logo
#

Latest news with #WasimSadiqNargal

Choice Of Partner Constitutional Right, Consent Of Family, Community Not Necessary: HC
Choice Of Partner Constitutional Right, Consent Of Family, Community Not Necessary: HC

News18

time25-04-2025

  • Politics
  • News18

Choice Of Partner Constitutional Right, Consent Of Family, Community Not Necessary: HC

Last Updated: 'Consent of family or community or clan is not necessary. Once two adult individuals agree to enter into wedlock, their consent has to be piously given primacy,' the court said Reaffirming individual liberty and constitutional rights, the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court (HC) recently directed the police to provide protection to a man and woman who got married against their families' wishes and feared retaliation. The court underscored that the choice of a life partner by consenting adults is a manifestation of their choice that is recognised under Articles 19 and 21 of the Constitution. 'Consent of family or community or clan is not necessary. Once two adult individuals agree to enter into wedlock, their consent has to be piously given primacy," the court said. A bench of Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, while hearing a petition filed by Anamika Devi and her husband, noted that both individuals were majors and had entered into marriage of their own free will on March 26, in accordance with Hindu rites. The couple approached the court citing imminent threats of physical violence and harassment from their relatives due to their inter-familial marriage. Observing that such consensual unions deserve Constitutional protection, the court held that neither family approval nor societal endorsement is necessary once two consenting adults decide to marry. 'The concept of liberty has to be weighed and tested on the touchstone of constitutional sensitivity," Justice Nargal observed, adding that liberty without dignity and choice would reduce the constitutional identity of an individual to mere hollowness. He further stated that 'no one shall be permitted to interfere in the fructification of the said choice", terming any such obstruction a violation of constitutional rights. The court clarified that the current order does not validate the marriage or confirm the petitioners' age or majority. These aspects, it said, are subject to verification as per prevailing legal standards. First Published: April 25, 2025, 16:02 IST

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store