Latest news with #WhereThingsStand
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Big Fans Of State Sovereignty Except When California Does It
As I mentioned in yesterday's edition of Where Things Stand, there is an element of campaign-promise fulfillment intertwined in the Trump administration's aggro deployment of National Guard troops to inflame an already tense standoff between LA protesters and local law enforcement. Trump's spent much of his political career vowing to punish his perceived enemies (in this case, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and, more generally, a state that won't give Trump its Electoral College votes). Before he was even back in office this year, he was already formulating a plan to punish states and municipalities that dare to be led by Dems. The dangerous standoff he's created in LA between civilians and the military is the real-life manifestation of a running bit in Trump's psyche, a feud between himself and blue-voting municipalities that, up until this point, he largely stoked via Truth Social posts and, starting in January, executive orders attacking sanctuary cities and those who govern them. In order to justify the deployment of the military against civilian protesters as anything bigger than him finding an opening for his blue city retribution, it appears he's enlisted some of his allies in the administration, and in Congress, to perform a bit of shameless spin when it comes to state sovereignty. When Trump first ordered the federalization of the California National Guard, Newsom surfaced an old tweet from Trump's DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, which she posted while governor of South Dakota in 2024. The tweet is a clip from an interview Noem did with Fox News' resident MAGA man Sean Hannity during which she argued that if President Biden 'federalizes the National Guard, that would be a direct attack on states' rights.' (They were expressing disapproval of a theoretical move Biden could take to order the Texas National Guard to stand down when Texas Governor Greg Abbott mobilized it for border enforcement.) Newsom reposted the tweet on Sunday. Noem is, of course, now living and dying by President Trump's decision to federalize the National Guard without consulting a state governor, going so far, per a document obtained by the San Francisco Chronicle, as to suggest that Guard members go beyond their current unprecedented deployment and extra-legally join ICE in conducting immigration arrests. Trump's pals in Congress, meanwhile, are having to twist themselves a bit more to make the hypocrisy stick. Take libertarian-in-chief Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), the man who is constantly lamenting federal overreach and professing his strong desire to shrink the size of the federal government. In response to questions about Trump's decision to federalize National Guard troops and send them into LA, Paul said he supported the decision. He also gave the game away: that the true point of deploying troops was not about mitigating protests but about forcing California, a sanctuary state, to bend to the President's will. 'I've always preferred local law enforcement to federal but this is a time in which it looks as though the state government is resisting enforcing federal law,' he said. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) — the world's biggest fan of states' rights when it comes to their ability to impose draconian abortion bans in Roe's wake — was all in on the deployment when speaking to reporters on Tuesday. 'President Trump has put his hand on the table and said 'Not on my watch,' and we applaud that so we're standing with him,' Johnson said. 'Look, that's not my lane. I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested, but he ought to be tarred and feathered,' he continued. Some vulnerable House Republicans have reportedly been vocalizing their lack of enthusiasm for a White House-created, Mike Johnson-supported plan that would see Congress green-light a handful of DOGE cuts in the form of a rescissions package. Turns out some of the devastating cuts to foreign aid programs are not just hard to stomach, but rubber stamping them might prove problematic for these representatives' reelection prospects. Specifically, at least a dozen House Republicans have expressed concerns about cuts to the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, a George W. Bush-era program. Per Politico: In recent days, White House officials have conveyed to GOP leaders that they will not only maintain life-saving treatments under PEPFAR but will also — in response to concerns from more than a dozen House Republicans — preserve some prevention programs as well, according to three people granted anonymity to discuss the private assurances. After a recent visit to Hiroshima, Japan, DNI Director Tulsi Gabbard put out a video on Twitter Tuesday warning that the world is closer to nuclear war than ever before. In it she accused 'political elites' who can hide in 'shelters' of trying to stoke conflict between world powers with access to nuclear weapons. 'As we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite and warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers,' Gabbard said in the video. 'Perhaps it's because they are confident that they will have access to nuclear shelters for themselves and for their families that regular people won't have access to,' she said. 'It's up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness.' A judge granted the Trump administration's motion for summary judgment Tuesday evening, finding that the President's removal power allowed him (via DOGE) to axe the U.S. African Development Foundation's board, and that the board members had already been removed when they voted to appoint a new president. We had covered this saga a bit in March as Trump was early on his aggressive push to remake the executive branch, demolishing many agencies in the process. The USADF had managed to hold off DOGE — at least for awhile. Judge Richard Leon had telegraphed Tuesday's decision in recent court hearings. This is not one of the independent agencies that had removal protections and is unlikely to end in a showdown over agency power. — Kate Riga Stephen Miller Demanded ICE Target Home Depots Punishing Blue Cities Was Always On The Agenda Trump Admin Calls In National Guard Against LA Protestors White House Pushes Texas to Redistrict, Hoping to Blunt Democratic Gains Fake Images and Conspiracy Theories Swirl Around L.A. Protests GOP senator on Trump's military parade: 'I wouldn't have done it'
Yahoo
21-03-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Elon Gives House GOP A Little Incentive For Helping The Executive Defy The Judiciary
House Republicans can have $6,600 for supporting Elon Musk's drive to impeach judges who place checks on President Trump's lawless executive actions, as a treat. Musk has been championing talk of impeaching federal judges who block or place temporary holds on some of Trump's most Constitution-smashing executive actions since Day 1. When judges first started shutting down some of DOGE's initial stabs at freezing and rescinding congressionally allocated federal grants and funds, Musk was one of the first to push the idea that judicial impeachments were in order. Since then, some of Trump's closest allies in the White House and his more far-right friends in the People's House have latched onto the effort. It's been a natural escalation in some ways. As I noted in yesterday's edition of Where Things Stand, House Republicans began ceding their own check on the executive branch during shutdown talks last week. It makes a certain sense for them to begin trying to pare back the third branch of government's checks as well. This week, Rep. Brandon Gill (R-TX) introduced articles of impeachment against U.S. District Judge James Boasberg, who has attempted to keep the Trump administration in check after it defied his instructions to halt deportations under the Alien Enemies Act. Republicans have also moved to impeach federal judges Paul Engelmayer, John McConnell Jr., John Bates and Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali. The New York Times is now reporting that Musk has, apparently, 'made the maximum allowable donation to Republican members of Congress who support impeaching federal judges,' in the Times words, citing five people with knowledge of the matter. Those who have received the $6,600 donation include Gill, as well as Reps. Eli Crane (R-AZ), Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Andy Ogles (R-TN), Andrew Clyde (R-GA), Derrick Van Orden (R-WI). Each of these Republicans has either publicly supported impeaching judges who have ruled against the Trump administration or has taken some sort of 'action' in response to recent rulings. Musk also donated to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who criticized Boasberg. Not content to just hand over their own authority, and thereby expanding the powers of the executive branch, Musk is giving House Republicans incentive to help the Trump administration take a sledgehammer to additional parts of our system of checks and balances. While most of her colleagues are hiding from their constituents while at home in their states this week, Rep. Harriet Hageman (R-WY), who launched a successful primary challenge against former Rep. Liz Cheney in 2022, decided to face voters in person in her district (one that Biden won in 2020). Rather than answering questions about constituents' concerns, it appears she spent the whole time gaslighting the crowd, which was angry about the Trump administration's latest lawless executive actions. Per NBC News: 'It's so bizarre to me how obsessed you are with federal government,' Hageman told attendees, prompting more outbursts from the crowd. 'You guys are going to have a heart attack if you don't calm down,' she added. 'I'm sorry, your hysteria is just really over the top.' She ended the town hall 15 mins early and her office later claimed that the uproar was staged by Dem activists, just as it, presumably, was for the rest of her Republican colleagues who have been berated by scared and angry constituents in recent weeks. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has brought the first criminal charges under his state's near total abortion ban against a midwife for, he claimed, providing illegal abortions. It's one of the first times since Roe was overturned that a provider has been charged. As 'Abortion, Every Day' author Jessica Valenti pointed out, it appears that Paxton is attempting to do some broader anti-abortion, but also anti-midwife care, messaging with the arrest by framing it as a crackdown on someone practicing medicine 'without a license' — rather than an outright attack on abortion access in the state. Check out this new piece from The Bulwark, as the constitutional sheriffs movement gets in line behind Trump's mass deportations effort: Your Sheriff Might Be Planning to Help ICE Conduct Mass Deportations MAGA Is Raging Hard Against The Judges Who Get In Its Way The Problem With Needing Trump To Whip Your Votes DOJ Asserts Trump Hypothetically Has Power To Purge All Female Agency Heads, Or Those Over 40 Vivian Wilson on Being Elon Musk's Estranged Daughter, Going Viral, and Protecting Trans Youth If Trump Defies the Courts, Here's What a Judge Can Do Tesla Recalls Cybertrucks After Steel Trim Pieces Come Loose
