Latest news with #PedagogyoftheOppressed
Observer
29-05-2025
- General
- Observer
A reflection on value, work and dignity
It is hard to live without a piece of bread. How can one feed a family? How can a future be built without a salary? These are not just questions; they are cries of millions who wake up each day trapped in a cycle where survival takes precedence over dreams. In a quiet café on the edge of a bustling city, a conversation unfolded that left a lasting impression. A young graduate, full of hope yet weighed by despair, turned to his friend and said, "They offered me RO 400. I asked myself, is that what I'm worth?" His friend sighed. "That's all they give to every starter. You should take it." Here lies the tragedy of our times, not in the number, but in the belief that worth should be defined by what is offered, not by what is brought to the table. This is not a suggestion to reject jobs, nor a promotion of idleness or detached idealism. What must be advocated is simple but powerful: Never let others define your value. If an individual does not set his price, someone else will often set it far below what is deserved. The prevailing system, corporate, capitalist, profit-driven, demands energy, creativity, time, and soul. And in return? It gives just enough to survive, never to thrive. Noam Chomsky once remarked, "The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion." Today, that limitation extends to self-worth. Society has taught acceptance without questioning. But one must pause. Reflect. If an offer is RO 400, how much value is actually being generated for the organisation? In many cases, an employee's ideas, execution, and presence generate five, ten, or even 20 times more than their compensation. Paulo Freire in Pedagogy of the Oppressed argued that the greatest form of oppression is making people believe that their suffering is natural. That earning a low wage is just part of the process. That struggling is noble. But struggling without justice is not noble, it is exploitation. There is a story worth sharing. Years ago, a young professional entered the job market with optimism and readiness to serve. An offer came, one that was far below what his qualifications and potential warranted. Still, it was accepted under the belief, "At least it's a start." That individual worked tirelessly, produced results, and brought innovation. Yet the promotion never came. The salary hike never happened. Until a mentor once said, "If you price yourself cheap, don't expect the world to increase your rate." That sentence was transformative. To those reading this, especially those wondering if it's acceptable to say no to an underwhelming offer, know this: it is more than okay. It is right. Each person must calculate his rent, food and future. Ask: Can this salary support a family? Can peace be found knowing one is underpaid? No individual was born to be a number on a payroll sheet. Every person is of potential and excellence. Walt Whitman once wrote, "I am large, I contain multitudes." Each human holds multitudes within. Never let a paycheque shrink the spirit. The corporate world may not change overnight. But individual stories can. Change begins with one choice. One decision. One moment of courage to declare: I am worth more. Let this message echo. Let the world be reminded of human values, not with arrogance, but with clarity and courage. And perhaps, others will follow. A movement may begin. A system may evolve, not just for today, but for all the generations yet to come. Value must be honoured. Dignity must be priced right. And no one should ever settle for less than they truly deserve. Mohammed Anwar Al Balushi The writer works for Middle East College
Yahoo
06-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Opinion - To improve K-12 education, Linda McMahon should target radicalized education schools
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon started as the co-founder of World Wrestling Entertainment. Her first target for a knockout as secretary should be radicalized education schools. With the recent publication of the National Assessment of Educational Progress report, Americans are increasingly aware of the absolute failure of our K-12 public education system to produce kids with the requisite knowledge and skills to compete in the global economy. McMahon might be tempted to focus like a laser on raising test scores in the here and now. Undoubtedly, she should take immediate steps to reverse the downward spiral. However, she should also set her aim for teacher colleges that produce unprepared and politicized educators. Student achievement will languish as long as education schools are churning out teachers who see their primary roles as developing the next generation of social justice activists. When I entered my own doctoral program in education in January 2018, I was taken aback at how little foundational scholarship was required. Most coursework relied on far-fetched ideological theories rather than providing rigorous data-informed resources to improve student learning. Paulo Friere's 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed' served as an education bible, and was required reading in most classes. Friere declares, 'No pedagogy which is truly liberating can remain distant from the oppressed by treating them as unfortunates and by presenting for their emulation models from among the oppressors.' In other words, the role of teachers in their minds is not to teach kids to be successful, but to empower students to overthrow the system that created their success. Today's education schools are training teachers to 'decolonize the curriculum,' a pedagogy based on stripping the curriculum of all scholarly influences and promoting perpetual revolution. And the results speak for themselves — our kids are failing. More and more teachers are speaking out about how their teacher education programs failed to prepare them to teach students how to read and write. According to the U.S. Department of Education, a second grade teacher in Utah stated, 'My college education and teacher prep program left me prepared to address how members of the LGBT+ community and students of color may feel inside of a school, but blindsided about what to do if a student cannot read in third grade. My preparation was filled with diversity, equity, and inclusion training and very little practical support.' In 2022, the Center for Organizational Research and Education published a report that found that California spent upwards of $36 million on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in K-12 schools. What does California have to show for its expenditure? According to EdSource, only 7 percent of Black students there are proficient or advanced in reading. Latino students scored slightly higher, with 19 percent scoring proficient or advanced. Looking at all of California's fourth graders, only 31 percent scored proficient or advanced in reading. In a letter posted in 2024, the dean of UCLA's School of Education and Information Studies wrote, 'Since the mid-1990s, UCLA's Departments of Education and Information Studies have been housed together within the same school, continuing each department's long commitment to using teaching, scholarship, and service to dismantle systemic inequity and increase social justice.' Dean Christina A. Christie's letter continues to tout the department's commitment to equity and justice, but fails to comment on the importance of teaching students how to read. UCLA is not alone in its negligence. Founded in 1870, Hunter College hosts New York state's oldest teacher preparation program. Hunter's School of Education holds 'that the transformative power of education, an essential tenet of democracy, can only be realized by interrupting societal inequities and injustices.' Only 31 percent of New York's fourth graders are reading at proficient or advanced levels. McMahon has the opportunity to turn our teacher training pipeline around. First, she can strongly encourage that K-12 school preparation programs possess requisite skills on the basics required to teach their subject matter. The Department of Education possesses the power of the purse and can withhold funding from universities that fail in their basic mission. McMahon can expose the extreme agendas in today's education schools, putting university presidents on notice that this radicalized approach to educating teachers must stop. And alongside the Department of Education, congressional leaders must focus on recalcitrant education schools' deans and failing to adequately prepare teachers. Only when teacher's colleges go back to the basics of training teachers to teach kids to read and write will we see improvements in our kids' learning. McMahon has a unique opportunity to deliver a knockout in order to save American education. Brandy Shufutinsky, EdD, is the director of Education and Community Engagement with the North American Values Institute. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
06-03-2025
- Politics
- The Hill
To improve K-12 education, Linda McMahon should target radicalized education schools
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon started as the co-founder of World Wrestling Entertainment. Her first target for a knockout as secretary should be radicalized education schools. With the recent publication of the National Assessment of Educational Progress report, Americans are increasingly aware of the absolute failure of our K-12 public education system to produce kids with the requisite knowledge and skills to compete in the global economy. McMahon might be tempted to focus like a laser on raising test scores in the here and now. Undoubtedly, she should take immediate steps to reverse the downward spiral. However, she should also set her aim for teacher colleges that produce unprepared and politicized educators. Student achievement will languish as long as education schools are churning out teachers who see their primary roles as developing the next generation of social justice activists. When I entered my own doctoral program in education in January 2018, I was taken aback at how little foundational scholarship was required. Most coursework relied on far-fetched ideological theories rather than providing rigorous data-informed resources to improve student learning. Paulo Friere's ' Pedagogy of the Oppressed ' served as an education bible, and was required reading in most classes. Friere declares, 'No pedagogy which is truly liberating can remain distant from the oppressed by treating them as unfortunates and by presenting for their emulation models from among the oppressors.' In other words, the role of teachers in their minds is not to teach kids to be successful, but to empower students to overthrow the system that created their success. Today's education schools are training teachers to 'decolonize the curriculum,' a pedagogy based on stripping the curriculum of all scholarly influences and promoting perpetual revolution. And the results speak for themselves — our kids are failing. More and more teachers are speaking out about how their teacher education programs failed to prepare them to teach students how to read and write. According to the U.S. Department of Education, a second grade teacher in Utah stated, 'My college education and teacher prep program left me prepared to address how members of the LGBT+ community and students of color may feel inside of a school, but blindsided about what to do if a student cannot read in third grade. My preparation was filled with diversity, equity, and inclusion training and very little practical support.' In 2022, the Center for Organizational Research and Education published a report that found that California spent upwards of $36 million on diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in K-12 schools. What does California have to show for its expenditure? According to EdSource, only 7 percent of Black students there are proficient or advanced in reading. Latino students scored slightly higher, with 19 percent scoring proficient or advanced. Looking at all of California's fourth graders, only 31 percent scored proficient or advanced in reading. In a letter posted in 2024, the dean of UCLA's School of Education and Information Studies wrote, 'Since the mid-1990s, UCLA's Departments of Education and Information Studies have been housed together within the same school, continuing each department's long commitment to using teaching, scholarship, and service to dismantle systemic inequity and increase social justice.' Dean Christina A. Christie's letter continues to tout the department's commitment to equity and justice, but fails to comment on the importance of teaching students how to read. UCLA is not alone in its negligence. Founded in 1870, Hunter College hosts New York state's oldest teacher preparation program. Hunter's School of Education holds 'that the transformative power of education, an essential tenet of democracy, can only be realized by interrupting societal inequities and injustices.' Only 31 percent of New York's fourth graders are reading at proficient or advanced levels. McMahon has the opportunity to turn our teacher training pipeline around. First, she can strongly encourage that K-12 school preparation programs possess requisite skills on the basics required to teach their subject matter. The Department of Education possesses the power of the purse and can withhold funding from universities that fail in their basic mission. McMahon can expose the extreme agendas in today's education schools, putting university presidents on notice that this radicalized approach to educating teachers must stop. And alongside the Department of Education, congressional leaders must focus on recalcitrant education schools' deans and failing to adequately prepare teachers. Only when teacher's colleges go back to the basics of training teachers to teach kids to read and write will we see improvements in our kids' learning. McMahon has a unique opportunity to deliver a knockout in order to save American education.
Express Tribune
12-02-2025
- General
- Express Tribune
Is your school just a bank in disguise?
Imagine a typical classroom: Rows of students sit at desks that are arranged with surgical precision, designed to prevent any interaction. Half the class is zoned out, nodding occasionally, but mostly counting down the minutes until the lecture finally ends. The teacher who stands at the front of the classroom delivers the same lesson day after day, decade after decade, stuck in a never-ending loop with no feedback. Fluorescent lights flicker overhead, never quite giving off enough light. The teacher lectures, the students take notes. Facts are memorized then regurgitated with apathy. Paulo Freire would say this scene perfectly depicts what he calls 'the banking model of education', a traditional method of teaching that has shaped our classrooms for generations. In this model of education students are treated as empty 'bank' accounts into which knowledge is deposited by an all-knowing authority figure. Few books in the history of academia have had as profound an impact as Paulo Freire's Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (quick glossary interlude! The term 'pedagogy' refers to the method and practice of teaching). First published in 1968 in Brazil, this work has gone on to shape the way people around the world think about education. It is the third most-cited book in all of the humanities, a testament to its lasting influence on scholars, educators, and activists alike. But why has Pedagogy of the Oppressed resonated so deeply? To begin answering these questions, we might start with a broader inquiry: What does it mean to be educated? A possible answer to this question is that to be educated is to possess a vast store of knowledge, delivered efficiently and effectively into one's mind, to be accessed and used at will. But for Freire, education is not simply about the passive transfer of information. It is about the transformation of the educated subject. He argues that the ontological vocation of human beings, that is, their fundamental, existential purpose, is the drive to become more fully human. (quick glossary interlude! Ontology is the study of existence, a.k.a what exists and how does it exist? The term ontological vocation then, broadly, refers to our inherent purpose or calling as human beings). At the heart of Freire's work is the belief that human beings exist within an ongoing contradiction—a constant tension between oppression and liberation. Just as we oscillate between hunger and satisfaction, between exhaustion and rest, we are always moving between forces that seek to limit us and forces that seek to free us. We are born into a world teeming with possibilities. The sheer number of choices we could make, the vast potential paths our lives could take, is overwhelming. Faced with this weight, people often seek comfort in external structures—ideologies, religion, nationalism, consumerism—systems that provide easy answers to life's complexities. In exchange for stability and certainty, individuals often surrender large pieces of their own identity, shaping themselves in the image of these external authorities rather than defining themselves on their own terms. Recognizing this reality raises two crucial questions. What role does education play in shaping individuals who either passively accept their conditions or actively challenge them? And ultimately, is our current schooling system a tool of oppression or liberation? To answer this question, Freire conceptualizes the 'banking model of education'. The metaphor is deliberate: in this model, students are passive recipients of knowledge. The teacher owns the knowledge. The student's role is simply to absorb and regurgitate. The banking model can be effective if the goal of education is simply to efficiently distribute knowledge, ensuring that most people memorize and internalize a predetermined set of information decided by an authority. You can't really dispute the fact that this is an excellent way to train people to produce the right answers on standardized tests. But what exactly is it that we are testing? If the purpose of education is not just to memorize facts but to cultivate critical, engaged thinkers who can understand and navigate a complex world, then the banking model fails miserably. Freire argues that this is precisely the kind of education that produces citizens who passively consume media, mindlessly internalizing dominant narratives (which generally serve the state, oops). When confronted with uncertainty, a student trained under this model will instinctively look to authority figures to provide answers, rather than develop the skills to critically evaluate a situation for themselves. When people are trained from childhood to uncritically accept what they are fed, they become easy to govern, easy to manipulate, and even easier to oppress. Freire's theory is about developing a consciousness that understands oppression not just at a personal level but at a societal one. It is a call to collective, political action, one against authoritarianism in all its forms. (quick glossary interlude! Authoritarianism describes a system where a single leader or a small elite holds concentrated power without being accountable to the larger public). True education, Freire argues, must be about more than depositing information, it must teach people how to think. Freire offers a powerful alternative to the banking model: 'conscientização', or 'critical consciousness'. To to have critical consciousness is to be engaged in a process; it's an activity By this logic, being educated is not a static state of being but an active, ongoing commitment. But developing critical consciousness is not enough on its own. If critical thinking is driven purely by anger, it may simply replicate the cycle of oppression it hopes to dismantle. This is one of the historic dangers of many revolutionary movements: we risk turning the oppressed into the oppressor. Freire argues that critical consciousness must be rooted in love. This might sound idealistic, but for him, it is a deeply political stance. Love, in this context, means a genuine commitment to the well-being of all people—including both the oppressed and the oppressors. This idea is radical. It challenges the notion that the struggle for justice is merely about reversing the power dynamic. Freire insists that both the oppressor and the oppressed are dehumanized by systems of domination. At first glance, it might not seem obvious why the oppressor would be dehumanized. But consider this: is it truly fulfilling to have one's sense of self tied to the ability to control, dominate, and suppress others? When your power depends on limiting another person's humanity, are you truly free yourself? The answer, for Freire, is no. True liberation must be a process that frees both the oppressed and the oppressor. This is why education—real education—is more than just the transfer of knowledge. Education should be about helping people develop the skills, awareness, and love necessary to transform both themselves and the world around them. Freire's 'problem-posing' model of education offers a more effective and liberating education system. One of the biggest shifts in the problem-posing model is that education is centered around dialogue between teachers and students rather than being a one-way transfer of knowledge. Instead of a teacher delivering a monologue in the form of a lecture, the classroom becomes a space for discussion. This approach is this dialogical rather than monological. The teacher may still possess greater knowledge and experience—they may have had this particular discussion hundreds of times before and can anticipate common questions, objections, and areas of confusion—but the dynamic is no longer one in which students passively receive information. Instead, they actively participate in constructing meaning. For Freire, true learning happens when knowledge is co-created between teacher and student. Rather than reinforcing a rigid hierarchy where the teacher is always the authority and the student is always the passive learner, this model recognizes that meaningful education can emerge from mutual respect and intellectual engagement. The teacher's role is to facilitate critical thinking rather than simply dictate facts. Even when direct instruction is necessary, it should serve as a foundation for critical discussions rather than as an unquestionable truth to be memorized and repeated. By shifting from a banking model to a problem-posing approach, we create learners who are not just knowledgeable but also capable of questioning, analyzing, and shaping the world around them. Importantly, Freire's philosophy is not about replacing one form of dogma with another. If students are being conditioned to adopt a narrow worldview—whether in the name of traditional authority or radical ideology—then they are not practicing the type of critical education he envisioned. True critical consciousness means questioning all forms of imposed ideology, regardless of their source or stance. Education should not create foot soldiers for a cause. It should nurture individuals who are willing to interrogate their own beliefs, challenge authority in all its forms, and remain open to the possibility that they too, might be wrong. The creation of independent thinkers capable of engaging with the world in a way that is both critical and compassionate is possible. And it starts in your classroom, today.
