Latest news with #RaymondLopez
CBS News
2 days ago
- General
- CBS News
Chicago alderwoman threatens legal action against colleague amid war of words over Israeli embassy shooting
Chicago Ald. Rossana Rodriguez Sanchez (33rd) is threatening legal action against fellow Ald. Raymond Lopez (15th), amid a war of words tied to last week's deadly shooting of two Israeli Embassy workers in Washington, D.C. Lopez is standing behind comments and social media posts related to the shooting, but Rodriguez Sanchez has said they are inaccurate, dangerous, and violate the public trust. Her attorney has sent Lopez a cease and desist order, and has threatened legal action if he doesn't comply. In the hours after it was revealed the accused gunman in last week's deadly shooting outside the Capital Jewish Museum in D.C. is from Chicago, some Chicago leaders began to weigh in. Among them was Lopez, who shared a post on his aldermanic X account, writing "birds of a feather" and circling faces in a group shot of United Working Families, a group that helps promote Black and Brown political candidates. Those faces included Rodriguez Sanchez, Ald. Byron Sigcho-Lopez, Mayor Brandon Johnson, and U.S. Rep. Delia Ramirez. The photo had lines drawn on it pointing to an individual in the middle, who was later proven not to be the D.C. shooting suspect. Instead it was a former aide to Rodriguez Sanchez, Chris Poulos. "It was really nerve-wracking to see Chris in that picture, his face circled, and the sort of insinuation that this person was a murderer," Rodriguez Sanchez said. United Working Families asked Lopez to take that post down, but he has refused. Instead, the next day he posed, "Happy Friday Chicago - let's make it a great one, unless you stand with radicalized terrorists and the politicians that enable, uplift & defend them." On Tuesday, in a cease and desist letter, lawyers for Rodriguez Sanchez said his comments and decision to not remove them have "caused direct harm, including endangering her and her staff's safety. It also constitutes defamation in violation of Illinois law." And about the gunman, her attorney said: "He has no known connection to the Alderwoman and has never been a member or volunteer of 33d Ward Working Families." Rodriguez Sanchez's attorney has demanded Lopez immediately take down any social media posts falsely linking the alderwoman to the accused gunman, "and immediately cease making similar false statements." "You have shamefully and carelessly continued to put a private citizen in harms way by misidentifying him as an alleged murderer. You have recklessly exploited the tragic murders of Ms. Millgram and Mr. Lischinsky by using them as a platform to repeat falsehoods about Ald. Rodriguez Sanchez, endangering her and her staff," attorney Caryn Lederer wrote. "As a public servant, your deliberate spread of misinformation is a violation of public trust and the responsibilities of your office. It also constitutes defamation under Illinois law." But Lopez insists he has nothing to apologize for. He said, while others made the leap that the photo connected politicians to the shooter, he insisted he never did. "I simply said that those individuals were birds of a feather. If you and I are part of a same group and we take a picture, we are birds of a feather. It is not my fault people don't understand what the meaning of that is," Lopez said. In the hours after the shooting, Lopez also went on AM 560 and said, "There's some back and forth as to whether or not the individual was actually the terrorist, or if that was just Rossana's former campaign chairman/chief of staff taking one for the team to say that it's not him and that they're not sitting with the terrorist." Lopez said he has consulted with his lawyers, and he feels he has no reason to take down any of his social media posts. To be clear, the person in the photo Lopez shared on X is not the accused D.C. shooter, and there is no evidence that suspect has any ties to Rodriguez Sanchez.
Yahoo
22-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Tension runs high in City Council over cost of settlements
CHICAGO (WGN) — With the city already having blown through the $82 million budgeted to cover settlements and judgements, tensions ran high at City Hall on Wednesday as alders approved seven additional payments. While some alders argued the settlements OK'd Wednesday are needed to make people whole, other members called for reform, saying they're suspicious why the city's law department keeps signing off on massive settlements. 'We have to stop setting precedent, which is settling every single time in this room,' Ald. Raymond Lopez (15th Ward) told his colleagues. Ald. Nick Sposato (38th Ward) agreed: 'This has to stop, people. This has to stop. It's a two-way street. This can't be a one-way street. Only we can lose and you can win? That ain't right!' More than $62 million approved Wednesday was to settle four lawsuits that alleged misconduct by Chicago police officers. A combined $48 million goes to three men who spent decades in prison on a wrongful conviction. They were released in 2022. Another $8.25 million goes to another man who spent 17 years in prison before his conviction was overturned. A woman who became a double leg amputee to frostbite after allegedly being ignored by police during frigid temperatures in 2021 will receive $5 million. Another $1.2 million goes to a man who alleged former Sgt. Ronald Watts planted drugs on him. In a non-police misconduct case, alders OK'd more than $15 million to settle a suit brought by Chicago Parking Meters LLC related, in part, to a disagreement about meter enforcement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
12-03-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Chicago fur ban set to face City Council vote
Aldermen are set to vote Wednesday on an ordinance that would ban the sale of new fur products in Chicago. The ordinance is an effort to fight animal cruelty, sponsor Ald. Raymond Lopez, 15th, said. But opponents say it will close historic family-owned businesses and is a government overreach. Several speakers during public testimony at the beginning of the council meeting urged aldermen to pass the ban, saying animals are tortured in order to collect furs. The measure breezed through a first vote in the License and Consumer Protection Committee, but could face tougher scrutiny Wednesday as the City Council's Black Caucus ramped up a fight to strike it down. Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, joined Black Caucus chair Stephanie Coleman and a group of Black pastors at a news conference before the Wednesday meeting to argue the vote is 'about personal choice.' 'Are we going to ban leather next? Are we going to ban beef? Are we going to put Ronald McDonald out of a job?' O'Shea said. 'I can't believe we're here today, that this is actually going to come to a vote at this time in our city. We need to be focused on public safety, on public health, on our schools, on attracting business, on supporting business.' Michael K. Harris Jr., government manager for the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, predicted the ordinance would ban the sale of shearling and sheepskin products, including the popular Ugg boots. Lopez told the Tribune he does not believe the ordinance would ban such products and is not intended to. The ordinance, set to go into effect one year after passage, allows the sale of used fur products and makes clear exceptions for leather, cowhide and deerskin products. It also makes exceptions to allow the sale of secondhand fur products, as well as new fur products used in religious and cultural practices. Mayor Brandon Johnson appears to have stayed out of the debate over fur products, even as many Black aldermen rally around Beverly furrier Island Furs. The store is one of three Black-owned furriers in the country, O'Shea said. Gerard Brown, who has owned Island Furs for three decades, said the ban would put his store out of business. 'I can understand if people don't want to wear my product. That's okay, that's what makes my country, freedom of speech, so freedom of choice,' Brown said. 'My creativity will stop because they've dictated to me how I should create my fashion.' Other issues in the city deserve more attention, argued Walter Turner, pastor of South Shore's New Spiritual Light Missionary Baptist Church. Turner painted the ordinance as an overstep harming Black Chicago. 'We have a whole lot of other serious issues going on in our communities. Our babies are being shot every day. We need to deal with our school system,' he said. 'This is about shutting down businesses that have been a staple.'
Chicago Tribune
12-03-2025
- Business
- Chicago Tribune
Chicago fur ban set to face City Council vote
Aldermen are set to vote Wednesday on an ordinance that would ban the sale of new fur products in Chicago. The ordinance is an effort to fight animal cruelty, sponsor Ald. Raymond Lopez, 15th, said. But opponents say it will close historic family-owned businesses and is a government overreach. Several speakers during public testimony at the beginning of the council meeting urged aldermen to pass the ban, saying animals are tortured in order to collect furs. The measure breezed through a first vote in the License and Consumer Protection Committee, but could face tougher scrutiny Wednesday as the City Council's Black Caucus ramped up a fight to strike it down. Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, joined Black Caucus chair Stephanie Coleman and a group of Black pastors at a news conference before the Wednesday meeting to argue the vote is 'about personal choice.' 'Are we going to ban leather next? Are we going to ban beef? Are we going to put Ronald McDonald out of a job?' O'Shea said. 'I can't believe we're here today, that this is actually going to come to a vote at this time in our city. We need to be focused on public safety, on public health, on our schools, on attracting business, on supporting business.' Michael K. Harris Jr., government manager for the Illinois Retail Merchants Association, predicted the ordinance would ban the sale of shearling and sheepskin products, including the popular Ugg boots. Lopez told the Tribune he does not believe the ordinance would ban such products and is not intended to. The ordinance, set to go into effect one year after passage, allows the sale of used fur products and makes clear exceptions for leather, cowhide and deerskin products. It also makes exceptions to allow the sale of secondhand fur products, as well as new fur products used in religious and cultural practices. Mayor Brandon Johnson appears to have stayed out of the debate over fur products, even as many Black aldermen rally around Beverly furrier Island Furs. The store is one of three Black-owned furriers in the country, O'Shea said. Gerard Brown, who has owned Island Furs for three decades, said the ban would put his store out of business. 'I can understand if people don't want to wear my product. That's okay, that's what makes my country, freedom of speech, so freedom of choice,' Brown said. 'My creativity will stop because they've dictated to me how I should create my fashion.' Other issues in the city deserve more attention, argued Walter Turner, pastor of South Shore's New Spiritual Light Missionary Baptist Church. Turner painted the ordinance as an overstep harming Black Chicago. 'We have a whole lot of other serious issues going on in our communities. Our babies are being shot every day. We need to deal with our school system,' he said. 'This is about shutting down businesses that have been a staple.'
CBS News
12-03-2025
- Business
- CBS News
Chicago City Council expected to vote on fur ban, more than $3 million in police misconduct settlements
A proposed fur ban and several settlements in police misconduct lawsuits are up for final votes by the Chicago City Council on Wednesday. A group of aldermen and Black clergy members rallied ahead of the meeting to urge the council to vote down a proposal from Ald. Raymond Lopez (15th) to ban new fur from being sold in the city. They argue it will close down Island Furs, a Black-owned business in the Beverly neighborhood, which has served the community for more than 30 years. Since 1994, Island Furs owner and cofounder Gerard Brown has stitched and repaired fur coats that last generations. Brown's showroom is full of fresh new pieces — all items he would not be able to sell if the new city ordinance passes. He noted that the man credited as the founder of Chicago, Jean Baptiste Point du Sable, was involved with the fur trade. "DuSable started the fur trade here in Chicago, so it's kind of bizarre to try to truly eliminate our livelihood," Brown said last week after the City Council License Committee backed Lopez's proposed fur ban. Ald. Matt O'Shea (19th), who has two furriers in his ward – Island Furs and Andriana Furs – called the proposal "a complete overreach." "This is about closing businesses. This is about closing one of only three Black furriers in the entire United States. I can't believe we're here today, that this is actually going to come to a vote," he said. Ald. Stephanie Coleman (16th), who chairs the City Council Black Caucus, said, "We believe that we have better business to attain to, and specifically saving small businesses." "It's cruel to hurt small businesses like Island Furs and Andriana Furs in the 19th Ward. This issue should be taken to a state level, and not here in City Council," she said. In addition to Island Furs and Andriana Furs, the proposal would impact four other furriers in Chicago. If passed, those businesses would have one year to adjust to the ban, which provides exemptions for used fur products and fur products for religious or "traditional tribal, cultural or spiritual purposes by a member of a federally or state-recognized Native American tribe." Otherwise, businesses would only be able to sell faux fur products. The ban does not cover leather, cowhide or deerskin products, or animal pelts preserved through taxidermy. Supporters of the proposed ban said the way animals are trapped, bred, and killed for their pelts leads to suffering and public health risks. Police misconduct lawsuit settlements also up for vote Meantime, the City Council also is set to give final approval to a handful of proposed settlements accusing police of misconduct. Miracle Boyd, a Chicago activist who was punched in the face by an officer during a 2020 protest in Grant Park, is in line for a $280,000 settlement. In July 2020, Boyd was rallying in Grant Park, calling to defund police in the wake of the murder of George Floyd by a police officer in Minneapolis. Some in the crowd attempted to tear down the Christopher Columbus statue. Police have said some members of the crowd began attacking officers with fireworks, rocks, frozen bottles, and other objects. Boyd, then 18, and an activist with GoodKids MadCity, was filming video on her cell phone when she saw Nicholas Jovanovich "walking aggressively toward her," and calling her a "piece of s***," according to her lawsuit. Jovanovich then hit her in the face "without justification," knocking out her tooth, and telling her "give me that f***ing phone." In addition to losing a tooth, Boyd also suffered nerve damage, according to her lawsuit. The Civilian Office of Police Accountability, which investigates allegations of police misconduct, ruled Jovanovich used excessive force, and made several false or misleading statements during the investigation, and recommended he be fired. Jovanovich resigned before the Chicago Police Board could move forward with any disciplinary action. Boyd has said she didn't do anything to excuse the officer's actions, noting it's legal in Illinois to record public interactions with police. The City Council also is poised to pay $2.5 million to the families of two people killed during high-speed police chases that violated Chicago Police Department policies. The family of Ezell Ricky Island would get a $1.5 million settlement, after he was killed in a crash on the West Side in February 2020. Island was in the back seat of a car being chased at speeds of more than 75 mph after cutting off an unmarked police SUV as he pulled out of a liquor store parking lot. The driver of the SUV refused to stop when police tried to pull him over, and ended up crashing into a pillar supporting CTA tracks along Lake Street. Island was killed and three others were injured in the crash. A lawsuit filed by Island's family accuses police of chasing the SUV without permission and not reporting the chase to dispatchers at the city's 911 center, as required by police orders. A $1 million settlement would go to the family of Mignonne Robinson, who was killed after being hit by a car fleeing police three days after the chase that killed Island. Robinson was driving on Kedzie Avenue when her car was hit by a vehicle fleeing a traffic stop on Jackson Boulevard. Her family's lawsuit claims police failed to notify dispatchers of the chase, and of conducting a chase at high speeds even though the risk to innocent bystanders outweighed the benefits of pulling over a driver for running a red light. LGBTQ+ hotel, Rector Building landmark status up for final approval Aldermen also are expected to approve landmark status for the Rector Building, at 79 W. Monroe St., which is undergoing a $64.2 million renovation as part of the city's effort to revitalize underused buildings in the Loop. A developer is converting 11 of the building's empty office floors into apartments and businesses. Built in 1905, the 14-story building is the oldest surviving commercial high-rise designed by Chicago architect Jarvis Hunt, who designed buildings all over the city and elsewhere in the late 19th and early 20th century, according to the city's Department of Planning and Development. Landmark designation for the building would protect its exterior architecture as the interior undergoes renovations. Aldermen also are expected to give the green light to a boutique hotel in Lakeview geared toward LGBTQ+ visitors. The six-story hotel near Belmont and Halsted would feature a rooftop deck and a basement speakeasy bar. The developer is Allan O'Brien, owner of Men's Room Chicago, a popular fashion store a few hundred feet away on Halsted.
