Latest news with #PeterRoskam
Telegraph
3 days ago
- Business
- Telegraph
Trump plots tax raid on foreign companies in threat to Britain
The two sides continue to negotiate despite the trade deal struck earlier in May. Anna Leach, chief economist at the Institute of Directors, said the Section 899 powers would put more pressure on the Prime Minister in the talks. 'It adds further pressure to the ongoing UK-US trade negotiations – the terms for the deal announced on May 8 already 'commits' (but does not legally bind) both the US and the UK to negotiating 'an ambitious set of digital trade provisions',' she said. Scrapping or watering down the digital services tax, which is forecast to raise more than £1bn per year, would be a blow to Rachel Reeves, who is already facing pressure to find billions of pounds more to fund an about-turn on winter fuel payments to pensioners. Downing Street has previously insisted the tax is not up for negotiation. At present, businesses operating in the US are subject to various state and federal-level taxes, but the powers contained within the new bill would allow an additional levy to be added on top. It would apply not just to corporate profits but also gains from investments into US assets, potentially including government debt. The powers would only penalise companies that take money out of the US. It comes as Mr Trump pushes businesses to invest and keep more money in the country. Peter Roskam, a former Republican member of the House of Representatives, and now head of law firm BakerHostetler's federal policy team, said the proposal 'brings a sledgehammer to the idea that the US will allow itself to be characterised as a tax haven by anyone'. However, experts said the threat would make foreign investors and businesses less willing to commit to the US. 'Weaponisation of US markets' Ms Leach said: 'This would stoke uncertainty further, undermine returns and reduce the attractiveness of the States as an investment destination. 'This is perhaps helpful to the Chancellor who is seeking to persuade investors to place their bets on the UK market.' Chris Sanger, tax partner at EY, said: 'It would impose an additional cost on foreign businesses operating in the US. That might mean the governments outside the US would change their rules, or it might mean that companies, much as they are seeing with tariffs, have an additional cost of operating in the US, which may make them less competitive in the US market.' George Saravelos at Deutsche Bank said the tax threat could pose a risk to the US's own public finances. The rule appears to allow Mr Trump to impose the border tax on foreign investors who buy US government bonds – effectively lending to the country – if they attempt to transfer the interest earned from those bonds back to their home countries. Mr Saravelos described it as a 'weaponisation of US capital markets' that would put investors off financing the US state. He said: 'The adverse impact on demand for US Treasuries and funding the US twin deficit at a time when this is most needed is clear.' Jordan Rochester, at investment bank Mizuho, said investors would demand a higher rate of interest from the US government to compensate for any higher charges, driving up the White House's borrowing costs. 'Just the threat of it being used could spook investors, trigger another sizeable market sell-off, and make the administration think twice about its actual use,' he said. Mr Trump's tax and spending bill contains a wide range of provisions and policies, but predominantly sets out trillions of dollars of tax breaks partly funded through cuts to healthcare. The bill was narrowly passed by the House of Representatives earlier in May and has now moved to the Senate for approval. Commenting on its passage, Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social: 'This is arguably the most significant piece of legislation that will ever be signed in the history of our country.'
New York Times
06-03-2025
- Politics
- New York Times
National Endowment for Democracy Sues Top Trump Aides Over Funding Freeze
The National Endowment for Democracy, a nonprofit that has had bipartisan support over decades for its work promoting democracy abroad, is suing the U.S. government and cabinet officials for withholding $239 million in congressional appropriations. Members of the group's board, which includes current and former Republican and Democratic politicians, said the organization filed the lawsuit on Wednesday afternoon as a last resort because it had been unable to get the State Department to restart the flow of money. The group has had to put about 75 percent of its staff on unpaid leave, and about 1,200 grant recipients have received no money for projects since late January, after President Trump signed an executive order freezing all foreign aid. The group argues that its money from Congress is not foreign aid and does not fall under the purview of the State Department, which manages the transfer of funds, or any other executive branch agency. Withholding the funding, the board members say, is illegal. Peter Roskam, a former Republican congressman from Illinois who chairs the nonprofit, said the board voted on Tuesday to go to court. 'We'd be delighted to learn that this was just an oversight and someone just forgot to hit the send button,' he said in an interview on Wednesday, minutes before the lawsuit was filed. 'But clearly that's not what's going on.' The endowment's plight is emblematic of the colossal shift in foreign policy that is taking place in the second Trump administration, as the president tries to move the government away from overseas democracy and human rights work and toward an approach that eschews alliances in favor of a more transactional and nationalistic approach. Some senior administration officials have adopted language, including phrases once common among progressive critics of the U.S. government, about the downside of American projects that seek to extend influence abroad, calling such programs 'nation-building' and attempts at 'regime change.' Spokespeople for the White House, the State Department and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Elon Musk, the billionaire adviser to Mr. Trump, posted scathing criticism of N.E.D. online last month, saying it was 'RIFE with CORRUPTION!!' 'That evil organization needs to be dissolved,' he wrote, using the same conspiratorial language he has employed to describe the U.S. Agency for International Development, which Mr. Musk has helped dismantle. Representative Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican who is Mr. Trump's pick for ambassador to the United Nations, was on the N.E.D. board until she had to step down to prepare for Senate confirmation for her new job. Senator Todd Young, Republican of Indiana, is currently on the board. Mr. Trump's 'America First' policy has also been brought into sharp relief in recent weeks by his criticism of Ukraine in its fight against Russia; his imposing of tariffs on allies Canada and Mexico; his insistence on taking mineral-rich Greenland from Denmark, another ally; and his decision to cut off almost all foreign aid, which strategists have seen as an important component of American soft power. The grants N.E.D. gives out are focused on promoting democracy, free speech and religious freedoms in more than 100 countries and territories, including ones that the first Trump administration and the Biden administration considered rivals or adversaries like China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela and Cuba. The grants fund projects such as developing software that allows citizens to access banned websites. Mel Martinez, a former Republican senator representing Florida, said the Trump administration's unwillingness to release funding for organizations that support overseas dissidents was an affront to exiles from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. 'That entire group of people are politically active,' he said. 'Many have been strong supporters of the president.' In Venezuela, for example, grants support independent groups that monitor elections and defend dissidents targeted by the autocratic government. Authoritarian governments, including those of China and Russia, have denounced the work of N.E.D. over many years. The group traces its origins to a speech by President Ronald Reagan to the British Parliament in 1982. He vowed that 'the march of freedom and democracy' would 'leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history.' Congress passed a law establishing N.E.D. the following year. N.E.D. gives funding to several sister nonprofits, notably the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute. Those groups are also ending programs because of the funding freeze. Several Senate allies of Mr. Trump, including Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, sit on the I.R.I. board. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a defendant in the lawsuit, is a former board member. The Republican group's website says it has had to disable its operations to save on expenses, but a page still reminds people to remember the work that it does: 'Dictators are afraid of their own people. Helping citizens have a voice in their country is at the heart of what I.R.I. does.' David Super, a professor who studies administrative law at Georgetown University, said N.E.D.'s case had some similarities to a lawsuit filed by contracting companies for U.S.A.I.D. The Trump administration also froze that agency's funds. In both cases, Mr. Super said, Congress had passed 'clear, mandatory authorizing and appropriations statutes.' Withholding money from N.E.D., he said, 'is clearly violating both laws.'
