logo
#

Latest news with #SubstanceAbuse

Wisconsin has seen progress in reducing overdose deaths. Trump's cuts could upend that.
Wisconsin has seen progress in reducing overdose deaths. Trump's cuts could upend that.

Yahoo

time15-05-2025

  • Health
  • Yahoo

Wisconsin has seen progress in reducing overdose deaths. Trump's cuts could upend that.

A new report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control reinforces earlier data showing an ongoing decline in overdose deaths nationwide, and repeats the contention that one of the main reasons for the progress is an approach called harm reduction. Despite these advances, the Trump administration has proposed eliminating federal grants for harm reduction efforts, a move that Wisconsin public health officials warn could stall gains made in drug overdose prevention. Those concerns were amplified by more than 320 behavioral medicine academic experts, who wrote to congressional leaders May 12 decrying the cuts to these life-saving overdose prevention services. In February 2025, the CDC released a promising report with provisional data showing that from October 2023 to September 2024, overdose deaths had dropped by more than 27,000. Dr. Allison Arwady, director of the National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, called the nearly 24% decline unprecedented. The widespread distribution of naloxone, a key product of the federal harm reduction program, was a crucial factor in this milestone, the report found. Naloxone, known by the brand name Narcan, reverses life-threatening symptoms associated with opioid overdoses. Related: Wisconsin records significant drop in overdose deaths, although officials remain cautious Now, on May 14, the CDC has released a second provisional report showing an even more profound decline from that 12-month time period ― a nearly 27% drop in overdose deaths. The decline in overdose deaths has steadily continued from month to month, the report said. It strongly supported the idea that these strides can be attributed to public health interventions. Harm reduction makes up one of the four pillars of an overdose prevention strategy prioritized by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services after Trump declared a national emergency on the opioid epidemic in his first presidential term. The approach promotes getting critical health services to people regardless of whether they use drugs, including safe syringe programs, fentanyl and xylazine testing strips, and the distribution of naloxone or Narcan. "We accept that, for better or worse, people use drugs. We work to minimize risks and harm that come with drug use," said Dr. Julia Olsen, a supervisor at Public Health Madison & Dane County. "We don't condemn or judge people for their use. We try to meet them where they're at and make sure they can be as healthy, safe and well as they can be." In his second term, the Trump administration is walking back aspects of the overdose strategy his first administration spearheaded. In his discretionary budget to Congress shared on the White House website May, Trump has proposed removing harm reduction services from the equation, saying the Biden-Harris administration used the approach "to fund dangerous activities … which included funding 'safe smoking kits and supplies' and 'syringes' for drug users." Findings from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration tell a different story. The health agency has written several reports suggesting that harm reduction efforts are a powerful public health approach, not only when it comes to mitigating overdoses, but removing stigmas and making safer choices, even when using illicit drugs. "Of course, we want to prevent these overdoses from happening, but at the same time, we have to recognize that we have a problem on our hands right now, in Milwaukee County, in Wisconsin, in the United States," said Dr. Ben Weston, chief health policy advisor for Milwaukee County. "We need to address that to save lives, and that's where harm reduction comes in." Milwaukee County has used harm reduction as part of its overdose prevention strategy for years. The county won $101 million from opioid settlement funds in two settlement agreements, one in 2021 and the other in 2023, with companies that supplied opioids. The County Board allocated $11 million to install 11 new vending machines at specific locations — a health center, a concert venue, a social service agency and more — and packing them with free supplies like Narcan, fentanyl testing strips, and medication lock bags. Related: Milwaukee County received a record $101 million opioid settlement. How will it spend the money? Related: County exec David Crowley steers part of massive opioid settlement to treatment, prevention Harm reduction efforts also break down barriers, Weston said. They can then be a stepping stone for medication-assisted treatment like buprenorphine and methadone, Weston said, drugs that block the opioid receptors in the brain while reducing cravings and withdrawal symptoms. "Giving buprenorphine not just in a specialized clinic, where you have to wait several weeks to get in, but right there at the time of the 911 call, or whether they're on the street or under a bridge, in their living room, wherever, harm reduction is key to getting them those treatments," Weston said. While the harm reduction movement has been around for decades, notably during the HIV-AIDS epidemic, it wasn't until the Biden-Harris administration that it transformed from a fringe grassroots philosophy to a federal drug policy. 2022 marked the first year that the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, or SAMHSA, awarded 25 harm reduction grants to agencies across the country. In October 2023, Wisconsin Department of Health Services received nearly $28 million in substance use block grants, which included harm reduction efforts. In turn, vending machines stocked with free naloxone nasal spray, fentanyl strips and medication lock bags started cropping up on busy streets, in schools, health care clinics and libraries, and in sheriff's departments. In 2024, Milwaukee County saw its most dramatic drop in drug overdose deaths since 2018, a decline of nearly 28% from a year earlier. "Harm reduction is saving lives, which is critical," Weston said. Related: As DOGE slashes funding source, Wisconsin behavioral treatment centers worry about programs Related: Milwaukee County unveils new overdose dashboard, ushering new hopes of driving down deaths Olsen, in Dane County, said that while it's difficult to prove causation, the county's received fewer non-fatal overdose calls to emergency medical services (EMS) since the state starting ramping up its harm reduction efforts. And over the last few years, more than 14,000 people have used the harm reduction services at its three public health offices in Madison. Olsen and Weston both told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that access to harm reduction services led to those same people making healthier choices in other areas of their lives. Syringe services, for example, reduce the risks of contracting and transmitting HIV and viral hepatitis, but while there, people can learn about safer injection practices, vaccinations, wound care, and how to get access to social and mental health services. The Trump administration plans to consolidate several programs, including SAMHSA, into a unified entity under the new Administration for a Healthy America, which will focus on chronic disease prevention, maternal and child health, and mental health services. The budget would retain $5.7 billion "for activities that were formerly part of SAMHSA," according to the discretionary budget. It would not include the $56 million annual grant through SAMHSA that distributes overdose-reversing kits and trains first responders in how to administer naloxone. Proponents of Trump's budget, which would cut a quarter of Health and Human Services, including more than a $1 billion from SAMHSA, have argued the cuts are necessary to "streamline operations, enhance responsiveness to the American people, and ultimately improve the nation's health as part of the Make America Healthy Again initiative," HHS press secretary Vianca Rodriguez Feliciano told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in an email. Feliciano offered no specifics on how the cuts would improve the nation's health. Widespread cuts like this, public health officials argue, will reduce access to supplies and resources at a time when communities in Wisconsin and beyond are starting to see the benefits of the federal overdose prevention strategy. Rhetoric from the White House, too, risks growing misconceptions of what harm reduction is and, significantly, what it is not. Already, the biggest falsehood Weston and Olsen encounter is that harm reduction enables drug use. "Teenagers don't decide to start doing heroin because they know they could get naloxone," Olsen said. "That's just not how addiction progresses for people." Instead, harm reduction offers an opportunity to save lives, Weston said. "Anybody who knows somebody who has died from an overdose will tell you that they wish that person could have another chance, and they wish they could have intervened, that maybe they could have made a difference," Weston said. "Harm reduction is that difference." Natalie Eilbert covers mental health issues for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. She welcomes story tips and feedback. You can reach her at neilbert@ or view her X (Twitter) profile at @natalie_eilbert. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Harm prevention efforts have cut drug OD deaths. Why is Trump opposed?

Trump's Focus on Punishing Drug Dealers May Hurt Drug Users Trying to Quit
Trump's Focus on Punishing Drug Dealers May Hurt Drug Users Trying to Quit

New York Times

time13-05-2025

  • Health
  • New York Times

Trump's Focus on Punishing Drug Dealers May Hurt Drug Users Trying to Quit

President Trump has long railed against drug traffickers. He has said they should be given the death penalty 'for their heinous acts.' On the first day of his second term, he signed an executive order listing cartels as 'terrorist organizations.' But many public health and addiction experts fear that his budget proposals and other actions effectively punish people who use drugs and struggle with addiction. The Trump administration has vowed to reduce overdose deaths, one of the country's deadliest public health crises, by emphasizing law enforcement, border patrols and tariffs against China and Mexico to keep out fentanyl and other dangerous drugs. But it is also seeking huge cuts to programs that reduce drug demand. The budget it submitted to Congress this month seeks to eliminate more than a billion dollars for national and regional treatment and prevention services. The primary federal agency addressing drug use, the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, has so far lost about half its workers to layoffs under the Trump administration and is slated to be collapsed into the new Administration for a Healthy America, whose purview will reach far beyond mental illness and drug use. And if reductions to Medicaid being discussed by Republicans in Congress are realized, millions of Americans will be unable to continue, much less start treatment. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. The budget itself says that ending drug trafficking 'starts with secure borders and a commitment to law and order' and that it is cutting addiction services deemed duplicative or 'too small to have a national impact.' Those cuts are agonizing, public health experts say, because they come just as the country is making sustained progress in lowering the number of fentanyl deaths. Many interventions may be contributing to that progress, including greater availability of the overdose reversal spray naloxone; more treatment beds, sober housing and peer counseling; and declines in the strength and quantity of the illicit drug supply, they say. But studies so far have not demonstrated convincingly which of those factors merit greater focus and investment. 'It would be a tragedy if we defund these programs without fully understanding what's working and then our overdose rate starts to climb again,' said Dr. Matthew Christiansen, an addiction medicine physician in Huntington, a city once labeled ground zero for the opioid crisis. A letter signed by more than 320 behavioral medicine academic experts, sent Monday to congressional leaders, decried the cuts, including those to 'community-based naloxone distribution, peer outreach programs, drug-use-related infectious disease prevention programs and drug test strip programs.' The president's budget calls for ending grants for 'harm reduction,' a strategy to prevent disease transmission and keep drug users alive that has become largely accepted by mainstream addiction treatment providers. The budget derides federal financial support for 'dangerous activities billed as 'harm reduction,' which included funding 'safe smoking kits and supplies' and 'syringes' for drug users.' That language is a callback to false reports in 2022 that a $30 million federal harm reduction grant could be used to purchase pipes for smoking crack and meth. In fact, a small portion of that grant, designated for 'safer smoking kits,' was for supplies like alcohol swabs and lip balm. The grant also supported programs in states that permit sterile syringe exchanges, effective in reducing hepatitis C and H.I.V. infection rates. 'You can't just tell people to stop using drugs with a snap of the fingers,' said Dr. Christiansen, a former director of West Virginia's drug control policy. 'These are tools to reduce the harm of opioids while also helping them be successful long-term.' According to the federal agency's annual survey of substance use, in 2023, 27.2 million Americans ages 12 or older had a drug use disorder, 28.9 million had alcohol use disorder, and 7.5 million had both. The budget does leave intact block grants for states to combat addiction and mental illness. But without the agency's additional grants, hands-on training and monitoring, in addition to possible Medicaid reductions, states will not be able to afford the many medical and social services required to prevent and treat addiction, Dr. Christiansen said. David Herzberg, a professor of drug policy and history at the University at Buffalo, said that Mr. Trump's almost single-minded linking of the nation's drug problems with border issues harks back to late 19th-century America, when the government associated opium dens with Chinese immigrants. Fearing the incursion of Chinese workers and inflamed by press reports of Chinese men using opium to lure young white women into prostitution, Congress severely restricted Chinese immigration. Then as now, Mr. Herzberg said, political conservatives found that targeting foreign drug suppliers was a muscular means of advancing broader agendas. In contrast with highly publicized drug seizures, people who chronically use drugs have become afterthoughts, usually visible only as street irritants, their addiction perceived to be the result of their own choices, he said. Elected leaders who advocate for their welfare risk being tarred as soft on crime. 'If politicians are going to stick their necks out for them, I would be shocked,' Mr. Herzberg said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store