Latest news with #TrumpBiden
The Guardian
a day ago
- Politics
- The Guardian
Trump orders inquiry into Biden's actions as president over ‘cognitive decline' reports
Donald Trump has ordered an investigation into his predecessor Joe Biden's actions as president, alleging that his top aides masked the Democratic president's 'cognitive decline'. Biden beat Trump during the 2020 election and dropped out of his re-election bid after a disastrous debate performance sparked concerns about his age and mental acuity. Biden's cognitive abilities during his presidency had been a Republican talking point for several years, but reporting in numerous US media outlets and a recent book co-authored by Jake Tapper, a CNN host, have revealed that top Democrats and people in Biden's inner circle also had serious misgivings about his ability to do the duties of president. More details soon …
New York Times
3 days ago
- Business
- New York Times
Should Republicans Have Won in a Landslide?
Could Kamala Harris have won if she had more time? What if she had stayed focused on the economy over the final month? Did Joe Biden's age cost Democrats the election? I've read articles on all of these topics over the last few weeks, and they're all reasonable questions. It's natural to wonder whether any election could have gone differently, especially in a contest as close and consequential as this one. But since the election, I've often asked myself a very different question, one that ought to be kept in mind as people re-litigate the race: Should Republicans have won the 2024 election by a much wider margin? While the history books will rightfully dwell on whether Democrats could have forestalled another Trump presidency, the question of whether Mr. Trump cost conservatives a more decisive victory might be the more useful one to understand American politics today. Voters wanted change, badly. They were repelled not just by Mr. Biden's faltering condition, but also by rising prices and perceived failures of Democratic governance on everything from immigration to energy. While it didn't yield a more decisive Republican victory, the backlash against pandemic-era restrictions, rising prices and 'woke' all help explain why a close election felt like a conservative 'vibe shift.' The race was close for one reason: Donald J. Trump. He was an unpopular felon who had alienated millions of Americans with his comments and actions over nearly a decade. Obviously, President Trump possesses important political strengths, but his weaknesses plainly made a landslide victory more challenging. To the extent the election offered the Republicans an opportunity to win big, he was not the candidate to capitalize on it. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
South China Morning Post
3 days ago
- Business
- South China Morning Post
Trump says US-Iran deal would not allow any uranium enrichment
US President Donald Trump on Monday ruled out allowing Iran to enrich uranium under any nuclear deal between the foes – as Tehran defended what it said was its 'peaceful' pursuit of fuel for power generation. Advertisement Uranium enrichment has remained a key point of contention in five rounds of talks since April to sign a new accord to replace the deal with major powers that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. 'Under our potential Agreement – WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump said on his Truth Social network after the Axios news outlet said Washington's offer would let Tehran enrich some of the nuclear fuel. Republican Trump also blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the impasse, saying the Democrat 'should have stopped Iran a long time ago from 'enriching''. Egypt's Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty, Iranian counterpart Abbas Araghchi and UN nuclear watchdog chief Rafael Grossi in Cairo. Photo: AFP Axios said the latest proposal that Washington had sent Tehran on Saturday would allow limited low-level uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, for an amount of time that has yet to be determined.
Reuters
19-05-2025
- Business
- Reuters
Exclusive: Nippon Steel to invest $14 billion in U.S. Steel including $4 billion for new mill, document says
WASHINGTON, May 19 (Reuters) - Nippon Steel (5401.T), opens new tab plans to invest $14 billion in U.S. Steel's (X.N), opens new tab operations including up to $4 billion in a new steel mill if the Trump administration green lights its bid for the iconic U.S. company, according to a document and two people familiar with the matter. Under details of the plan included in the document, the company will plow $11 billion into U.S. Steel's infrastructure through 2028. That includes $1 billion in a green field site, which is expected to grow by $3 billion over the following years and has not been previously reported. The total investment figure was previously reported by CTFN. The super-charged investment pledge, up from an initial $1.4 billion, was pitched as part of a last ditch effort to win approval of the merger, which has drawn fire from both Presidents Donald Trump and Joe Biden. The companies face a May 21 deadline for the completion of a fresh national security review of their proposed tie-up, which was blocked by Biden on national security grounds in January following a prior review. Trump would then have 15 days to decide the fate of the transaction, although the timeline could slip. It is unclear if the billions in new investment will be enough to sway Trump. But the offer shows the lengths Nippon Steel is willing to go to to secure approval, with a looming $565 million breakup fee and current steep U.S. steel tariffs of 25% to access thriving American steel markets. U.S. Steel declined to comment. Nippon Steel, the White House and the Treasury Department, which leads the committee overseeing the national security review, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Washington Post
13-05-2025
- Politics
- Washington Post
MSNBC in five words: ‘I could not agree more'
MSNBC host Stephanie Ruhle was ripping President Donald Trump. 'Give me a break,' she said on April 30 regarding the president's attempts to blame worsening economic conditions on his predecessor, Joe Biden. Those efforts might work for a 'low-information voter in a news desert,' but not for everyone else. 'Losing that credibility hurts all of us,' argued Ruhle.
