Latest news with #President'sEmergencyPlanforAidsRelief
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Health
- Yahoo
White House says it will spare some Aids programs that were on the chopping block
The White House is trying to reassure House Republicans that Donald Trump's plans to slash funding to Aids projects around the world will spare a number of key prevention programs. House Speaker Mike Johnson and his fellow GOP leaders in the lower chamber of Congress are racing to shore up support ahead of a vote on a $9.4bn package of spending cuts Thursday. Congressional Republicans have expressed particular concern over planned cuts to former commander-in-chief George W Bush's signature President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR), which has been credited with saving millions of lives across the globe since 2003. As part of an effort to allay those worries and rally the troops, the House GOP leadership has vowed to retain treatments offered under PEPFAR as well as a number of other prevention schemes, according to Capitol Hill sources cited by Politico. Speaker Johnson's whip team reportedly spent Monday evening frantically texting Republicans and calculating probable votes for the 'rescissions' package, which, in addition to cutting hundreds of millions of dollars in foreign Aids funding, also targets public broadcasters like NPR and PBS, both of whom are currently suing Trump's administration over the withdrawal of federal funding. Russell Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, told appropriators last week that the administration is seeking to take 'an analytical look' at Aids prevention and instead prioritize funding for 'life-saving treatment' for sufferers as part of its scaling back of PEPFAR. 'It is something that our budget will be very trim on,' he said of prevention funding. 'We believe that many of these nonprofits are not geared towards the viewpoints of the administration. And we're $37 trillion in debt. So at some point, the continent of Africa needs to absorb more of the burden of providing this healthcare.' Trump's cuts to Aids prevention funding, enacted under an executive order he signed within hours of returning to the Oval Office in January, have been forecast to have disastrous results. A crisis that had been on course to be brought under control by 2030 will now be extended at the cost of an estimated 4m more lives, according to forecasts from the United Nations Aids agency. The disruption to global HIV programmes by the U.S. is also projected to lead to more than 3m more Aids orphans than was previously anticipated by the end of the decade. But the president himself has insisted that it is Europe that needs to step up and invest more to help the nations worst-hit by the disease. 'Nobody does anything but the United States… Other countries should be helping us with that,' he told reporters onboard Air Force One last month. 'We're the only country. Where are the others? Where is France? Where is Germany? We've spent billions and billions of dollars.' A documentary investigation by The Independent, which includes reporting from remote areas in Uganda and Zimbabwe, has recently demonstrated that Trump's brutal severing of aid – and abrupt halt in medication – is already tearing lives apart. Earlier this year The Independent revealed Trump's slashing of foreign aid has derailed the projected end of the Aids pandemic and could lead to four million extra deaths by 2030. Figures show the number of Aids-related deaths could jump from six million to 10 million in the next five years unless funding is reinstated, according to forecasts from the UN Aids agency (UNAIDS). The unprecedented disruption to global HIV programs by the U.S. is also projected to lead to more than three million more Aids orphans than previously expected by the end of the decade.
Daily Maverick
29-04-2025
- Health
- Daily Maverick
From setbacks to solutions: How Hlokomela Clinic adapted to funding challenges in HIV care
Trump's slash and burn to foreign aid has hit HIV programmes hard. Here's what Hlokomela Clinic has been doing to prepare for such cuts — and what it has learned about surviving over the past 20 years. When Sindy Nkuna woke up to an email saying that the United States had decided to temporarily freeze all foreign aid in January, it was scary. 'I felt shattered,' she says. 'For days I had racing heartbeats thinking what's going to happen to me and to my kids. It was unbelievable. I have two boys.' Nkuna had been placed at the Hlokomela Clinic, 200km away from Polokwane, keeping track of HIV information in the fruit and game farming community of the Mopani district, Limpopo. A data capturer, she tracked new cases of HIV, how many people had been tested and how many were on treatment. The funding for her job — and six HIV testing counsellors, a site coordinator and part of their financial manager's salary — came through a grant from the Anova Health Institute, the HIV organisation that received the most President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar) funding in South Africa. Pepfar is the US government's Aids fund that financially supports HIV projects, mostly run by non-profit organisations, in countries like South Africa. Nkuna sat at home anxiously waiting to hear if she would still have a job. At the end of February, word came that almost all USAid funding, which included many of the Pepfar-sponsored projects, would be permanently cut. Overnight Hlokomela was left without its HIV testing team that does fieldwork, and funding for equipment like cooler bags and transport costs for mobile testing clinics, all of which were paid for by Anova. HIV field services at the 50 sites across Hoedspruit farms and communities that helped test about 1,000 people for HIV every month were shuttered. 'It affected all of our HIV outreach… it was worse than Covid,' said Christine du Preez, who founded Hlokomela in 2005. The team had to figure out how to make it work for its remaining staff — and the 25,000 farmers, workers and their families that depend on them for basic health services. But Hlokomela was far better equipped to deal with the crisis than many other organisations that also lost their USAid funding. Here's why the plans they've made — and the lessons they learned in the past decade — are helping them get by. Use what you've got Problem: Hlokomela lost its field HIV testing team. Solution: Community health workers get people to test at Hlokomela's clinic (facility staff weren't affected by funding cuts) and HIV testing staff from other projects help with testing. Hlokomela has three clinics, with nine mobile clinics that work in 72 sites across fruit and game farms. With 106 staff members, it employs paid nurses, data capturers, lay counsellors, community health workers and doctors who volunteer twice a week for free. The Anova funding — which made up 2% of Hlokomela's overall budget — paid for the mobile testing clinics and the staff who ran them. In 2008, 28.5% of farm workers in Hoedspruit had HIV, over 10 percentage points higher than the proportion of adults — 17.64% — who had the virus in South Africa in 2007, according to health department data. Du Preez says their latest data from this year shows that Hlokomela has helped the proportion of HIV-infected farmworkers to drop to 6.5%. But when their funding stopped, Hlokomela was caught by surprise. Since then, testing had dropped by nearly 90%, Nkuna said. Still, they made a plan. It's the Community Health Workers — known as nompilos, 'mother of life' in isiZulu — that they've leaned into. Hlokomela has trained about 75 of these farm workers, who earn a monthly stipend, in health education as well as checking blood pressure and heart rates, and screening for chronic conditions such as HIV and TB. Because Hlokomela's funding for clinic staff was still intact, they could continue to test people for HIV at facilities. But someone had to tell people about it — and explain how to get there. The nompilos went around farms identifying people who needed to get tested, and encouraged them to go to Hlokomela's clinics. Hlokomela then also roped in seven volunteers, who were certified in HIV testing, from another one of their projects to help with the now higher numbers of people who needed to get tested at their clinics. Moreover, the project came up with a short-term fix to stop the backlog to capture testing data from getting too high. Nkuna was the only person trained to use the government's HIV database. That's why Hlokomela temporarily transferred two employees from its sex worker programme to help with recording health tracking data, said Antoinette Ngwenya, a Hlokomela programme manager. 'The fact that we still have a clinic means that we can still do HIV testing. Because if we don't test and get them on treatment, we could have a boom of HIV again,' said Du Preez. 'Hopefully we will get another plan. It looks like the Discovery Fund is also going to help us to get the HIV testing services going again.' Don't put all your eggs in one basket Problem: Getting all your money from one donor can make you close down overnight. Solution: Diversify funding as far as possible — and as soon as possible. About 10 years ago, Hlokomela learned a tough lesson: don't rely on a single donor as it poses a serious risk of an organisation collapsing when things go wrong with the funder. For 10 years, Hlokomela was mainly funded by the United Nations' International Organisation for Migration (IOM). 'When we had IOM we could run many projects and have big events for campaigns. It was great,' said Ngwenya. But then IOM's funding to Hlokomela ended in 2016, and the organisation had to start raising other funds. 'We were worried we were going to close down. One of the challenges was realising there was funder fatigue, so we had to start thinking outside of the box,' Du Preez said. 'We found ways to make our own money, got our network of donors to help us find other funders and made an agreement with the provincial health department.' The Limpopo Department of Health signed a three-year agreement to pay stipends for Hlokomela's then 41 nompilos. Eight years later, Hlokomela is funded by grants from organisations like the Discovery Fund, the Aids Foundation South Africa via the Global Fund, the pharmaceutical company Adcock Ingram, and the Australian High Commission. It also gets donations from individuals, businesses and lodges in the area. The provincial health department, meanwhile, supplies medication, including HIV treatments. Hlokomela also just registered as an NGO in the US, which Du Preez believes will make it easier to get US funding from philanthropic foundations based there. She says she's been working on the registration for 15 months. 'One day we spoke with our managers, and I said we need to get money from America. We started with the application for an NGO in America called the Hlokomela Fund. I just got back from there to finalise it.' Right now, though, there are rumours that the Trump administration may impose restrictions on money flowing from US-based philanthropic foundations to projects with sites in countries outside the US. Such restrictions could potentially influence how US-registered organisations are allowed to operate. Share the cost Problem: Not enough funds for health services offered. Solution: Employers co-pay for employees' clinic visits and Hlokomela sells fresh produce to stores for extra income. In 2016, Hlokomela decided to find new ways to help fund the health services they offered to farm workers. Before that, all health services were free because they were funded by grants and other donations. But grants and donations can end at any time. Some form of co-payment was needed, Hlokomela's managers argued: subsidised services are more sustainable than services which are 100% paid for by donors. First, Hlokomela had to work out how much clinic visits cost. Consultants brought on by Discovery helped calculate the average cost per clinic visit for patients, which came to R400. In 2021, Hlokomela introduced a three-tier co-payment system. Employers, like farmers and reserve owners, could subscribe for between R1,650 and R3,850 per month, based on their staff size. For example, those with up to 50 employees paid R1,650. If a worker went to the clinic for a consultation they only paid 30% of the consultation fee, as the rest was covered by the employer's contribution. That system is still in place. Du Preez says some of the farmers weren't enthusiastic about the costs but soon saw the benefits; if they had to take their workers to a government clinic, which was further away, long queues meant they'd have to wait at the clinic all day. But long-term, good relationships with the farmers helped. People from the area also can buy a monthly health card or pay for walk-in visits for R300. By the end of 2023, Hlokomela had about 16 employers with 2,000 employees subscribed, and had sold 554 health cards. This new revenue stream brought in about R2-million last year alone, according to Du Preez. Hlokomela also sells vegetables and dried fruits from its herb garden to retailers such as Pick n Pay and local lodges. As of February 2025, the partial-payment system made up about 11% of its budget, and the herb garden 2%. Global Fund support for its sex worker programme — which also included money for HIV services — ended in April, but it has secured a six-month extension, albeit with half of the original budget. It will have to make it stretch. Further funding from the Global Fund, which currently receives one-third of its funding from the US, could be under threat with the Trump administration's targeted slash-and-burn approach. Du Preez said that as they got through the Covid-19 pandemic without having to let any staff go, they planned to do the same in this crisis. 'We've been doing it (outreach HIV testing) for the past 20 years and can't stop now… There's always a Plan B. Don't ask me what it is now, but we'll have one. We always try to have something else.' DM Zano Kunene visited the Hlokomela clinic as part of a Discovery Foundation media tour in April. The foundation covered the costs of the tour, but did not see or approve this story before publication. It also didn't have input on the content of this story.
The National
01-03-2025
- Health
- The National
Guterres says US aid cuts to UN run 'counter to American interests' globally
The UN Secretary General warned on Friday that severe cuts to US aid spending implemented by President Donald Trump 'run counter to American interests globally'. Antonio Guterres said that in the last 48 hours, UN agencies and various aid NGOs have been notified about deep cuts in US funding, following through on President Trump's promises to slash spending. 'I can only hope that these decisions can be reversed based on more careful reviews, and the same applies to other countries that have recently announced reductions in humanitarian and development aid,' he told reporters in New York. The US State Department said on Wednesday that it had slashed its multiyear aid contracts by 92 per cent as it seeks to save roughly $60 billion on overseas development and humanitarian programmes. Mr Guterres said that all UN agencies are prepared to offer details and justifications for their projects, emphasising that it is committed to delivering essential, life-saving assistance to those in need. Highlighting the dire consequences in conflict and crisis regions, the UN chief noted that in north-east Syria alone, where 2.5 million people require assistance, the lack of US funding could leave many even more vulnerable. In Afghanistan, the suspension threatens to deprive more than nine million people of health and protection services, with hundreds of mobile health teams being discontinued. The situation is equally grim in South Sudan, where programmes aiding refugees from the conflict in neighbouring Sudan have run dry, causing dangerous overcrowding in border areas. In addition, the cessation of funding has halted numerous programmes aimed at combating serious diseases including tuberculosis, malaria and cholera. On Thursday, the Trump administration announced it would be terminating its funding of the joint UN programme on HIV/Aids, known as UNAids. 'This is a serious development, which impacts the entire HIV response including in the continuity of life-saving HIV services for people living with and affected by HIV, civil society and our partners,' UNAids said on its website. Before the aid cuts, the US was the primary contributor to HIV prevention efforts in low and middle-income countries, providing two thirds of international funding. A significant portion of this aid was channelled through the President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (Pepfar), a programme initiated in 2003 by president George W Bush, which supported about 70 per cent of global efforts to combat the deadly disease. This week, the UK also revealed plans to reduce its international aid budget to increase defence funding, a decision that humanitarian organisations warned could undermine British influence and severely affect the vulnerable populations they assist.
