23-04-2025
Alabama Senate approves bill requiring school boards to adopt religious instruction policies
Sen. Shay Shelnutt, R-Trussville (left) speaks with Sen. Lance Bell, R-Pell City, on the floor of the Alabama Senate on April 8, 2025 at the Alabama Statehouse in Montgomery, Alabama. (Brian Lyman/Alabama Reflector)
The Alabama Senate passed a bill Tuesday that would require local school boards to develop policies allowing students to leave campus during school hours for religious instruction.
SB 278, sponsored by Sen. Shay Shelnutt, R-Trussville, would mandate that school districts establish procedures for students to attend religious classes off-site for elective credit, provided certain conditions are met. The bill passed 25-6 and moves to the House for consideration.
'We passed a law in Alabama in 2019 allowing school districts to enact policies. Since that time, very few school districts have adopted release time policies … parents are approaching superintendents and school boards throughout the state and are being told no,' Shelnutt claimed as he introduced the bill to the floor.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Under the bill, which Shelnutt framed as a 'parental rights and religious freedom bill,' participation in religious instruction would be optional and require parental consent. The bill would mandate that organizations providing instruction provide transportation to and from school and that they be liable if anything happens to a child. The bill would also prohibit local funds from being used to provide religious instruction.
Sen. Bobby Singleton, D-Greensboro, asked about teacher qualifications and program accreditation for the off-site religious classes and whether instructors needed to be certified.
'If I'm Muslim, and I want to go to a mosque to get this done — so the school board has to go speak with the person who's over the mosque to make sure that they're accredited and certified in their program?' Singleton asked.
Shelnutt said this would be decided locally, saying 'that would be up to the local school board if they want to set their policy.'
This led to further exchanges about whether local boards would vet programs across different faiths, such as instructors at a mosque or various churches. Shelnutt maintained local boards set the policy.
'I'm sure there will be differences in the local school boards and how they set them up,' Shelnutt said when pressed on potential inconsistencies across the state's 139 districts.
Sen. Greg Albritton, R-Atmore, asked for assurance that local policies could not discriminate against specific religions.
'The policy cannot isolate whether it be the Jehovah Witnesses or whether it be the Seventh Day Adventists or be the Methodists … the policy would have to cover for each of those, is that correct?' Albritton asked. Shelnutt said the policy 'cannot be restricted' and parents ultimately choose participation.
Sen. Merika Coleman, D-Pleasant Grove, asked about liability, particularly regarding child safety, referencing past issues within religious institutions. She asked who holds liability under programs if something negative happened to the child.
'A child could break his or her leg or hurt themselves? Who holds that liability? With these off-campus type entities,' Coleman asked.
Shelnutt said that the 'sponsoring entity holds all the liability, and the state law already states that,' which would absolve the school system.
Sen. Vivian Davis Figures, D-Mobile, questioned the need for the bill, given existing religious education avenues and school choice laws.
'Why don't you give the local school board the option to vote this in if they even want to do it for their particular school system?' Figures asked.
Shelnutt maintained they are giving the local school boards 'local control' by 'giving the local school board control of coming up with the policy.'
Shelnutt also added an amendment before the bill's passage to ensure that school boards with pre-existing release time policies would not be required to change them, which was adopted 26-4 with one abstention.
A House committee rejected a similar bill earlier this month.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
