4 days ago
BREAKING NEWS Head of Scotland Yard's disastrous Operation Midland VIP paedophile investigation has gross misconduct probe dropped at 11th hour
The only officer to face disciplinary proceedings over the Metropolitan Police 's disastrous VIP paedophile investigation saw the case against him sensationally dropped today.
Former Met Deputy Assistant Commissioner Steve Rodhouse was due to face a disciplinary board later this month on an allegation of gross misconduct over claims that he lied in public at the conclusion of the Operation Midland probe in 2016.
However the charge has been dropped at the 11th hour after the Met 'recently disclosed' a 'large volume of relevant material.'
Mr Rodhouse, who was later promoted to Deputy Head of the National Crime Agency, Britain's version of the FBI, oversaw Midland, an investigation based on the lies of fantasist Carl Beech – aka 'Nick'.
Beech accused prominent public figures including former home secretary Leon Brittan, former Army head Lord Bramall and ex-Tory MP Harvey Proctor of being part of a murderous paedophile ring.
He was jailed for 18 years over the false allegations in 2019.
Mr Rodhouse was first cleared of misconduct in relation to his handling of the Midland investigation in 2017, however the police watchdog ruled that he should face a fresh gross misconduct hearing in 2023 over claims he used 'inaccurate or dishonest' words as the investigation concluded.
These related to two other serial liars – outed in a Daily Mail investigation – who appeared to back Beech's lies.
Beech was only prosecuted following a damning review of the Midland probe by retired High Court judge Sir Richard Henriques, who suggested he be investigated by another police force.
However the two other fantasists – known as Witnesses A and B – were not referred by the Met for outside investigation, despite Sir Richard recommending they should be.
In 2016, Mr Rodhouse privately told Sir Richard he was 'satisfied' that Witnesses A and B had 'told deliberate lies.'
But in a public statement issued just months earlier, Scotland Yard said detectives 'had not found evidence to prove they were knowingly misled by a complainant.'
Mr Rodhouse reiterated this in a TV interview over the collapse of the 16-month inquiry.
The pair have since been referred to West Midland Police to be investigated over claims they perverted the course of justice.
Today, the Independent Office for Police Conduct [IOPC], said it had withdrawn its direction that Mr Rodhouse should face gross misconduct proceedings after a 'large volume of relevant material was recently disclosed' to the watchdog by the Met.
The statement said that, following analysis of the recently disclosed material, there was 'no evidence… that there was any inappropriate motivation in Mr Rodhouse's comments to the media'.
The bombshell announcement is just the latest blow to victims and relatives of those caught up in the Midland scandal, widely regarded as one of the worst police investigations in living memory.
It follows almost a decade of allegations of incompetence and cover-up at the heart of the Met in relation to the investigation and raises serious questions over the competency of the police watchdog, which has repeatedly refused or been unable to hold officers to account.
Despite the allegations of incompetence, today's announcement means no officer has been held to account over the fiasco.
IOPC director Amanda Rowe said it was 'highly regrettable' that material requested three years ago had 'only recently' been discovered and disclosed.
'Police forces have a legal obligation to provide information to the IOPC when we request it,' she added.
'However, we acknowledge that we could have taken further steps during the investigation to seek additional assurance from the Met that relevant email material was definitely unavailable.
'We apologise to all of those affected and we are working with the force to establish exactly how and why this situation has occurred, and to reduce the risk of it happening again.
'Today's announcement does not change our finding that by failing to follow Sir Richard's recommendation in his review to investigate the witnesses, the Met's service was unacceptable and its subsequent reviews concluding no investigation was needed were flawed.
'During our investigation we reported a potential crime to the Met, which is being actively investigated by another force.'
Last year, Mr Rodhouse received a £10,000 pay rise despite being removed from his role as director-general of operations at the National Crime Agency because of the disciplinary hearing, taking his salary to £190,000-£195,000.
In a statement in response to today's decision, Mr Rodhouse stood firm and described the investigation against him as a 'debacle.'
'I am pleased that the IOPC has finally recognised that I acted with honesty, integrity and care throughout a difficult investigation,' he said.
'I welcome the IOPC's apology, but I have yet to receive an adequate explanation as to how this debacle occurred.
'I recognise that senior police officers must be held accountable for their actions, and that public complaints must be properly considered. However, if police officers are to willingly take on complex and challenging investigations, they must have the confidence that any complaints made about their conduct will be competently investigated in a balanced and timely fashion. That was not the case here.
'Vital evidence was not considered despite it being readily available and repeatedly requested. Once it was finally considered, it became clear that the allegations made against me were ill-founded and incorrect.
'I am grateful for all of the support that I have received, and I now look forward to resuming my career investigating and prosecuting serious criminals.'
