Latest news with #freeport
South China Morning Post
2 days ago
- Business
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong's John Lee seeks closer ties in meeting with EU officials
Hong Kong's leader has sought to deepen ties with the EU in a meeting with the bloc's representatives, saying the city will remain a free port despite growing protectionism globally. Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said on Wednesday that he had hosted a lunch attended by Harvey Rouse, head of the Office of the European Union to Hong Kong and Macau, as well as 15 consuls general from the bloc's member countries. The gathering served as a platform for direct dialogue and an exchange of views, with a focus on exploring new avenues to enhance economic, trade and development cooperation, Lee said in a social media post. He emphasised Hong Kong's unique position as a 'superconnector' and 'super value-adder', citing its low and simple tax regime, world-class infrastructure, diverse and multicultural talent pool, and broad spectrum of professional services. These attributes made the city an 'ideal gateway between East and West', Lee said. He also extended an invitation to businesses globally, including those from Europe, to 'explore the vast array of opportunities' both in Hong Kong and mainland China. The lunch took place amid simmering US-China tensions, even as the two countries reached a deal during high-level talks in London on tariff cuts, rare earth exports, Chinese students attending US universities and a trade-war truce signed earlier in Geneva. The latest agreement is subject to final approval by the presidents of the two countries. The United States and China have been engaged in an escalating tit-for-tat tariff war in recent months, with the levy on Chinese goods at one point reaching 145 per cent.
South China Morning Post
6 days ago
- Business
- South China Morning Post
‘Don't kill your successful DNA': Hong Kong's John Lee on tariffs, trade war
Hong Kong will not destroy its 'successful DNA' and jeopardise its free-port status by retaliating with counter-tariffs on the US even if geopolitical tensions with China escalate further, the city's leader has promised. Advertisement Chief Executive John Lee Ka-chiu said his administration had made 'contingency plans for the worst' and would increase support for local businesses in finding 'blue oceans' in new markets. In an exclusive, wide-ranging interview with the Post to mark the third anniversary of his administration, Lee addressed domestic and external challenges as he likened Hong Kong's integration with mainland China to 'a river flowing into the sea', with the city maintaining its way of life while benefiting from the closer ties. Lee has his work cut out for him, mitigating the impact of the tariffs that US President Donald Trump has imposed on China to include Hong Kong, regardless of the 'one country, two systems' policy under which the city is governed. 22:27 Why Hong Kong will remain a free port regardless of Donald Trump's tariffs Why Hong Kong will remain a free port regardless of Donald Trump's tariffs Trump launched his latest and most destructive tariff war against China in April, shortly after starting his second term.
Forbes
01-06-2025
- Business
- Forbes
Curating Freeports And Foreign Asset Protection With Evolving Tariffs
The season finale of Daredevil: Born Again referenced a fictional freeport in the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York which the villain, Kingpin was using to shield illicit assets from tax and tariffs. This nod in popular entertainment to a classic tax-efficiency strategy, especially for wealthy collectors of art, highlights the concern that freeports are also a breeding ground for illicit activities, such as money laundering. Unlike Foreign Asset Protection Trusts (FAPT), the use of freeports to limit tax exposure and obtain more security and privacy in the storage and transfer of luxury goods, such as fine art and wines, cryptocurrency, and classic cars was generally only accessible and known among the uber-wealthy. However, in past few years, the European Union has focused its attention on regulating activities in freeports, especially after increasing instances of use of these freeports, including those in Switzerland and Geneva, for illegitimate activities. The increasing uncertainty on tax and tariffs may garner more interest in freeport use even within the United States. The Delaware Freeport, for example attracts significant art collectors from New York especially because it provides a state tax haven and an alternative to shipping artwork to Switzerland, for example. Rising tariffs which would support the increased use of freeports may result in greater scrutiny and tax enforcement to combat potential tax evasion and other illicit activities that may increase also. The implementation of any asset protection or tax-efficiency strategy, including the use of freeports is a risk assessment, where the administrative costs and burden of compliance must be weighed against the financial and security benefits of using these wealth planning vehicles. Freeports have been used to reduce overhead costs, enhance security and privacy, and support globalization and trade liberalization for centuries. They are designated areas, situated near seaports and airports, globally, to hold and transact activities involving luxury goods for wealthy investors. Freeports which as legally classified as Special Economic Zones (SEZ) or Free Trade Zones (FTZ), are structured to encourage economic activity by providing a tax haven wealthy investors. When the owner of a luxury asset, such as a work of art, collectible, or a classic car, acquires and transports the asset directly to a freeport, the asset is considered 'in transit.' Therefore, the asset is not subject to the taxes that would apply to the sale or movement of goods across borders. Additionally, the asset would continue to appreciate for an indefinite period, and continue to be exempt from tax, including sales tax, import duties, and capital gains tax. Originally established for storage of grains and other assets in transit between borders, freeports have become an attractive asset protection vehicle for the wealthy, globally. In addition to the exemption of sales tax, capital gains tax, and import duties, the seller can avoid capital gains tax upon sale also. However, simply directing storage and transactions of the assets to a freeport will not benefit the asset owner on tax-efficiency. For example, the United States taxes its residents and citizens on income generated anywhere, globally. Therefore, an asset that generates income, even in a freeport that remains under the ownership of a US citizen or resident would be subject to US federal tax. Tariffs which apply on the trade of goods may be reduced or eliminated by the use of freeports, but holding assets in freeports may attract the scrutiny of the IRS and the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which supervises certain freeports. Note that the CBP subjects all activity within the freeport zone to public interest review and U.S. laws and regulations, providing the CBP authority to exclude any merchandise that may be considered detrimental to the public interest. While a freeport may eliminate the application of any tariff imposed by the US and minimize trade barriers, the tax exposure due to the US tax regime should be considered. Assets in freeports are considered to be in transit and therefore not subject to tariffs, however, additional enforcement and compliance obligations may be implemented to align with the increased tariffs that cause significant administrative burden on the asset owners. Freeports do not, therefore, replace the need for additional planning, such as the use of Domestic and Foreign Asset Protection Trusts. Using a Foreign Asset Protection Trust (FAPT) or similar irrevocable trust structures and independent entities in conjunction with storing assets in freeports may provide additional layers of security and opportunities for further tax mitigation. A FAPT enables a U.S. citizen to transfer assets to be held in a foreign jurisdiction while protecting it from domestic creditors because of the limited jurisdiction of the legal system across borders. Assets stored in a freeport may use a FAPT or other entity to be the owner of the asset to provide layered protection as well. A FAPT imposes a significantly higher burden of proof for creditors attempting to claim fraudulent transfer, shorter statute of limitations in many foreign jurisdictions, thus reducing the window for litigation, and, in some cases, favorable tax benefits. Unlike assets in free ports, FAPTs, if designed and managed with certain restrictions, can qualify as being outside the scope of U.S. tax jurisdiction, which would be tax-advantageous. Significant compliance obligations exist, however, on distributions to foreign beneficiaries, to foreign holders of the underlying entities, foreign asset reporting, and foreign trust regulations which can be administratively burdensome and risk significant non-compliance penalties. Additionally, FAPTs without carefully planned funding and structured restrictions on transfers and control risk may bypass any creditor protection and the original asset owner may suffer the wrath of the courts. Further, if the US passes the Big Beautiful Tax Bill, several provisions, including proposed Section 899 would impact the tax treatment of foreign holdings, which can be challenging for highly valuable assets, as are generally stored in freeports. Regardless, if structured properly and legitimately, the tax-efficiency and privacy protections offered by the FAPT can be significant. Freeports have historically supported global trade, asset protection, and tax efficiency. They can facilitate commerce and globalization and can be especially useful for wealth preservation with assets subject to tariffs and duties in a time of uncertainty on global trade. However, as global financial regulations and transparency initiatives expand, freeports are ripe for scrutiny and regulatory measures which warrant staying up to date with compliance and reporting requirements. The high cost and administrative burden of compliance supports the use of freeports primarily for high-value goods and luxury assets, especially those requiring more security and privacy than more common investments.
South China Morning Post
12-05-2025
- Business
- South China Morning Post
Activist investor David Webb hopes Hong Kong statutory body will carry on his work
Hong Kong corporate governance activist David Webb has said a statutory body may carry on part of the work of his influential Webb-site platform, a move he hopes will ensure that at least some of the wide-ranging data stays in the public domain. The 59-year-old Briton, who is battling late-stage cancer and has said he only has months to live, on Monday also urged the city to maintain its free-port status and promote itself as a duty-free hub amid the ongoing trade disputes between the US and China. Long-time Hong Kong resident Webb made the remarks at a fireside chat at the Foreign Correspondents' Club, an event that was held as a public farewell for the high-profile activist investor. 'I fought the disease as hard as I could and I'm still fighting, but there is an obvious end to it,' said Webb, who disclosed his metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis in June 2020. 'And I wanted to be in control of the shutdown of Webb-site and find a way for people if they find what I've been doing useful, which they seem to today, to take it forward. 'I can't name it, but there's a statutory body that has shown interest in taking parts of this forward, hopefully making it publicly available.' The former investment banker announced earlier this year that he would begin closing the Webb-site platform in stages.
