21-04-2025
- Business
- Business Journals
Bill to end landmark abuse in Seattle, Tacoma heads to governor's desk
Only two legislators voted against the bill that seeks to curtail weaponization of the landmarking process.
A bill that aims to end abuse of municipal landmark processes is on its way to Gov. Bob Ferguson's desk.
The House on Saturday unanimously concurred with the Senate's approved version, SHB 1576, which requires the consent of an owner to nominate a property for landmark designation. Today in some jurisdictions anyone can nominate a property to be landmarked and, as a result, slow down redevelopment.
Ferguson's office did not immediately respond to the Business Journal's query about whether he'll sign the bill, but given its bipartisan support, he likely will.
It's a blow to the not-in-my-backyard (NIMBY) crowd, and Seattle developer Ben Martiz of Great Expectations took to the social platform X to celebrate the end of weaponization of the landmark process, which he called "the biggest tool NIMBYs have to block housing. ... No longer can a single person declare a structure they don't own a landmark and block development."
Only two senators, Democrats Claudia Kauffman of Kent and Steve Conway of Tacoma, voted aginst the legislation. The Business Journal has reached out to both of comment.
Related content
Builders, developers and civic groups like the Seattle and Bellevue chambers lobbied for the bill. Microsoft also signed a letter of support.
Supporters of the legislation, including the state chapters of the Associated General Contractors and commercial real estate trade group NAIOP, as well as the local Habitat for Humanity chapter, said getting through the landmark process, especially in Seattle, can be time-consuming and costly, requiring consultants.
In Seattle, a 44-story, 550-unit mixed-use apartment tower proposed at 2005 Fifth Ave. is in its 12th meeting with the landmarks board. The project would replace a 1927 building that was named a city landmark in 2017.
"It's fantastic to see the state being the grown up and putting a stop to this nonsense. But it's also stunning it was happening for so long," Maritz posted. "The whole thing shows how out of touch our city leadership has been that we didn't stop it ourselves."
The legislation affects only those local governments, including Seattle and Tacoma, that today do not require owners' consent to landmark. In addition, a building must be at least 40 years old to be landmarked, up from Seattle's cutoff of 25 years.
The legislation does not undo any existing designations, nor interfere with the designation process in historic districts like Pioneer Square. Owners' consent is not required for buildings over 100 years old.
