logo
#

Latest news with #UkrainianImmigrants

187,000 Ukrainians  Get A Reprieve From U.S. Deportation as War Rages
187,000 Ukrainians  Get A Reprieve From U.S. Deportation as War Rages

Forbes

time16 hours ago

  • Politics
  • Forbes

187,000 Ukrainians Get A Reprieve From U.S. Deportation as War Rages

A major court decision has brought long-awaited relief to tens of thousands of Ukrainian U.S. immigrants who got relief to live in the U.S. under temporary protection. Many had been stuck for months without the ability to work or apply for legal status because of a government-imposed freeze on immigration processing. Now, after a federal judge ruled that pause unlawful, the U.S. government is restarting the process — allowing parolees to once again seek work permits, asylum, and more permanent immigration solutions. But while this news is welcome, it comes against a darker backdrop: the United States, despite having promised to protect Ukraine's independence decades ago, has in recent months attempted to deport some Ukrainians back to a country still under active assault by Russia. And instead of supporting Ukraine as the victim of Russia's invasion of its sovereignty, the administration is outright supporting Russia as the aggressor. The situation in Ukraine remains dire. Reports of war crimes, rapes, torture, and mass graves in places like Bucha, Irpyn, and other towns have shocked the world. Russian forces continue to occupy parts of Ukrainian territory, and the toll on civilians—especially women and children—grows daily. Yet, while the war grinds on, the U.S. government has attempted to strip protections from Ukrainians in the U.S. under temporary humanitarian programs, exposing them to the risk of deportation. This includes those who arrived through the Uniting for Ukraine (U4U) program, launched in 2022 to offer temporary safety. This effort has left many advocates and immigrants feeling betrayed, especially given America's 1994 commitment under the Budapest Memorandum, where the U.S., U.K., and Russia pledged to respect Ukraine's independence and territorial integrity. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal—the third largest in the world—in exchange for that promise. Russia, which received the surrendered weapons, has flagrantly violated the deal. But critics say the U.S. is also falling short, not through bombs or invasion, but through immigration policy that undermines the very people fleeing that war. In February 2025, the U.S. paused processing of immigration applications for people here on humanitarian parole, including U4U participants. That meant: This left over 187,000 Ukrainian parolees in a dangerous legal limbo. Many were unable to renew documents or continue working — some were even placed into deportation proceedings. On May 28, a federal court ruled this freeze unlawful, siding with plaintiffs in a case called Svitlana Doe v. Noem. The judge ordered the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to restart application processing. On June 9, USCIS issued internal guidance telling officers to resume working on backlogged cases. While new U4U sponsorships are still paused, existing parolees can now move forward again. These numbers represent real people: children in school, parents holding jobs, soldiers' families who fled Russian bombs. Many are now hoping to finally get decisions on their cases — decisions that could mean safety, stability, and legal status. With the court's ruling in place, parolees in the U.S. can once again apply for: Applications will be reviewed after additional security vetting. Interviews that were previously canceled may now be rescheduled. While the court decision is good news, there are still big challenges: In fact, just days after the court's May 28 ruling, the Trump administration (in its ongoing legal battle) asked the court to throw out the decision—arguing that Ukrainian sponsors had no right to sue, and that deportation wasn't a real threat. That argument rings hollow to many Ukrainians and Americans alike. It ignores the reality that returning someone to a war zone where civilian apartment blocks are being shelled is not a policy—it's a moral failure. This matter is part of the overall discontent that was displayed as hundreds of thousands of people in America demonstrated Saturday against Trump immigration policies in cities across the country while in Washington the American Army marched in a parade to mark their 250th birthday and President Trump marked his 78th birthday. In the days ahead the debate over what is the proper immigration policy for American to follow in general, not just for Ukrainians, will be at the forefront of considerations in Congress. Meanwhile President Trump has travelled to Canada to attend the G-7 meeting and deal with security issues such as the Middle East and Ukraine while keeping an eye on immigration issues back home. This moment is a test of America's moral compass. The U.S. once asked Ukraine to trade its nukes for a promise of peace. Now, Ukrainians are asking America to keep that promise—not with weapons, but with compassion and lawful protection. For over 187,000 Ukrainians here, this ruling which gave Ukrainian U.S. immigrations relief from deportation a ray of hope. But it's also a reminder that immigration is not just policy — it's people. And behind every application is a family fleeing a war the world promised to help them survive. Now is the time to act — apply, renew, and speak up. Because history will remember not only what Russia did to Ukraine, but what the world did—or didn't do—in response.

EU to debate accelerating departure of Ukrainian immigrants
EU to debate accelerating departure of Ukrainian immigrants

Russia Today

time04-06-2025

  • Business
  • Russia Today

EU to debate accelerating departure of Ukrainian immigrants

EU member states will consider what to do with the millions of Ukrainian immigrants currently in the bloc at an upcoming meeting, as a scheme used to skip normal asylum procedures winds down, Euractiv reported on Wednesday. Discussions on phasing-out the Temporary Protection Directive (TPD), alongside a broader review of the immigrants' legal status in the EU, are expected to take center stage at the bloc's upcoming Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting on June 12–13. The debate comes as member states face mounting challenges in managing the large number of Ukrainian immigrants. As of March 2025, more than 4.3 million Ukrainians had received temporary protection in the EU, according to Eurostat. Although Brussels insists continued support is vital, several governments are reassessing how much assistance they can offer. Germany, which hosts over 1.2 million Ukrainians, has started cutting back welfare benefits, citing sustainability concerns. Poland, which has been one of Ukraine's main backers since the escalation of the conflict with Russia, has resisted accepting more migrants under the EU's proposed migration pact. Social tensions have been mounting in the country as some citizens reportedly perceive Ukrainian immigrants as freeloaders and potential criminals. Government data shows that at least 2.5 million Ukrainians reside in Poland, making up nearly 7% of the country's population. Brussels activated the TPD shortly after the Ukraine conflict escalated in early 2022. First introduced in 2001, the directive provides a wide range of benefits, including residence permits, housing, access to jobs, education, healthcare, financial aid and social services. Although it was initially due to expire in March 2025, the scheme was extended until March 2026. According to Euractiv, talks on possible immigrant exit strategies were gaining momentum behind the scenes due to a 'shifting geopolitical landscape.' The European Commission is reportedly assessing the legal framework and a new proposal is expected on Wednesday. More than 6.3 million Ukrainian immigrants have been registered across Europe, with another 560,000 living outside the continent as of April, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). 'We are already on thin ice with the latest extension. A straightforward interpretation of the directive would mean that after three years it would lose its validity,' Martin Wagner, Senior Policy Advisor at the International Center for Migration Policy Development, said last month.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store