logo
#

Latest news with #TigereChagutah

Amnesty says Rwanda-backed militia tortured DR Congo civilians
Amnesty says Rwanda-backed militia tortured DR Congo civilians

The Sun

time7 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Sun

Amnesty says Rwanda-backed militia tortured DR Congo civilians

KINSHASA: Amnesty International accused the Rwanda-backed M23 militia of killing and torturing civilian prisoners in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, in a report published on Tuesday. Since its resurgence in 2021, the M23 has seized vast swathes of the DRC's resource-rich east with Rwanda's help. In a lightning offensive, the M23 captured the key cities of Goma and Bukavu at the beginning of 2025, before setting itself up to govern for the long term in the areas under its control. Yet the armed group has struggled to clamp down on the region's persistent unrest, with hundreds of Congolese soldiers and pro-government militia fighters having dispersed to evade capture by the M23. The M23 regularly carries out raids in Goma and Bukavu, claiming to have captured hundreds of suspected criminals. 'M23's public statements about bringing order to eastern DRC mask their horrific treatment of detainees,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's Regional Director for East and Southern Africa. The rights group said it had taken testimony from 18 civilians 'who had been held unlawfully in M23 detention sites in Goma and Bukavu, nine of whom were tortured by M23 fighters'. Former prisoners said they had been accused by the M23 of supporting the DRC's government, though the 'M23 never produced evidence of these accusations', the Amnesty report said. 'They said hundreds were held in overcrowded, unsanitary cells without sufficient food, water, sanitation facilities or healthcare,' the report continued. Eight of the witnesses said they had seen fellow detainees die while incarcerated, 'likely from torture and harsh detention conditions', the report added. Two others testified that they saw M23 militiamen kill prisoners, it said. One witnessed two people killed with hammers, while another said they saw a fellow prisoner shot dead. According to the witnesses, M23 fighters tortured prisoners 'with flexible wooden rods, boards, electric cables, engine belts, gun butts, or sticks, on their backs, legs, buttocks and genitals, leaving them with signs of trauma'. Some detainees were driven to 'drinking each other's urine' by the harsh conditions, one prisoner told Amnesty. The rights group called for the M23 to grant independent monitors access to its detention sites. Chagutah, Amnesty's regional director, urged the international community to put pressure on Rwanda to stop supporting the armed group. Responding to the report on X, M23 spokesman Lawrence Kanyuka accused Chagutah of making 'grotesque and unsubstantiated accusations'. 'We will soon publish a detailed work discrediting each allegation of this so-called report,' the spokesman added.

Amnesty: M23 Tortured Civilians in Eastern DR Congo
Amnesty: M23 Tortured Civilians in Eastern DR Congo

The Sun

time7 days ago

  • Politics
  • The Sun

Amnesty: M23 Tortured Civilians in Eastern DR Congo

KINSHASA: Amnesty International accused the Rwanda-backed M23 militia of killing and torturing civilian prisoners in the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, in a report published on Tuesday. Since its resurgence in 2021, the M23 has seized vast swathes of the DRC's resource-rich east with Rwanda's help. In a lightning offensive, the M23 captured the key cities of Goma and Bukavu at the beginning of 2025, before setting itself up to govern for the long term in the areas under its control. Yet the armed group has struggled to clamp down on the region's persistent unrest, with hundreds of Congolese soldiers and pro-government militia fighters having dispersed to evade capture by the M23. The M23 regularly carries out raids in Goma and Bukavu, claiming to have captured hundreds of suspected criminals. 'M23's public statements about bringing order to eastern DRC mask their horrific treatment of detainees,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's Regional Director for East and Southern Africa. The rights group said it had taken testimony from 18 civilians 'who had been held unlawfully in M23 detention sites in Goma and Bukavu, nine of whom were tortured by M23 fighters'. Former prisoners said they had been accused by the M23 of supporting the DRC's government, though the 'M23 never produced evidence of these accusations', the Amnesty report said. 'They said hundreds were held in overcrowded, unsanitary cells without sufficient food, water, sanitation facilities or healthcare,' the report continued. Eight of the witnesses said they had seen fellow detainees die while incarcerated, 'likely from torture and harsh detention conditions', the report added. Two others testified that they saw M23 militiamen kill prisoners, it said. One witnessed two people killed with hammers, while another said they saw a fellow prisoner shot dead. According to the witnesses, M23 fighters tortured prisoners 'with flexible wooden rods, boards, electric cables, engine belts, gun butts, or sticks, on their backs, legs, buttocks and genitals, leaving them with signs of trauma'. Some detainees were driven to 'drinking each other's urine' by the harsh conditions, one prisoner told Amnesty. The rights group called for the M23 to grant independent monitors access to its detention sites. Chagutah, Amnesty's regional director, urged the international community to put pressure on Rwanda to stop supporting the armed group. Responding to the report on X, M23 spokesman Lawrence Kanyuka accused Chagutah of making 'grotesque and unsubstantiated accusations'. 'We will soon publish a detailed work discrediting each allegation of this so-called report,' the spokesman added.

M23 rebels accused of 'possible war crimes' in eastern DR Congo
M23 rebels accused of 'possible war crimes' in eastern DR Congo

Euronews

time27-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Euronews

M23 rebels accused of 'possible war crimes' in eastern DR Congo

Human rights organisation Amnesty International has accused the Rwandan-backed M23 rebels of killing, torturing and forcibly disappearing civilian detainees in two cities in the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The NGO made the claims in a new investigation published on Tuesday. The report's publication comes amid major fighting in the mineral-rich east of the country, where M23 rebels seized the largest city, Goma, in January. Thousands were killed and tens of thousands were displaced there. M23 then took Bukavu, the region's second biggest city, in February. Between February and April, Amnesty International interviewed 18 civilians who said they had been detained by M23 in Goma and Bukavu. Many of the detainees, who were all men, said that the rebel group did not provide them with evidence to support the allegation that they supported the Congolese army or government. Nine of the interviewed men said they had been tortured by M13 fighters, while eight people told Amnesty that they saw other detainees die in detention, likely from torture and brutal conditions. Two of the interviewees described seeing fighters from the rebel group kill two detainees with hammers and shoot another dead. Amnesty said that M23 fighters frequently refused to grant relatives of detainees access to their loved ones, or denied that they were held there, which the human rights group said amounted to enforced disappearances. The rebel group has also made families pay sizeable ransoms to have their family members freed, the human rights organisation said. The interviewed detainees reported hundreds of people being held in overcrowded, unsanitary cells without enough food, water or sanitation. 'It was incredibly hot… People were drinking each other's urine. On rainy days, you could drink rainwater,' said one former detainee, who added that there were only three toilets for hundreds of people. 'Congolese know all too well the cruelty of M23…They continue to live in misery as international actors have become complacent, waiting patiently for a peace deal while M23 keeps brutalising Congolese,' said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty International's Regional Director for East and Southern Africa. Amnesty International demands that the group immediately release all civilians and 'cease these unlawful, brutal practices', Chagutah said. 'These acts violate international humanitarian law and may amount to war crimes,' Amnesty said in a statement. M23 is the most powerful of the roughly 100 armed groups fighting for control in the country's east, which holds valuable mineral deposits that are critical to much of the world's technology. They are supported by around 4,000 troops from neighbouring Rwanda, UN experts say. After M23 fighters seized Bukavu in February, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said his office had 'confirmed cases of summary execution of children by M23 after they entered the city of Bukavu'. Türk said his office was also aware of children with weapons. The UN has accused both the Congolese government forces and M23 rebels of recruiting child soldiers, and the UN Human Rights Council in February launched an investigation into atrocities committed by both sides, including rapes and killings. The decades-long war has created one of the world's worst humanitarian crises, displacing more than seven million people, including 100,000 who fled their homes this year.

South Sudan: What if the UN lifts its arms embargo?
South Sudan: What if the UN lifts its arms embargo?

News24

time26-05-2025

  • Politics
  • News24

South Sudan: What if the UN lifts its arms embargo?

Global concern is once again shifting to South Sudan, the world's youngest nation. The flare-up of a long-simmering conflict in the East African country has claimed thousands of lives. It has also displaced some 2.3 million people and pushed around 60 000 children into malnourishment. International efforts to end the conflict have included a UN embargo on arms transfers to the parties to the conflicts, which expires on 31 May. UN Security Council members are set to vote on a draft resolution to extend the South Sudan sanctions regime. According to Amnesty International, the lives of civilians are at risk without an extension of the arms embargo. 'We urge the [UN] Security Council to renew the embargo, enforce it and protect civilian lives,' Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty's Regional Director for East and Southern Africa, said. 'While the UN arms embargo has not been a panacea, the human rights situation would almost certainly be worse without it,' he added. Amnesty describes as an open violation of the embargo the 'deployment of armed Ugandan soldiers and military equipment to South Sudan since March 11, 2025'. Violations of UN sanctions The UN Security Council's arms embargo on South Sudan dates back to 2018 and its sanctions regime on the country to 2015. On 30 May 2024, the Council extended the sanctions for a year. In addition to the arms embargo, it also encompasses asset freezes and travel bans. At the time, the UN said it was open to reviewing the arms embargo through modification, suspension or progressive lifting. In its estimation, arms shipments violated the UN resolution to end the conflict and further contributed to the instability in the country. However, a statement by International Crisis Group says that while the sanctions 'appear to have made it harder for actors to deploy heavy weapons', the country's porous borders make it difficult to enforce a small arms and light weapons ban. In a letter to the UN in early 2024, South Sudan's First Vice President, Riek Machar, accused Uganda of 'grave violation' of the arms embargo following the Ugandan armed forces deployment into South Sudan. According to Amnesty, its Crisis Evidence Lab recently verified two videos featuring Uganda People's Defence Forces (UPDF) personnel and equipment. 'The first shows dozens of UPDF soldiers arriving at Juba International Airport on March 11. The second shows armoured personnel carriers and military trucks,' Amnesty said. Amid the reported violations, there's growing concern over whether the UN can effectively intervene and what a renewal of the arms embargo could even mean. Is UN peacekeeping working? Recently, the UN Security Council extended the mandate of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) for 12 months, expressing 'deep concern' over the deteriorating situation in the country. Amid these continued efforts, some citizens are questioning the impact of UN peacekeeping efforts. 'The UN is here in Juba or in other parts of South Sudan. They are there, they are roaming around the streets, but they cannot take an action,' Abraham Maliet Mamer, Secretary General of the South Sudan Investment Authority, told DW. 'I don't believe their mandate is clear. You cannot say you are peacekeeping, what peace are you keeping? People are fighting every day and you're not doing anything about it.' The UN, however, insists that it is doing all it can to stop the conflict. 'This country has suffered two civil wars before its independence and two after its independence. There is no appetite for more suffering in the population. They have suffered a lot due to civil wars. So, we have to stop the civil war at whatever cost,' Lieutenant General Mohan Subramanian, UNMISS Force Commander, told DW.

South Sudan crisis: What if the UN lifts its arms embargo?
South Sudan crisis: What if the UN lifts its arms embargo?

Times of Oman

time25-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Times of Oman

South Sudan crisis: What if the UN lifts its arms embargo?

Global concern is once again shifting to South Sudan, the world's youngest nation. Juba: The flare-up of a long-simmering conflict in the East African country has claimed thousands of lives. It has also displaced some 2.3 million people and pushed around 60,000 children into malnourishment. International efforts to end the conflict have included a United Nations (UN) embargo on arms transfers to the parties to the conflicts, which expires on May 31. UN Security Council members are set to vote on a draft resolution to extend the South Sudan sanctions regime. According to Amnesty International, the lives of civilians are at risk without an extension of the arms embargo. "We urge the [UN] Security Council to renew the embargo, enforce it and protect civilian lives," said Tigere Chagutah, Amnesty's Regional Director for East and Southern Africa. "While the UN arms embargo has not been a panacea, the human rights situation would almost certainly be worse without it," he added. Amnesty describes as an open violation of the embargo the "deployment of armed Ugandan soldiers and military equipment to South Sudan since March 11, 2025." Violations of UN sanctions The UN Security Council imposed an arms embargo on South Sudan in 2018, and its sanctions regime on the country dates back to 2015. On May 30, 2024, the Council extended the sanctions for a year. In addition to the arms embargo, it also encompasses asset freezes and travel bans. At the time, the UN said it was open to reviewing the arms embargo through modification, suspension, or progressive lifting. In its estimation, arms shipments violated the UN resolution to end the conflict and further contributed to the instability in the country. However, a statement by International Crisis Group says that while the sanctions "appear to have made it harder for actors to deploy heavy weapons", the country's porous borders make it difficult to enforce a small arms and light weapons ban. In a letter to the UN in early 2024, South Sudan's First Vice President, Riek Machar, accused Uganda of "grave violation" of the arms embargo following the deployment of its troops to South Sudan. Amnesty's Crisis Evidence Lab recently verified two videos featuring Uganda People's Defence Forces (UPDF) personnel and equipment. "The first shows dozens of UPDF soldiers arriving at Juba International Airport on March 11. The second shows armored personnel carriers and military trucks," Amnesty said. Amid the reported violations, there's growing concern over whether the UN can effectively intervene and what a renewal of the arms embargo could even mean. Is UN peacekeeping working? Recently, the UN Security Council extended the mandate of the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) for 12 months, expressing "deep concern" over the deteriorating situation in the country. Amid these continued efforts, some citizens are questioning the impact of UN peacekeeping efforts. "The UN is here in Juba or in other parts of South Sudan. They are there, they are roaming around the streets, but they cannot take an action," Abraham Maliet Mamer, Secretary General of the South Sudan Investment Authority, told DW. "I don't believe their mandate is clear. You cannot say you are peacekeeping, what peace are you keeping? People are fighting every day and you're not doing anything about it." The UN, however, insists that it is doing all it can to stop the conflict. "This country has suffered two civil wars before its independence and two after its independence. There is no appetite for more suffering in the population. They have suffered a lot due to civil wars. So, we have to stop the civil war at whatever cost," Lieutenant General Mohan Subramanian, UNMISS Force Commander, told DW.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store