logo
#

Latest news with #RegulatoryInterventionsandMunicipallyOwnedUtilities

Opinion: Secrecy shrouds city's refusal to engage on Enmax power line
Opinion: Secrecy shrouds city's refusal to engage on Enmax power line

Calgary Herald

time24-05-2025

  • Business
  • Calgary Herald

Opinion: Secrecy shrouds city's refusal to engage on Enmax power line

In a project that we have not been able to find an equivalent for in Calgary, Enmax has proposed running a high-voltage transmission line — with towers up to 10 storeys tall — down a northeast residential street. The Alberta Utilities Commission is holding a public hearing beginning May 26 to determine whether to approve Enmax's request to build the line above ground, or if it should be buried. Article content Article content Article content If Enmax gets its preferred overhead option, people living in the dozens of houses and hundreds of apartments, and those resting and recovering in the Fanning Centre, will see their view of 40 fully mature trees ripped from their streets and throughout the largest regional park in the area. Article content Article content For a one-time savings of $10 million, Enmax proposes to sterilize the area and put hundreds of millions of dollars in development at the North Hill Co-op, Ambassador Motor Inn, the city-owned Midfield Heights and several smaller developments along the line's route at risk. Article content More than 800 people have signed a petition led by the Winston Heights-Mountview Community Association, opposing the overhead lines. However, as neighbours rally, our Ward 4 councillor and city administration have been silent. Article content Why would the city, with so much to lose in revenue from the land they are about to sell, and those from whom they collect property taxes, not even offer an opinion? We have worked with the city for too long to believe that the public servants wouldn't be concerned with Enmax's proposal. Article content Article content And indeed they were, at one point. The city's parks department notified the AUC that it intended to participate in the hearing because it 'feels strongly that an aboveground alignment . . . will ultimately sterilize the public land.' They later, confusingly, withdrew this request to participate. Article content It turns out there's an unfortunate reason the city won't participate in the hearing, despite potentially losing millions from the sale of Midfield Heights lots and in future property taxes, and seeing their densification and tree canopy strategies abandoned. Article content In June 2024, council passed a confidential policy titled Regulatory Interventions and Municipally Owned Utilities (CD2024-0677). You can't read the details and neither can we, but we've had it confirmed by multiple city staffers and councillors that it forbids the city from offering an opinion during AUC proceedings that involve Enmax.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store