Latest news with #TheConversation
Politico
13 hours ago
- Politics
- Politico
Playbook: Trump's Epstein evolution
Presented by With help from Eli Okun, Bethany Irvine and Ali Bianco Good Saturday morning. This is Ankush Khardori. Get in touch. COMING TOMORROW: Where some hear 'America First,' others hear 'isolationist' — a label that Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) says sounds like 'a slur' to him in today's political climate, he tells Playbook's Dasha Burns on this week's episode of 'The Conversation.' 'I don't want to withdraw from the world,' Schmitt said. 'I think that it's viewing the world as it is, understanding what our core national interests are, using diplomacy first. And if we have to engage, it's with overwhelming force. It's kind of a Jacksonian view of foreign policy. And I think that is where the people are at. If you get across this country, especially on the Republican voters, that's where a majority of Republican voters are at.' The full episode drops tomorrow. Watch the clip DRIVING THE DAY UNDER SIEGE: It's the story that continues to grip Washington: the Trump administration's handling of the so-called Epstein files. If the White House was hoping to move on quickly from the controversy, that became harder this week after The Wall Street Journal published a story about a suggestive letter that President Donald Trump allegedly sent to Jeffrey Epstein over 20 years ago. Trump immediately and strenuously denied the report, and yesterday followed through on his threat to sue the Journal. POLITICO hasn't independently verified the letter. The potential ripple effects could be significant. Trump's lawsuit could become the most important legal clash yet between Trump and the press, as well as a test of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp (the parent company of the paper) as a media institution. Trump has recently managed to secure settlements in litigation against ABC and CBS' parent company. Given that backdrop and Trump's history of litigiousness, it is likely the Journal's story was heavily lawyered. A spokesperson for the paper said in a statement: 'We have full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting, and will vigorously defend against any lawsuit.' Trump's lawsuit carries two potential downsides for the president: (1) the story will stay in the news as long as the case continues; and (2) the Journal's lawyers may seek to depose Trump and question him under oath if the case proceeds to discovery. On top of that, the ongoing controversy threatens some of Trump's greatest political strengths — his ability to influence political narratives and, in particular, his ability to position himself as a political outsider, as Michael Kruse writes for POLITICO Magazine. 'The Epstein story isn't going away (or at least wasn't?) because it complicates this superstory,' Michael writes, and because it 'suggests to the legions who've been partial to Trump that actually maybe that's not right — that actually maybe he's less one of us and more part of them.' The rolling controversy and the Journal's story also raise questions about what the heck is actually going on here. There are three potential scenarios, as your author wrote earlier this week: (1) There's an actual cover-up at hand; (2) Trump officials really believed the Epstein conspiracy theories until they got into government; or (3) they never believed them and were always misleading voters. There are other possibilities — for instance, that Trump is protecting an ally — but they tend to require more elaborate and questionable assumptions. (There are also variations. Maybe some of them believed the theories and others didn't … you get the drift.) The second scenario remains firmly in play. Perhaps Trump — as well as VP JD Vance and FBI Director Kash Patel, among others — were sincere in their questions about what is in the government's investigative files and the circumstances surrounding Epstein's death, but they have now discovered their concerns were misguided. The third scenario also cannot be ruled out. Epstein was a subject of great interest among Trump's supporters, and there was apparent political upside in indulging their theories. But what about that first scenario? Let's be very clear: There's no direct evidence of an intentional cover-up on the part of Trump, the White House or the DOJ. You can also credibly argue — as Trump has — that if there were damaging revelations about him in the government's files, someone might have leaked them to the press during the Biden administration. The Trump possibility has been the subject of hushed discussions this week in Washington, both among some members of the political class and — as your author can attest — some former DOJ lawyers, who are temperamentally skeptical and professionally trained to ask difficult and at times uncomfortable questions, including questions that ultimately go nowhere. Here are some potentially relevant data points that raise serious questions about Trump's evolving statements: (1) the existence of the letter at issue in the Journal story (assuming, of course, that it was accurately attributed to Trump, which again he has denied); (2) Trump's effort to turn the page at a Cabinet meeting last week by saying people should ignore the conspiracy theories and move on (at least on its face, this is hard to square with Trump's history of developing and pursuing baseless conspiracy theories and his persistent interest in years-old matters like the Steele dossier); (3) Trump's effort to pin the blame on Democrats, notwithstanding the fact that interest in Epstein has largely been driven in political circles by the right, including by Trump, Vance and Patel, among others; (4) Trump's qualified statements indicating that he supports the release of only 'credible' information and only 'pertinent' grand jury testimony, as well as his unprompted suggestion in an interview last year that there might be 'phony stuff' in the government's files (these are not qualifiers that you tend to hear from Trump in other situations); and (5) Trump's instruction to AG Pam Bondi to seek the release of 'any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval.' The DOJ officially sought the release of that grand jury testimony yesterday, citing 'the public interest' in the government's investigative work. It remains to be seen what the court will do, but as Erica Orden and Kyle Cheney write for POLITICO, the grand jury testimony likely represents only a small fraction of what is in the government's investigative files. The points above at best comprise limited circumstantial evidence, but in a highly charged political environment, Trump's words matter, and the goalpost-shifting from the administration over the last week or so begs close scrutiny of the president's words. In response to a request for comment, White House comms director Steven Cheung provided the following statement: 'This is another bullshit story that amounts to nothing more than a leftist journalist working in conjunction with the Democrats to publish fake news in an attempt to smear President Trump just like they did with the now proven Russian Collusion Hoax.' 9 THINGS THAT STUCK WITH US 1. FOR YOUR RADAR: The Trump administration completed a large-scale prisoner swap with Venezuela yesterday, sending about 250 Venezuelans who had been deported and imprisoned in El Salvador back to their home country in exchange for 10 U.S. nationals, CNN's Kristen Holmes and colleagues report. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on X that the released Americans were 'on their way to freedom,' adding 'Every wrongfully detained American in Venezuela is now free and back in our homeland.' Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele said in a separate post has approved the release of 'all the Venezuelan nationals detained in our country, accused of being part of the criminal organization Tren de Aragua.' More details: Mellissa Harper, the acting assistant director of enforcement and removal operations for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, revealed in legal papers filed to a federal judge that 'the Trump administration 'obtained assurances' from Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro's government that it would permit its citizens to return to the United States for legal proceedings, if required by a court,' POLITICO's Kyle Cheney reports. 2. MIDDLE EAST LATEST: The director of Israel's Mossad spy agency asked White House special envoy Steve Witkoff this week for U.S. help convincing countries, including Ethiopia, Indonesia and Libya, to take hundreds of thousands of Palestinians from Gaza, Axios' Barak Ravid scoops. In their meeting, Mossad spy chief David Barnea 'suggested that the U.S. offer incentives to those countries and help Israel convince them, though 'Witkoff was non-committal, and it's not clear if the U.S. will actively weigh in on this issue.' The push from Israel comes after Trump walked back a proposal in February to remove two million Palestinians from Gaza following significant pushback from Arab countries. Meanwhile, a Hamas spokesperson said yesterday that while the group would prefer reaching an interim truce with Gaza 'it could revert to insisting on a full package deal to end the conflict,' if the latest round of negotiations falters, per Reuters. 'Hamas has repeatedly offered to release all the hostages held in Gaza and conclude a permanent ceasefire agreement, and Israel has refused, Abu Ubaida added in a televised speech.' Elsewhere in the region: 'Israel and Syria agree to ceasefire, US ambassador to Turkey says,' by Reuters' Jasper Ward: 'The ceasefire announcement came after the U.S. worked to put an end to the conflict. … It also followed what appeared to be a de-escalation of the conflict after government troops withdrew from Sweida, where violence had been centered.' 3. THE ODD COUPLE: 'A Kentucky Republican and a California liberal: The unlikely alliance pushing Trump on Epstein,' by POLITICO's Liz Crampton and colleagues: 'Leading the charge for Congress to vote on publicizing Epstein-related records are Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.). The odd couple — a libertarian from rural Kentucky and a progressive from Silicon Valley — is piecing together Republican and Democratic support for the House to take an up-or-down vote on releasing the so-called Epstein files. If successful, their efforts would further complicate Trump's ability to move on from the spiraling scandal that has angered his political base.' Bipartisanship lives: 'I do believe that there are issues that populists on the right and left can collaborate on,' Khanna said in an interview. 'In this case, it's about going after the corruption in our government. Rich and powerful men shouldn't have impunity from accountability. And that's something that both people on the left and right are sick of.' 4. DEEP IN THE HEART: With Texas AG Ken Paxton facing scrutiny for his divorce, and incumbent Sen. John Cornyn slipping in primary polling — Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-Texas) is seemingly testing the waters of the heated Texas Senate race. Though the Houston-area Republican has yet to formally announce a bid, he's launched a new six-figure ad buy in the Houston and Dallas media markets marketing himself 'as a family man, showing himself with his wife and three young children,' Axios' Alex Isenstadt reports: 'Hunt has been running a separate ad in the Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, Waco, and Amarillo areas highlighting his military background.' In the blue corner: 'Joe Rogan's Latest Guest Might Turn Texas Blue,' by Adam Wren for POLITICO Magazine: 'State Rep. James Talarico opens up about what it's like to go on the most coveted podcast in politics, his potential run for Senate and how his party needs to change.' 5. HITTING REWIND: U.S. District Judge Paul Gardephe formally dismissed Trump's 2023 lawsuit against veteran journalist Bob Woodward and publishing house Simon & Schuster yesterday, CNN's Brian Stelter reports. Though Trump alleged in the 2023 suit that Woodward released audio from their interviews without his consent, Gardephe argued 'it appears unlikely' that Trump 'can adequately plead a plausible copyright interest in 'The Trump Tapes.'' Trump had initially sought around $50 million in damages, claiming Woodward's interviews were 'protected material, subject to various limitations on use and distribution.' 6. TALES FROM THE CRYPTO: The House's approval Thursday of a bill laying out a regulatory framework for the crypto token known as stablecoins could prove whether the rapidly growing crypto industry can be seen as a financial disruptor, POLITICO's Declan Harty reports. 'The crypto faithful have long held the market up as the next frontier of finance,' though the 'the industry's ambitions have faced repeated roadblocks, including, until now, a reluctance among policymakers to legitimize it with new, tailored regulations.' 7. LOST IN THE WILDERNESS: The DNC's planned audit of the party's 2024 losses will largely 'steer clear of the decisions made by the Biden-turned-Harris campaign and will focus more heavily instead on actions taken by allied groups,' NYT's Reid Epstein and Shane Goldmacher report. The so-called after-action review is expected to side step questions around whether former President Joe Biden 'should have run for re-election in the first place, whether he should have exited the race earlier than he did and whether former Vice President Kamala Harris was the right choice to replace him.' What to expect: 'Party officials described the draft document as focusing on the 2024 election as a whole, but not on the presidential campaign.' Though, 'D.N.C. officials cautioned that interviews were still taking place and the report's conclusions might change before it is released this fall.' 8. BEYOND THE BELTWAY: Nevada could bear the brunt of Trump's megabill, with up to 100,000 residents facing a loss of insurance coverage as a result of some of the tax and Medicaid measures, NBC's Adam Edelman reports. 'Unlike some other states, which may be able to shift funds around in their budgets to build financial support for affected residents, Nevada's hands are largely tied … It has no state income tax and has a state constitutional provision requiring a two-thirds majority to raise revenue.' 9. AI LOOK AHEAD: 'Trump set to unveil AI orders to boost US edge over China,' by Semafor's Gina Chon: 'Pushing for speedier permitting for data center buildouts, promoting US tech exports, and other moves that would facilitate the nation's advancements are expected to be part of [next week's White House] rollout. … Trump is also expected to give a speech on his AI vision after months of private discussions between administration officials, tech executives, think tanks, and others.' CLICKER — 'The nation's cartoonists on the week in politics,' edited by Matt Wuerker — 17 funnies GREAT WEEKEND READS: — ''Great Enough to Blow Any City Off the Map': On Site at the First Nuclear Explosion,' by Garrett Graff for POLITICO Magazine: 'The men who set off the nuclear age tell the tale in their own words.' — 'The Canadians Are Furious,' by N.Y. Mag's Simon van Zuylen-Wood: 'Trump accomplished what was once considered impossible: Our northern neighbors have united against us.' — 'Is the U.S. Ready for the Next War?' by The New Yorker's Dexter Filkins: 'With global conflicts increasingly shaped by drones and A.I., the American military risks losing its dominance.' — 'A Little-Known Microsoft Program Could Expose the Defense Department to Chinese Hackers,' by ProPublica's Renee Dudley: 'The Pentagon bans foreign citizens from accessing highly sensitive data, but Microsoft bypasses this by using engineers in China and elsewhere to remotely instruct American 'escorts' who may lack expertise to identify malicious code.' — ''Even God Cannot Hear Us Here': What I Witnessed Inside an ICE Women's Prison,' by Rümeysa Öztürk for Vanity Fair: 'Tufts University doctoral student Rümeysa Öztürk opens up for the first time about her shocking arrest and 45 days in a South Louisiana processing facility. She recalls the generous and compassionate women who helped her through this harrowing ordeal.' — 'Kansas City poured millions into a grocery store. It still may close,' by WaPo's Annie Gowen: 'More cities and states are experimenting with the concept of city-owned grocery stores, but these experiments often don't account for social issues.' TALK OF THE TOWN IN MEMORIAM — David Mazzarella, a reporter, editor and newspaper executive for 45 years, has died, his family announced. 'Over the course of his career, Mazzarella was editor at four newspapers, including USA TODAY at a time when it was one of the most widely circulated daily newspapers in the United States. At various times he was also a foreign correspondent, a publisher, a regional circulation director and head of an international newspaper operation,' his family writes. 'In an article for Brill's Content magazine on the improvements happening at that time at [USA TODAY], media critic Howard Kurtz suggested that Mazzarella may be 'the best newspaper editor in America no one's ever heard of.'' — Ed Feulner, founder, trustee and longest serving president of The Heritage Foundation has died, the organization announced. After founding the organization in 1973, Feulner served as president for 37 years, and 'What started as a small outpost for conservative ideas became — under Ed's tireless leadership — the intellectual arsenal for the Reagan Revolution and the modern conservative movement,' the organization said in a statement. TRANSITION — Kara Lynum has launched KML Strategies, a law firm helping other firms, organizations, and individuals navigate immigration policy changes. Lynum previously served as the DHS' acting general counsel and deputy general counsel and is a Senate Judiciary Committee alum. HAPPY BIRTHDAY: Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-Ill.) and Ron Estes (R-Kan.) … WSJ's Rebecca Ballhaus … WaPo's Isaac Arnsdorf … Capitol Counsel's Lyndon Boozer … UL Standards & Engagement's Jeff Marootian … LSG's Ben Jenkins … Larry McCarthy … Rick Dearborn … Eric Lichtblau (6-0) … Andrea Porwoll … POLITICO's Rachael Bade, Lauren Gardner, Luis Pinto de Sa, Gregory Svirnovskiy, Massimo Artista and Matt Comer … Joe Goetz … Kelly Magsamen … Lindsee Gentry Towers … Maria Giannopoulos … former Rep. John Campbell (R-Calif.) (7-0) … NBC's Alex Johnson … Stephen Ching … Stephanie Valencia … Atossa Araxia Abrahamian … The Hill's Rema Rahman … Mary Newman Fox … Andrew Mizsak of Main Street Consultants … Ron Faucheux … Ruby Gordon of Carbon Solutions Group … Ron Brown of Heidrick & Struggles … Jim Davenport of Thorn Run Partners … Rachel Robinson (1-0-3) THE SHOWS (Full Sunday show listings here): ABC 'This Week': Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) … LA Mayor Karen Bass. Panel: Donna Brazile, Reince Priebus, Sarah Isgur and Molly Ball. FOX 'Fox News Sunday': Sen. Dave McCormick (R-Pa.) … Sen. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) . Panel: Michael Allen, Marie Harf, Doug Heye and Annie Linskey. CBS 'Face the Nation': Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick … Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) … acting ICE Director Todd Lyons … LA Mayor Karen Bass. Polling special: Anthony Salvanto. CNN 'State of the Union': Beto O'Rourke … Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.)… Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) … Adam Boehler. Panel: Bryan Lanza, Karen Finney, Jaime Herrera Beutler and Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.). NewsNation 'The Hill Sunday': Rep. Eric Sorensen (D-Ill.) … Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) … Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) Panel: Yoni Appelbaum, Jessica Taylor, Tia Mitchell and Michael Warren. Fox News 'Sunday Morning Futures': Senate Majority Leader John Thune … David Sacks … Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.). Panel: Reps. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.) and Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) and Curtis Sliwa. MSNBC 'PoliticsNation': Rep. Jennifer McClellan (D-Va.) … Adelita Grijalva. Send Playbookers tips to playbook@ or text us on Signal here. Playbook couldn't happen without our editor Zack Stanton, deputy editor Garrett Ross and Playbook Podcast producer Callan Tansill-Suddath.
News18
18 hours ago
- Health
- News18
Scroll, watch, burn: sunscreen misinformation, its real-world damage
London, Jul 19 (The Conversation) On a sunny afternoon, I was scrolling through social media when I came across a video of a young woman tossing her sunscreen into a bin. 'I don't trust this stuff anymore," she said to the camera, holding the bottle up like a piece of damning evidence. The clip had been viewed over half a million times, with commenters applauding her for 'ditching chemicals" and recommending homemade alternatives like coconut oil and zinc powder. In my research on the effect of digital technology on health, I've seen how posts like this can shape real-world behaviour. And anecdotally, dermatologists have reported seeing more patients with severe sunburns or suspicious moles who say they stopped using sunscreen after watching similar videos. Sunscreen misinformation created by social media influencers is spreading and this isn't just a random trend. It's being fuelled by the platforms designed to host influencer content. In my book, The Digital Health Self, I explain how social media platforms are not neutral arenas for sharing information. They are commercial ecosystems engineered to maximise engagement and time spent online – metrics that directly drive advertising revenue. Content that sparks emotion – outrage, fear, inspiration – is boosted to the top of your feed. That's why posts questioning or rejecting science often spread further than measured, evidence-based advice. Each second a user spends watching or reacting gives the platform more data – and more opportunities to serve targeted ads. This is how health misinformation becomes profitable. In my work, I describe social media platforms as 'unregulated public health platforms". They influence what users see and believe about health, but unlike public health institutions, they're not bound by standards for accuracy or harm reduction. If an influencer claims sunscreen is toxic, that message won't be factchecked or flagged – it will often be amplified. Why? Because controversy fuels engagement. I call this environment 'the credibility arena": a space where trust is built not through expertise, but through performance and aesthetic appeal. As I write in my book: 'Trust is earned not by what is known, but by how well one narrates suffering, recovery, and resilience." A creator crying on camera about 'toxins" can feel more authentic to viewers than a calm, clinical explanation of ultraviolet radiation from a medical expert. This shift has real consequences. Ultraviolet rays are invisible, constant and damaging. They penetrate cloud cover and harm skin even on cool days. Decades of research, especially in countries like Australia with high skin cancer rates, show that regular use of broad-spectrum sunscreen dramatically reduces risk. And yet, myths spreading online are urging people to do the opposite: to abandon sunscreen as dangerous or unnecessary. This trend isn't driven solely by individual creators. It's embedded in how content is designed, framed and presented. Algorithms prioritise short, emotionally-charged videos. Interfaces highlight trending sounds and hashtags. Recommendation systems push users toward extreme or dramatic content. These features all shape what we see and how we interpret it. The 'For You" page isn't neutral. It's engineered to keep you scrolling, and shock value outperforms nuance every time. That's why videos about 'ditching chemicals" thrive, even as posts on other aspects of women's health are shadowbanned or suppressed. Shadowbanning refers to when a platform limits the visibility of content – making it harder to find, without informing the user – often due to vague or inconsistently applied moderation rules. The system rewards spectacle, not science. Once creators discover that a particular format, like tossing products into a bin, boosts engagement, it's replicated over and over again. Visibility isn't organic. It's manufactured. Those who throw away their sunscreen often believe they're doing the right thing. They're drawn to creators who feel relatable, sincere and independent — especially when official health campaigns seem cold, patronising or out of touch. But the consequences can be serious. Sun damage accumulates silently, raising skin cancer risk with every hour spent unprotected. Sunscreen isn't perfect. It needs to be reapplied properly and paired with shade and protective clothing. But the evidence for its effectiveness is clear and robust. The real danger lies in a system that not only allows misinformation to spread, but also incentivises it. A system in which false claims can boost an influencer's reach and a platform's revenue. To resist harmful health trends, we need to understand the systems that promote them. In the case of sunscreen, rejecting protection isn't just a personal decision – it's a symptom of a digital culture that turns health into content, and often profits from the harm it causes. (The Conversation) NSA NSA First Published: July 19, 2025, 11:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Scroll.in
2 days ago
- Business
- Scroll.in
Multicultural Indians
Ad Why Zohran Mamdani's surname tells the story of migration, resilience and community Mamdanis in Uganda belong to the Khoja community, a South Asian Muslim merchant caste, that shaped economic development across the western Indian Ocean. Iqbal Akhtar, The Conversation · 5 minutes ago Watch this Tamil-speaking Chinese grandmom from Malaysia tell you how to make traditional Diwali rangoli Scroll Staff · Nov 10, 2015 · 03:00 pm
Scroll.in
2 days ago
- Scroll.in
Iqbal Akhtar, The Conversation
Stories written by Why Zohran Mamdani's surname tells the story of migration, resilience and community Mamdanis in Uganda belong to the Khoja community, a South Asian Muslim merchant caste, that shaped economic development across the western Indian Ocean. Iqbal Akhtar, The Conversation · 5 minutes ago How women are reshaping Islamic pilgrimages as Saudis change rules Single women can now travel unaccompanied by a male guardian, part of an effort by the kingdom to improve the rights of women in Saudi Arabia. Iqbal Akhtar, The Conversation · Jul 28, 2023 · 07:30 pm
News18
2 days ago
- Health
- News18
Separated men nearly 5 times more likely to take their lives than married men
Melbourne, Jul 18 (The Conversation) Breakups hurt. Emotional and psychological distress are common when intimate relationships break down. For some people, this distress can be so overwhelming that it leads to suicidal thoughts and behaviours. This problem seems especially the case for men. Intimate partner problems including breakups, separation and divorce feature in the paths to suicide among one in three Australian men aged 25 to 44 who end their lives. Men account for three in every four suicides in many nations worldwide, including Australia. So improving our understanding of links between relationship breakdown and men's suicide risk has life-saving potential. Our research, published today, is the first large-scale review of the evidence to focus on understanding men's risk of suicide after a breakup. We found separated men were nearly five times more likely to die by suicide compared to married men. What did we find? We brought together findings from 75 studies across 30 countries worldwide, involving more than 106 million men. We focused on understanding why relationship breakdown can lead to suicide in men, and which men are most at risk. We might not be able to prevent breakups from happening, but we can promote healthy adjustment to the stress of relationship breakdown to try and prevent suicide. For separated men, the risk was much higher. We found that separated men were 4.8 times more likely to die by suicide than married men. Most strikingly, we found separated men under 35 years of age had nearly nine times greater odds of suicide than married men of the same age. The short-term period after relationship breakdown therefore appears particularly risky for men's mental health. What are these men feeling? Some men's difficulties regulating the intense emotional stress of relationship breakdown can play a role in their suicide risk. For some men, the emotional pain tied to separation – deep sadness, shame, guilt, anxiety and loss – can be so intense it feels never-ending. Many men are raised in a culture of masculinity that often encourages them to suppress or withdraw from their emotions in times of intense stress. Some men also experience difficulties understanding or interpreting their emotions, which can create challenges in knowing how to respond to them. Overall, our research found relationship breakdown may lead to suicide for some men because of the complex interaction between the individual (emotional distress) and interpersonal (changes in their social network and availability of support) impacts of a breakup. Many of these impacts don't seem to feature in the paths to suicide after a breakup for women in the same way. Breakups also impact social networks As intimate relationships become more serious, we tend to spend less time investing in our friendships, especially if juggling the demands of a career and family. Many men, especially in heterosexual relationships, rely on their intimate partner as a primary source of social and emotional support – often at the expense of connections outside their relationship. This can create a risky situation if relationships break down, as it seems many men are left with little support to turn to. This rang true in our research, as men's social disconnection and loneliness seemed to increase their suicide risk following relationship breakdown. We also know people can struggle to know how to support men after a breakup. Research has found some men who ask for support are told to just 'get back on the horse". Such a response invalidates men's pain and reinforces masculine stereotypes that relationship breakdown doesn't affect them. So, what can we do? There is no simple answer to preventing suicide following relationship breakdown, but a range of opportunities exist. We can intervene early, by educating young people with the skills to end relationships healthily, handle rejection and regulate the difficult emotions of a breakup. We can embed support groups and other opportunities for connection and peer support in relationship services that are regularly in contact with those navigating separation, to help combat loneliness. top videos View all We can ensure mental health practitioners are equipped with the skills necessary to engage and respond effectively to men who seek help following a breakup, to help keep them safe until they can get back on their feet. Most importantly, if men come to any of us seeking support after a breakup, we can remember that time is often a great healer. The best we can do is sit with men in their pain, rather than try and get them to stop feeling it. This connection could be life-saving. (The Conversation) NSA NSA First Published: July 18, 2025, 11:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
