Latest news with #fingerprint
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Aussie baffled after discovering strange markings in unopened Vegemite jar
The strange discovery of a fingerprint in an unopened jar of Vegemite has left lovers of the uniquely Australian breakfast staple baffled. The jar was purchased from a Woolworths supermarket using their online delivery service, with the shopper revealing an investigation had been launched after they brought the marking to Vegemite's attention. Sharing a picture of the jar on Reddit, users could clearly see the spread had been tampered with. 'Was really looking forward to some Vegemite on toast,' the post was captioned. 'Woolies just dropped off my order, and the vegemite opened a little too easily with the ring intact... I looked in thinking it would be fine and there's a fingerprint! 'Obviously it will be taken to the police for fingerprint analysis immediately, I can't let a crime like this go unpunished.' It remains unclear whether the fingerprint was make during the manufacturing process or at the supermarket. 'Makes me wonder if someone picked it up and it was already open then they tried to shove it back on the maybe they thought it was funny?' They wrote. The shopper concluded the post by revealing they would be forced to 'have strawberry jam on toast and that's just not the same'. Reddit users were divided over the bizarre find with some joking the marking would add 'extra flavour' while others insisting they should 'just scrape off the top layer'. However, another wrote: 'I wouldn't eat it just because it's kinda gross and you don't know what else they've done with it.' Another suggested the shopper should 'get your money back'. The shopper later shared an update confirming they had returned to the same Woolies branch and found three jars with lids that could be easily removed, suggesting a 'product defeat'. They said one of the jars also had marks in the spread similar to the one they had found in the original Vegemite. 'I've reported to Woolies, Vegemite, and the ACCC product safety line,' they added. Vegemite confirmed in a statement they were 'actively investigating' the incident. 'We are in contact with the author of a recent post shared by a Melbourne Reddit user concerning a jar of Vegemite which they believed to have been tampered with,' the statement shared with said. 'We take such matters seriously and are committed to ensuring the safety and quality of our products. There is no evidence to suggest a widespread problem. 'We are actively investigating the case and remain dedicated to upholding the high standards that Vegemite is known for.'
News.com.au
12 hours ago
- News.com.au
‘Ew': Aussies horrified over ‘mysterious' find in Vegemite
A Melbourne shopper's disappointment over their morning toast has sparked both a corporate investigation and a wave of online banter after they claimed to have received a jar of Vegemite with a mysterious fingerprint in it. Posting to r/melbourne, the user shared a photo of the jar with its lid unscrewed, revealing what appears to be an imprint embedded in the spread. 'Was really looking forward to some Vegemite on toast,' the post was captioned. ' Woolies just dropped off my order, and the Vegemite opened a little too easily with the ring intact … I looked in thinking it would be fine and there's a fingerprint!' the person continued. However, they obviously weren't too upset by it, as they jokingly added: 'Obviously, it will be taken to the police for fingerprint analysis immediately, I can't let a crime like this go unpunished'. 'Now I have to have strawberry jam on toast, and that's just not the same,' the post concluded. Commenters weighed in The post's tongue-in-cheek tone did leave a few commenters confused, with one asking, 'Is this real?' and another declaring it 'fake news'. But the original poster insisted it was real, prompting a variety of commenters to weigh in on what they'd do in that situation. Half admitted they'd probably eat it anyway. 'There's enough salt in there to kill any germs I reckon,' claimed one. 'Get into it,' urged another. 'It's extra flavour,' joked a third person, while a fourth advised the user to 'just scrape off the top layer,' and someone else said, 'there's worse things than fingerprints when you go out and eat'. However, others were horrified: 'I wouldn't eat it, it's kind of gross and you don't know what else they've done with it,' said one. 'Ew, get your money back,' someone else urged. The original poster then updated the thread, saying they strongly believe this was a product defect, as 'upon returning to the store, two out of three jars I bought, the lids just came off without any effort, and one had marks in it already'. They also mentioned that they reported this to Woolworths, Vegemite, and the ACCC. Vegemite responds Vegemite shared a statement with that read: 'We are in contact with the author of a recent post shared by a Melbourne Reddit user concerning a jar of Vegemite which they believed to have been tampered with. We take such matters seriously and are committed to ensuring the safety and quality of our products. 'There is no evidence to suggest a widespread problem. We are actively investigating the case and remain dedicated to upholding the high standards that Vegemite is known for.'
Globe and Mail
a day ago
- Business
- Globe and Mail
Intelligent Bio Solutions (NASDAQ: INBS) Showcases Portable Drug Testing System at RISE25
The company's non-invasive fingerprint drug screening system uses fingerprint sweat to screen for drugs such as cannabis, cocaine, methamphetamine, and opiates. Results are available in under ten minutes, supporting faster, on-site decision-making in treatment and justice settings. INBS is pursuing FDA approval and further entry into the U.S. market, where it currently operates in a Forensic Use Only capacity. The company has over 450 active accounts in 24 countries, targeting sectors such as healthcare, justice, and workplace safety. INBS partnered with SMARTOX, a U.S. distributor, to connect with stakeholders in criminal justice and addiction recovery. Intelligent Bio Solutions (NASDAQ: INBS), a medical technology company specializing in rapid, non-invasive testing solutions, recently attended the RISE25 conference to demonstrate its portable Intelligent Fingerprint Drug Screening System, continuing its push into the U.S. market for rapid, non-invasive screening technologies ( The event, held May 28–31 in Florida, attracted over 7,000 professionals from the fields of addiction treatment, mental health, and criminal justice. The conference has become a national gathering point for… Read More>> NOTE TO INVESTORS: IBN is a multifaceted financial news, content creation and publishing company utilized by both public and private companies to optimize investor awareness and recognition. For more information, please visit Please see full terms of use and disclaimers on the InvestorBrandNetwork website applicable to all content provided by IBN, wherever published or re-published: Corporate Communications
BBC News
27-05-2025
- General
- BBC News
Ancient human fingerprint suggests Neanderthals made art
Scientists in Spain say they have discovered the oldest full human fingerprint after unearthing a rock which they say resembles a human face and suggests Neanderthals could make art.A Neanderthal man is believed to have dipped his finger in red pigment to paint a nose on a pebble around 43,000 years ago. The rock was discovered in the San Lázaro rock shelter in Segovia, "strategic position" of the dot has led scientists to see it as evidence of Neanderthals' "symbolic behaviour", suggesting they had the ability to think about things in an abstract findings contribute to the ongoing debate on Neanderthals' ability to make art, study co-author María de Andrés-Herrero said. In an interview with the BBC's Newsday, Prof de Andrés-Herrero from the University of Complutense in Madrid said excavation at the shelter began five years ago and in 2022 they found the stone below 1.5m (5 feet) of sediments from Neanderthal groups."At the beginning we couldn't believe what we were looking at, because there was a bigger stone in comparison to other stones that appeared at this site, with a red dot just in the middle which looked like a human face."It was unclear whether the dot was made with ochre, a natural clay pigment. Once the research group was able to confirm it was a pigment, Prof de Andrés-Herrero said they contacted Spain's scientific police to support their team was able to conduct deep research using multi-spectrum analysis and they identified a of the pebble also suggested the fingerprint was of a male adult, according to the team's archaeologist David Álvarez Alonso, the study's co-author, said that as there were no other Neanderthal references to compare the prints to, it was difficult to say for certain. Speaking from a news conference updating the public on the scientific development, Spanish official Gonzalo Santonja said the pebble was the oldest portable object to be painted in the European continent and "the only object of portable art painted by Neanderthals". Prof de Andrés-Herrero said her research group's findings mark "an important contribution to the debate on Neanderthals' symbolic capacity, because it represents the first known pigment-marked object in an archaeological context" and it is "clear it is a Neanderthal site".In addition to this, the human fingerprint was found in a non-utilitarian context, the expert added, suggesting that the dot on the pebble was intended for artistic Herrero also said it is the first time scientists have discovered a stone in an archaeological context with a red ochre dot, meaning Neanderthals brought it to the thinking is that one of the Neanderthals found the stone, "which caught his attention because of its fissures, and he intentionally made his mark with an ochre [pigment] stain in the middle of the object," Prof Alonso said, quoted by Spanish news agency Europa believe the mark was not accidental because, according to their findings, the red pigment does not exist naturally in the shelter, meaning it was "intentionally brought to the shelter". In their paper, which was published in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, researchers wrote: "The pebble from San Lázaro rock-shelter presents a series of characteristics that render it exceptional, based on which we have deemed it a visual symbol that could be considered a piece of portable art in some contexts."
Yahoo
27-05-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
World's oldest fingerprint may be a clue that Neanderthals created art
One day around 43,000 years ago, a Neanderthal man in what is now central Spain came across a large granite pebble whose pleasing contours and indentations snagged his eye. Something in the shape of that quartz-rich stone – perhaps its odd resemblance to an elongated face – may have compelled him to pick it up, study it and, eventually, to dip one of his fingers in red pigment and press it against the pebble's edge, exactly where the nose on that face would have been. In doing so, he left behind what is thought to be the world's oldest complete human fingerprint, on what would appear to be the oldest piece of European portable art. The discovery, which could enrich our understanding of how Neanderthals saw and interpreted the world, has come to light after almost three years of research by a team of Spanish archaeologists, geologists and police forensic experts. The dig team noticed there was something odd about the stone – which is just over 20cm in length – as soon as they found it while excavating the San Lázaro rock shelter on the outskirts of Segovia in July 2022. It did not look like something that had been used as a hammer or an anvil; it didn't look like a tool at all. 'The stone was oddly shaped and had a red ochre dot, which really caught our eye,' said David Álvarez Alonso, an archaeologist at Complutense University in Madrid. 'We were all thinking the same thing and looking at each other because of its shape: we were all thinking, 'This looks like a face'. But obviously that wasn't enough. As we carried on our research, we knew we needed information to be able to advance the hypothesis that there was some purposefulness here, this was a symbolic object and that one possible explanation – although we'll never know for sure – is that this was the symbolisation of a face.' Determined to test their conviction that the red mark was a human fingerprint placed deliberately between the indentations that could have been the eyes and mouth of a face, the team enlisted the help of other experts. Further investigations confirmed that the pigment, which contained iron oxides and clay minerals, was not found elsewhere in or around the cave. 'We then got in touch with the scientific police to determine whether we were right that the dot had been applied using a fingertip,' said Álvarez Alonso. 'They confirmed that it had.' The print, they concluded, was human and could be that of an adult male. 'Once we had that and all the other pieces, context and information, we advanced the theory that this could be a pareidolia [catching sight of a face in an ordinary, inanimate object] which then led to a human intervention in the form of the red dot,' said the archaeologist. 'Without that red dot, you can't make any claims about the object.' Álvarez Alonso argues that the dot's existence raises questions that all point in the same direction. 'It couldn't have been a coincidence that the dot is where it is – and there are no markings to indicate any other use,' he said. 'So why did they bring this pebble from the river to the inside of the cave? And, what's more, there's no ochre inside the cave or outside it. So they must have had to bring pigment from elsewhere.' The team's findings, reported in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, reinforce the idea that Neanderthals – who died out some 40,000 years ago – were capable of acts of artistic and symbolic creation, meaning modern humans were not the first to use art as a means of expression. 'The fact that the pebble was selected because of its appearance and then marked with ochre shows that there was a human mind capable of symbolising, imagining, idealising and projecting his or her thoughts on an object,' the authors write. 'Furthermore, in this case, we can propose that three fundamental cognitive processes are involved in creating art: the mental conception of an image, deliberate communication, and the attribution of meaning. These are the basic elements characterising symbolism and, also prehistoric – non-figurative – art. Furthermore, this pebble could thus represent one of the oldest known abstractions of a human face in the prehistoric record.' Álvarez Alonso and his colleagues are looking forward to the debate that their discovery will reignite over whether modern humans were the first artists. 'We've set out our interpretation in the article, but the debate goes on,' he said. 'And anything to do with Neanderthals always prompts a massive debate. If we had a pebble with a red dot on it that was done 5,000 years ago by Homo sapiens, no one would hesitate to call it portable art. But associating Neanderthals with art generates a lot of debate. I think there's sometimes an unintentional prejudice.' Still, said the archaeologist, he and the rest of the team believed the most logical explanation was that someone, a very long time ago, 'saw something special in this pebble', picked it up and set about imbuing it with meaning. 'Why would a Neanderthal have seen it differently from the way we see it today?' he asked. 'They were human, too. The thing here is that we're dealing with an unparalleled object; there's nothing similar. It's not like art where, if you discover a cave painting, there are hundreds more you can use for context. But our assertion is that the Neanderthals had a similar capacity for symbolic thought to Homo sapiens – and we think this object reinforces that notion.'
