logo
#

Latest news with #TransportationNetworkCompanyConsumerProtectionAct

Colorado Senate approves ride-sharing safety bill with substantial amendments
Colorado Senate approves ride-sharing safety bill with substantial amendments

Yahoo

time23-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Colorado Senate approves ride-sharing safety bill with substantial amendments

Rep. Jenny Willford, a Northglenn Democrat, speaks about the Transportation Network Company Consumer Protection Act at the Colorado Capitol on Feb. 28, 2025. (Sara Wilson/Colorado Newsline) Lawmakers heavily amended a bill on Tuesday that aims to improve safety for users of ride-sharing services like Uber, two weeks after the company threatened to pull out of the state if the legislation became law unchanged. The Senate then gave preliminary approval to the bill after the amendments. It will be up for a final recorded vote on Wednesday, the last day of the 2025 regular lawmaking session. 'Uber and Lyft have severe safety issues and are in crisis, whether they want to admit it or not. It's why they've spent billions of marketing to convince the public they are safe,' said bill sponsor Sen. Faith Winter, a Broomfield Democrat. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX In Uber's latest U.S. safety report, it found 2,717 reports of sexual assault in 2021 and 2022, with the majority of victims being riders. 'Transportation network companies like Uber and Lyft exercise full control over their platforms and have continually implemented the lowest-cost safety measures, which are inadequate,' Winter said. 'They profit off of people, taking them at their word that they are safe.' As introduced, House Bill 25-1291 would mandate stricter, more frequent background checks and clearer disqualifications for drivers with histories of assault, harassment, kidnapping, menacing or domestic violence. It would require companies to establish and enforce policies around preventing account sharing or driver impersonation. Drivers would be prohibited from offering food or drinks to riders. It also would have required continuous audio and visual recording during drives. The bill was introduced and championed by Rep. Jenny Willford, a Northglenn Democrat, who sued Lyft earlier this year over an alleged sexual assault that occurred last February. The driver during the incident was using someone else's account. But the provisions faced staunch opposition from ride-sharing companies. Uber said last month, as the bill passed a Senate committee, that it would exit Colorado because the law would create too great a legal risk to operate, according to The Colorado Sun. That prompted a series of sweeping changes on Tuesday as the Senate considered the bill. Winter said sponsors worked with Lyft on the amendments. The biggest amendment allows for drivers and riders to opt in to video and audio recording instead of requiring it. The state's public utilities commission would adopt rules about the recordings, including education about the safety benefits for companies. Uber has an existing safety feature that allows riders to choose to audio record a ride. Sponsors said the amendment was hard to accept. 'A driver whose intent is to traffic, kidnap or assault someone is not going to create their own evidence,' bill sponsor Sen. Jessie Danielson, a Wheat Ridge Democrat, said. 'This is the thing we didn't want to give away, but we acknowledge there are concerns from drivers, companies and civil rights groups. We couldn't get there on this go-around, how to require the driver to film and still preserve these rights.' Another amendment narrows the scope of when someone could bring a lawsuit against a driver or rider to instances of sexual assault, kidnapping, personal injury and death. A driver would also need to notify the company within 48 hours of a guilty plea for an offense that would disqualify them from driving, and an amendment removed the company's liability if a driver does not report. Lawmakers also approved an amendment that would allow the water and food ban to be enforced through random compliance checks, and would allow companies to remove driver ratings and reviews they deem bias-motivated. Additionally, an amendment changed the timeline for a company to review a complaint against a driver to seven days from 72 hours. It's unclear if the changes will sway Uber's position. 'Last-minute changes and a rushed process have made this legislation incredibly challenging. With new provisions added just this morning without the opportunity to review, we need time to thoroughly evaluate the bill to determine whether it is workable,' a spokesperson wrote in an email. They said Uber saw text of the Senate floor amendments on Monday night. Winter said sponsors worked with stakeholders, including Lyft, on amendments. If the Senate passes the bill Wednesday, it will head back to the House to concur with the amendments and then to the governor's desk for a signature. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Colorado Democrats push for stricter background checks for Lyft, Uber drivers
Colorado Democrats push for stricter background checks for Lyft, Uber drivers

Yahoo

time28-02-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Colorado Democrats push for stricter background checks for Lyft, Uber drivers

Rep. Jenny Willford, a Northglenn Democrat, speaks about the Transportation Network Company Consumer Protection Act at the Colorado Capitol on Feb. 28, 2025. (Sara Wilson/Colorado Newsline) A Colorado lawmaker is calling for stricter safety provisions on ride-sharing platforms like Uber and Lyft one year after she said she was sexually assaulted by a driver. Rep. Jenny Willford, a Northglenn Democrat, is sponsoring a consumer protection bill that would require stronger background checks, driver identity verification and video recording during the drive. 'For too long, (transportation network companies) like Uber and Lyft have operated with virtually no accountability. They control the platform. They set the rules,' she said. 'But when something goes wrong and someone gets hurt, when lives are shattered and forever changed, they deflect. They pretend it isn't their problem, and they dodge responsibility.' SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX The bill, which is set to be introduced soon, will also be sponsored by Rep. Meg Froelich of Englewood, Sen. Jessie Danielson of Wheat Ridge and Sen. Faith Winter of Westminster, all Democrats. They announced the bill during a Friday morning press conference surrounded by about a dozen colleagues holding signs that read 'One sexual assault is too many' and 'Rideshare safety now.' Willford sued Lyft earlier this year over an alleged sexual assault that occurred last February. The driver who picked her up was using someone else's account, Willford said, made inappropriate comments during the drive and assaulted her a short distance from her home. The bill, according to draft text, would require a series of increased safety measures for ride-sharing drivers to become authorized. They would need to undergo a fingerprint-based criminal history record check, a higher standard than the current name-only background checks ride-sharing companies currently prefer. Those checks would be required every six months. Taxi and limousine drivers in Colorado are currently required to undergo a fingerprint background check. Ride-sharing drivers in New York City must submit fingerprints, and a Boston city councilor is calling for a similar requirement after a recent alleged sexual assault in the city. The bill 'requires real background checks, not the easily manipulated name-based ones that these companies rely on, but fingerprint-based screenings, like we require in every other safety critical industry that work with vulnerable populations, because you cannot fake fingerprints,' Willford said. Additionally, drivers would need to prove that they are the one connected to the approved account when they pick up a rider, either through an in-vehicle dashboard camera, live selfie, biometric verification or other method that 'effectively verifies' their identity. The bill would also require continuous audio and video recording during rides, with an opt-out provision. A 2024 survey from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found that about 37% of people consider security cameras in taxis and rideshares to be very important to safety. It would also set standards for the timeline and type of data and information a ride-sharing company would need to provide in the event of a public utilities commission complaint or request from law enforcement. 'This legislation will demand transparency, requiring TNCs to track and report violent incidents and to provide critical evidence to survivors and law enforcement within 24 hours, not weeks or months later. It will ensure that drivers who commit crimes or violate these protections never drive again,' Willford said. Finally, ride-sharing companies would need to submit an annual report to the state about reported instances of assault, stalking, harassment, murder or car accidents on the platform. Willford said that if enacted, the bill would create the strongest suite of protections for riders in any state. Neither Lyft nor Uber immediately responded to a request for comment on the legislation. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store