Latest news with #StephenJackson
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Sport
- Yahoo
Former 76ers Guard Questions Paul George's Hall of Fame Case
Former 76ers Guard Questions Paul George's Hall of Fame Case originally appeared on Athlon Sports. There's no question that Paul George is one of the best players in the NBA. Throughout his playing career, he has collected awards that serve as evidence of his brilliance. When it's all said and done, George has the case to be inducted into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame. Advertisement However, not everyone views his career in that manner. A former guard for the Philadelphia 76ers, Patrick Beverley, weighed in on the talk about George's basketball immortalization. In the recent episode of his show, "The Pat Bev Podcast," the defensive point guard questioned the All-Star's case. Initially, he was talking to his guest, former NBA player Stephen Jackson, about the Hall of Fame. Beverley used George as an example, but took a slight shot at the forward. Philadelphia 76ers forward Paul George looks on against the Golden State Streicher-Imagn Images Beverley was ranting about Jackson not being in the Hall of Fame. He then argued that if George has the qualifications, the current co-host of the show "All The Smoke" should be included in the Hall. Advertisement "People say Paul George right," Beverley said. "You hear a lot of people say yes he is. And I'm looking at it like well if he's a Hall of Famer, [Stephen Jackson] for sure a Hall of Famer. Lou Will is for sure a Hall of Famer. I'm trying to see like what's the stipulations." Although Jackson and Lou Williams were both amazing players, they weren't stars like George. However, a championship is what's missing from the Sixers star's list of accolades. Still, that doesn't mean he doesn't have a case to be in the Hall of Fame. The former Fresno State star is a nine-time All-Star, a six-time All-NBA, a four-time All-Defensive player and the 2013 Most Improved Player. Advertisement Related: NBA Trade Rumors Buzzing Around 76ers Ahead of Draft This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.
Time of India
26-04-2025
- Entertainment
- Time of India
'Sh*t is going to happen': Reggie Miller defends Stephen Jackson while giving an emotional recount of infamous ‘Malice at the Palace' incident
Reggie Miller defends Stephen Jackson while giving an emotional recount of infamous 'Malice at the Palace' incident (Image Credit: Getty Images) Reggie Miller and Stephen Jackson, the two basketball veterans, took fans down memory lane and gave their accounts of the infamous ' Malice at the Palace ' incident, which significantly disrupted the NBA world. Stephen Jackson chose the All The Smoke podcast, which covered the incident, to apologize to Reggie Miller, which left the latter teary-eyed. Reggie Miller defended Stephen Jackson while revisiting 'Malice at the Palace' incident during a podcast In All the Smoke's recent podcast, Reggie Miller and Stephen Jackson came face to face. They revisited the infamous incident, 'Malice at the Palace,' which affected their team's future in the championship and various players' careers. Stephen Jackson extended a heartfelt apology to Reggie Miller for his behavior, which moved him. Responding graciously to the apology, Miller said: 'You don't need to apologize because that's basketball that's life you know shit's going to happen and even though we were short-handed ..when we were short-handed bander Brothers like when people talk about Bander Brothers I mean people forget we had to play the next night with like five or six guys cuz everyone was suspended still made the playoffs and still made the playoffs..' Reggie Miller & Stephen Jackson Reflect on Malice at the Palace Stephen said in his apology: 'I'm glad to see you because this I've never had a chance to tell you that… i'm sorry.. u just let me finish though because like I we all understood what our motivation was for that season it wasn't for us it was for you the whole motivation for getting things done the right way and getting the championship was for you so… I never got a chance to apologize you for my actions now with me saying that I love you even more because you defended me because you knew that I was just being a loyal teammate i wasn't you know what I'm saying i wasn't out there being a thug or nothing like that so it meant a lot to me but we never had a chance to talk about it during the time uh has passed… so much time has passed.. how how have your relationship been with guys that was involved and guys that was on our team' Miller choked up hearing those words from Stephen Jackson. He said he didn't need to apologize and went on to explain what the Indiana Pacers' days meant to him. What 'Malice in the Palace' incident is all about Malice in the Palace is one of the most unfortunate incidents in NBA history . On November 19, 2004, a game between the Indiana Pacers and the Detroit Pistons was underway at the Palace in Auburn Hills, Michigan. During the game, the Indiana Pacers' Ron Artest's foul involving the Detroit Pistons' Ben Wallace triggered the events, leading to an uncontrollable physical altercation involving players and coaches from both teams. The matter worsened when a fan threw a beer at Artest, following which the players ran into the stands and fought with fans. Reflecting on the Malice at the Palace: A look back 20 years later The brawl led to several suspensions, including Stephen Jackson's, who was suspended for 30 games, as he mentioned in the podcast. Other suspended players were Artest, Jermaine O'Neal, and Anthony Johnson. Even a few fans involved in the brawl were banned from attending NBA games for life. The fans also faced assault charges and were asked to do community service. The NBA also took some transformative steps and instructed players to dress in business casuals when arriving at the court to play. The dress code stayed till 2014, and was relaxed after Adam Silver took over the commissioner's position after David Stern, who had set the code. Also Read: Klay Thompson's Dream Come True, Plans to Celebrate After He Surpasses Reggie Miller On His Newly Achieved Record What do you think of Stephen Jackson's apology to Reggie Miller? Share your thoughts in the comments.
Yahoo
17-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Insiders hold 45% of Polymetals Resources Ltd (ASX:POL), and they've been buying recently
Polymetals Resources' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership Recent purchases by insiders We've discovered 2 warning signs about Polymetals Resources. View them for free. If you want to know who really controls Polymetals Resources Ltd (ASX:POL), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 45% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Notably, insiders have bought shares recently. This could signal that stock prices could go up and insiders are here for it. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Polymetals Resources, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Polymetals Resources Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing. We can see that Polymetals Resources does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Polymetals Resources, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Polymetals Resources. From our data, we infer that the largest shareholder is David Sproule (who also holds the title of Top Key Executive) with 30% of shares outstanding. Its usually considered a good sign when insiders own a significant number of shares in the company, and in this case, we're glad to see a company insider play the role of a key stakeholder. Jupiter Fund Management Plc is the second largest shareholder owning 8.3% of common stock, and Stephen Jackson holds about 6.6% of the company stock. To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Polymetals Resources Ltd. Insiders have a AU$93m stake in this AU$204m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 7.0%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. It appears to us that public companies own 3.3% of Polymetals Resources. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Polymetals Resources has 2 warning signs we think you should be aware of. If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
