Latest news with #Whoppers
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Ryan Lochte Says Having His Divorce News Go Public Was 'Rough' After Wife Kayla Announces 'End' of Their Marriage
Ryan Lochte thanked his friends and family for their support amid his divorce from wife Kayla The Olympian said he had a "rough day" but will continue "to put one foot in front of the other and keep moving forward" Kayla confirmed the divorce in a post on Instagram on Wednesday, June 4Ryan Lochte is grateful for the people in his life as he navigates the end of his marriage. In a video message shared on his Instagram Stories on Thursday, June 5, the 40-year-old Olympian thanked his friends and family who reached out after his estranged wife Kayla publicly shared her decision to "end" their marriage a day earlier. "Just wanna say thank you to everyone that wrote a message, reached out to me," Lochte said in his Stories, while in the car with his daughter Liv Rae and son Caiden Zane. "Just open arms. It means a lot to me. Yesterday was a rough day for me, but, like always in life, you've got to put one foot in front of the other and keep moving forward." Lochte continued, saying, "And thats what I'm doing. To my second family that sent me this beautiful card, and a basket full of candy that now my son is eating," before Caiden jumped into the video to show a box of Whoppers. "Thank you guys, I love you guys." Lochte said before ending his video. The swimmer added, "Love y'all," in text over the video. Kayla, who shares Caiden, who turns 8 on June 8, as well as daughters Liv Rae (who turns 6 on June 17) and Georgia June, (who turns 2 on June 22) with Lochte, confirmed she's divorcing her husband of seven years in an Instagram post on Wednesday, June 4. 'Earlier this year, I made the hard decision to end my marriage after deep prayer and reflection,' Kayla began in her statement. 'I hold marriage in the highest regard, so this has been one of the most painful, revealing, and challenging seasons of my life. I've been hesitant to share until I could do so from a place of healing — not from fresh, open wounds.' Kayla said she wants to continue "living with transparency and authenticity," but also noted that she wants to protect "the parts of this journey that are private and unfolding in uncharted territory.' Court records obtained by PEOPLE show that Kayla filed for divorce on March 26. Lochte addressed the split after Kayla shared her post on Instagram, writing, 'I want to take a moment to acknowledge what Kayla shared. This past year has brought major changes for both of us as we've come to the difficult decision to end our marriage. I'm deeply grateful for the life we've built together and especially for the love we share for our three children." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from juicy celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Lochte said the decision "hasn't been easy" but he believes it's "the right step toward peace and well-being for us both." "I remain committed to healing, growth, and co-parenting with care and respect as we move forward separately," Lochte added. 'Thank you to our family and friends for your continued support — it truly means a lot as we begin this new chapter." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
15-05-2025
- Yahoo
A McDonald's Is Banning Dine-In Service For All Customers Under 21
A McDonald's location in Virginia is no longer allowing customers under 21 to dine in The policy change comes after reports of multiple fights and other "disrespectful" behavior from young customers Adults 21 and older will be allowed to dine in but have to ring a doorbell and show their IDA McDonald's in Virginia is setting an age restriction for customers. The fast food location is establishing a new policy that guests under the age of 21 cannot dine inside (or even enter) the restaurant. The Fairfax County McDonald's recently initiated the age limit after multiple fights among young people broke out in the dining area, NBC Washington reported. The home of the Big Mac is down the street from a high school. The news segment showed a sign taped to the McDonald's door reading 'Safety Notice Effective Immediately,' outlining the new arrangement. 'Due to repeated incidents of student violence, this McDonald's location is temporarily closed for dine-in service to anyone under 21 years of age. This decision was made to protect our staff, our guests, and our community,' the notice read. 'Adults — we are still here to serve you! Please ring the doorbell and a team member will assist you.' The note concluded by thanking customers for their 'understanding' while they work to keep the location 'safe and welcoming.' McDonald's management told NBC that adults who dine in the restaurant might be asked to show their IDs. 'These kids are off the chain,' a customer outside the location told the camera crew, describing the 'disrespect' she has seen from young people at the establishment. 'It's a company, it should be a safe environment for families to enjoy their food,' another customer said. The Fairfax County McDonald's Operator clarified in a statement to PEOPLE that all customers are still welcome to place orders via the Mobile App. "We love being part of the Edison community and we value each and every customer. We've enhanced our Franconia Road McDonald's security measures in an effort to create a safer environment for our staff and customers," the statement said. "This policy was developed in partnership with local school officials with oversight from local law enforcement. This serves as a temporary fix as we work towards a long-term solution for all. We thank our community for its support, understanding and patience." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human-interest stories. Fellow chain restaurant Burger King found itself in hot water over allegedly misleading ads. The fast food spot is being sued by 19 plaintiffs across 13 states, who claim Whoppers are 35% smaller than what's shown in ads. On May 5, U.S. District Judge Roy K. Altman in Florida ruled that Burger King must face a 2022 lawsuit claiming it misled customers with ads that amplified the size of its burger beyond typical advertising exaggeration. Read the original article on People
Yahoo
14-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
The Burger King Lawsuit That's Been 8 Years in the Making Is Finally Moving Forward
First, it was Taco Bell's Crunchwrap. Now, angry customers are coming for the Whopper. Burger King's signature sandwich has come under fire for allegedly false advertising, and recently, a judge ruled that the class action lawsuit against the chain can move forward. Originally filed in 2022, the lawsuit claims the proportions of the Whopper advertised compared to the burger customers get in the drive-thru are way out of whack, exaggerated by a whopping 35%. In the case, the plaintiffs allege that Burger King 'materially overstates the size of (and the amount of beef contained in) many of its burgers and sandwiches,' dating the issue back to September 2017. The filing goes on to accuse BK of 'overstating the size of nearly every menu item in its current advertisements.' Basically, customers are finally sick and tired of seeing massive, meaty Whoppers in TV commercials and online ads, only to be let down when they sit down to dine. Class action cases have been rattling the food industry in a major way in recent years, bringing down Buffalo Wild Wings' 'boneless wings' stunt and going after Beyond Meat's 'deceitful' branding tactics. Believe it or not, several other major fast-food chains—Wendy's and McDonald's, for example—have also faced legal trouble in the past for the same offense, although those two cases were eventually dismissed. Burger King had asked the judge to dismiss the case, arguing it's not required by law to sell burgers that look exactly like the advertisements, but U.S. District Judge Roy K. Altman has decided to move it forward, stating the plaintiff's claims 'go beyond mere exaggeration or puffery.' It's interesting to note the judge signed off on some parts of the lawsuit proceeding, but not others: specifically, any claims pertaining to TV and online ads or accusations of the company violating consumer protection laws. However, print ads are still relevant, so photos shown right on the BK menu will be under consideration for negligent misrepresentation and unjust enrichment. Is it wrong for Burger King to make its food look as delicious as possible? Well, maybe, if it means the burger joint is wrongly influencing your choices and buying habits. So, what will come out of all this fast food confusion (and what's in it for us)? Hopefully, a payout to customers who have been served a disappointing Whopper—or, even better, a future with beefier burgers. Read the original article on ALLRECIPES
Yahoo
08-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Lawsuit against Burger King ads moves forward
If you're disappointed with a restaurant meal, perhaps you'll leave a negative review. Some Burger King customers went further, bringing a lawsuit against the Whopper-maker. Thanks to a judge's ruling this week, that suit can move forward. U.S. District Judge Roy Altman rejected Burger King Corp.'s bid to dismiss the complaint brought by plaintiffs from several states. They want to sue on behalf of a class of people 'who purchased a Burger King menu item based on false and misleading advertising concerning the size and/or the amount of ingredients contained in said menu item.' The Florida judge wrote that 'the main issue before us is relatively straightforward: Would a 'reasonable consumer' be deceived by BKC's in-store advertisements?' He found it 'plausible to believe that some reasonable consumers could be deceived by BKC's advertisements.' He noted that it's still a preliminary stage of the litigation at which deference to the plaintiffs' claims is required. A Burger King spokesperson called the plaintiffs' claims 'false.' The judge's written order, published Monday, featured side-by-side photo comparisons of the company's burgers as-advertised next to actual, slimmer Whoppers and Big Kings. Altman was appointed to the bench by President Donald Trump, a noted McDonald's fan. He said in his order that he will set a status conference to discuss a schedule for next steps in the case. Subscribe to the Deadline: Legal Newsletter for expert analysis on the top legal stories of the week, including updates from the Supreme Court and developments in the Trump administration's legal cases. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
07-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Judge lets Burger King defendants have it their way and move forward with case over Whopper size
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways A federal judge has ruled that a group of Burger King customers can proceed with a lawsuit over the size of their Whoppers. In a filing Monday, Florida District Judge Roy K. Altman denied a motion to dismiss the case against the fast food giant, which has been accused of falsely advertising its products. 'After careful review – and drawing all reasonable inferences for the Plaintiffs – we find it plausible to believe that some reasonable consumers could be deceived by [Burger King Corporation] BKC's advertisements,' the judge ruled. The plaintiff's allegations "go beyond mere exaggeration or puffery,' Altman added. The original suit is being brought by 19 customers from 13 different states. A federal judge has denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit against Burger King over misleading ads about its burgers. The lawsuit, obtained by The Independent, contains side-by-side images of the brightly colored advertisement burgers ... (Burger King) 'Each of our Plaintiffs purchased BKC products at Burger King stores in their home states, and each came away disappointed by the incongruity between what they received and what they expected based on BKC's advertisements,' Altman's ruling stated. ... next to sad-looking, real-life photos taken by the customers (Court filings) 'Most reasonable consumers would be vexed' by the differences in the advertisements, it added. Though the motion to dismiss the suit has been denied, a date has not been set for the jury trial – as requested by the plaintiffs. According to the original lawsuit, Burger King began to 'materially overstate the size of its burgers' in its ads in September 2017. The corporation 'advertises its burgers as large burgers compared to competitors and containing oversized meat patties and ingredients that overflow over the bun to make it appear that the burgers are approximately 35 percent larger in size, and contain more than double the meat, than the actual burger,' the suit states. According to the original lawsuit, Burger King began to 'materially overstate the size of its burgers' in its ads in September 2017 (Mike Egerton/PA Wire) The lawsuit, obtained by The Independent, contains side-by-side images of the brightly colored, bursting advertisement burgers next to sad-looking, real-life photos taken by the customers. Burger King overstates the size of 'nearly every menu item in its current advertisements,' the suit claims. Included on the lawsuit's list of 'overstated menu items' are: the Impossible Whopper, Big King, Single Quarter Pound King, Bacon King, Double Whopper, Triple Whopper With Cheese, Whopper Jr., Bacon Double Cheeseburger, Double Cheeseburger, Bacon Cheeseburger, Cheeseburger, Hamburger, Whopper Melt, Bacon Whopper Melt, Spicy Whopper Melt, Breakfast Bacon King, Fully Loaded Croisann'Wich, Double Sausage, and the Egg & Cheese Croissan'Wich. In response to Monday's ruling a spokesperson for Burger King said that the plaintiffs' claims were false, adding: "The flame-grilled beef patties portrayed in our advertising are the same patties used in the millions of burgers we serve to Guests across the U.S.'
