Latest news with #drugPolicy
CTV News
a day ago
- Health
- CTV News
Maison Benoît Labre may have to move safe consumption site 7 metres under proposed Quebec law
The Maison Benoît Labre says it is willing to conform with new rules proposed in Bill 103 if the government commits to supporting the organization. The bill was tabled on May 6 to 'regulate supervised consumption sites in order to promote their harmonious cohabitation with the community.' Consultations are ongoing. The Saint-Henri non-profit's biggest obstacle will be to meet the new requirement for safe consumption sites to be at least 150 metres away from schools and daycares. The Maison Benoît Labre made headlines last year when neighbours complained about the day centre for homeless people opening the city's first supervised drug consumption site, saying they felt unsafe. The new bill seemed to be targeting the organization, according to its director. Andréane Désilets, director of the Maison Benoît Labre, told the National Assembly that several steps have been taken since to integrate it into the neighbourhood better. Those include consulting with the borough, public health authorities, Montreal police, other community organizations, and other community organizations, going door-to-door, and more. The organization has been helping vulnerable and homeless people in Montreal's Sud-Ouest borough for over 70 years. It provides meals, psychosocial support, over 30 transitional housing units, a 24/7 day centre, and outreach. 'Matter of life and death' Maison Benoît Labre would have to move its safe consumption site just seven metres to meet the new rules while keeping its transitional housing units and day centre where they are. Désilets stressed that there cannot be a break in services while the organization looks for a new space as 'it's a matter of life and death.' She said the housing crisis, affordability crisis and opioid crisis are all compounding and have gotten worse in recent years. 'People are dying of overdose every day all over Quebec, men, women, young people, all of whom are extremely vulnerable,' she said Wednesday. 'Supervised consumption sites save lives and prevent mischief. Experts in health and safety have agreed on this. We already saved several lives.' Désilets said she does not believe moving a block away will increase the social acceptability of the safe consumption site or solve cohabitation issues, but she is willing to work with officials. However, that takes time and resources. Désilets said she's been visiting potential sites and talking with local entrepreneurs, but acquiring a new space would cost about $3.5 million – which Maison Benoît Labre doesn't have. A move like this can't be done in four years, she added. It took the non-profit seven years to move into its current four-storey building near Atwater market, according to Désilets. The Maison Benoît Labre is asking the government to accompany organizations that will have to relocate and provide the necessary financial support to maintain services during the process. 'I believe this law will pass, so from there how do we make sure we're working together and make sure community organizations don't shoulder all the responsibility?' Désilets told journalists at a news scrum after the consultation. Break in services would be 'catastrophic' Social Services Minister Lionel Carmant's department would have new powers to approve or refuse new supervised drug consumption sites under the proposed law. Carmant said everything will taken under Santé Quebec's charge and the province will have to contribute financially if issues arise. However, centres like the Maison Benoît Labre may not get the full amount they're asking for. He added that Quebec is in favour of sites offering evidence-based harm reduction services, saying the government has a duty to provide safe spaces for everyone who uses the sites as well as those who live nearby. Québec Solidaire's Guillaume Cliche-Rivard, the MNA for the area, said he was willing to commit to accompanying the Maison Benoît Labre and urged Carmant to do the same. 'Two people die of an overdose every day in Quebec … A break in services would be catastrophic,' he said. In the meantime, Désilets said more is needed to sensitize the public to issues related to homelessness and the opioid crisis to promote cohabitation. 'People are scared of what they don't understand,' she said. The Mouvement pour mettre fin à l'itinérance à Montréal also took part in Wednesday's consultation and criticized the bill's lack of homelessness prevention measures. They accused the government of overly politicizing the issue, saying there are already effective frameworks in place and that the bill is a 'band-aid' measure. 'There are success stories of social cohabitation but they are not shared with the public,' said director Michele Chappaz.
CBC
a day ago
- Business
- CBC
Montreal supervised drug site says forced move under proposed Quebec law could cost $6.6M
A supervised drug consumption site in Montreal's Sud-Ouest borough that could be forced to move if a proposed Quebec law is adopted said the change of location could cost an estimated $6.6 million. Under Bill 103, supervised drug consumption sites can't be located within 150 metres of a school or daycare. Maison Benoît-Labre, which houses a homeless shelter and supervised site, would have to move given its proximity to Victor-Rousselot elementary school. "We're at 143 metres at this point, door to door," said Andréane Désilets, Maison Benoît-Labre's executive director, stressing that if the centre was seven metres further away it would be compliant. Désilets made the comments in Quebec City, during consultations into Bill 103, tabled by Social Services Minister Lionel Carmant. The bill comes in response to concerns over supervised drug consumption sites, including the Maison Benoît-Labre. Parents and nearby residents flagged concerns about the area, including many saying they've witnessed open drug use, aggressive behaviour and sexual conduct from frequenters of the day centre, including when children are around. The back door of the centre borders a park used by students of Victor-Rousselot elementary school. Désilet admitted cohabitation has been an issue, especially when the supervised site opened just over a year ago. "We did work very hard with the community," she said, reiterating how a change of location isn't the way to improve things. "Everyone sat down and thought of a better plan and now there is a big [improvement] at this point." WATCH | Quebec moves to ban safe consumption sites near schools, daycares: Quebec moves to ban safe consumption sites near schools, daycares 29 days ago Duration 2:13 Bill 103 would bar supervised drug use sites from operating within 150 metres of a school or daycare. If passed, the bill will require two of these sites to move, including the Maison Benoît-Labre in Montreal. Nonetheless, Désilet said the group will comply with the law, but added there needs to be more government support. Carmant said the bill clearly states that everything will be taken charge of by Santé Québec, the Health Ministry's new operational arm. "If there are financial issues, the government will have to contribute obviously," he told reporters. "We've always been supporting these centres. We're the ones financing them." He specified, however, that the government would provide it's own budget regarding any costs associated to a change of location. "We have to confirm that the numbers that they are providing are correct and this will be done through Santé Québec," Carmant said. Désilet said a move is a complicated process and fears its impacts are being underestimated. "It's hard. It's hard on the staff. It's hard on everyone," she said, "It's very complicated to also maintain the services, make sure that there's no overdoses at the same time — at the new location at the old location." As it stands, supervised drug consumption sites located near schools would have four years to move. Guillaume Cliche-Rivard, Québec Solidaire's social services critic, said the minister needs to make amendments to improve the legislation. He was critical of the bill saying the responsibility for cohabitation rests on the shoulders of the community groups who run the sites, but they don't have the means or funds to do that. "Quebec needs to be a partner with those [organizations]," he said.
Daily Mail
28-05-2025
- Health
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Rampage killings have become commonplace and drugs like cannabis are to blame - PETER HITCHENS tells SARAH VINE on provocative Mail podcast
Rampage killings have become commonplace throughout the Western world and the normalisation of mind-altering drugs is to blame, acclaimed broadcaster Peter Hitchens argued on the latest episode of the Mail's Alas Vine & Hitchens podcast. Responding to events in Liverpool on Monday, where a 53-year-old man allegedly high on drugs drove his car into a group of celebrating football fans, Hitchens said more must be done to restrict access to substances with the potential to cause 'madness'. A rampage killing is a specific type of mass murder where an individual kills several innocent people in a relatively short period of time. 'It is common now, in almost every major society in the world, that we get rampage killings', Hitchens said. 'It is incessant. It happens all the time. It never used to happen – and I think I know why. What has fundamentally changed since the 1950s and 60s? 'Crazy individuals are quite uncommon. Usually, madness is connected to some form of brain injury, which is either caused by serious head trauma or a disease. Or a third thing, drugs. 'Anders Brevik was a steroid user. The man who went wild in several Mosques in New Zealand was also on steroids. 'Drugs like steroids, SSRIs, antidepressants, and marijuana are often in the recent backstories of people who do these things. It's very hard to find these things out because the authorities aren't interested. 'There's a huge reluctance in our society to admit that there is a correlation between these things and drugs. There is an immense marijuana lobby – the other drugs have their lobbies as well. 'Particularly, there is a reluctance to admit any connection between the use of marijuana and insane violence.' Metanalyses conducted in America have shown a tenuous link between cannabis use and the propensity to commit violent crimes. However, other studies conducted in the wake of legalisation in certain US states have shown the opposite – with violence decreasing where dispensaries open. Mail columnist Sarah Vine disagreed with her co-host, arguing that psychotic people often seek out drugs and it is not the substances themselves that account for the perpetuator's underlying mental illness. She also emphasised that the prohibition of drugs like cannabis creates a black market actively incentivised to sell a more potent product. However, Vine concurred that the power of cannabis to stir mental illness has been downplayed in wider society. 'People think that because cannabis isn't chemically addictive, it isn't dangerous', Vine began. 'But it is highly psychologically addictive – I have friends that were heavy smokers that when they tried to quit, they went mad.' Hitchens compared the light policing of cannabis in the West to countries like South Korea, Japan, and China, making the point that Asia sees very few of these rampage-style killings. He argued: 'In South Korea, these things just do not happen because the possession of marijuana is still considered a crime. 'Asian governments have rejected the propaganda – if you're a public figure and you're caught with it, you do not merely go to jail, you are discredited. 'You are out of public life forever because it is seen as a shameful thing to do, as it ought to be. 'The people that promote it should also face shame because they are ruining lives. It is not a victimless crime – the family of a person who becomes permanently ill because of marijuana use is a family full of grief for the next 40 years. 'It ought to be punished – we must have it on our statute books that you are punished for possession.' To watch the full contentious debate, search for Alas Vine & Hitchens now, wherever you get your podcasts.
National Post
12-05-2025
- Health
- National Post
Derek Finkle: Controversial drug injection sites among Carney's first challenges
When Mark Carney was asked on the campaign trail about whether federal approval for injection sites would continue under his government, he avoided the contentious topic by saying the effectiveness of those sites was under review. Article content Article content Even in his evasion, our new prime minister was undermining the position staked out by his predecessor, Justin Trudeau. When asked about such controversial initiatives as injection sites and the distribution of so-called 'safer supply' opioids to those with severe addictions, the latter was fond of insisting his government was simply 'following the science.' Article content Article content If science had decided injection sites were wildly successful and necessary, then why does Carney's government need to study them? Article content Article content As it turns out, Carney and his minority government are going to be called on to conclude their alleged study of injection sites sooner rather than later. This is because the federal drug law exemption (required for injection sites across Canada to operate) expired for a site in the Sandy Hill neighbourhood of Ottawa on April 30. Article content The Sandy Hill Community Health Centre, which houses the injection site, applied to renew its federal drug law exemption on Jan. 30. Just a few months earlier, another injection site in the same ward, Rideau-Vanier, which is home to three sites, was granted a five-year exemption renewal under controversial circumstances. Article content So controversial, in fact, that the head of a local arts non-profit has since gone to federal court seeking a judicial review of the insular and secretive process Health Canada utilized in coming to its decision. Article content At the 11th hour, late on April 30, Health Canada advised the Sandy Hill site that it was renewing its exemption — not for five years but only 30 days. The obvious reason for such a short exemption renewal being that Health Canada needs to take direction from the new government. Article content Article content One piece of good news for Mark Carney is that the materials required for his study of injection sites have recently been assembled in a very large, detailed package. This exhaustive analysis of the topic results from a legal challenge filed by an injection site in Toronto's Kensington neighbourhood, claiming that legislation passed in Ontario late last year prohibiting injection sites from operating within 200 metres of schools and daycare facilities violates the charter rights of drug users. Article content Article content The judge overseeing this litigation estimated the case's court record to be 6,000 pages in total. I may be the only journalist to have read it in its entirety. So, free of charge, I will provide Mr. Carney with the Coles notes summary.
CBC
09-05-2025
- Health
- CBC
Fentanyl crackdowns could increase overdose deaths, advocates warn
Data from the U.S. and Health Canada has shown that overdose deaths have dropped significantly in both countries, but harm reduction advocates say tariff-related crackdowns on fentanyl and other drugs, such as carfentanil, could undermine that progress.
