to take cognisance of the alleged scam to effectively weed out all the officials involved and hold them accountable. Relying on several orders passed by the Supreme Court, the petitioner submitted that the Apex Court emphasised the importance of a fair trial and investigation and the role of the courts in ensuring public confidence. "Assurance of a fair trial is the first imperative of the dispensation of justice and the central criterion for the court to consider whether there is a need for transfer of the probe," he said.
Time of India
16-05-2025
- Business
- Time of India
‘No irregularities in schemes for dalits'
Chennai: Denying any irregularities in the implemantation of the 500 crore (AABCS) for the upliftment of sanitary workers as entrepreneurs, Tamil Nadu govt told the that it engaged the Delhi-based (DICCI) as it had implemented similar schemes in four states successfully. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now "The company implemented similar schemes in four other states successfully. The scheme is a laudable initiative that benefitted many manual scavengers," advocate-general P S Raman told a vacation bench of justice G R Swaminathan and justice V Lakshminarayanan on Friday, in response to a filed by YouTuber Savukku Shankar. The PIL sought CBI probe alleging misappropriation of funds. The vacation bench had on Wednesday directed the state to produce the files relating to the scheme. When the plea came up for hearing on Friday, additional advocate-general J Ravindran, representing the municipal administration department, submitted that the court must provide more time for the department to produce the files. "The scheme started in 2023, but the petitioner remained silent until May 2025 and moved the second vacation court. The court ordered the production of files and posted for orders today (Friday). I am seeking a reasonable time. This is only a request," Ravindran said.
