logo
#

Latest news with #SouthMimms

Genesis GV70 is Porsche-fast EV with cocktail bar vibe, fast charging & feature that means you won't mind pulling over
Genesis GV70 is Porsche-fast EV with cocktail bar vibe, fast charging & feature that means you won't mind pulling over

The Sun

time28-05-2025

  • Automotive
  • The Sun

Genesis GV70 is Porsche-fast EV with cocktail bar vibe, fast charging & feature that means you won't mind pulling over

NEXT time you are at Gridserve at South Mimms, have a look at the people around you. They're guaranteed to be sat drinking terrible coffee and doom scrolling, trying not to show their envy. 5 5 5 Because you chose a Genesis GV70 with its in-car spa. And they didn't. That means you can properly zone out for 20 minutes with gentle melodies, soft lighting and a choice of three fragrances from the climate control, all while having a revitalising massage from the seats. This is actually a thing. While the car recharges, you can too. Just remember to pack two slices of cucumber for your eyes. The top bods at Genesis are obsessed with customer care and it all starts from the moment you get in touch. Want to try a car? Your Genesis personal assistant will send a demonstrator to your door. Car needs servicing? They will collect it, leave a courtesy car, then switch back later. All at no cost. Because every Genesis comes with a free five-year care plan. The Genesis X Gran Equator Concept Now let's circle back to the classy GV70. Every version is four-wheel drive, 490hp and powered by a new 84kWh battery that'll do up to 298 miles. That's fast, like Porsche Macan -fast, and it recharges as quickly as one too. That's why you've only got 20 minutes to detox. The new-for-2025 GV70 also features virtual gearshift technology first seen in Hyundai's Ioniq 5N. See-you-later overtakes It makes the driver feel in charge, if they want to, adding simulated gear changes and fake engine sounds. There's a boost button on the steering wheel for those instant see-you-later overtakes. Otherwise, let the car do its thing and progress is quiet and relaxed. Sophisticated electronically controlled suspension smooths out our broken roads. Other things. The cabin in the old GV70 was fine. Nicely crafted. If a little bit old-school. This new one's had a major glow-up. That 27in OLED infotainment screen carries loads of technology including Netflix and Disney Plus. Then there's the 'mood curator' mode I mentioned earlier. An incredibly unnecessary but entirely welcome feature. At night, the new wrap-round LED lighting strip gives the car a cocktail bar vibe. Where you're the DJ. Bang & Olufsen in here, buddy. Not a Temu special. Plonk your phone and keys under the central armrest and a UV-C ultraviolet light will kill germs and bacteria. Like I said, Genesis cares for you. When the GV70 arrived on these shores four years ago it was powered by a 2.5-litre petrol engine. 5 5 Then Genesis announced it would switch to EV-only last year. Too early. Now we're told there's a GV70 range-extender in the pipeline, which uses a petrol engine to charge a battery pack to drive the wheels. So you'll have absolutely no reason to stop at South Mimms for 20 minutes for the spa. But you still might.

‘It's like Alcatraz': The home county under siege from Rayner's green belt blitz
‘It's like Alcatraz': The home county under siege from Rayner's green belt blitz

Yahoo

time22-05-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

‘It's like Alcatraz': The home county under siege from Rayner's green belt blitz

In a sleepy town on the edge of Hertfordshire, a revolt is brewing to protect prized green space from a slew of major developments. The uprising came together in a packed church hall meeting last week, attended by more than 100 Potters Bar residents opposed to plans to concrete over local land. The group has already set its sights on blocking a number of projects, including plans for Europe's biggest data centre in South Mimms and a separate 900-home development nearby. 'The data centre will be enormous, and it's going to have high-security fencing all the way round with security lights on 24 hours a day,' says Margaret Ohren, one of the meeting's organisers who has lived in Potters Bar for 32 years. 'It'll be like building Alcatraz in the middle of Potter's Bar. It's absolutely ridiculous.' With plans for developments creeping closer to town boundaries, Ohren fears that Potters Bar will become 'another London borough'. 'Potters Bar is a town that is like an island, and we're surrounded by green belt,' she says. 'If all these proposals go ahead, we'll be subsumed into a load of buildings.' The town is one of many places in Hertfordshire facing an onslaught of proposals on green belt land, with the county fast becoming a flashpoint in Angela Rayner's building blitz across the countryside. Findings shared by CPRE Hertfordshire, a local charity, show that 65pc of large-scale proposals it has screened since the Government published its new national planning policy framework (NPPF) in December are on green belt land. Those include two mammoth data centres, including the South Mimms site and a separate 84,000 sq metre project in Abbots Langley, which was approved by Rayner's team last week. In North Herts, a 45-hectare solar farm in Wandon End is also going through a public inquiry after its developers appealed to the Housing Secretary to overrule the council's decision to block the site. A 15-minute drive away, a 35.5-hectare solar farm and battery storage system is set to be built at Sperberry Hill. This is alongside a number of proposed residential developments, with 4,800 homes planned across Hertfordshire's green belt. Chris Berry, of CPRE Hertfordshire, claims there is an 'unrelenting onslaught' in Hertfordshire, as there are 10 solar farms waiting in the wings alongside seven battery storage systems, six of which have already been approved. Campaigners and residents blame the development blitz on inconsistencies in the Government's definition of the 'grey belt', which is deemed lower-quality green belt land, such as disused car parks. To stem the tide, CPRE has begun a national petition urging the Government to amend its definition of the 'grey belt', which has garnered more than 1,400 signatures at the time of writing. Debating the Government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill in the Commons last week, Matthew Pennycook, Labour's housing minister, said the test of what qualifies as grey belt is 'very clear in the NPPF', and the framework is 'clear' that the green belt can only be built on in 'exceptional circumstances'. However, Abby Coften, chief executive of CPRE Hertfordshire, says the way it is defined is 'giving developers free rein' to build in the countryside. 'There are so many contradictions between national policy and what's happening on the ground,' says Coften. 'It's devastating for the countryside, wildlife, our own environment and our health and well-being. 'Planning applications which have been refused are now coming back because developers are seeing an opportunity from inconsistencies in the NPPF.' More than 29,000 homes could be built on Hertfordshire's brownfield sites, according to CPRE. 'If you think about that on a national level, these sites could be redeveloped, they could provide affordable housing and that would avoid us building all over the countryside,' says Coften. 'The Government clearly wants all of these additional homes, and they're not prioritising the environment.' Gary Ansell, chair of the Kings Langley and District Residents Association, says that in more than 25 years of heading the group, he says it is 'the worst we've ever seen in terms of developments happening'. 'We accept that development needs to happen and it's good to use brownfield,' says Ansell, but he adds that major projects are 'eating away at our green belt'. 'The biggest fear is that our village is suffering a death by a thousand cuts,' he says. 'We're losing our identity as a historic village in Hertfordshire.' Hertfordshire's green belt has been made all the more vulnerable because of national pressure to 'build, build, build', says David Zerny, a fellow Kings Langley resident. 'Introducing grey belt but without a clear definition means that ultimately, inspectors are not given much guidance and that means the green belt is now very vulnerable,' he says. Mr Zerny says Hemel Hempstead, Kings Langley and Watford are also under 'particular threat' if more land near the M25 can be counted as grey belt. 'The purpose of the green belt, ironically, was to give Londoners a place to go for recreation, for mental health,' he adds. 'Taking that away from us hurts Londoners as much as it hurts people who live here in the shires.' Oliver Cooper, leader of the Conservatives on Three Rivers District Council in Hertfordshire, representing the village where he grew up, says a huge amount of development has been pushed out of London into the home counties, including in Hertfordshire. 'A lot of that is based on the fact that the grey belt, as a concept, has been completely mis-sold,' says Mr Cooper. 'If Keir Starmer were a shopkeeper using that script, he would probably be prosecuted by Trading Standards.' In response to criticism, the Government has argued that it will not put its target of building 1.5m homes by 2030 ahead of the environment. A spokesman for the Housing Department says: 'Our planning changes are about building on brownfield first, and clearly protecting long-standing green belt purposes while setting out a more strategic, targeted approach to this type of land. 'And while we are clear that we must build the homes and infrastructure that people need, our ambitious plans will not come at the expense of the environment.' However, back in Potter's Bar, Ohsen is demanding a nationwide plan to ensure the countryside is not left in the lurch. 'It's a crucial time,' she says. 'Save the green belt now, or we'll never see it again. 'I've got grandchildren - they need housing, but do they need housing on the green belt? If we join up all the towns in the South East, they're never going to see a cow, or a sheep, or a bluebell. It could be something they'll read about in books.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

‘It's like Alcatraz': The home county under siege from Rayner's green belt blitz
‘It's like Alcatraz': The home county under siege from Rayner's green belt blitz

Telegraph

time22-05-2025

  • Business
  • Telegraph

‘It's like Alcatraz': The home county under siege from Rayner's green belt blitz

In a sleepy town on the edge of Hertfordshire, a revolt is brewing to protect prized green space from a slew of major developments. The uprising came together in a packed church hall meeting last week, attended by more than 100 Potters Bar residents opposed to plans to concrete over local land. The group has already set its sights on blocking a number of projects, including plans for Europe's biggest data centre in South Mimms and a separate 900-home development nearby. 'The data centre will be enormous, and it's going to have high-security fencing all the way round with security lights on 24 hours a day,' says Margaret Ohren, one of the meeting's organisers who has lived in Potters Bar for 32 years. 'It'll be like building Alcatraz in the middle of Potter's Bar. It's absolutely ridiculous.' With plans for developments creeping closer to town boundaries, Ohren fears that Potters Bar will become 'another London borough'. 'Potters Bar is a town that is like an island, and we're surrounded by green belt,' she says. 'If all these proposals go ahead, we'll be subsumed into a load of buildings.' The town is one of many places in Hertfordshire facing an onslaught of proposals on green belt land, with the county fast becoming a flashpoint in Angela Rayner's building blitz across the countryside. Findings shared by CPRE Hertfordshire, a local charity, show that 65pc of large-scale proposals it has screened since the Government published its new national planning policy framework (NPPF) in December are on green belt land. Those include two mammoth data centres, including the South Mimms site and a separate 84,000 sq metre project in Abbots Langley, which was approved by Rayner's team last week. In North Herts, a 45-hectare solar farm in Wandon End is also going through a public inquiry after its developers appealed to the Housing Secretary to overrule the council's decision to block the site. A 15-minute drive away, a 35.5-hectare solar farm and battery storage system is set to be built at Sperberry Hill. This is alongside a number of proposed residential developments, with 4,800 homes planned across Hertfordshire's green belt. Chris Berry, of CPRE Hertfordshire, claims there is an 'unrelenting onslaught' in Hertfordshire, as there are 10 solar farms waiting in the wings alongside seven battery storage systems, six of which have already been approved. Campaigners and residents blame the development blitz on inconsistencies in the Government's definition of the 'grey belt', which is deemed lower-quality green belt land, such as disused car parks. To stem the tide, CPRE has begun a national petition urging the Government to amend its definition of the 'grey belt', which has garnered more than 1,400 signatures at the time of writing. Debating the Government's new Planning and Infrastructure Bill in the Commons last week, Matthew Pennycook, Labour's housing minister, said the test of what qualifies as grey belt is 'very clear in the NPPF', and the framework is 'clear' that the green belt can only be built on in 'exceptional circumstances'. However, Abby Coften, chief executive of CPRE Hertfordshire, says the way it is defined is 'giving developers free rein' to build in the countryside. 'There are so many contradictions between national policy and what's happening on the ground,' says Coften. 'It's devastating for the countryside, wildlife, our own environment and our health and well-being. 'Planning applications which have been refused are now coming back because developers are seeing an opportunity from inconsistencies in the NPPF.' More than 29,000 homes could be built on Hertfordshire's brownfield sites, according to CPRE. 'If you think about that on a national level, these sites could be redeveloped, they could provide affordable housing and that would avoid us building all over the countryside,' says Coften. 'The Government clearly wants all of these additional homes, and they're not prioritising the environment.' Gary Ansell, chair of the Kings Langley and District Residents Association, says that in more than 25 years of heading the group, he says it is 'the worst we've ever seen in terms of developments happening'. 'We accept that development needs to happen and it's good to use brownfield,' says Ansell, but he adds that major projects are 'eating away at our green belt'. 'The biggest fear is that our village is suffering a death by a thousand cuts,' he says. 'We're losing our identity as a historic village in Hertfordshire.' Hertfordshire's green belt has been made all the more vulnerable because of national pressure to 'build, build, build', says David Zerny, a fellow Kings Langley resident. 'Introducing grey belt but without a clear definition means that ultimately, inspectors are not given much guidance and that means the green belt is now very vulnerable,' he says. Mr Zerny says Hemel Hempstead, Kings Langley and Watford are also under 'particular threat' if more land near the M25 can be counted as grey belt. 'The purpose of the green belt, ironically, was to give Londoners a place to go for recreation, for mental health,' he adds. 'Taking that away from us hurts Londoners as much as it hurts people who live here in the shires.' Oliver Cooper, leader of the Conservatives on Three Rivers District Council in Hertfordshire, representing the village where he grew up, says a huge amount of development has been pushed out of London into the home counties, including in Hertfordshire. 'A lot of that is based on the fact that the grey belt, as a concept, has been completely mis-sold,' says Mr Cooper. 'If Keir Starmer were a shopkeeper using that script, he would probably be prosecuted by Trading Standards.' In response to criticism, the Government has argued that it will not put its target of building 1.5m homes by 2030 ahead of the environment. A spokesman for the Housing Department says: 'Our planning changes are about building on brownfield first, and clearly protecting long-standing green belt purposes while setting out a more strategic, targeted approach to this type of land. 'And while we are clear that we must build the homes and infrastructure that people need, our ambitious plans will not come at the expense of the environment.' However, back in Potter's Bar, Ohsen is demanding a nationwide plan to ensure the countryside is not left in the lurch. 'It's a crucial time,' she says. 'Save the green belt now, or we'll never see it again. 'I've got grandchildren - they need housing, but do they need housing on the green belt? If we join up all the towns in the South East, they're never going to see a cow, or a sheep, or a bluebell. It could be something they'll read about in books.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store