Latest news with #SB450
Yahoo
21-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
State Senate sends school Guardian bill to House; fate of rival bills remains uncertain
Mar. 20—dbeard @ MORGANTOWN — The state Senate sent its bill to put contracted Guardians into public schools over to the House of Delegates on Thursday, but what will become of it remains a question. A different House bill with similar intent that the delegates sent to the Senate last week is languishing in Senate Education. Last year, the two sides failed to reconcile their differences and the rival bills died in conference committee on the last day of the session. On Thursday, the Senate passed SB 450 with a 34-0 vote. It would create the West Virginia Guardian Program It would permit a county school board to contract with retired law enforcement officers to provide security on school campuses. The Guardian would be authorized to carry a weapon after meeting specified requirements. The bill spells out required training and testing. The Guardian would not be a law enforcement officer and could detain a suspect but would have no power to arrest. The bill would require a potential Guardian to pay $50 for a permit from the county sheriff. The sheriff would use the money for the permitting program. Any surplus funds at the end of the fiscal year could be used for other law enforcement purposes and operating needs of the sheriff's office. County participation would be voluntary, subject to available funding. No state money would be provided. But head scratching ensues because last week the House passed HB 2164 in a 93-0 vote. It includes a slightly tweaked version of SB 450 along with the House approach. The House approach says public and charter schools, along with private and religious schools, may employ school safety officers. SSOs must also be former law enforcement officers and may carry firearms. They may detain but not arrest a suspect. The hiring school must cover the equipment costs and provide insurance coverage. The bill prescribes training for the SSOs. The House tweak to SB 450 is that it cuts a Senate provision providing qualified immunity from civil and criminal liability for the school and the Guardian. It substitutes an insurance requirement. Bringing on an officer is optional under both bills, based on the school's desire and finances. But HB 2164 is more expansive by giving schools a choice between hiring or contracting officers. The Dominion Post asked the House of Delegates press office about their intentions for the bills. House Education chair Joe Ellington, R-Mercer, said that because HB 2164 is more comprehensive, he believes the House version should be the vehicle for the legislation. He did not indicate if there is any compromise deal or plan in the works.
Yahoo
08-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
House Judiciary OKs bill allowing schools to hire safety officers or contract Guardians
Mar. 7—dbeard @ MORGANTOWN — School security guard legislation continues to wend its way through the Legislature, with a bill blending House and Senate versions earning unanimous House Judiciary Committee approval on Friday. HB 2164 will now head to the House floor. It's the third iteration, blending House Education's version with SB 450, which passed out of Senate Education and has been sitting in Senate Finance (in the early part of each session, the respective finance committees hold agency budget hearings and bills needing financial review pile up in the queue). The Hose provisions say public and charter schools, along with private and religious schools, may employ school safety officers. SSOs must be former law enforcement officers and may carry firearms. They may detain but not arrest a suspect. The hiring school must cover the equipment costs and provide insurance coverage. The bill prescribes training for the SSOs. In a new bill section, it brings in the Senate's West Virginia Guardian program. This allows public schools, including charters (private and religious schools do not appear n this section), to contract with a former law enforcement officer to provide Guardian services. The powers are essentially the same as for an SSO. Adding this to the House version gives schools a choice of bringing on an officer either as an employee or as an independent contractor. One change from SB 450 is HB 2164 cuts a provision providing qualified immunity from civil and criminal liability for the school and the Guardian. In substitutes an insurance requirement. For both SSOs and Guardians, this is an option for a school, not mandatory. Last year, the competing House and Senate approaches went to conference committee on the last day of the 2024 session but went unresolved before the session adjourned and both bills died. On Friday, Delegate Michael Hornby, R-Berkeley and a bill co-sponsor, said they've worked hard on this for the past two years. "It's about time we address this so that we can protect our kids." Delegate Keith Marple, R-Harrison, said every school in his county has a resource officer, and that officer is always the most popular adult in the school. They have good rapport with the kids and the kids will come to them to share any problems they're having at school or at home. "They've been able to rescue some kids from dangerous situations in their homes, " he said. The bill now heads to the House floor.
Yahoo
08-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
House Judiciary OKs bill allowing schools to hire safety officers or contract Guardians
Mar. 7—dbeard @ MORGANTOWN — School security guard legislation continues to wend its way through the Legislature, with a bill blending House and Senate versions earning unanimous House Judiciary Committee approval on Friday. HB 2164 will now head to the House floor. It's the third iteration, blending House Education's version with SB 450, which passed out of Senate Education and has been sitting in Senate Finance (in the early part of each session, the respective finance committees hold agency budget hearings and bills needing financial review pile up in the queue). The Hose provisions say public and charter schools, along with private and religious schools, may employ school safety officers. SSOs must be former law enforcement officers and may carry firearms. They may detain but not arrest a suspect. The hiring school must cover the equipment costs and provide insurance coverage. The bill prescribes training for the SSOs. In a new bill section, it brings in the Senate's West Virginia Guardian program. This allows public schools, including charters (private and religious schools do not appear n this section), to contract with a former law enforcement officer to provide Guardian services. The powers are essentially the same as for an SSO. Adding this to the House version gives schools a choice of bringing on an officer either as an employee or as an independent contractor. One change from SB 450 is HB 2164 cuts a provision providing qualified immunity from civil and criminal liability for the school and the Guardian. In substitutes an insurance requirement. For both SSOs and Guardians, this is an option for a school, not mandatory. Last year, the competing House and Senate approaches went to conference committee on the last day of the 2024 session but went unresolved before the session adjourned and both bills died. On Friday, Delegate Michael Hornby, R-Berkeley and a bill co-sponsor, said they've worked hard on this for the past two years. "It's about time we address this so that we can protect our kids." Delegate Keith Marple, R-Harrison, said every school in his county has a resource officer, and that officer is always the most popular adult in the school. They have good rapport with the kids and the kids will come to them to share any problems they're having at school or at home. "They've been able to rescue some kids from dangerous situations in their homes, " he said. The bill now heads to the House floor.
Yahoo
26-02-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Senate committee advances two school safety bills: armed guards, panic alarms
Feb. 25—dbeard @ MORGANTOWN — The Senate Education Committee sailed through two school safety bills Tuesday morning. One resurrects the West Virginia Guardian Program. The other would require public schools to install a panic alarm system. SB 450 is the Guardian bill. It would permit a county school board to contract with former (it specifies retired in a separate section) law enforcement officer to provide security on school campuses. The Guardian would be authorized to carry a weapon after meeting specified requirements. The bill spells out required training and testing. The Guardian would not be a law enforcement officer and have no power to arrest. The bill would require a potential Guardian to pay $50 for a permit from the county sheriff. The sheriff would use the money for the permitting program. Any surplus funds at the end of the fiscal year could be used for other law enforcement purposes and operating needs of the sheriff's office. County participation would be voluntary, subject to available funding. No state money would be provided. The committee approved the bill without discussion. It goes next to Finance. Last year, the House and Senate had competing versions of this bill. The House version would have allowed public, charter and private schools to employ armed security officers who were former law enforcement officers. The Senate version, like this year's, would have the Guardians as contractors, But it was slightly more expansive, including honorably discharged veterans. The competing approaches went to conference committee on the last day of the 2024 session but went unresolved before the session adjourned. Panic alarms SB 434 would require each public school — including charters — to have on campus a wearable panic alarm system. Each employee would be trained how to wear and use the alarm. The alarm would be tied to the local emergency alert system to be able to transmit 911 calls and mobile activations, and to initiate campus-wide lockdown notifications. The bill would require local law enforcement to have access to campus security data, including cameras, maps and access control. Sen. Robbie Morris, R-Randolph, asked how much this will cost and who will pay for it. Committee counsel said the bill doesn't specify. Further discussion indicated that if the state doesn't provide money it would fall to the counties. Sen. Rollan Roberts, R-Raleigh, offered a successful amendment to specify that the bill only applies to public schools. That leaves it optional for private schools. SB 434 also heads to Finance.
