Latest news with #RecreationandPark
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- Business
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F.'s controversial fountain deemed ‘hazardous' and will be fenced off indefinitely
San Francisco officials ordered Vaillancourt Fountain on Embarcadero Plaza to be fenced off indefinitely Monday morning after a new report concluded that its crumbling condition poses a public safety risk. Construction of the fence, scheduled to begin at 7 a.m. Monday and continue throughout the week, cast new doubt on the massive artwork's future as a major renovation of the plaza gets underway. The blocky, 710-ton sculpture has been a lightning rod for public opinion for more than a half-century, but it was a draw for parkgoers who darted through its gushing water and for skateboarders who plied its famed stairs and ledges. But a pump failure has left the fountain dry for the past year, and the closure seeks to prevent anyone from climbing on the interactive structure or even getting close to it. It comes as a result of an independent report commissioned by the San Francisco Recreation and Park Department, which manages Embarcadero Plaza, as officials consider how to treat the fountain as part of the planned $30 million plaza renovation. The 122-page assessment issued last week by architecture firm Page & Turnbull found that the 55-year-old public art is corroding and deteriorating, contains toxic materials including asbestos and lead, and fails to meet seismic safety codes. Based on those findings, Recreation and Park staff judged the sculpture unsafe for the public to interact with and for structural maintenance workers to get inside and repair. 'The fountain isn't just falling apart — it's hazardous,' said Recreation and Park spokesperson Tamara Aparton. 'The structure is cracked, corroded and missing key supports. Add lead and asbestos to the mix, and it's a serious safety risk. That's why we're fencing it off now, to protect the public while longer term decisions are made.' The new steel mesh security fencing will be 3½ feet tall on the Market Street side, so people can still lean over it and look at the sculpture. In the back, on the Embarcadero side, it will connect to an existing 6-foot-tall fence. The reinforced concrete artwork by Canadian sculptor Armand Vaillancourt, completed in 1971, is part of San Francisco's Civic Art Collection, and any final decision about its fate will be determined by the Arts Commission after public hearings and possibly a vote by the Board of Supervisors. The city is in the planning and design phase for an ambitious new park that will combine Embarcadero Plaza and the adjacent Sue Bierman Park in a space spanning 5 acres, twice the size of Union Square. Since the release of a preliminary rendering of the park that omitted the fountain, Vaillancourt and architectural preservationists have been lobbying for it to stay put. The report, which included structural analysis by DCI Engineers and hazardous materials testing by North Tower Environmental, did not specify the cost of bringing the fountain up to code and restoring the water element. Rec and Park estimates the cost to fully renovate the artwork, inside and out, at $12 million to $17 million, with ongoing maintenance costs of $100,000 per year. Boosters of Brutalist architecture and other preservationists have been lobbying on the fountain's behalf, and in May, the 95-year-old Vaillancourt made a trip from his home in Montreal to meet with staff of both the Arts Commission and Rec and Park to plead for his sculpture's preservation. 'They made the new plan, and my monumental sculpture is not there,' Vaillancourt told the Chronicle during a visit to his namesake work. 'I'm here to save that piece of art.' The fountain is 40 feet tall, and Vaillancourt told the Chronicle it is anchored 40 feet down. It survived the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, which severely damaged the adjacent Embarcadero Freeway, forcing that structure's demolition. The sculptor argued that cleaning and repairing the fountain would return it to its original glory and keep it sound for another century. He also said the fountain is immobile, and demolishing it would cost more than it would to fix it. But the technical report tells a different story. It states that the fountain sits on bay mud and infill and does not meet seismic safety standards. In a major earthquake, 'The structure is likely to yield and deform beyond that deformation already apparent in some of the stress cracking in the concrete,' it says. The report also states that parts of the interior support structure are corroded or missing, and asbestos-containing materials and lead-based paint were found in parts of the sculpture, including the pump room. Mechanical and electrical systems 'are beyond their serviceable life' and would need to be replaced, it says. Disassembling and reassembling the fountain would be 'feasible,' the report says, but 'require substantial effort and time' to perform. The job would be complicated by the large machinery needed to stabilize and move the concrete tubes, and the dangers to workers who would have to climb in and around the pipes to cut them — as well as the precautions needed to prevent asbestos exposure. 'Overall, Vaillancourt exhibits a range of deterioration that must be addressed for the fountain to be enjoyed safely,' the report summary reads. 'That said,' it concludes, 'the fountain does not appear yet to have deteriorated beyond repair, though certain systems and components have, and there may be a variety of approaches to treatment to be explored in future phases that could stabilize and restore it.' In the meantime, Aparton said, 'the bottom line is that the fountain is no longer safe to approach or interact with.' Arts Commission spokesperson Coma Te concurred. 'Given the findings presented in the structural report, public safety comes first,' he said in an email. 'The Arts Commission supports Rec and Park's decision to secure the area as they work to complete planning and design work for the plaza.'
San Francisco Chronicle
5 days ago
- Business
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. Mayor Lurie wants to end free parking in Golden Gate Park
Anyone who's unfurled a picnic blanket in Golden Gate Park has probably witnessed the line of cars packing its curbs, taking advantage of free parking. That privilege could soon end. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie has introduced budget legislation to make visitors pay to stow their cars, probably at a rate of $3 an hour, though the cost would fluctuate according to demand. When Recreation and Park officials proposed the idea earlier this year, they hoped to stave off a budget deficit that could balloon to $15 million by 2027. Parking fees were among a slew of possible funding initiatives put forward during a Rec and Park Commission meeting in late February. Other recommendations included a $5-an-hour charge to rent a tennis court. Without a steady and reliable new revenue stream, the parks department could be forced to make crippling cuts across its system, including closing swimming pools and offering fewer summer camps. Additionally, staff might have to mow ball fields less frequently, scale back the gardener apprentice program and reduce custodial facilities. 'San Francisco's parks are one of our greatest treasures,' Lurie wrote in a statement. 'And despite serious fiscal challenges, our budget offers a fair, responsible way to keep them clean, safe and open to everyone.' He emphasized the importance of prioritizing core services as the city makes agonizing cuts across its departments. The Board of Supervisors would have to approve Lurie's parking legislation for it to take effect in 2027. Lurie must sign the budget into law by Aug. 1. • Live event: Can the Bay Area save public transit? Join reporter Rachel Swan, Muni head Julie Kirschbaum, BART GM Bob Powers and State Sen. Scott Wiener live at Manny's at 6 p.m. on June 18. Get your ticket. Parking kiosks alone could generate a windfall for city parks, with revenue projections of $1.2 million in the upcoming fiscal year, and $9.2 million the following year. Although San Franciscans often grumble over parking fees, some call the Golden Gate Park proposal a worthy trade-off. 'A lot of people come to the park to visit the museum or the botanical gardens, and I don't think it's a huge ask for them to pay a few dollars for parking,' said Steffen Franz, president of the neighborhood group Friends of Lafayette Park in Pacific Heights. While Golden Gate Park has two paid parking lots, spaces are free along Martin Luther King Drive — the main artery other than John F. Kennedy Drive, where cars are not allowed on the east section. For the time being, motorists can also find free street parking on Nancy Pelosi or Bowling Green drives or JFK Drive on the west side of the park.
