19-05-2025
Forum: Stronger action needed against animal abuse
I refer to The Straits Times' article, 'Should there be harsher penalties for animal abusers? Lawyers weigh in' (May 17).
As a fellow cat owner, I am deeply saddened and disturbed by the recent spate of cat abuse cases in Yishun and Punggol. These cruel and senseless acts highlight the urgent need to review and strengthen our stance on animal welfare.
Singapore's current penalties under the Animals and Birds Act – up to 18 months' jail and a $15,000 fine for first-time offenders – seem inadequate as a deterrent. Investigations often take years, and offenders are frequently let off with light sentences. One example is the case of a man who was jailed for 14 months after killing cats by throwing them off HDB blocks.
I urge the Government to ban abusers from pet ownership and mandate counselling and psychiatric evaluation. Tackling the underlying emotional and psychological issues is key to preventing repeat offences.
Research has shown that people abuse animals due to psychological and emotional issues, social pressures, and behavioural factors. In some cases, these acts stem from deep loneliness, a lack of empathy, or thrill-seeking behaviour. Studies have also shown that many serial offenders of violent crimes began with animal abuse – a clear warning sign that society must not ignore.
Much can be done at the community level through public education. Residents should be encouraged to report suspected abuse early. I've seen positive examples in cat feeder communities like the one in Holland Village, where volunteers work together to monitor and protect community cats and educate others about them . Such efforts deserve wider support.
Regardless of the reason, harming animals is wrong. When we harm them, we upset the natural balance we share – because humans and animals are meant to coexist.
Vivien Tan Ling Ling
More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
