logo
#

Latest news with #Quasi-War

Trump's Deportations Betray American Ideals
Trump's Deportations Betray American Ideals

IOL News

time23-05-2025

  • Politics
  • IOL News

Trump's Deportations Betray American Ideals

On the 20th of January 2025, Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second and final term as President of the United States, the 'leader of the free world'. However, today there are few characteristics that can define the USA as free, especially for non-white citizens or migrants. Over the 115 days in his Presidency the dynamics of the current world order has adjusted relationships and methods of operations almost on a daily occurrence. Most notably there have been an ongoing series of tariffs imposed on various sectors, commodities and countries. Some brief examples include steel and aluminum, cars, films, computers and smartphones. The countries that have received tariffs include China, Mexico, Canada and the UK. The justification for these substantial measures is centered in nationalism, by advancing domestically produced goods and eliminating the perception of being 'cheated' by foreign entities. However, this rhetoric of being excluded and not understanding the real impact behind tariffs is not being extended to targeting human beings. This has resulted in the deportation of 142,000 individuals between the 20th of January and the 29th of April. Furthermore, to add insult to injury, in March President Trump invoked the 1798 Alien Enemies Act which allows the president to detain or deport natives and citizens of an 'enemy' nation. The use of this legislation is not only outdated, imposed outside of its jurisdiction, but is also dangerous to countless individuals and their families. The law originally was designed for wartime threats as part of the Alien and Sedition Acts, aimed to strengthen national security against tension with France during the Quasi-War. These actions pose major concerns beginning with the fact that the law invoked outside of a declared war circumvents the strides that human rights standards have made, racially profiling individuals and potentially leans on being unconstitutional for mass deportation without due process. Bypassing the legal safeguards for individuals and labeling them as 'enemies' raises red flags for future immigration and asylum scenarios, leaving one to ponder who is the real enemy whom tears families apart across borders, and oftentimes to lands that they have no affiliation with, such as the case with over 100 Venezuelans who are believed to be located in Cecot, a massive prison in El Salvador. To exacerbate the challenges, third-country detentions raise significant problems revolving around accountability and legal responsibility, especially considering that according to the families, the detainees are being treated and labelled as violent criminals and terrorists without any court judgements. Furthermore, there is yet to be an official publicised list of detainees from the US or Salvadoran authorities, while their legal statuses remain unclear. Such secrecy is extremely concerning because of the human rights abuses, legal responsibility, as well as the moral and political consequences for the US's global standing. For much of President Trump's campaigning he emphasised that he is 'for the people', yet such actions towards the Venezuelans and Salavorans directly opposes the president's declaration, the actions damage the US's credibility as a defender of human rights and its democratic values, and may further weaken the already strained relationship the country has with other Latin American countries. Moreover, there are reports that for many of these detainees, they were not informed of the intention behind the US's government to deport them to a third country where many were denied access to legal counsel, thereby disenfranchising a fair opportunity to contest their deportation, effectively constituting a forced expulsion. Family members of the detainees are without any information about their loved ones' whereabouts and this highlights the US's severe lack in transparency and accountability. The president of the USA has a very colourful legal past in his personal capacity, with slogans of 'Make America Great Again', can one truly be surprised what foreign individuals are being treated with this level of disdain and dehumanisation, particularly from a country that has been built off of slavery and immigrants? But as a global community, what are we doing for these people and for those whose stories have not yet seen the front pages of our newspapers? The reality is the world has a tendency to look to powerful Western countries such as the USA as pillars of moral, political and just practice, but it could be argued that these foundational principles are only applied when it is convenient. The concept of a 'leader of the free world' is incompatible with practices that undermine individuals' presumption of innocence and result in criminalisation without due process; human rights should not be contingent on nationality or immigration status. Given these actions, the future of America's global image as a defender of human rights and the people will be very contentious. By Banthati Sekwala: Associate at BRICS+ Consulting Group Egyptian and South African Specialist **The Views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of Independent Media or IOL. ** MORE ARTICLES ON OUR WEBSITE ** Follow @brics_daily on Twitter for daily BRICS+ updates

The History Behind the USS Constellation and Its Stunning Model
The History Behind the USS Constellation and Its Stunning Model

Time Business News

time15-05-2025

  • General
  • Time Business News

The History Behind the USS Constellation and Its Stunning Model

In the vast tapestry of American naval history, few vessels have captured the imagination quite like the USS Constellation. This legendary warship has sailed through decades of American maritime history, witnessing the birth of a nation and its rise to naval prominence. Today, history enthusiasts and collectors alike can bring a piece of this storied legacy into their homes through meticulously crafted USS Constellation ship models that pay homage to this extraordinary vessel. The name 'USS Constellation' actually refers to two distinguished vessels in the United States Navy, creating a fascinating historical narrative that spans nearly two centuries of American naval development. Authorized by the Naval Act of 1794, the first USS Constellation was one of the original six frigates commissioned for the newly formed United States Navy. Designed by naval architect Joshua Humphreys, this 38-gun frigate was launched on September 7, 1797, from Harris Creek in Baltimore's Fell's Point neighborhood. The first Constellation quickly distinguished herself during the Quasi-War with France (1798-1800), when under the command of Captain Thomas Truxtun, she defeated the French frigate L'Insurgente in February 1799. This victory marked the first capture of an enemy warship by the young American navy, establishing the Constellation's place in naval lore. Throughout the early 19th century, the Constellation served in various capacities, protecting American interests during the Barbary Wars and the War of 1812. Later, she played a crucial role in anti-piracy operations in the West Indies and participated in the suppression of the Atlantic slave trade off the coast of Africa. The second vessel to bear the name was launched on August 26, 1854, at the Gosport Navy Yard in Norfolk, Virginia. This sloop-of-war represented the transition from sail to steam power in naval warfare, though she herself was designed as the last all-sail warship built for the U.S. Navy. Throughout her active service, the second Constellation participated in numerous humanitarian missions, served as a training ship for Naval Academy midshipmen, and transported famine relief supplies to Ireland. During the Civil War, she patrolled the Mediterranean to protect Union merchant ships from Confederate raiders. Today, this Constellation is preserved as a museum ship in Baltimore's Inner Harbor, where visitors can explore her decks and experience a living piece of American naval history. For those who appreciate maritime history but can't visit Baltimore regularly, a USS Constellation ship model offers a tangible connection to this historical vessel. These stunning replicas represent the pinnacle of nautical craftsmanship, combining historical accuracy with artistic expression. Creating a historically accurate model of the USS Constellation requires extraordinary attention to detail and a deep understanding of 18th and 19th-century shipbuilding techniques. Master craftsmen at Old Modern Handicrafts employ traditional 'plank-on-frame' construction methods, building the model just as the original ship was built, only on a miniature scale. Each model begins with extensive research, consulting original ship plans, historical documents, and detailed photographs to ensure accuracy. The wooden hull is crafted using premium woods such as western red cedar, mahogany, rosewood, and teak—materials chosen for their durability, grain patterns, and historical authenticity. The intricate details that bring the model to life are nothing short of astonishing. From the complex rigging with hundreds of carefully placed lines to the brass cannons positioned along the gun decks, every element is crafted to scale. Skilled artisans spend hundreds of hours meticulously assembling these miniature marvels, resulting in museum-quality pieces that can be proudly displayed in homes, offices, or collections. Beyond their aesthetic appeal, USS Constellation models serve as three-dimensional educational tools that illuminate various aspects of maritime history and naval architecture. These detailed models showcase the ingenious design elements that made American frigates like the Constellation superior fighting vessels for their time. Students and enthusiasts can observe: The distinctive 'diagonal riders' in the hull design that provided exceptional structural strength The arrangement of gun decks and the strategic placement of cannons The complex sail plan that allowed for remarkable speed and maneuverability The evolution of naval technology as seen in the differences between the 1797 frigate and the 1854 sloop-of-war A USS Constellation model transforms abstract historical events into tangible reality. When displayed in educational settings, these models help students visualize: The conditions under which sailors lived and worked in the Age of Sail The technological capabilities that influenced naval strategy and tactics The evolution of American naval power from the nation's founding through the Civil War The role of warships in diplomacy, commerce protection, and humanitarian missions For collectors and history enthusiasts, acquiring a high-quality USS Constellation model represents an investment in both art and history. These models appreciate in value over time, particularly those crafted with exceptional attention to historical detail and superior materials. When selecting a USS Constellation model for your collection, consider these factors: Historical Accuracy: The best models are created based on extensive research and adhere closely to the original ship's specifications. Craftsmanship: Look for models built by experienced artisans using traditional techniques rather than mass-produced replicas. Materials: Premium models utilize high-quality woods and metals that enhance durability and aesthetic appeal. Scale and Size: Models are available in various scales, from smaller versions suitable for desktop display to impressive large-scale replicas that serve as statement pieces. Certification: Many collectors value models that come with certificates of authenticity and detailed information about their construction. The presentation of your USS Constellation model significantly enhances its impact. Consider these display options: Display Cases : Custom-built glass cases protect the model from dust and damage while providing unobstructed views from all angles. : Custom-built glass cases protect the model from dust and damage while providing unobstructed views from all angles. Lighting : Strategic lighting can highlight the intricate details of the model, creating dramatic shadows that emphasize the craftsmanship. : Strategic lighting can highlight the intricate details of the model, creating dramatic shadows that emphasize the craftsmanship. Contextual Elements : Accompanying your model with period maps, naval flags, or informational placards creates an educational exhibit. : Accompanying your model with period maps, naval flags, or informational placards creates an educational exhibit. Themed Collections: Some enthusiasts create themed collections that trace the evolution of American naval vessels or showcase ships from specific historical periods. While various manufacturers offer ship models, discerning collectors seek pieces that combine historical accuracy with superior craftsmanship. Old Modern Handicrafts (OMH) stands as a premier destination for museum-quality nautical replicas, including the USS Constellation. With a legacy spanning generations, OMH's master craftsmen bring historical vessels to life through painstaking research and traditional building techniques. Each model undergoes rigorous quality control, ensuring that every detail—from the curve of the hull to the placement of the smallest rigging line—meets the highest standards of accuracy and artistry. Their commitment to historical authenticity is evident in every USS Constellation model they produce. Using premium materials and century-old techniques, these artisans create more than just replicas; they craft historical documents in three dimensions that preserve and celebrate America's rich maritime heritage. The USS Constellation's story continues to resonate with Americans today, reminding us of our maritime heritage and the crucial role naval power played in shaping the nation. Whether preserved in Baltimore Harbor or meticulously recreated in model form, this historic vessel connects us to the daring sailors, brilliant designers, and strategic thinkers who helped establish American sea power. For the collector or enthusiast who brings a USS Constellation model into their home or office, the connection to history becomes personal. These exquisite replicas serve not just as decorative items but as conversation pieces that invite exploration of America's naval past and the technological innovations that shaped maritime warfare. In an age of digital displays and virtual experiences, there remains something profoundly satisfying about the tangible presence of a precisely crafted ship model. The USS Constellation, in miniature form, brings the majesty of the Age of Sail into the present day, allowing us to appreciate the engineering marvels that ruled the waves long before the age of steel and steam. Whether you're a serious collector, a history buff, or someone seeking a distinctive decorative piece with historical significance, a USS Constellation model from Old Modern Handicrafts offers a perfect blend of artistry, history, and craftsmanship that will be treasured for generations to come. Interested in exploring the world of premium ship models and nautical decor? Visit Old Modern Handicrafts to discover their extensive collection of historically accurate replicas, including the magnificent USS Constellation and over 1,000 other finely crafted nautical treasures. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

Appeals court upholds temporary block on Alien Enemies Act deportations
Appeals court upholds temporary block on Alien Enemies Act deportations

Washington Post

time28-03-2025

  • Politics
  • Washington Post

Appeals court upholds temporary block on Alien Enemies Act deportations

A federal appeals panel on Wednesday refused to allow the Trump administration to summarily deport migrants under a rarely invoked wartime power while litigation on the matter continues. The 2-1 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit delivered at least a temporary blow to the government, which argued that U.S. District Judge James E. Boasberg's two-week ban on deportations under the Alien Enemies Act usurped the executive branch's power to make national security decisions. The case began with the administration's effort to bypass immigration court hearings and deport hundreds of people it says are members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang to a notorious prison in El Salvador. It became a flash point in the growing tensions between President Donald Trump and the federal courts. In upholding Boasberg's order Wednesday, the appellate panel stressed the temporary nature of the ban, which the judge imposed to prevent deportations until he could hear arguments on their legality. Circuit Judges Karen Henderson and Patricia Millett cautioned in separate opinions that their decisions should not be read as a final judgment on the merits of the Trump administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act. Boasberg must first rule on that question, and either party in the case could then appeal. Still, Henderson questioned the administration's justification for invoking the act, which allows the president to remove foreigners during a declared war or invasion, noting it had only been used before in cases of armed conflict with foreign powers. 'The Alien Enemies Act was enacted by the Fifth Congress amid an actual conflict — the Quasi-War — with France, a foreign power. War was front and center in the minds of the enacting legislature,' wrote Henderson, who was appointed to the appeals court by President George W. Bush. She added later: 'The theme that rings true is that an invasion is a military affair, not one of migration.' Millett, an appointee of President Barack Obama, questioned the administration's failure to set up a process for those targeted for removal to challenge their designations as Tren de Aragua members. 'The true mark of this great Nation under law is that we adhere to legal requirements even when it is hard, even when important national interests are at stake, and even when the claimant may be unpopular,' she wrote. 'For if the government can choose to abandon fair and equal process for some people, it can do the same for everyone.' Their decision drew dissent from the lone Trump appointee on the panel, Circuit Judge Justin Walker, who said the case should have been brought in Texas, where the migrants facing deportation were being held, instead of in D.C. He further questioned whether Boasberg's order had impinged on delicate foreign policy negotiations with El Salvador, whose government agreed to imprison those the administration has identified as Tren de Aragua members. 'The orders risk the possibility that those foreign actors will change their minds about allowing the United States to remove Tren de Aragua members to their countries,' Walker wrote. 'Even if they don't change their minds, it gives them leverage to negotiate for better terms.' In court filings and hearings, Justice Department lawyers argued that the president's right to invoke the Alien Enemies Act was not subject to judicial review because the president has expansive power to make national security decisions — a claim Henderson flatly rejected. Legal experts have questioned the justification for invoking the 1798 law, given that the United States is not at war with Venezuela. The law allows for the detention and removal of citizens of a country with which the United States is at war. It was last invoked during World War II to intern Japanese, Italian and German nationals; it also laid the foundation for the internment of more than 110,000 Japanese Americans. Trump secretly signed a proclamation invoking the law on March 14. His administration designated Tren de Araguas a foreign terrorist organization, and the proclamation claimed the gang is 'perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion against the territory of the United States.' The White House made the proclamation public on March 15, after the ACLU and Democracy Forward Foundation filed a preemptive lawsuit against the administration's use of the law to deport five Venezuelan migrants. That same day, Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order, barring their deportation under the act. He expanded the order hours later to prevent the removal of any alleged Tren de Aragua members while the case before him played out. Boasberg also ordered the return of any flights in the process of taking those migrants to El Salvador. Since then, lawyers for some of the people on those flights have said that their clients had nothing to do with the gang. They hailed the appellate court's ruling as an opportunity to ensure they receive due process. 'The decision means that hundreds more individuals will not be immediately sent, possibly for the rest of their lives, to one of the worst prisons in the world, without ever even having had an opportunity to claim they aren't members of the gang,' said Lee Gelernt, the ACLU lawyer who argued the case. Boasberg has continued to press the Trump administration for details on the flights so he can determine whether they defied his order. A Washington Post review of flight records found that two flights took off for El Salvador while the judge was reviewing the case and a third flight took off minutes after his written order was issued. Trump officials said the migrants on the third flight were deported under a different legal authority. Justice Department lawyers maintain that officials have complied with Boasberg's ruling, and they have resisted the judge's demands for more information. Late Monday, they cited what is known as the state secrets privilege, which allows the executive branch to withhold sensitive national security information in either criminal or civil litigation. Trump and his allies have attacked Boasberg and called for his impeachment, a statement that drew a rare rebuke from Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) has introduced articles of impeachment against the judge. But in deciding the appeal of his temporary restraining order Wednesday, one of the appellate court judges lauded Boasberg for handling the case with 'great expedition and circumspection.' His orders, Millett wrote, 'do nothing more than freeze the status quo until weighty and unprecedented legal issues can be addressed.' She added: 'There is neither jurisdiction nor reason for this court to interfere at this very preliminary stage.' Perry Stein contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store