Latest news with #SARS-CoV-1
NDTV
08-05-2025
- Health
- NDTV
Covid-19 Likely Originated From Wildlife Trade, Not Lab Leak, Researchers Claim
A new genetic study bolsters the theory that COVID-19 originated from the wildlife trade, challenging claims of a lab leak. Researchers traced the virus's origins to animals sold in Wuhan markets, adding fuel to the ongoing debate amid US-China tensions. The findings, published in Cell on May 7, 2025, point to a natural spillover, highlighting the persistent risks of zoonotic diseases stemming from the wildlife trade. Researchers at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine and their colleagues concluded that the ancestor of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, emerged just years before the pandemic began. The virus left its origin in Western China or Northern Laos just years before the emergence, travelling nearly 2,700 kilometres to Central China. This timeframe is too short for natural dispersal by its primary host, the horseshoe bat, suggesting it "hitched a ride" via the wildlife trade, similar to the SARS outbreak in 2002. "When two different viruses infect the same bat, sometimes what comes out of that bat is an amalgam of different pieces of both viruses," said co-senior author Joel Wertheim, PhD, a professor of medicine at UC San Diego School of Medicine's Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health. "Recombination complicates our understanding of the evolution of these viruses because it results in different parts of the genome having different evolutionary histories." To overcome this, the researchers focused on non-recombining regions of the viral genomes, allowing them to more accurately reconstruct the evolutionary history. The study indicates that sarbecoviruses related to SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 have circulated around Western China and Southeast Asia for millennia, spreading at similar rates as their horseshoe bat hosts. "Horseshoe bats have an estimated foraging area of around 2-3 km and a dispersal capacity similar to the diffusion velocity we estimated for the sarbecoviruses related to SARS-CoV-2," said co-senior author Simon Dellicour, Ph.D., head of the Spatial Epidemiology Lab at Université Libre de Bruxelles and visiting professor at KU Leuven. The analysis further revealed that the most recent sarbecovirus ancestors of both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 left their points of origin less than 10 years before infecting humans more than a thousand kilometres away. "We show that the original SARS-CoV-1 was circulating in Western China - just one to two years before the emergence of SARS in Guangdong Province, South Central China, and SARS-CoV-2 in Western China or Northern Laos - just five to seven years before the emergence of COVID-19 in Wuhan," said Jonathan E. Pekar, PhD, a 2023 graduate of the Bioinformatics and Systems Biology programme at UC San Diego School of Medicine, now a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Edinburgh.
West Australian
08-05-2025
- Health
- West Australian
Origin story of COVID virus rewritten, challenging lab leak theory
New research is rewriting the origin story of the virus that triggered the deadly COVID pandemic. Challenging the idea that the pandemic was caused by a lab leak, scientists now believe they know when and where the virus first emerged. COVID, which first emerged in humans in Wuhan in central China in December 2019, is calculated to have caused up to 36 million deaths worldwide. It's believe the virus that causes it left the area where it first emerged among animals in China or northern Laos several years before jumping across to humans 2700 kilometres away in Wuhan. While the primary host of the virus was a horseshoe bat, the virus was only able to travel the distance to where the human cases were first detected by 'hitching a ride' there with other animals via the wildlife trade, according to the research published in Cell . Researchers from the University of California San Diego School of Medicine made the finding after analysing the family tree of virus strains SARS-CoV-1, which caused the SARS pandemic of 2002-2004, and the SARS-CoV-2, which caused the COVID pandemic — mapping their evolutionary history before they emerged in humans. 'We show that the original SARS-CoV-1 was circulating in Western China — just one to two years before the emergence of SARS in Guangdong Province, South Central China, and SARS-CoV-2 in Western China or Northern Laos — just five to seven years before the emergence of COVID-19 in Wuhan,' researcher Jonathan E. Pekar said. Given the distances that both viruses would have had to cover so quickly, it is highly improbable that they could have been carried there via the bats alone, they concluded. Much more likely, they say, is that they were transported there accidentally by wild animal traders via intermediate host animals. 'The viruses most closely related to the original SARS coronavirus were found in palm civets and raccoon dogs in southern China, hundreds of miles from the bat populations that were their original source,' said co-senior author Michael Worobey. 'For more than two decades the scientific community has concluded that the live-wildlife trade was how those hundreds of miles were covered. We're seeing exactly the same pattern with SARS-CoV-2.' The findings challenge the view that SARS-CoV-1 emerged naturally, but SARS-CoV2 was the result of a lab leak. 'At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a concern that the distance between Wuhan and the bat virus reservoir was too extreme for a zoonotic origin,' co-senior author Joel Wertheim said. 'This paper shows that it isn't unusual and is, in fact, extremely similar to the emergence of SARS-CoV-1 in 2002.' It's hoped that by continuing to sample wild bat populations for viruses, scientists will be able to prepare for and control future outbreaks. Debate about the origins of COVID-19 has raged since the pandemic took hold in 2019-2020. The CIA said in January the pandemic was more likely to have emerged from a lab in China than from nature, after the agency had for years said it could not reach a conclusion on the matter.
Perth Now
08-05-2025
- Health
- Perth Now
COVID shock as new findings challenge popular origin theory
New research is rewriting the origin story of the virus that triggered the deadly COVID pandemic. Challenging the idea that the pandemic was caused by a lab leak, scientists now believe they know when and where the virus first emerged. COVID, which first emerged in humans in Wuhan in central China in December 2019, is calculated to have caused up to 36 million deaths worldwide. It's believe the virus that causes it left the area where it first emerged among animals in China or northern Laos several years before jumping across to humans 2700 kilometres away in Wuhan. While the primary host of the virus was a horseshoe bat, the virus was only able to travel the distance to where the human cases were first detected by 'hitching a ride' there with other animals via the wildlife trade, according to the research published in Cell. Researchers from the University of California San Diego School of Medicine made the finding after analysing the family tree of virus strains SARS-CoV-1, which caused the SARS pandemic of 2002-2004, and the SARS-CoV-2, which caused the COVID pandemic — mapping their evolutionary history before they emerged in humans. 'We show that the original SARS-CoV-1 was circulating in Western China — just one to two years before the emergence of SARS in Guangdong Province, South Central China, and SARS-CoV-2 in Western China or Northern Laos — just five to seven years before the emergence of COVID-19 in Wuhan,' researcher Jonathan E. Pekar said. Given the distances that both viruses would have had to cover so quickly, it is highly improbable that they could have been carried there via the bats alone, they concluded. Much more likely, they say, is that they were transported there accidentally by wild animal traders via intermediate host animals. 'The viruses most closely related to the original SARS coronavirus were found in palm civets and raccoon dogs in southern China, hundreds of miles from the bat populations that were their original source,' said co-senior author Michael Worobey. 'For more than two decades the scientific community has concluded that the live-wildlife trade was how those hundreds of miles were covered. We're seeing exactly the same pattern with SARS-CoV-2.' The findings challenge the view that SARS-CoV-1 emerged naturally, but SARS-CoV2 was the result of a lab leak. 'At the outset of the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a concern that the distance between Wuhan and the bat virus reservoir was too extreme for a zoonotic origin,' co-senior author Joel Wertheim said. 'This paper shows that it isn't unusual and is, in fact, extremely similar to the emergence of SARS-CoV-1 in 2002.' It's hoped that by continuing to sample wild bat populations for viruses, scientists will be able to prepare for and control future outbreaks. Debate about the origins of COVID-19 has raged since the pandemic took hold in 2019-2020. The CIA said in January the pandemic was more likely to have emerged from a lab in China than from nature, after the agency had for years said it could not reach a conclusion on the matter.
Yahoo
01-05-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
HHS touts universal flu, coronavirus vaccine initiative while casting doubt on future of seasonal Covid-19 shots
The US Department of Health and Human Services said Thursday that it aims to accomplish within four years a scientific feat that hasn't been achieved for the past 45: the development of a universal flu vaccine that could protect against multiple virus strains with pandemic potential, including H5N1 avian influenza. 'Generation Gold Standard is a paradigm shift,' National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said in a statement on the new initiative. 'It extends vaccine protection beyond strain-specific limits and prepares for flu viral threats – not just today's, but tomorrow's as well – using traditional vaccine technology brought into the 21st century.' HHS said the project, being developed in-house at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is targeting US Food and Drug Administration approval of universal influenza vaccines in 2029, with human clinical trials scheduled to start next year. The Wall Street Journal first reported that it will be funded with $500 million from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, a figure confirmed by a spokesperson for HHS. 'I hope it works,' said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine scientist at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. He noted that he trained in a flu lab in the early 1980s that was working on a universal flu vaccine, and one still hasn't been developed. 'It's not for lack of effort, and it's not for lack of expertise, and it's not for lack of money that we don't have a universal influenza vaccine. It's just really hard to do.' Flu viruses are wily because they mutate from season to season, sometimes significantly, and because efforts to protect against all – or many – strains at once haven't succeeded, we get updated flu shots each year to protect us against the latest circulating strains. A similar paradigm has unfolded for Covid-19 vaccines since they were first authorized in the height of the pandemic at the end of 2020. HHS's new initiative also aims to develop universal coronavirus vaccines that could provide protection against not just the virus that causes Covid-19 – SARS-CoV-2 – but its cousins SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV. The vaccine technology in HHS's new initiative uses inactivated whole-virus vaccines, an older approach that delivers an entire virus that's been chemically tweaked so it can't infect human cells. The project comes from work being driven by Dr. Matthew Memoli, the NIH's principal deputy director, and Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, acting director of NIAID. Memoli, who gained attention in 2021 for opposing Covid-19 vaccine mandates and reportedly declined Covid-19 vaccination himself, said in 2022 that one of the vaccines being advanced in this project, which can potentially be administered through a squirt up the nose, is an attempt 'to induce a comprehensive immune response that closely mimics immunity gained following a natural influenza infection.' Vaccine experts who are not involved in the project said universal flu and coronavirus vaccines are a worthy goal, but they questioned whether this project could produce one. Dr. Greg Poland, who directs the vaccine research group at the Mayo Clinic, said the accepted scientific definition of a universal flu vaccine is one that would provide at least 75% protection against symptomatic infection with both A and B strain flu viruses for at least a year, and preferably over multiple seasons, for all age groups. Poland says research that's been published on the most advanced candidate in the new initiative, BPL-1357, describes a vaccine that contains inert versions of four A-strain avian influenza viruses but doesn't include any B-strain viruses, 'which tells me they're not aiming at seasonal viruses,' he said. 'They're aiming at those viruses that have the potential for pandemicity,' or the potential to start pandemics. Poland said he was also surprised by the amount of money being devoted to a vaccine technology that science has largely moved away from. 'Why would we devise a major program and devote a tremendous amount of resources to an old platform?' he asked. The advantage of using whole viruses is that they give the body a chance to develop antibodies to many parts of a virus, which tends to create long-lasting protection, even if some parts of the virus mutate. But they can also cause unwanted side effects and adverse reactions. Whole virus vaccines are typically grown in chicken eggs or cells. In this case, the vaccines under study are grown in canine kidney cells. Those viruses are treated with a chemical called beta-propiolactone, which prevents them from being able to copy themselves in the body and infect cells. The inactivated viruses are then purified and mixed into a shot or nasal spray. The US used to use flu vaccines made from whole inactivated viruses but has since moved to safer options, such as subunit or split virus vaccines, which use only a part of the flu virus to create an immune response. Flumist, a nasal spray, uses a whole but weakened version of the virus, so it's not completely inactivated. Inactivated whole-virus flu vaccines are still used in some other countries. Poland and another vaccine expert, Dr. Peter Hotez, director of the Center for Vaccine Development at Texas Children's Hospital, said whole-virus vaccines were once more common, but developers moved away from them because they produce inoculations that are sometimes too strong and can provoke dangerous immune reactions. 'I'm guessing it's going to be quite reactogenic,' Hotez said. He pointed to the 1976 swine flu vaccine, which produced a strong immune response to the whole virus it contained but also caused high rates of Guillain-Barré syndrome, an immune disorder in which the body attacks its own nerves and muscles, causing muscle weakness and paralysis. Other whole-virus vaccines, including the first ones developed to fight respiratory syncytial virus or RSV, have caused problems such as immune enhancement, where exposure to the virus after vaccination makes the infection more dangerous, not less. 'It's a bit of a head-scratcher why they have so much confidence in a whole inactivated virus approach. I don't quite understand that,' Hotez said. Just before it announced its new universal vaccine development plan, late Wednesday HHS threw into question the future of seasonally updated Covid-19 vaccines. The agency said in a statement that 'all new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure – a radical departure from past practices.' The FDA typically selects strains for updated Covid-19 vaccines in June so manufacturers can ready them for the fall respiratory virus season. The agency has adopted a system similar to the one used for flu vaccines, holding previously that updating only the strain targeted by the vaccine – and nothing else – didn't represent a change big enough to require new human trials. If HHS now requires placebo-controlled trials before clearing updated Covid-19 vaccines, experts said, that could delay availability of the shots by months, putting vulnerable people at risk. 'The advantage of updating the vaccine every year to make it more close to the circulating strain is, you get better antibody responses, so for four to six months, you will clearly have better protection against mild to moderate disease, and that matters especially for people who are more frail,' particularly people 75 and older, Offit said. A spokesperson for HHS didn't respond to an inquiry about whether the new guidance pertains to updated Covid-19 vaccines, but an official told CNN on Saturday that 'the covid vaccines, including new ones by Pfizer and Moderna, are new and must have more gold standard science to ensure safety and efficacy for the public.' The official drew a distinction from the flu shot, 'which has been tried and tested' for decades. Questions about the fate of Covid vaccines began to swirl after the FDA missed an April 1 deadline to decide whether to grant full approval to the Novavax vaccine, the only non-mRNA vaccine available to protect against the coronavirus. A source familiar with the situation, who wasn't authorized to speak on behalf of the agency, told CNN that the vaccine had been on track to be approved. Novavax later said the FDA had requested a 'postmarketing commitment' for a clinical trial, suggesting that a study would be required of the vaccine after it received full approval (it had been available through emergency use authorization since 2022). HHS's newest statement adds to questions about whether a trial would be required before approval, not just for Novavax's vaccine but also for updated versions of those from Moderna and Pfizer. In a conference call with Wall Street analysts Thursday, Moderna President Dr. Stephen Hoge insisted that the company's interactions with the FDA so far have been 'business as usual' and emphasized the 'real need for Covid vaccination, particularly this coming fall.' Covid-19 has become less deadly since the height of the pandemic as the population developed widespread immunity through both infection and vaccination, but the virus still kills and can be especially dangerous for the elderly. Between September 2023 and August 2024, there were more than 36,000 deaths from Covid-19 among people 65 and older, CDC data showed. This month may reveal whether the FDA shares Moderna's 'business as usual' approach. The company is expecting FDA decisions on a next-generation Covid-19 vaccine by May 31 and on an expansion of approval for its RSV vaccine into younger ages by June 12. It said an FDA decision on its combination flu and Covid-19 vaccine would be pushed back from the end of this year to 2026, as the agency said it requires efficacy data on the flu component to support the application. The company also said it's going to 'de-prioritize' development of the combination flu and Covid-19 vaccine for people under the age of 50, instead focusing on advancing it for older adults, as it shifts some resources to cancer therapies. If the FDA does require placebo-controlled trials before approving updated seasonal Covid-19 vaccines, experts said, it will signal a new standard. 'FDA clearly, after a deliberative process, adopted an approach that treated Covid-19 vaccine boosters like influenza boosters, not like a new product, and held to that over a few years,' said Dorit Reiss, a professor of law at UC Law San Francisco. 'They adopted a standard, and now they're changing it.' The agency does appear to be moving forward at least with the process of selecting strains; it's asked its group of outside advisers to hold May 22 as a date to meet to discuss them, according to a person who viewed the communication who wasn't authorized to speak on behalf of the FDA. In its statement Wednesday, HHS also claimed that current systems for monitoring vaccine safety, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and the Vaccine Safety Datalink, don't capture vaccine injuries sufficiently and 'have become templates of regulatory malpractice.' HHS said it's building surveillance systems now 'that will accurately measure vaccine risks as well as benefits.' Vaccine experts pushed back on the assertion that those systems are insufficient. And the plan to build a different surveillance system appeared to come into direct conflict with a pledge that Sen. Bill Cassidy said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made to secure his confirmation vote in February. Kennedy, Cassidy said at the time, has 'committed that he would work within the current vaccine approval and safety monitoring systems, and not establish parallel systems.' Cassidy, a Republican doctor from Louisiana, did not respond to CNN's request for comment Thursday.
CNN
01-05-2025
- Health
- CNN
HHS touts universal flu, coronavirus vaccine initiative while casting doubt on future of seasonal Covid-19 shots
The US Department of Health and Human Services said Thursday that it aims to accomplish within four years a scientific feat that hasn't been achieved for the past 45: the development of a universal flu vaccine that could protect against multiple virus strains with pandemic potential, including H5N1 avian influenza. 'Generation Gold Standard is a paradigm shift,' National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya said in a statement on the new initiative. 'It extends vaccine protection beyond strain-specific limits and prepares for flu viral threats – not just today's, but tomorrow's as well – using traditional vaccine technology brought into the 21st century.' HHS said the project, being developed in-house at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, is targeting US Food and Drug Administration approval of universal influenza vaccines in 2029, with human clinical trials scheduled to start next year. The Wall Street Journal first reported that it will be funded with $500 million from the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, a figure confirmed by a spokesperson for HHS. 'I hope it works,' said Dr. Paul Offit, a vaccine scientist at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. He noted that he trained in a flu lab in the early 1980s that was working on a universal flu vaccine, and one still hasn't been developed. 'It's not for lack of effort, and it's not for lack of expertise, and it's not for lack of money that we don't have a universal influenza vaccine. It's just really hard to do.' Flu viruses are wily because they mutate from season to season, sometimes significantly, and because efforts to protect against all – or many – strains at once haven't succeeded, we get updated flu shots each year to protect us against the latest circulating strains. A similar paradigm has unfolded for Covid-19 vaccines since they were first authorized in the height of the pandemic at the end of 2020. HHS's new initiative also aims to develop universal coronavirus vaccines that could provide protection against not just the virus that causes Covid-19 – SARS-CoV-2 – but its cousins SARS-CoV-1 and MERS-CoV. The vaccine technology in HHS's new initiative uses inactivated whole-virus vaccines, an older approach that delivers an entire virus that's been chemically tweaked so it can't infect human cells. The project comes from work being driven by Dr. Matthew Memoli, the NIH's principal deputy director, and Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger, acting director of NIAID. Memoli, who gained attention in 2021 for opposing Covid-19 vaccine mandates and reportedly declined Covid-19 vaccination himself, said in 2022 that one of the vaccines being advanced in this project, which can potentially be administered through a squirt up the nose, is an attempt 'to induce a comprehensive immune response that closely mimics immunity gained following a natural influenza infection.' Vaccine experts who are not involved in the project said universal flu and coronavirus vaccines are a worthy goal, but they questioned whether this project could produce one. Dr. Greg Poland, who directs the vaccine research group at the Mayo Clinic, said the accepted scientific definition of a universal flu vaccine is one that would provide at least 75% protection against symptomatic infection with both A and B strain flu viruses for at least a year, and preferably over multiple seasons, for all age groups. Poland says research that's been published on the most advanced candidate in the new initiative, BPL-1357, describes a vaccine that contains inert versions of four A-strain avian influenza viruses but doesn't include any B-strain viruses, 'which tells me they're not aiming at seasonal viruses,' he said. 'They're aiming at those viruses that have the potential for pandemicity,' or the potential to start pandemics. Poland said he was also surprised by the amount of money being devoted to a vaccine technology that science has largely moved away from. 'Why would we devise a major program and devote a tremendous amount of resources to an old platform?' he asked. The advantage of using whole viruses is that they give the body a chance to develop antibodies to many parts of a virus, which tends to create long-lasting protection, even if some parts of the virus mutate. But they can also cause unwanted side effects and adverse reactions. Whole virus vaccines are typically grown in chicken eggs or cells. In this case, the vaccines under study are grown in canine kidney cells. Those viruses are treated with a chemical called beta-propiolactone, which prevents them from being able to copy themselves in the body and infect cells. The inactivated viruses are then purified and mixed into a shot or nasal spray. The US used to use flu vaccines made from whole inactivated viruses but has since moved to safer options, such as subunit or split virus vaccines, which use only a part of the flu virus to create an immune response. Flumist, a nasal spray, uses a whole but weakened version of the virus, so it's not completely inactivated. Inactivated whole-virus flu vaccines are still used in some other countries. Poland and another vaccine expert, Dr. Peter Hotez, director of the Center for Vaccine Development at Texas Children's Hospital, said whole-virus vaccines were once more common, but developers moved away from them because they produce inoculations that are sometimes too strong and can provoke dangerous immune reactions. 'I'm guessing it's going to be quite reactogenic,' Hotez said. He pointed to the 1976 swine flu vaccine, which produced a strong immune response to the whole virus it contained but also caused high rates of Guillain-Barré syndrome, an immune disorder in which the body attacks its own nerves and muscles, causing muscle weakness and paralysis. Other whole-virus vaccines, including the first ones developed to fight respiratory syncytial virus or RSV, have caused problems such as immune enhancement, where exposure to the virus after vaccination makes the infection more dangerous, not less. 'It's a bit of a head-scratcher why they have so much confidence in a whole inactivated virus approach. I don't quite understand that,' Hotez said. Just before it announced its new universal vaccine development plan, late Wednesday HHS threw into question the future of seasonally updated Covid-19 vaccines. The agency said in a statement that 'all new vaccines will undergo safety testing in placebo-controlled trials prior to licensure – a radical departure from past practices.' The FDA typically selects strains for updated Covid-19 vaccines in June so manufacturers can ready them for the fall respiratory virus season. The agency has adopted a system similar to the one used for flu vaccines, holding previously that updating only the strain targeted by the vaccine – and nothing else – didn't represent a change big enough to require new human trials. If HHS now requires placebo-controlled trials before clearing updated Covid-19 vaccines, experts said, that could delay availability of the shots by months, putting vulnerable people at risk. 'The advantage of updating the vaccine every year to make it more close to the circulating strain is, you get better antibody responses, so for four to six months, you will clearly have better protection against mild to moderate disease, and that matters especially for people who are more frail,' particularly people 75 and older, Offit said. A spokesperson for HHS didn't respond to an inquiry about whether the new guidance pertains to updated Covid-19 vaccines, but an official told CNN on Saturday that 'the covid vaccines, including new ones by Pfizer and Moderna, are new and must have more gold standard science to ensure safety and efficacy for the public.' The official drew a distinction from the flu shot, 'which has been tried and tested' for decades. Questions about the fate of Covid vaccines began to swirl after the FDA missed an April 1 deadline to decide whether to grant full approval to the Novavax vaccine, the only non-mRNA vaccine available to protect against the coronavirus. A source familiar with the situation, who wasn't authorized to speak on behalf of the agency, told CNN that the vaccine had been on track to be approved. Novavax later said the FDA had requested a 'postmarketing commitment' for a clinical trial, suggesting that a study would be required of the vaccine after it received full approval (it had been available through emergency use authorization since 2022). HHS's newest statement adds to questions about whether a trial would be required before approval, not just for Novavax's vaccine but also for updated versions of those from Moderna and Pfizer. In a conference call with Wall Street analysts Thursday, Moderna President Dr. Stephen Hoge insisted that the company's interactions with the FDA so far have been 'business as usual' and emphasized the 'real need for Covid vaccination, particularly this coming fall.' Covid-19 has become less deadly since the height of the pandemic as the population developed widespread immunity through both infection and vaccination, but the virus still kills and can be especially dangerous for the elderly. Between September 2023 and August 2024, there were more than 36,000 deaths from Covid-19 among people 65 and older, CDC data showed. This month may reveal whether the FDA shares Moderna's 'business as usual' approach. The company is expecting FDA decisions on a next-generation Covid-19 vaccine by May 31 and on an expansion of approval for its RSV vaccine into younger ages by June 12. It said an FDA decision on its combination flu and Covid-19 vaccine would be pushed back from the end of this year to 2026, as the agency said it requires efficacy data on the flu component to support the application. The company also said it's going to 'de-prioritize' development of the combination flu and Covid-19 vaccine for people under the age of 50, instead focusing on advancing it for older adults, as it shifts some resources to cancer therapies. If the FDA does require placebo-controlled trials before approving updated seasonal Covid-19 vaccines, experts said, it will signal a new standard. 'FDA clearly, after a deliberative process, adopted an approach that treated Covid-19 vaccine boosters like influenza boosters, not like a new product, and held to that over a few years,' said Dorit Reiss, a professor of law at UC Law San Francisco. 'They adopted a standard, and now they're changing it.' The agency does appear to be moving forward at least with the process of selecting strains; it's asked its group of outside advisers to hold May 22 as a date to meet to discuss them, according to a person who viewed the communication who wasn't authorized to speak on behalf of the FDA. In its statement Wednesday, HHS also claimed that current systems for monitoring vaccine safety, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and the Vaccine Safety Datalink, don't capture vaccine injuries sufficiently and 'have become templates of regulatory malpractice.' HHS said it's building surveillance systems now 'that will accurately measure vaccine risks as well as benefits.' Vaccine experts pushed back on the assertion that those systems are insufficient. And the plan to build a different surveillance system appeared to come into direct conflict with a pledge that Sen. Bill Cassidy said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. made to secure his confirmation vote in February. Kennedy, Cassidy said at the time, has 'committed that he would work within the current vaccine approval and safety monitoring systems, and not establish parallel systems.' Cassidy, a Republican doctor from Louisiana, did not respond to CNN's request for comment Thursday.
