Latest news with #UniversityofJordan
IOL News
19-05-2025
- Health
- IOL News
UKZN Fellow and professor a trailblazer in antimicrobial resistance
Professor Sabiha Essack has been inducted as a UKZN Fellow in recognition of her outstanding and sustained contributions to research, innovation and capacity development in the field of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This honour is among the university's highest accolades bestowed on scholars, who have demonstrated exceptional academic and professional distinction. "It is a singular honour to be recognised by one's alma mater," said Essack. "This Fellowship is the collective effort of postdoctoral fellows, postgraduate students, collaborators and institutions that have contributed to this shared vision of combating AMR through science, innovation, and inclusive global partnerships." Essack, South African Research Chair (SARChI) in Antibiotic Resistance and One Health; Professor in Pharmaceutical Sciences at UKZN; and Honorary Professor of Pharmacy at the University of Jordan, has carved an illustrious path as a globally-recognised authority on antibiotic resistance. Her research, advocacy and leadership, have significantly influenced policy and practice locally, regionally and internationally. With a career spanning more than three decades, Essack's journey began with a Bachelor of Pharmacy in 1988. After practising as a hospital pharmacist for three years, she returned to academia to pursue her Master's and PhD degrees, during which time she was awarded a Wellcome Trust Research Fellowship to undertake research training in the United Kingdom. On her return, she established the Antimicrobial Research Unit at UKZN - now one of Africa's leading research hubs on AMR. Her pioneering research integrates human, animal and environmental health through a one health lens, addressing surveillance, resistance mechanisms, infection control and policy reform. A formidable academic leader, Essack has graduated 28 PhD and 46 Masters students - many of them women from across Africa. Her commitment to mentorship and transformation in research earned her the 2021 National Research Foundation Champion of Research Capacity Development and Transformation Award. She has a career total of 230 journal articles and 198 conference presentations, and was ranked among UKZN's top 30 researchers for three consecutive years. Her recent accolades include the 2024 Christiana Figueres Policy to Practice Award and a Horizon Award from Applied Microbiology International. THE POST
Ammon
07-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Ammon
26th Japanese Speech Contest in Jordan
Ammon News - The Embassy of Japan in Jordan and University of Jordan jointly hosted the 26th Japanese Language Speech Contest in collaboration with the Jordan Office of Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), JICA Alumni Association in Jordan (JAAJ), the Japan Foundation Cairo, Japanese Community Association in Jordan, and Jordan Japan Academic Society. The Vice President for Humanities at the University of Jordan Dr. Nahed Emaish, the Dean of the Faculty of Foreign Languages Dr. Marwan Al Jarrah, the Chargé d'affaires of Japan to Jordan Ms. Watanabe Tomoko, and the Chief Representative of JICA Jordan Office Mr. Morihata Shingo attended the event, along with many other distinguished guests and participants. The contest served a dual purpose: offering Jordanian students learning the Japanese language an opportunity to demonstrate their linguistic skills, while also introducing the audience to aspects of Japan's rich culture. In her opening remarks, Chargé d'affaires Ms. Watanabe Tomoko emphasized the importance of cultural exchange and language learning. She praised the efforts of Jordanian students who have embraced the Japanese language and expressed her hope for deeper ties between Japan and Jordan. The contest unfolded in two sessions: 1-Recitation Section: 8 contestants passionately recited their favorite lyrics of Japanese songs. Aya Maswadee secured the first prize. 2-Speech Section: 7 contestants eloquently gave a speech on the theme (My Precious Thing)'. Yara Abu Karaki emerged as the winner in this category. The first prize for both recitation and speech section were awarded by Chargé d'affaires Ms. Watanabe Tomoko, Special recognition was also bestowed upon the following individuals: •Second Prize for the Speech Section (Dana Abu Noufal)— presented by the Japanese Community Association in Jordan •Second Prize for the Recitation Section (Reem Kafino) — presented by JICA Jordan Office •Special Prize (Sarah Abu Alfoul) — presented by the Jordan Japan Academic Society (JJAS) The event fostered cultural exchange and camaraderie, bringing together Japanese and Jordanian participants from diverse backgrounds.
Jordan News
07-05-2025
- Politics
- Jordan News
A Look into the Numbers from the 200-Day Poll: Jordanian Media Regains Public Trust - Jordan News
The Center for Strategic Studies at the University of Jordan is distinguished by its well-established traditions, developed over many years, in conducting general and specialized public opinion surveys regarding the views and attitudes of the Jordanian public and elites on the formation of governments and other domestic issues, including economic and political matters. اضافة اعلان No one can question the 'institutional integrity' of the center, which stands on a solid scientific foundation and deep-rooted expertise in conducting surveys. Likewise, the credibility of its leadership is beyond reproach, as most of them hold academic degrees in political science, statistics, and the humanities and social sciences. They are well-versed in scientific research and public opinion measurement fundamentals. There is no doubt that the center's surveys serve as important and vital "indicators" for decision-makers, each within their relevant domains—be it public affairs, economics, society, or media. The official release of the results at fixed intervals in front of the media reflects a methodological, institutional, and scientific commitment by the center's team and confirms their transparency and credibility in engaging with public opinion. Some may disagree—justifiably so—either in part or in full, with the center's findings. However, it's undeniable that these surveys carry significant value, topics, and timing, especially in the absence of any alternative or independent entities undertaking this rigorous and appreciated work. As a researcher specialized in media and local affairs, what concerns me most is the aspect of "trust in the media" revealed in the center's survey results after 200 days of Dr. Jaafar Hassan's government. These findings deserve close reading and analysis, particularly those related to public sentiment toward media performance. The first of these indicators is that a 'high level of trust' in Jordanian media was recorded, with 67% of respondents expressing confidence. The second is an 'unprecedented rise' in trust within a record time—an increase of 16% between the 100-day and 200-day polls, climbing from 51% to 67%. Perhaps most noteworthy is the significant gap in trust between Jordanian media (of all types—public and private) and social media platforms. The difference approaches 20 percentage points in favor of traditional media (67%) compared to 47% for social media platforms. While 47% is not insignificant and warrants further discussion, that is beyond the scope of this analysis. Some official media institutions managed to top the trust rankings, even if those results may not please everyone. The hard truth is that scientific, survey-based studies do not offer results that cater to personal preferences or align with emotional responses. Rather, they reveal facts as captured by unbiased, systematic research methods. According to the survey, Al-Mamlaka TV (The Kingdom Channel) received the highest level of trust among Jordanian media institutions (72%), followed by Jordan TV (66%), and then other Jordanian media institutions (63%). These unprecedented levels of trust stem from several factors, including the explosive regional situation and the orchestrated campaigns of misinformation targeting the Jordanian state and its balanced political positions—particularly regarding the Palestinian cause. Social media platforms, often a breeding ground for demonization and doubt, have sometimes exerted psychological and intellectual pressure on the Jordanian public, attempting to undermine trust in national institutions and moderate political discourse. Yet rather than succeeding, these campaigns have had the opposite effect: they prompted Jordanians to cling more tightly to their national media, seeking a trustworthy, responsible, and calm narrative—one that prioritizes the nation's interest and appeals to logic over emotion. This increased trust is also due to qualitative improvements in the performance of some Jordanian media institutions. This trust is not a coincidence—it reflects clear efforts to provide professional content based on accuracy, balance, and adherence to ethical and professional standards. Both public and private media outlets in Jordan have realized the importance of staying connected to the public pulse—conveying the truth without exaggeration or downplaying, and proving, in a time of doubt and misinformation, that they remain the closest and most committed sources to serving the public's informational and intellectual security. Another key factor in building trust in Jordanian media has been the activation of its digital presence, along with that of official figures, on social media platforms. After years of allowing this space to be dominated by rumors, speculation, and misleading information, Jordanian institutions are beginning to understand the importance of being active and responsive in the digital sphere. Media outlets and officials' accounts now use digital platforms as direct communication tools with the public, enhancing their credibility and narrowing the gap between institutions and the people. This presence has evolved beyond just promotion or broadcasting news—it now includes responding, clarifying, and engaging with audiences. As a result, even in the open environment of digital interaction, Jordanian media has become a reliable reference point and a rational alternative to informational chaos. It's also impossible to discuss the rise in trust without acknowledging the relatively acceptable and reasonable level of media freedom in Jordan. While it may not reach the ideal threshold of total freedom, it has created a safe and responsible space where the media can report truthfully and express public opinion without falling into disorder or media blackmail. The rise in Jordanians' trust in their local media is not just a statistic in a survey—it reflects a collective awareness formed in response to external pressure and confusion. It reflects people's need for media that resembles them, speaks for them, and defends their national principles. Jordanian media has succeeded, at this critical historical moment, because it chose to be national, responsible, and rational—restoring a significant portion of its standing in the hearts of Jordanians. What this poll shows is a call for Jordanian media to continue this upward path—but without arrogance or complacency. Trust, as difficult as it is to build, can be shaken easily if transparency fades or the quality of content, analysis, and consistent innovation declines.
Jordan News
04-05-2025
- Business
- Jordan News
Public Trust in Jordanian Government Surges After 200 Days, Poll Finds - Jordan News
Public Trust in Jordanian Government Surges After 200 Days, Poll Finds Public confidence in Prime Minister Jafar Hassan's government has significantly increased 200 days into its term, accompanied by rising economic optimism, according to a new nationwide poll released Sunday by the Center for Strategic Studies (CSS) at the University of Jordan. اضافة اعلان The survey reveals a marked positive trend in public sentiment. Sixty-five percent of Jordanians now express confidence in the government's ability to govern effectively, a substantial jump from 51% recorded after its first 100 days and 54% upon its formation. Among the Kingdom's opinion leaders, 64% currently endorse the government's performance, compared to 70% at the 100-day mark and 52% at its inception. Notably, Hassan's administration has achieved the highest public confidence ratings for governing capability recorded for any Jordanian government since the CSS began tracking this metric in 2011. Economic sentiment also shows marked improvement; over half (52%) of Jordanians perceive the economy to be on the right track, a dramatic turnaround from only 14% two years ago. Correspondingly, optimism about the Jordanian economy under the current government is notable, shared by 58% of the public and 47% of opinion leaders. Confidence in the Prime Minister personally mirrors the government's upward trajectory. Within the national sample, 71% believe Hassan is effectively handling his responsibilities, surging from 55% after 100 days and 57% when he took office. Among opinion leaders, his approval stands strong at 75% (compared to 76% at 100 days and 55% at formation). The cabinet also enjoys improved ratings, with 60% of the public expressing confidence in the ministerial team's performance (up from 47% at 100 days, 50% at formation). Opinion leaders' confidence registered at 54% (vs. 55% at 100 days, 45% at formation). This translates into broader optimism towards the cabinet, shared by 58% of the public and 50% of opinion leaders. Trust in the nation's institutions extends beyond the core government. Jordanian media outlets saw a notable increase in public trust, reaching 63% in this poll, up significantly from 48% at the 100-day mark. Reflecting the overall increased confidence, a striking 74% of Jordanians now believe the country is heading in the right direction, a significant leap from 47% who felt this way at the 100-day mark and 55% when the government was formed. Public engagement remains high. Over half (52%) of the national sample are actively following the government's actions, a figure that climbs to 94% among opinion leaders. Prime Minister Hassan's nationwide field visits are well-received, approved by 66% of Jordanians, with 40% stating the visits positively impacted their home governorate. Perceptions of government service delivery have also improved. A combined 75% of citizens now either "strongly agree" (36%) or "somewhat agree" (39%) that the government is making its best effort to provide public services – a considerable increase from the 100-day assessment. Furthermore, slightly more people (55%, up from 51%) feel they can criticize the government without fear. Despite the positive momentum, there is little appetite for immediate change; 65% of the public and 56% of opinion leaders oppose a cabinet reshuffle at this time. Trust in Jordan's core state security institutions remains exceptionally robust, with the Jordanian Armed Forces - Arab Army, the Public Security Directorate (PSD), the General Intelligence Directorate (GID), and the Civil Defense Directorate (CDD) each commanding 99% public confidence. //Petra// AA
Jordan Times
04-05-2025
- Business
- Jordan Times
Public trust in government rises to 65%, highest level since 2011
AMMAN — Public confidence in the government of Prime Minister Jafar Hassan has risen to 65 percent, the highest level of confidence in a Jordanian government since 2011, according to a new survey by the University of Jordan's Centre for Strategic Studies (CSS). The poll, conducted at the end of April, reflected a steady rise in public approval since the government was formed, as confidence stood at 54 per cent when the government took office, rose to 51 per cent at the 100-day mark and has now reached 65 per cent after 200 days in office. Among opinion leaders, 64 per cent said the government was successfully managing its responsibilities - slightly lower than the 70 per cent at the 100-day mark, but still higher than the 52 per cent at its formation. At a press conference announcing the results, the CSS noted that Hassan's government has achieved unprecedented levels of public trust compared to previous governments, with both the Prime Minister and his cabinet receiving improved ratings. Confidence in Hassan personally has also rose, with 71 per cent of the public saying he is capable of leading the government, compared to 55 per cent at 100 days and 57 per cent at inauguration. Among opinion leaders, this figure reached 75 per cent. The performance of the ministerial team showed similar gains, with 60 per cent of respondents now believing that the ministers are competent, up from 47 per cent at the 100-day mark. Optimism about the direction of the cabinet reached 58 per cent among the general public and 50 per cent among opinion leaders. Public perceptions of the Kingdom's direction have also improved, with 74 per cent now believing that Jordan is on the right track - up from 47 per cent at the 100-day mark. The Prime Minister's local visits appear to have had a positive impact on citizens. Two thirds of respondents expressed satisfaction with these visits, while 40 per cent reported tangible benefits in their local area as a result. Engagement with government activities is also on the rise. More than half of respondents, some 52 per cent, said they follow government action, while an overwhelming 94 per cent of opinion leaders reported doing the same. Belief in the government's commitment to service delivery has also increased, with the results showing that 36 per cent of the public said they "strongly agree" and 39 per cent "somewhat agree" that the government is doing its best - up from 17 per cent and 45 per cent respectively in the previous survey. Freedom of expression indicators also improved slightly, with 55 per cent of Jordanians now saying they can criticise the government without fear, up from 51 per cent. Despite the generally positive mood, a majority of both the public (65 per cent) and opinion leaders (56 per cent) oppose a cabinet reshuffle at this time. Meanwhile, confidence in Jordan's core institutions remains high. The Jordanian Armed Forces, the General Intelligence Directorate and the Civil Defence each received approval ratings of 99 per cent, while Public Security scored 89 per cent. The nationally representative survey included 1,225 adults and 356 opinion leaders from seven professional and political sectors. It was conducted between 17 and 27 April with a margin of error of ±3 per cent and a confidence level of 94 per cent.
