Latest news with #TreasurySecretary


CBS News
14 hours ago
- Business
- CBS News
Transcript: Sen. Rand Paul on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 1, 2025
The following is the transcript of an interview with Sen. Rand Paul, Republican of Kentucky, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on June 1, 2025. MARGARET BRENNAN: And we go now to Republican Senator Rand Paul, who joins us from Lexington, Kentucky this morning. Good morning to you. SEN. RAND PAUL: Good morning, Margaret. MARGARET BRENNAN: You just heard the Treasury Secretary say a number of things, dismiss the potential price increases that could come from the tariffs when it comes to retailers. He also played down the cost of this tax and border bill that just passed through the House. Do you agree with his math? SEN. PAUL: Well, the math doesn't really add up. One of the things this big and beautiful bill is is it's a vehicle for increasing spending for the military and for the border. It's about $320 billion in new spending. To put that in perspective, that's more than all the DOGE cuts that we found so far. So, the increase in spending put into this bill exceeds the DOGE cuts. When you look just at the border wall, they have 46.5 billion for the border wall. Well, the current estimate from the CBP is 6.5 million per mile. So, if you did 1,000 miles, that's 6.5 billion, but they have 46 billion. So they've inflated the cost of the wall eight fold. So, there's a lot of new spending that has to be counteracted. But essentially, this is a bill by the military industrial complex advocates who are padding the military budget. There's going to be a lot of extra money. Look, the President has essentially stopped the border flow without- without new money and without any new legislation. So, I think they're asking for too much money. And in the end, the way you add it up to see if it actually is going to save money or add money, is how much debt are they going to borrow? 5 trillion over two years, an enormous amount. MARGARET BRENNAN: Right. That- that was the number that the Secretary was quibbling over. The President has taken note of some of your skepticism, and he did tweet yesterday saying that if you, Rand Paul, vote against his massive border and tax bill the people of Kentucky will never forgive you. Do you consider that a threat, and do you know if you have three other Republicans who will join you to block it from passage? SEN. PAUL: I had a very good conversation with the President this week about tariffs. He did most of the talking, and we don't agree exactly on the outcome. But when I come home to Kentucky, I talk to the Farm Bureau, which is opposed to the tariffs. I talked to the bourbon industry which is opposed to the tariffs. I talked to the cargo companies, UPS, DHL, all their pilots are opposed to it. I talked to the hardwood floor people. I talked to the people selling houses, building houses. I have no organized business- business interests in Kentucky for the tariffs. So I think it's worth the discussion, and it's worth people remembering that the Republicans used to be for lower taxes. Tariffs are a tax. So, if you raise taxes on the private sector, that's not good for the private sector. MARGARET BRENNAN: Well, you know, we hear from other senators who also get complaints from their people in their districts, but they're falling in line. Do you have three other Republicans who will stand with you to block this bill? SEN. PAUL: I think there are four of us at this point, and I would be very surprised if the bill, at least, is not modified in a good direction. Look, I want to vote for it. I'm for the tax cuts. I voted for the tax cuts before. I want the tax cuts to be permanent, but at the same time, I don't want to raise the debt ceiling 5 trillion. So, I've told him, if you take the debt ceiling off the bill, in all likelihood, I can vote for what the agreement is on the rest of the bill, and it doesn't have to be perfect to my liking. But I can't be- if I vote for the $5 trillion debt, who's left in Washington that cares about the debt. We will have lost it. The GOP will own the debt once they vote for this. MARGARET BRENNAN: But that the leader, as you know, is sort of in a tight spot here. He needs a vehicle to raise that debt ceiling. Otherwise, you have to turn to Democrats to get that done. What was the White House response when you asked that to the President? SEN. PAUL: Well, historically, the debt ceiling has always gone up and will always go up, and I'm not proposing that it doesn't, but the people who should vote for it are the people who vote for the spending. Historically, all the Democrats vote for raising the debt ceiling, and about 15 big government Republicans vote for it. This will be the first time it's voted on just by Republicans. This will be the first time that Republicans own the debt. They already own the spending. In March, we continued, not me, but most Republicans voted to continue the Biden spending levels. So you remember the campaign, everybody is talking about Bidenomics and Biden inflation and Biden spending levels. Well, the Republicans all voted to keep the Biden spending levels, and that's why the deficit this year is going to be $2.2 trillion this year. MARGARET BRENNAN: So, you think this is bad politics for Republicans. Some of your Republican colleagues, like Josh Hawley, are saying that changes to Medicaid are bad politics for America's working people and for your party. SEN. PAUL: I think it was a bad strategy. I think the tax cuts are good for the economy. When we passed the tax cuts in 2017 the economy grew like gangbusters. We had lowest unemployment historically. It was the great achievement of Trump's first administration. They should have been satisfied by just doing the tax part of this and not getting involved into the debt part of it. MARGARET BRENNAN: The last time you were with us in March, you talked about conversations you had with Elon Musk, as you know, he's just left his work with the administration. You had proposed a rescission request, a claw back about $500 billion of money Congress had already signed off on. We know now that the White House is going to ask Congress this week for some rescissions. Sounds like it's just $9.4 billion and it's- it's PBS, it's NPR and it's foreign aid. Is this really the best strategy? And do you think 51 Republican senators are on board with it? SEN. PAUL: First of all, I will vote for spending cuts. The more the better. This is very, very small to put it in perspective, if the deficit this year is 2.2 trillion, if you cut 9 billion, the deficit is going to be 2.191 trillion. It really doesn't materially change the course of the country. We should do it by all means. And it is the low hanging fruit. This is the money that was pointed out that was being spent for sex change operations in Guatemala, trans-opera in Columbia, all this crazy spending. Yes, it should be cut-- MARGARET BRENNAN: -- Sesame Street.-- SEN. PAUL: -- I had an amendment about a month- Excuse me-- MARGARET BRENNAN: It's Sesame Street. It's PBS and NPR. SEN. PAUL: Yeah. And I think, yeah- you're right. We'll see if there's the votes to cut it. I don't think we necessarily need government programming anymore. We have so many choices on the internet and so many choices on television, but my preference has always been, in the past, to cut a little bit of everything, rather than cut a lot of something. So what I've done in the past is propose a penny plan budget where we cut a certain percentage of everything, but it includes entitlements, or it doesn't really work. Once you exclude the entitlements, there isn't enough money to cut so you can never achieve balance by not looking at the entitlements. MARGARET BRENNAN: The budget director on another program this morning said they may not need to use this rescission, this claw back, because the White House has other tools. Do you think they need to go through Congress? Is this overstepping? SEN. PAUL: Well, they- well, they absolutely have to use a recession- the rescission, and it is done by simple majority, by Republicans only. There is no filibuster of it. So, it's a great tool to cut spending. If they don't use, it will be a huge wasted opportunity. But I will tell you, they tried in the first Trump administration. It wasn't their fault. They sent a tiny one, 16 billion, and it failed because two Republicans went the other way. So, we'll see what happens on this. But if we can't even cut welfare that we're giving to other countries, if we can't cut foreign aid welfare, I feel bad for the country. You know, interest rates are rising. We're having trouble selling our debt. We've got a lot of problems. MARGARET BRENNAN: Senator Rand Paul, we'll be right back.


Bloomberg
16 hours ago
- Business
- Bloomberg
Bessent Says US Will Never Default as Congress Faces Deadline
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the US 'is never going to default' as the deadline for increasing the federal debt ceiling gets closer. 'That is never going to happen,' Bessent said in an interview for CBS's Face the Nation scheduled to air Sunday. 'We are on the warning track and we will never hit the wall.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
Trump and Musk Team Up for Bonkers Oval Office Final Episode
Elon Musk isn't going anywhere. In a bizarre press conference in which he stood next to Donald Trump sporting a black eye while the treasury secretary he reportedly once 'shoved' watched on, Musk said he would continue to be the president's unofficial cost cutter - even though his DOGE gig was ending. 'I'll continue to be visiting here and be a friend and adviser to the president,' he said, wearing a black T-shirt emblazoned with the words 'The Dogefather'. 'I hope so,' said Trump. 'And I'll continue to support the DOGE team. And we are relentlessly pursuing a trillion dollars in waste and fraud reductions, which will benefit the American taxpayer,' Musk added. The odd couple then swapped compliments about the new gilded decor in the Oval Office. The White House appearance was designed to mark Musk's departure from DOGE due to federal rules only allowing his special government appointment to last for 134 days. The shift comes after a tumultuous few months in which the Tesla chief upended the federal bureaucracy, watched his stocks plummet, and ultimately failed to deliver the $1 trillion in savings he claimed DOGE would achieve. He also reportedly brawled with Cabinet members, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who, according to Steve Bannon, quoted in the Daily Mail, Musk once 'shoved' during a heated argument over his failed bid to find $1 trillion in savings. Bessent was in the room along with Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who once wanted the Treasury Secretary post, as Trump praised Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders the world has ever produced.' 'Elon has worked tirelessly helping lead the most sweeping consequential government reform program in generations,' Trump said. 'The kind of things that he's found and his people have found… are pretty unbelievable. The numbers that we're talking about are substantial, but they're going to be more substantial in time. 'With the Department of Government Efficiency, Elon's delivered a colossal change in the old ways of doing business in Washington.' Musk staying on in an unofficial capacity is likely to hit a nerve with critics, including some Republicans who were miffed this week when the billionaire expressed disappointment with the Trump-backed 'big beautiful bill.' But speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Musk said DOGE was 'like Buddhism - it's like a way of life, and I'm confident that over time we will see a trillion dollars of savings in waste, fraud, and reduction.' Musk's departure from DOGE leaves behind a legacy that is as divisive as the man himself. Supporters such Shark Tank entrepreneur Kevin O'Leary credited him with overhauling a stagnant bureaucracy and changing how Americans think about the US government. But he added that Musk also learnt the hard way about the challenges of Washington. 'You don't understand Washington until you go there. It is a very nasty, nasty place,' he said. 'Anybody that exposes themselves that close to the sun is going to burn some feathers, and I think he experienced that and realized, he did some great things, but there's other great things that he's doing.' Critics, on the other hand, say Musk left a trail of dysfunction and destruction. His erratic social media posts - such as his early threat that federal workers would be required to email five achievements every week or face the sack - confused and frustrated civil servants. About 260,000 federal workers have been fired, taken buyouts, or retired early since his DOGE appointment. As one outraged worker who had spent more than 30 years with the Agriculture Department told the Daily Beast: 'My entire career was tossed away because these MF's think federal employees don't deserve their jobs.'


Reuters
3 days ago
- Business
- Reuters
Wall Street futures down as Trump's tariffs stay put after latest court ruling
May 30 (Reuters) - Wall Street futures slipped on Friday, as investors took stock of an appeals court decision to undo a prior ruling that had blocked most of U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs, heading into the last trading day of a solid month for equities. The S&P 500 (.SPX), opens new tab and the Nasdaq (.IXIC), opens new tab are on pace for their best monthly showing since November 2023, while the Dow (.DJI), opens new tab is also set for a near 4% monthly advance. Stocks have seen immense volatility this month on Trump's on-and-off tariff moves, though the S&P 500 has rebounded from its April low and now sits about 4% lower from its all-time high hit in February. U.S. equities had initially rallied on Thursday when the Court of International Trade ruled late on Wednesday to effectively block most levies imposed since January, but did not address some industry-specific tariffs. However, a federal appeals court on Thursday temporarily reinstated most of the tariffs and ordered the plaintiffs in the cases to respond by June 5 and the administration by June 9. "This week's courtroom drama has added another layer of uncertainty to what was already an unsettling series of events," Richard Hunter, head of markets at interactive investor, said in a morning note. Hopes of more trade deals between the U.S. and major trading partners, along with upbeat earnings and tame inflation data, have been some of the main drivers of gains in equities this month. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that U.S. trade talks with China are "a bit stalled" and getting a deal over the finish line will likely need the direct involvement of President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. At 5:14 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 31 points, or 0.07%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 8.5 points, or 0.14% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 36.5 points, or 0.17%. Most megacap and growth stocks inched lower in premarket trading, with Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab off 0.7% after gaining in the last session on reporting robust quarterly revenue growth. Chipmaker Marvell Technology (MRVL.O), opens new tab shed 3.9% despite forecasting second-quarter revenue above estimates. Ulta Beauty (ULTA.O), opens new tab gained 8.6% after the cosmetics retailer raised its annual profit forecast after beating quarterly results. Zscaler (ZS.O), opens new tab advanced 3.2% as the cloud security firm raised its annual profit and revenue forecasts and named Kevin Rubin as its chief financial officer. Later in the day, the Personal Consumption Expenditure data - the Fed's favored inflation indicator - is scheduled for release at 8:30 a.m. ET, which could shed more light on the U.S. Federal Reserve's interest rate trajectory. Trump called Fed Chair Jerome Powell to the White House late on Thursday for their first face-to-face meeting since he took office in January and told the central bank chief he was making a "mistake" by not lowering interest rates. Traders currently see at least two 25 basis points of cuts by the end of the year, according to data compiled by LSEG.


Bloomberg
23-05-2025
- Politics
- Bloomberg
'Vicious, Illegal and Unwise': Summers On Harvard Ban
Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers speaks on Bloomberg TV about the US ban on foreigners enrolling at Harvard University. (Source: Bloomberg)