logo
#

Latest news with #charters

NASCAR wins key appeal in antitrust lawsuit filed by Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports
NASCAR wins key appeal in antitrust lawsuit filed by Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports

New York Times

time3 days ago

  • Business
  • New York Times

NASCAR wins key appeal in antitrust lawsuit filed by Michael Jordan's 23XI Racing, Front Row Motorsports

A three-judge federal appeals court has overturned a key ruling in the NASCAR antitrust case, dealing a significant blow to the race teams seeking to retain their status for this season. Front Row Motorsports and 23XI Racing, the team co-owned by Michael Jordan and three-time Daytona 500 winner Denny Hamlin, had won a preliminary injunction from a U.S. District Court in December that allowed them to race as 'charter' teams in 2025 without being subjected to a clause that prevented them from suing NASCAR. Advertisement But the U.S. Court of Appeals overturned that Thursday, ruling the lower court 'abused its discretion' with the preliminary injunction, clearing the way for NASCAR to strip three charters from each of the two race teams. The charters are valued in the tens of millions of dollars. Charters are franchise-like licenses that allow race teams to have guaranteed entries into NASCAR Cup Series races and earn the accompanying higher payouts. Without charters, 23XI and Front Row would have to race as 'open' teams and risk failing to qualify for a race; open teams also get drastically less money from each race than charter teams. The ruling follows a hearing last month in which the three judges expressed considerable skepticism over the grounds on which the preliminary injunction was granted, saying there was no similar precedent in more than 125 years of the Sherman Antitrust Act. At issue was a release clause in NASCAR's 2025 charter agreements the teams claimed would prevent them from bringing antitrust action against NASCAR if they signed it. The lower court agreed with the teams that the clause was a monopolistic practice and allowed them to sign a version of the charter agreement that removed the release clause while the lawsuit was pending this season. But the appeals court disagreed, ruling there were no previous cases that said requiring a release constituted an antitrust violation. 'Because we have found no support for the proposition that a business entity or person violates the antitrust laws by requiring a prospective participant to give a release for past conduct as a condition for doing business, we cannot conclude that the plaintiffs made a clear showing that they were likely to succeed on the merits of that theory,' the court said. 'And without satisfaction of the likelihood-of-success element, the plaintiffs were not entitled to a preliminary injunction.' Advertisement During the May hearing, judges had warned the teams their claim came across as 'having your cake and eating it, too.' That's because the teams were suing over monopolistic practices while also asking the court to force NASCAR to allow them to participate. 'If you don't want the contract, you don't enter into it and you sue,' Judge Paul Niemeyer said at the time. 'Or if you want the contract, you enter into it, and you've given up past releases.' It is not yet clear what will happen next in the immediate aftermath of Thursday's ruling. If NASCAR chooses to follow through by stripping the charters, the teams would lose approximately a combined quarter billion dollars in charter values in addition to the lower race winnings they will now receive. The teams can still appeal this ruling, so it would not go into effect immediately. Any team losing a charter is impactful considering the additional millions in lost revenue associated with owning a charter. Now, compound that by three — the number of charters each owned by 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports — and the magnitude of Thursday's ruling really is driven home. Both teams stand to lose a considerable amount of money, potentially to such a degree that it raises questions about how each team will be able to effectively operate going forward. Yes, both ownership groups have the financial means to withstand the short-term hit as their federal lawsuit against NASCAR plays out in the courts (the trial is set to begin Dec. 1). And the teams could still appeal and win, which would make all this null and void. As it stands, though, this appears to be a body blow that could stunt their respective competitiveness over the remainder of the 2025 season. From a bigger perspective as it relates to the ongoing lawsuit, should the teams appeal and lose, one has to wonder if Thursday's ruling influences 23XI and Front Row to reconsider pursuing their joint federal lawsuit. Or perhaps it emboldens them even more to continue forward, even in spite of the financial impact. — Jordan Bianchi, motorsports writer

Fishing website ranks Panama City among top 8 red snapper fishing sites in the Gulf
Fishing website ranks Panama City among top 8 red snapper fishing sites in the Gulf

Yahoo

time25-05-2025

  • Yahoo

Fishing website ranks Panama City among top 8 red snapper fishing sites in the Gulf

PANAMA CITY ― Panama City has been named one of the top red-snapper fishing destinations in the Gulf, according to provided a list of eight fishing destinations for red-snapper fishing in which Panama City was one of the destinations. The website did not rank the eight. Florida took three other spots on the list: Pensacola Beach, Clearwater and Lee County. The others include Galveston, Texas; Dauphin Island, Alabama; Grand Isle, Louisiana; and The Secret Coast, Mississippi. "While Panama City itself is tucked behind a barrier island, it only takes a quick exit through St. Andrews Inlet and you're in prime Red Snapper territory," The FishingBooker website says. "Panama City blends nature with culture and delicious seafood cuisine into a perfect post-fishing itinerary. St. Andrews State Park awaits with shaded trails and calm lakes for paddling, while Shell Island's pristine sands lie a short ferry ride away." Panama City Beach has a wide variety of fishing charters which include near-shore, in-shore, and deep-sea fishing. Just a coffee shop? 7 Brew Coffee opens in Panama City offering '20,000 combinations of drinks' Some popular fishing charters include Got'em Fishing Charters, PCB Fishing Addiction Charters, Jubilee Deep Sea Fishing, Reel Addiction 2 Charters, Salty C's Charters, and Reel Therapy Charters. For more information, visit to see the list and which fishing destinations are best in Bay County. This article originally appeared on The News Herald: Website puts Panama City among top 8 red snapper sites in the Gulf

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store