Latest news with #SwissFederalCouncil
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Switzerland joins range of measures under 17th EU sanctions package against Russia
On 2 June, Switzerland's Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (EAER) made the decision to implement part of the European Union's 17th package of sanctions against Russia. Source: Swiss Federal Council, as reported by European Pravda Details: The EAER expanded its sanctions list by incorporating 17 individuals and 89 legal entities targeted by the EU into its latest sanctions package. Switzerland also added 189 vessels to its blacklist. These ships are believed to belong to Russia's shadow fleet. Additionally, the country expanded the list of sanctioned goods. The measures will take effect at 23:00 on Tuesday, the Swiss Federal Council reported. Background: On 20 May, the EU Council approved the 17th package of sanctions against Russia for its war against Ukraine, as well as separate sanctions for the use of chemical weapons in Ukraine. The EU Council also revealed details of additional individual sanctions introduced in response to Russia's hybrid destabilisation activities targeting EU countries and allies. These sanctions are part of a series of packages that were set forward for approval on 20 May. Support Ukrainska Pravda on Patreon!
Euronews
11-03-2025
- Politics
- Euronews
Switzerland told it isn't doing enough to comply with climate ruling
The Swiss government has been pushing back against a landmark legal climate ruling last year. ADVERTISEMENT Switzerland hasn't shown that it's meeting the requirements of a landmark climate change decision from Europe's highest human rights court, the Council of Europe announced on Friday. Last April the European Court of Human Rights sided with a group of older Swiss women against their government. It ruled that countries must better protect their people from the consequences of climate change and that Switzerland 'had failed to comply with its duties' to combat climate change and meet emissions targets. Six months after the decision, Switzerland asked for the case to be shut, arguing it was fully in compliance with the obligations set by the Strasbourg-based court. The intergovernmental body that supervises the court's judgments, the Committee of Ministers, recognised that Switzerland had made some progress but hadn't demonstrated it was meeting all of the requirements. Environmentalists hail the decision as a victory 'The Swiss Federal Council is not getting away with its arguments at the Committee of Ministers. Switzerland must improve its climate policy to remedy the violation of our human rights,' Rosmarie Wydler-Wälti, co-president of Senior Women for Climate Protection (KlimaSeniorinnen) and one of the plaintiffs in the case, said in a statement. The group, which counts around 2,000 members across Switzerland with an average age of 73, argued that older women's rights are especially infringed on because they are most affected by the extreme heat that will become more frequent due to global warming. What happens next in the KlimaSeniorinnen case? Following a three-day meeting this week, Bern was asked to provide more information on a number of topics including 'concrete measures being taken to alleviate the most severe or imminent consequences of climate change in Switzerland, including any particular needs for protection, especially for persons in vulnerable situation.' This includes helping people adapt to heatwaves, for example, and involving citizens in the development of climate protection measures. The Committee of Ministers, composed of the foreign affairs ministers from the body's 46 member states, will meet again in September 2025. By then, the Swiss Federal Council must also declare the foundations of its climate strategy - including quantifying emissions within a national CO2 budget framework. The decision ignited debate in Switzerland and the government claims the court has overstepped its mandate. Corina Heri, an expert in climate change litigation at Tilburg Law School, said the decision to ask for more information was typical of the compliance process at the ECHR. 'Nothing is final yet,' she told The Associated Press. Climate litigation is on the rise Environmental groups, frustrated by what they see as the failure of elected officials to combat climate change, have increasingly turned to courts to advance their cause. ADVERTISEMENT Late last year, the International Court of Justice took up the largest case in its history, hearing the plight of several small island nations helpless in combating the devastating impact of climate change that they feel endangers their very survival. The world has already warmed 1.3 degrees Celsius since pre-industrial times because of the burning of fossil fuels. Between 1990 and 2020, sea levels rose by a global average of 10 centimetres and parts of the South Pacific have seen significantly more.
